Necessary & Sufficient Conditions Law, Science, Life & Logic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Philosophy 148 Chapter 3 (part 2).
Advertisements

1/15/ : Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments Expectations: L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between.
Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley.
Rules of Inferences Section 1.5. Definitions Argument: is a sequence of propositions (premises) that end with a proposition called conclusion. Valid Argument:
Syllogisms Formal Reasoning.
Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 5. ” All are lunatics, but he who can analyze his delusion is called a philosopher.” Ambrose Bierce “ Those who lack the courage.
Reason & Argument Lecture 3. Lecture Synopsis 1. Recap: validity, soundness & counter- examples, induction. 2. Arguing for a should conclusion. 3. Complications.
Euler’s circles Some A are not B. All B are C. Some A are not C. Algorithm = a method of solution guaranteed to give the right answer.
Evaluating arguments - 1 Logic ~ deductive argument forms zSome common deductive argument forms yArgument forms most often used in everyday argumentation.
Use a truth table to determine the validity or invalidity of this argument. First, translate into standard form “Martin is not buying a new car, since.
Deductive Validity Truth preserving: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. It is logically impossible for the premises to be true and the.
Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, even further more, expanded, Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.
IX Conjunctions of Premises & Conclusions Working with more than two premises.
CSE115/ENGR160 Discrete Mathematics 01/26/12 Ming-Hsuan Yang UC Merced 1.
Logical Reasoning: Deduction. Logic A domain-general system of reasoning Deductive reasoning System for constructing proofs –What must be true given certain.
Deductive Arguments and Inference Rules Terminology: Valid Argument: – truth of the premises guarantees the truth of the conclusion – It would be contradictory.
Intro to Logic: the tools of the trade You need to be able to: Recognize an argument when you see one (in media, articles, people’s claims). Organize arguments.
CS128 – Discrete Mathematics for Computer Science
This is Introductory Logic PHI 120 Get a syllabus online, if you don't already have one Presentation: "Good Arguments"
Chapter 1 The Logic of Compound Statements. Section 1.2 – 1.3 (Modus Tollens) Conditional and Valid & Invalid Arguments.
Logic 3 Tautological Implications and Tautological Equivalences
Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions and Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.
Logic. what is an argument? People argue all the time ― that is, they have arguments.  It is not often, however, that in the course of having an argument.
Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.
Through the Looking Glass, 1865
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual
Validity: Long and short truth tables Sign In! Week 10! Homework Due Review: MP,MT,CA Validity: Long truth tables Short truth table method Evaluations!
Chapter 3 Section 4 – Slide 1 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. AND.
3.6 Analyzing Arguments with Truth Tables
Valid and Invalid Arguments
0 Validity & Invalidity (Exercises) December 23, 2005.
Reason and Argument Chapter 6 (2/3). A symbol for the exclusive ‘or’ We will use ұ for the exclusive ‘or’ Strictly speaking, this connective is not necessary.
Logical Arguments. Strength 1.A useless argument is one in which the truth of the premisses has no effect at all on the truth of the conclusion. 2.A weak.
Reasoning Top-down biases symbolic distance effects semantic congruity effects Formal logic syllogisms conditional reasoning.
Deductive Arguments.
Unit 1D Analyzing Arguments. TWO TYPES OF ARGUMENTS Inductive Deductive Arguments come in two basic types:
1 DISJUNCTIVE AND HYPOTHETICAL SYLLOGISMS DISJUNCTIVE PROPOSITIONS: E.G EITHER WHALES ARE MAMMALS OR THEY ARE VERY LARGE FISH. DISJUNCTS: WHALES ARE MAMMALS.(P)
Chapter 3: Introduction to Logic. Logic Main goal: use logic to analyze arguments (claims) to see if they are valid or invalid. This is useful for math.
HOW TO CRITIQUE AN ARGUMENT
0 Validity & Invalidity (Exercises) All dogs have two heads. 2. All tigers are dogs. ___________________________________ 3. All tigers have two.
Philosophical Method  Logic: A Calculus For Good Reason  Clarification, Not Obfuscation  Distinctions and Disambiguation  Examples and Counterexamples.
Thinking Mathematically Arguments and Truth Tables.
Aim: Invalid Arguments Course: Math Literacy Do Now: Aim: What’s an Invalid Argument? Construct a truth table to show the following argument is not valid.
The construction of a formal argument
Use and mention Logic is part of philosophy Logic is a word “Logic” is a word Use There’s glory for you. --what do you mean by “glory”? Mention.
Propositional Logic A symbolic representation of deductive inference. Use upper case letters to represent simple propositions. E.g. Friday class rocks.
6.6 Argument Forms and Fallacies
Fun with Deductive Reasoning
Syllogisms and Three Types of Hypothetical Syllogisms
Chapter 7 Evaluating Deductive Arguments II: Truth Functional Logic Invitation to Critical Thinking First Canadian Edition.
Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.
Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 7 Lecture Notes Chapter 7.
Logic: The Language of Philosophy. What is Logic? Logic is the study of argumentation o In Philosophy, there are no right or wrong opinions, but there.
BHS Methods in Behavioral Sciences I April 7, 2003 Chapter 2 – Introduction to the Methods of Science.
Deductive Reasoning. Inductive: premise offers support and evidenceInductive: premise offers support and evidence Deductive: premises offers proof that.
Formal logic The part of logic that deals with arguments with forms.
Deductive Reasoning Valid Arguments
2. The Logic of Compound Statements Summary
a valid argument with true premises.
Deductive Arguments.
Logical Inferences: A set of premises accompanied by a suggested conclusion regardless of whether or not the conclusion is a logical consequence of the.
Logical Inferences: A set of premises accompanied by a suggested conclusion regardless of whether or not the conclusion is a logical consequence of the.
Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic 2012 Pearson Education, Inc.
3.5 Symbolic Arguments.
Logical Forms.
Thinking Critically Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
Concise Guide to Critical Thinking
SUMMARY Logic and Reasoning.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

Necessary & Sufficient Conditions Law, Science, Life & Logic

Necessary Condition Must be there for the effect, the charge, to be true Must be there for the effect, the charge, to be true If absent, cannot occur. If absent, cannot occur. No oxygen, no combustion. No oxygen, no combustion. No seeds, no plants to grow No seeds, no plants to grow Car runs only if gas in tank. Car runs only if gas in tank.

Sufficient Condition Whenever A is present, B will follow-decapitation is sufficient for death. Whenever A is present, B will follow-decapitation is sufficient for death. Getting a B in the course is sufficient for passing. Getting a B in the course is sufficient for passing.

Sufficient but---- Head off, death occurs, but others things can do same- e.g. knife to heart. Head off, death occurs, but others things can do same- e.g. knife to heart. One can pass the course also with an A or a C. One can pass the course also with an A or a C.

Necessary but-- Fire cannot happen with oxygen alone-need a match. Fire cannot happen with oxygen alone-need a match. Plants need seeds, but also water. Plants need seeds, but also water. Car needs gas, but also… Car needs gas, but also…

Conditional Statements Conditional is an if-then statement Conditional is an if-then statement If the sun shines, we will have a picnic. If the sun shines, we will have a picnic. Antecedent (sun shines); (we will have a picnic )is the consequent. Antecedent (sun shines); (we will have a picnic )is the consequent. Antecedent is the sufficient condition for the consequent. Antecedent is the sufficient condition for the consequent.

Antecedent=sufficient If the antecedent is true, then the consequent must be true. If the antecedent is true, then the consequent must be true. Symbolize as a -› c or S -›P Symbolize as a -› c or S -›P Sufficient only- sun shining is one sufficient condition for a picnic; celebrating is another. Sufficient only- sun shining is one sufficient condition for a picnic; celebrating is another.

Consequent is necessary If there is life, there is oxygen= Life -› Oxygen Life is a sufficient condition for oxygen and oxygen is a necessary condition for life. (Without oxygen there is no life and if life is present, there must be oxygen. If there is fire, there is oxygen; oxygen is a necessary condition for fire; fire is sufficient to know there is oxygen present. Fire -› Oxygen

Necessary= Consequent One will be able to light a match on the moon only if there were oxygen on the moon. Oxygen is the necessary condition for fire- it is the consequent of a conditional= Light a match -› oxygen

Conditional Arguments If I can create combustion, then there is oxygen. The match lit (combustion occurred), thus there is oxygen here. If I can create combustion, then there is oxygen. The match lit (combustion occurred), thus there is oxygen here. C -› O C -› O C C Thus, O Modus Ponens-Valid- Thus, O Modus Ponens-Valid- Affirming the Antecedent Affirming the Antecedent

Denying the Consequent If the match lights, there is oxygen in this place. There is not oxygen in this place. The match does not light. Denying consequent If the match lights, there is oxygen in this place. There is not oxygen in this place. The match does not light. Denying consequent M -› O M -› O ̴ O Valid ̴ O Valid ̴ M Modus Tollens ̴ M Modus Tollens

Necessary & Sufficient Something can serve as both necessary and sufficient- “You will get Malaria if and only if you are bitten by a mosquito carrying the germ. Malaria ≈ Mosquito (germ) Something can serve as both necessary and sufficient- “You will get Malaria if and only if you are bitten by a mosquito carrying the germ. Malaria ≈ Mosquito (germ) If you have Malaria you must have been bitten by the mosquito with the germ. If you have Malaria you must have been bitten by the mosquito with the germ.

What is a Fallacy? Fallacy is an argument that does not provide support for its conclusion because of faulty reasoning. Fallacy is an argument that does not provide support for its conclusion because of faulty reasoning. A fallacious argument= one in which the premises, even if true, would not justify the conclusion. A fallacious argument= one in which the premises, even if true, would not justify the conclusion.

Conditional Fallacies Denying the antecedent- denies a sufficient condition and this is not adequate to deny the consequent. Denying the antecedent- denies a sufficient condition and this is not adequate to deny the consequent. If Barry Bonds plays, the team will win. Bonds did not play, Thus, the team will not win. If Barry Bonds plays, the team will win. Bonds did not play, Thus, the team will not win. B -› W ̴ B Thus, ̴ W Invalid=Fallacy B -› W ̴ B Thus, ̴ W Invalid=Fallacy

Affirming Consequent If Barry Bonds plays, the team will win. The team won, thus Barry Bonds played the game. If Barry Bonds plays, the team will win. The team won, thus Barry Bonds played the game. Consequent is a necessary condition, but not sufficient. Consequent is a necessary condition, but not sufficient. B -› W W Thus, B Invalid=Fallacy B -› W W Thus, B Invalid=Fallacy Eg. Oxygen is necessary to have combustion, but it cannot bring it about. Eg. Oxygen is necessary to have combustion, but it cannot bring it about.

Let’s try some examples What are the necessary and sufficient conditions for each of the following? What are the necessary and sufficient conditions for each of the following? Being a mother ; being a father Being a mother ; being a father Being President of the United States Being President of the United States Being a member of the Olympic team Being a member of the Olympic team Producing an award winning essay. Producing an award winning essay.