A Practical Guide. The Handbook Part I BCCC Vision of Assessment Guiding Principles of Assessment Part II The Assessment Model Part III A guide on how.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School Based Assessment and Reporting Unit Curriculum Directorate
Advertisements

Capacity Building Global Support Program Enhance the institutional capacity necessary to support professionals in implementing tiger conservation over.
Building a Strategic Management System Office for Student Affairs, Twin Cities Campus Ground Level Work Metrics Initiatives Managing Change Change Management.
Collaboration Works! 10/20/20101 Planning Research Institutional Effectiveness.
Institutional Effectiveness (ie) and Assessment
Orientation for New Site Visitors CIDA’s Mission, Value, and the Guiding Principles of Peer Review.
Supporting Quality of Student Learning Online: Using Quality Matters to Strengthen Online Teaching and Learning Valencia College - Orlando, Florida Charles.
1 Program Improvement Update Foundations for writing the LEA Addendum.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Pace University Assessment Plan. Outline I. What is assessment? II. How does it apply to Pace? III. Who’s involved? IV. How will assessment be implemented.
Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
Essential Elements of a Workable Assessment Plan Pat Tinsley McGill, Ph.D. Professor, Strategic Management College of Business Faculty Lead, Assessment.
Assessment Cycle California Lutheran University Deans’ Council February 6, 2006.
August 3,  Review “Guiding Principles for SLO Assessment” (ASCCC, 2010)  Review Assessment Pulse Roundtable results  Discuss and formulate our.
Focus on Learning: Student Outcomes Assessment and the Learning College.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP
Hazlet Township Public Schools
The Scholarship of Civic Engagement Adapted from a presentation by Robert G. Bringle Director, Center for Service and Learning Indiana University-Purdue.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Closing the Loop: The Assessment Process from Outcomes to Academic Excellence, Budgetary Competence and Community Engagement.
Closing the Loop: The Assessment Process from Outcomes to Academic Excellence, Budgetary Competence and Community Engagement January 2012.
Academic Assessment Accountability: Are we what we say we are? Program Improvement: How can we be even better? External audiences: SACS.
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
Health Promotion as a Quality issue
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Polk Pre-Collegiate Academy April 16– 17, 2014.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
The NCATE Journey Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University AACTE/NCATE Orientation - Spring 2008.
WRITING LEARNING OUTCOMES AND MAPPING CURRICULUM UK Office of Assessment.
Institutional Effectiveness A set of ongoing and systematic actions, processes, steps and practices that include: Planning Assessment of programs and.
S AN D IEGO AND I MPERIAL V ALLEY B ASIC S KILLS N ETWORK Dr. Lisa Brewster.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Preparing for Advanced Tiers using CICO Calvert County Returning Team Summer Institute Cathy Shwaery, PBIS Maryland Overview.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Western Carolina University Office of Assessment A Division of the Office of the Provost.
Performance Management A briefing for new managers.
High Performance Leaders in Irving Independent School District (IISD) Administrator’s Leadership Conference August 3, 2010 Leadership 1.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Peer Reviewer - Basic Workshop 2 Prof Hala Salah Consultant in NQAAP Prof Hussein El-Maghraby Member, NQAAP.
Learning-Centered Leadership Joseph Murphy Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.
Curriculum Design & Review Process.  Understand the basic principles and elements of the Curriculum Design & Review Process (CDRP).  Using a CDRP framework,
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
Working together to strengthen student learning: faculty inquiry in action California Statewide Academic Senate April 18, 2008.
Criterion 1 Mission A. The institution's mission is broadly understood within the institution and guides its operations. B. The mission is articulated.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Montgomery College Fall 2011 Orientation.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
College Success Program John Cowles, Ph.D. Dean of Student Success and Retention Grand Rapids Community College Grand Rapids, Michigan.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Harvesting the Benefits of QM Culture for Institutional Accreditation
Achieving the Dream Mark A. Smith.
Dr. James W. Dottin Department Chair Business Administration
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
February 21-22, 2018.
Inquiry into Effective Practices of SLO Assessment AScCC Educational policies committee Anna Bruzzese ASCCC South Representative; ASCCC Educational Policies.
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Presentation transcript:

A Practical Guide

The Handbook Part I BCCC Vision of Assessment Guiding Principles of Assessment Part II The Assessment Model Part III A guide on how to complete an outcomes assessment project

BCCC Vision of Assessment Through a college-wide culture of assessment, Baltimore City Community College provides a quality education for all who enter our doors. Assessment is by nature a goal- driven, evidence-based, and improvement-oriented process that involves all stakeholders working collaboratively. This ongoing process promotes excellence in teaching and learning by assessing all elements of the educational process. Our culture of assessment provides institutional resources, training, and support. Continual assessment is an integral component of BCCC’s commitment to excellence as an institution of higher education.

BCCC Guiding Principles for SLOA Principle 1 Faculty engagement and active involvement in SLOA development is essential. Faculty members are best suited to develop the educational outcomes for their programs and courses and to determine how to assess the outcomes and use the collected data for development and improvement. Therefore, the primary responsibility of the faculty is to develop assessment tools and determine the uses of the resulting data.

BCCC Guiding Principles for SLOA Principle 2 All appropriate participants at each level of the college, not just select groups or individuals, should be committed to following the process of assessment. All academic departments must be involved. This means including adjunct faculty in discussions and decisions as much as possible.

BCCC Guiding Principles for SLOA Principle 3 The results of outcomes assessment should be used to evaluate the effectiveness of academic programs and activities, as well as student services, but not the performance of individual faculty or staff. SLOA is a process that must be separate from faculty evaluation.

BCCC Guiding Principles for SLOA Principle 4 College administrators must provide leadership and accountability to the process, as well as enable the assessment process by providing adequate resources, staff, and other forms of support.

BCCC Guiding Principles for SLOA Principle 5 Assessment data do not exist in a vacuum and must be analyzed alongside all other factors that may affect achievement of outcomes. Other factors, some that will be out of our control, must be considered during the analysis phase. Factors such as personal problems, home situations, work hours, study habits and incoming skill levels, to name a few, can affect the assessment results.

BCCC Guiding Principles for SLOA Principle 6 The SLOA process should be as simple and manageable as possible. The process cannot become so complicated that it interferes with the educational experience rather than assessing and improving it.

BCCC Guiding Principles for SLOA Principle 7 Faculty and all others involved at the college should engage in SLOA development and assessment because it is good professional practice that benefits programs and students, not because it is an accreditation requirement. If outcomes assessment is used primarily as a reporting tool, then the process has failed.

BCCC Guiding Principles for SLOA Principle 8 Outcomes assessment must be ongoing and performed on a regular basis in each academic area. It must become an academic habit.

BCCC Assessment Model CourseProgramInstitutional CourseProgramInstitutional Design Backwards Assess Forward

Student Learning Outcomes Assessment: Program Level Program Assessment Program Outcomes Assessment Project Assesses program specific content and skills Core Competency Assessment Project Assesses transferable skills (i.e., written and oral communication)

Student Learning Outcomes Assessment: Program Level Complete Observation and Recommendation forms Based on Observation Report and Recommendation Form Dissemination of Assessment Instruments Program Coordinator w/FAT develop a POAP Planning Implementation Analysis and Reporting Implementation of Recommendations

Student Learning Outcomes Assessment: Course Level Course Assessment ISLO Core Competency (General Education) Discipline Assessment Track Special Projects General Course Assessment

Student Learning Outcomes Assessment: Course Level

Closing the Loop Make changes to ensure that students are learning and achieving learning outcomes Re-evaluate and revise student-supported learning activities that will be used to reach the desired benchmark for achievement of learning outcomes. Implement the revised outcomes assessment plan and report the results