Special recognition: University of Florida.  Participants will be able to: ◦ Articulate specifications for learning outcomes ◦ Classify learning outcomes.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Association of American Colleges and Universities.
Advertisements

Program Goals Just Arent Enough: Strategies for Putting Learning Outcomes into Words Dr. Jill L. Lane Research Associate/Program Manager Schreyer Institute.
Mark Bills Middle School IB Applicant
PORTFOLIO.
National Academic Reference Standards
Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas.
1 Graduates’ Attributes : EMF, EUR-ACE and Federal Educational Standards Alexander I. Chuchalin, Chair of the RAEE Accreditation Board Graduates’ Attributes.
Core Competencies Student Focus Group, Nov. 20, 2008.
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
NMT Gen Ed Learning Objectives An ability to communicate well An ability to reason well An ability to evaluate and apply information Development of analytical.
Introduction to Student Learning Outcomes in the Major
Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary.
DIPOL Quality Practice in Training at İstanbul Technical University Maritime Faculty Dr.Banu Tansel.
ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Capstone Design Project (CDP) Civil Engineering Department First Semester 1431/1432 H 10/14/20091 King Saud University, Civil Engineering Department.
FLCC knows a lot about assessment – J will send examples
Student Learning Outcomes: Tools for Intentionality.
THE NEW TEXAS CORE CURRICULUM (OCTOBER 27, 2011).
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
Timothy S. Brophy, Ph.D., Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida Office of the Provost.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
Writing Measurable Student Learning Outcomes
OBE Briefing.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Communication Degree Program Outcomes
ABET’s coming to Rose! Your involvement Monday, Nov 5, 2012.
Learning Outcomes and Assessment APCC Peter Wolf April
Outcomes-based Education at UC. Created, Implemented, Maintained and Assessed by Faculty (Supported by Everyone!)
SLOAC Committee Flex Day Working Session Date: Time: 12:45 – 2:15.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
Comments on Nontechnical ABET Criteria J. W. V. Miller 6/30/08 Adapted from the University of Delaware Civil and Environmental Engineering Website
What should a Housy graduate be able to do? December 4, 2014 J. Martinez.
Timothy S. Brophy, Ph.D., Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida Office of the Provost Gainesville, FL THE BASICS OF STUDENT LEARNING.
Writing Learning Outcomes David Steer & Stephane Booth Co-Chairs Learning Outcomes Committee.
Assessing Program-Level SLOs November 2010 Mary Pape Antonio Ramirez 1.
REVISIONS TO GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES Auburn University Senate Information Item, August 2014.
Chapter 1 Defining Social Studies. Chapter 1: Defining Social Studies Thinking Ahead What do you associate with or think of when you hear the words social.
The Basics of Student Learning Outcomes Assessment SACSCOC Summer Institute July 20, 2015 handout for this session is in the online program Timothy S.
Graduate studies - Master of Pharmacy (MPharm) 1 st and 2 nd cycle integrated, 5 yrs, 10 semesters, 300 ECTS-credits 1 Integrated master's degrees qualifications.
“Outcomification”: Development and Use of Student Learning Outcomes Noelle C. Griffin, PhD Director, Assessment and Data Analysis Loyola Marymount University.
Bonnie Paller 2013 AALC Assessment Retreat.  The charge of the Task Force is to identify the abilities and intellectual traits that all students are.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Copyright © 2011 by ABET, Inc. and TMS 1 December 2, 2008 ABET Update UMC Meeting April 6, 2015 San Francisco, CA Chester J. Van Tyne
Copyright © 2014 by ABET Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5 Charles Hickman Managing Director, Society, Volunteer and Industry Relations AIAA Conference.
Constructing a Syllabus and Writing Good Learning Outcomes.
Preparing for ABET visit Prof. Dr. Lerzan Özkale Management Engineering Head of Department November 2010.
Developing Program Learning Outcomes To help in the quality of services.
Arkansas State University – Jonesboro Institutional Priority “Develop a culture of learning to enhance institutional outcomes”
University of Utah Program Goals and Objectives Program Goals and Objectives Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Strategic.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
Orange Coast College Office of Institutional Effectiveness ISLO Update to Institutional Effectiveness Committee 4/25/2014 ISLO GE SLO Local AA/AS.
Systems Wide Learning at a Community College Developments in the last five years –SACS-COC (Course Outcomes to Program Outcomes) –The Texas Higher Education.
Funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the authors and do.
Learning Objectives for Senior School Students. Failing to plan is planning to fail. / Psychology of Achievement /
Designing Quality Assessment and Rubrics
8/23/ th ACS National Meeting, Boston, MA POGIL as a model for general education in chemistry Scott E. Van Bramer Widener University.
Writing Measurable Student Learning Outcomes
21st Century Skills in the Classroom
Assessment Planning and Learning Outcome Design Dr
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
Assessing Learning: Creating Outcomes
AACSB’s Standard 9: Curriculum content
Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5
NJCU College of Education
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Development of ABET Syllabus
Assessment and Accreditation
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH
Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 1, 2016
Presentation transcript:

Special recognition: University of Florida

 Participants will be able to: ◦ Articulate specifications for learning outcomes ◦ Classify learning outcomes using Bloom’s taxonomy ◦ Write (or evaluate) student learning outcomes for your course ◦ Explain how you might assess student learning outcomes

 SACS-COC = the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools’ Commission on Colleges  State of Texas- legislative mandates  Federal Student Aid  Public Accountability  Enhance Student Learning!

 The institution identifies expected outcomes, assesses the extent to which it achieves these outcomes, and provides evidence of improvement based on analysis of the results in each of the following areas: (Institutional effectiveness)  educational programs, to include student learning outcomes

 Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs)describe student learning – what students will know and be able to do as a result of completing a program  Program Goals do not describe student learning – instead, they describe programmatic elements, such as admission criteria, acceptance and graduation rates, etc

 Outputs describe and count what we do and whom we reach, and represent products or services we produce. Processes deliver outputs; what is produced at the end of a process is an output.  An outcome is a level of performance or achievement. It may be associated with a process or its output. Outcomes imply measurement - quantification - of performance.

This distinction is important, especially in the development and review of Student Learning Outcomes. We seek to measure outcomes as well as their associated outputs; however, SLOs focus on outcomes. For example, while we produce a number of new graduates (the output), it is critical that we have a measure of the quality of the graduates as defined by the college or discipline (the outcome). Effective Student Learning Outcomes describe, in measurable terms, these quality characteristics by defining our expectations for students at the end of the course or program.

 Focus on what students will know and be able to do. ◦ All disciplines have a body of core knowledge that students must learn to be successful as well as a core set of applications of that knowledge in professional settings.  Describe observable and measureable actions or behaviors. ◦ Effective SLOs present a core set of observable, measureable behaviors. Measurement tools vary from quizzes and tests to complex rubrics.  The key to measurability: an active verb that describes a observable behavior, process, or product  A framework for developing SLOs: Bloom’s TaxonomyBloom’s Taxonomy

 Understand ◦ An internal process that is indicated by demonstrated behaviors – not recommended for program or course SLOs  Appreciate; value ◦ Internal processes that are indicated by demonstrated behaviors closely tied to personal choice  Become familiar with ◦ Focuses assessment on “becoming familiar,” not familiarity  Learn about, think about ◦ Not observable; demonstrable through communication or other demonstration of learning  Become aware of, gain an awareness of ◦ Focuses assessment on becoming and/or gaining – not actual awareness  Demonstrate the ability to ◦ Focuses assessment on ability, not achievement or demonstration of a skill  Also introduce, cover, present………..

 To introduce the basic principles of learning and the biological processes…..  Attend a live theater event and discuss its impact on them as an audience member who has a knowledge of theater history.  To familiarize students with 9 to 10 literature or literature related books.  Understanding of American history.

 The students will be able to understand regression models and time series models in economics.  The students will be able to interpret and develop regression models and time series models in economics.

 Students will know the differences in major contemporary theories in the field of sociology  Students will be able to contrast major contemporary theories in the field of sociology

This model allows you to develop assessments that measure the outcomes, and that then connect directly to the program learning goals Course-level Student Learning Outcome these are determined by the faculty and specify course-level, observable products or demonstrations Program-level Goals produce Student Learning Outcomes these describe what students will do to demonstrate they have met the learning goals University Level – undergraduate student learning outcomes

 1. Master the depth of knowledge required for a degree  Articulate disciplinary and interdisciplinary theories, concepts, principles, skills, and practices  Synthesize knowledge across courses and other experiences  Apply knowledge from core curriculum courses, discipline-based courses, and other experiences in a range of contexts to solve problems and make decisions  2. Demonstrate critical thinking  Evaluate, analyze, and integrate information from a variety of sources  Use appropriate strategies and tools to represent, analyze, and integrate information  Develop critical, reasoned positions  3. Communicate effectively  Demonstrate effective oral communication skills (which could include the use of languages such as American Sign language for those who do not communicate orally)  Demonstrate effective writing skills  Demonstrate effective nonverbal communication skills (which could include appropriate use of performance, design, or representations such as maps, tables, and graphs)  Listen actively and critically  Present work effectively to a range of audiences  Effectively communicate original and creative ideas  4. Practice personal and social responsibility  Practice ethical leadership  Recognize an ethical dilemma and apply rational decision-making in order to address it  Choose ethical courses of action in research and practice  Acknowledge and address the consequences of one’s own actions  Engage in local and global civic activities  5. Demonstrate social, cultural, and global competence  Live and work effectively in a diverse and global society  Articulate the value of a diverse and global perspective  Recognize diverse economic, political, cultural, and religious opinions and practices  6. Prepare to engage in lifelong learning  Exhibit the skills necessary to acquire, organize, reorganize, and interpret new knowledge  Show proficiency in current technologies and the ability to adapt to emerging technologies  Recognize and participate in activities that enhance wellness of body, mind, and spirit  Formulate a plan of personal goals for continued professional growth  Demonstrate intellectual curiosity  7. Work collaboratively  Participate effectively in teams  Consider different points of view  Work with others to support a shared purpose or goal

Students who complete the MSE degree will:Understand materials systems and their role in engineering Apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering principles to materials science and engineering to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data Design a system, component or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability and sustainability

Content Knowledge Apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering principles to materials science and engineering. Design and conduct materials science and engineering experiments and analyze and interpret the data. Critical Thinking Design a materials science and engineering system, component or process to meet desired needs within realistic economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability and sustainability constraints. Communication Communicate technical data and design information effectively in speech and in writing to other materials engineers.

Assessments in the boxes marked A are conducted using specific homework, exam, or assignment questions aligned with that SLO. Source: MSE Academic Assessment Plan

 These are determined by the faculty to teach the course  However, these should directly relate to the program SLOs

 Upon completion of this course, the student will be able to:

Quick thought

Syllabi Review

 Are there learning outcomes?  Observable?  Measurable?  Direct?  Constructive advice……..

Revise Current Syllabi

 Direct assessments of student learning are those that provide for direct examination or observation of student knowledge or skills against measurable performance indicators.  Indirect assessments are those that ascertain the opinion or self- report of the extent or value of learning experiences

 Review your exams or assessments  Better yet… have one of your colleagues review your exams or assessments  Are your assessments in line with your student learning outcomes (taxonomy)? Many will say yes. On review, most assessments are at fairly low taxonomic levels.  Choose a cognitive level on Bloom’s taxonomy for each question that best reflects the expectations of the question…see what you find……..

 Carriveau, R. (2010). Connecting the dots – Developing student learning outcomes and outcomes-based assessments. Denton, TX: Fancy Fox Publications  Suskie, L. (2009). Assessing student learning: A common sense guide (2 nd ed.) San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.  Walvoord, B. (2010). Assessment clear and simple: A practical guide for institutions, departments, and general education (2 nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.