License Supplements under 21 CFR

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Basic Principles of GMP
Advertisements

Managing Compliance Related to Human Subjects Research Review Joseph Sherwin, Ph.D. Office of Regulatory Affairs University of Pennsylvania Fourth Annual.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Appendix 01.
1 Balloting/Handling Negative Votes September 11, 2006 ASTM Training Session Bob Morgan Brynn Iwanowski.
1 Balloting/Handling Negative Votes September 22 nd and 24 th, 2009 ASTM Virtual Training Session Christine DeJong Joe Koury.
Task Group Chairman and Technical Contact Responsibilities ASTM International Officers Training Workshop September 2012 Scott Orthey and Steve Mawn 1.
RXQ Customer Enrollment Using a Registration Agent (RA) Process Flow Diagram (Move-In) Customer Supplier Customer authorizes Enrollment ( )
Document #07-2I RXQ Customer Enrollment Using a Registration Agent (RA) Process Flow Diagram (Move-In) (mod 7/25 & clean-up 8/20) Customer Supplier.
RECORD KEEPING Cooperative Development of Operational
HIV Drug Resistance Training
Harmonized implementation of CDM Accreditation CDM-Accreditation Panel.
State of New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services Patient Safety Reporting System Module 2 – New Event Entry.
August 28, 2009 Federal Emergency Management Agency Public Assistance Arbitration Process.
2 HOME DELIVERED MEALS Waiver Workshop Presented by: Regional and Local Services (RLS) Access and Intake /Area Agency on Aging (A&I/AAA) May 27-28, 2009.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Year 6 mental test 10 second questions
Site Safety Plans PFN ME 35B.
1 According to PETROSAFE safety policy, the company is keen that: Introduction All Egyptian Petroleum companies and foreign companies working in A.R.E.
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
Effectively applying ISO9001:2000 clauses 6 and 7.
CBER Whole Blood and Blood Components Diane K. Hall Consumer Safety Officer CBER, OBRR, DBA September 16, 2009.
Biopharmaceutical Quality
Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) Overview for IRBs
1 Quality Indicators for Device Demonstrations April 21, 2009 Lisa Kosh Diana Carl.
Overview of FDA Device Regulations
AEMCPAGE Relaunch 1 June 2009.
Replacement Reagent Policy Update
Hazardous Waste Section
VOORBLAD.
Checking & Corrective Action
Factor P 16 8(8-5ab) 4(d² + 4) 3rs(2r – s) 15cd(1 + 2cd) 8(4a² + 3b²)
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Model and Relationships 6 M 1 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
Januar MDMDFSSMDMDFSSS
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
Intracellular Compartments and Transport
PSSA Preparation.
Essential Cell Biology
Annual Register Verification Training Presented By: OFFICE OF AUDITOR GENERAL New York City Department of Education.
Development of Guidance Documents Jennifer Scharpf, M. P. H
CBER 1 Blood Establishment Computer Software (BECS) Michael Gorman, BA, MT(ASCP)SBB Consumer Safety Officer, CBER, OBRR, DBA September 15, 2009.
CBER Whole Blood and Blood Component Labeling Jennifer Jones Consumer Safety Officer CBER, OBRR, DBA September 16, 2009.
CBER 1 Normal Source Plasma Donor Program Rosia E. Nesbitt, BS, SBB(ASCP), CQA(ASQ) Consumer Safety Officer CBER, OBRR, DBA September 16, 2009.
CBER Irradiated Blood Components Jennifer Jones Consumer Safety Officer CBER, OBRR, DBA September 16, 2009.
CBER Cooperative Manufacturing Arrangements (Contractors) Jennifer Jones Consumer Safety Officer CBER, OBRR, DBA September 15, 2009.
CBER Managed Review Process Sheryl A. Kochman Deputy Director, DBA, OBRR, CBER September 15, 2009.
CBER Pre-License and Pre-Approval Inspections
CBER Blood Establishment Registration and Product Listing Jan O’Brien Blood Registration Coordinator DBA, OBRR, CBER September 15, 2009.
CBER U.S. Food and Drug Administration Notice: Archived Document The content in this document is provided on the FDA’s website for reference purposes only.
FDA Guidance for Industry: Use of Serological Tests to Reduce the Risk of Transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi Infection in Whole Blood and Blood Components.
CBER Review Considerations on Source Plasma Vaccination Programs Judy Ellen Ciaraldi BS, MT(ASCP)SBB, CQA(ASQ) CBER, OBRR, DBA September 16, 2009.
CBER 1 Establishment Submissions Rosia E. Nesbitt, BS, SBB(ASCP), CQA(ASQ) Consumer Safety Officer CBER, OBRR, DBA September 15, 2009.
1 Supplements and Other Changes to an Approved Application By: Richard J. Stec Jr., Ph.D. February 7, 2007.
CBER Red Blood Cell Immunization Programs Judy Ellen Ciaraldi BS, MT(ASCP)SBB, CQA(ASQ) CBER, OBRR, DBA September 16, 2009.
Apheresis Blood Components
FDA Recommendations: Sampling Plans for Blood Establishments Lore Fields MT(ASCP)SBB Consumer Safety Officer OBRR/CBER/FDA October 19, 2012.
Leukocyte-Reduced Blood Components Lore Fields MT(ASCP)SBB Consumer Safety Officer, DBA, OBRR, CBER September 16, 2009.
CBER 1 Review Considerations on Additional Centers under an Approved License Rosia E. Nesbitt, BS, SBB(ASCP), CQA(ASQ) Consumer Safety Officer CBER, OBRR,
CBER Alternative Procedures “Variances” Judy Ellen Ciaraldi BS, MT(ASCP)SBB, CQA(ASQ) CBER, OBRR, DBA September 15, 2009.
CBER September 16, 2009 Review Considerations on Disease State Donor Programs Hoi-may Wong, BS, MT(ASCP)SBB Consumer Safety Officer CBER, OBRR, DBA.
CBER 1 Disease Associated Antibody Donor Program Rosia E. Nesbitt, BS, SBB(ASCP), CQA(ASQ) Consumer Safety Officer CBER, OBRR, DBA September 16, 2009.
COMPARABILITY PROTOCOLUPDATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCE Manufacturing Subcommittee July 20-21, 2004 Stephen Moore, Ph.D. Chemistry Team.
Comparability Protocols Lore Fields MT(ASCP)SBB Consumer Safety Officer DBA/OBRR/CBER September 16, 2009.
CBER Source Plasma Labeling Judy Ellen Ciaraldi BS, MT(ASCP)SBB, CQA(ASQ) CBER, OBRR, DBA September 16, 2009.
Minimizing the Risks of TSE Agents in Human Tissues Melissa A. Greenwald, M.D. Division of Human Tissues Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies;
CBER Common Problems on Source Plasma Inspections Judy Ellen Ciaraldi BS, MT(ASCP)SBB, CQA(ASQ) CBER, OBRR, DBA September 16, 2009.
Final Rule for Sanitary Transportation. Background Proposed Rule: February 5, 2014 Public Comments: More than 200 Final Rule: On Display April 5, 2016.
Presentation transcript:

License Supplements under 21 CFR 601.12 Hoi-may Wong, BS, MT(ASCP)SBB Consumer Safety Officer CBER, OBRR, DBA September 15, 2009

BLA Supplements A manufacturer may make a change in the product, labeling, production process, quality controls, equipment, or facilities that has been described in the approved license application(s). The requirements for making a change are prescribed in 21 CFR 601.12. The regulation applies only to the manufacture and distribution of licensed products.

Outline Regulations Reporting categories Examples of changes in each category Deficiencies identified during the CBE30, CBE, AR review Comparability protocols Labeling changes Failure to comply

21 CFR 601.12 An applicant must inform the FDA about each change in the product, production process, quality controls, equipment, facilities, responsible personnel, or labeling established in the approved license application(s).

21 CFR 601.12 (cont.) Before distributing a product made using a change, an applicant must assess the effects of the change and demonstrate through appropriate validation….. the lack of adverse effect of the change on the identity, strength, quality, purity, or potency of the product as they may relate to the safety or effectiveness of the product.

Three Reporting Categories Prior Approval Supplement (PAS) Changes Being Effected in 30 days Supplement (CBE30) - Changes Being Effected Supplement (CBE) Annual Report (AR)

Prior Approval Supplement Described in 21 CFR 601.12(b) Change that has a substantial potential to have an adverse effect on the safety or effectiveness of the product Review and approval of supplement required before product made using change can be distributed

Examples of PAS Changes Implementation of new manufacturing processes, such as - additional product, e.g. Fresh Frozen Plasma - leukocyte reduction - washing / rejuvenating - freezing / deglycerolizing - irradiation - change from manual to automated collection

Examples of PAS Changes (cont.) Addition of the following SOPs - Donor suitability, including donor deferral - Blood collection, including arm preparation - High risk behavior questions and AIDS information - Donor history forms, including informed consent - Product manufacturing for licensed products - Quarantine and disposition of unsuitable product

Examples of PAS Changes (cont.) Revision of SOPs When the change is less restrictive than previously approved When implementing a change for which FDA has not published a guidance document Implementation of an immunization program for RBCs or unlicensed vaccine Implementation of Source Plasma collection program from disease state or high risk donors Implementation of a physician substitute program

Examples of PAS Changes (cont.) Request for comparability protocol Use of a new contract testing laboratory for infectious disease testing of blood components Addition of a new contractor to perform manufacturing steps Relocation of a facility with change in core center personnel, SOP or equipment Request for an alternative procedure under 21 CFR 640.120

Changes Being Effected in 30 Days Supplement Described in 21 CFR 601.12(c) Change that has a moderate potential to have an adverse effect on the safety or effectiveness of the product Submission of a supplement at least 30 days prior to the distribution of the product made using the change Initial review of submission within 30 days for completeness and correctness

Changes Being Effected in 30 Days Supplement (cont.) FDA will communicate with applicant within 30 days if supplement is incomplete or not submitted in correct category (21 CFR 601.12(c)(4)) Product may be distributed 30 days after FDA receipt of supplement, unless FDA has communicated with the applicant and informed them not to distribute FDA will continue the review after 30 days - This is not a 30-day approval Written approval will be sent to applicant after review is completed and issues are adequately addressed

Examples of CBE-30 Changes Implementation of a FDA-cleared computer- assisted self-interview system Collection of plasma as a by-product in an approved apheresis RBC and/or platelet program Implementation of licensed vaccine immunization program following manufacturer’s instructions

Examples of CBE-30 Changes (cont.) Use of registered contract donor testing laboratory for infectious disease testing Use of an off-site storage facility Request for alternative procedure with published guidance, e.g. implementation of an infrequent plasmapheresis collection program

Changes Being Effected Supplement Described in 21 CFR 601.12(c)(5) Change that has a moderate potential to have an adverse effect on the safety or effectiveness of the product FDA will communicate with applicant if supplement is incomplete or not submitted in correct category Product made using the change may be distributed immediately upon FDA receipt of the supplement unless FDA has communicated with the applicant and informed them not to distribute

Changes Being Effected Supplement (cont.) FDA will continue the review - This is not an immediate approval Written approval will be sent to applicant after review is completed and issues are adequately addressed Example Request to change annual report date

Annual Report Described in 21 CFR 601.12(d) Change that has a minimal potential to have an adverse effect on the safety or effectiveness of the product All licensed facilities are required to submit an annual report each year describing minor changes made in the previous12 months within 60 days of The anniversary date of approval of the application The date of approval of an alternative reporting period

Annual Report (cont.) Annual report date determined by the date of the first product approval An applicant may request in writing an alternative date as the annual report date Content of report - Cover letter and FDA form 356h Include U.S. License Number, time period covered in the report, current organization chart, licensed products, list of all facilities, including contracted facilities and their functions

Annual Report (cont.) Content of report (cont.) Full description of minor changes - List products affected by each change - List all facilities where changes were implemented - Describe SOP or process affected by the change - Date changes became effective

Examples of AR Changes Revision of approved SOP with more restrictive changes Changes or upgrades by the device manufacturer of automated apheresis equipment that does not affect the safety or effectiveness of the product Implementation of a pre-existing disease-associated Source Plasma collection program from normal donors Change in “doing business as” name that does not affect the legal entity name of the license

Examples of AR Changes (cont.) Changes of previously approved equipment or collection sets used according to manufacturer’s instructions - irradiation equipment - blood collection set or leukocyte reduction filters - donor screening equipment - automated equipment for ABO/Rh, syphilis and infectious disease testing on donor samples - Infectious disease testing methodology

Examples of AR Changes (cont.) Implementation of a blood establishment computer system (except CASI) Use of an approved back-up donor testing laboratory Use of an accepted AABB donor history questionnaire without modification Addition of tests not required or recommended by FDA

Not Considered AR Changes Changes reported as supplements Inadvertent development of antibody in RBC immunization programs; keep on file at center Biological product deviation reports (21 CFR 606.171) Changes in authorized official name, contact information and mailing address Send to FDA as soon as possible to ensure uninterrupted effective communication

Deficiencies Identified During the CBE30, CBE, AR Review Deficiencies identified during the review Change reported in wrong category (e.g., sent in as CBE30 but should have been a PAS) Submission does not contain sufficient information to determine the effect of the change on the product Actions taken (21 CFR 601.12(c)(4 & 6)) FDA will communicate with the applicant and inform them to not distribute product until the supplement has been approved or the additional information has been submitted If no deficiencies are identified during the preliminary review but deficiencies that may adversely impact the product are identified during the in-depth review, FDA may order the manufacturer to cease distribution of the product

Comparability Protocol Described in 21 CFR 601.12(e) Submit as a PAS Supplement includes protocols describing specific tests and validation studies and acceptable limits to be achieved to demonstrate the lack of adverse effect on the safety or effectiveness of the product Change is specific Approval may result in reduced reporting category for future changes

Comparability Protocol (cont.) Content of CP supplement - Description of change - SOPs - Validation protocol, including acceptance criteria - Training program - QA plan - Implementation plan - Label(s) if applicable.

Comparability Protocol (cont.) Uses of comparability protocol - Implementation of a single change in multiple facilities under the same license - Implementation of a single change with a long planning stage and short implementation timetable

Changes in Labeling PAS - Described in 21 CFR 601.12(f)(1): - Contain additional claims - Change in volume of Whole Blood container (e.g., 450 mL to 500 mL) - Injectable <-> Noninjectable Source Plasma - Conversion from Codabar to ISBT 128 labels

Changes in Labeling (cont.) CBE - Described in 601.12(f)(2): Change in legal name of applicant (new license number will be issued) Change in FDA-approved additive/anticoagulant for Whole Blood collections

Failure to Comply Described in 21 CFR 601.12(g) Action is taken on repeated offenses Applicable laws and regulations will be enforced All changes may have to be submitted as supplements and receive approval prior to distribution of products

Blood and Plasma Branch telephone number: For more information Please call if you have questions on how to submit a comparability protocol Please call if you do not see your change listed in the guidance document Please call if you are unsure of the reporting category or the contents of your submission Blood and Plasma Branch telephone number: 301-827-3543

Regulatory Oversight The blood component manufacturer is responsible for compliance with regulations and good manufacturing practices when collecting, processing, labeling, testing, storing, and distributing blood components (21 CFR 600.3(t)) Documentation of the manufacturing process changes are reviewed during FDA inspections (21 CFR 600.21)

References Regulations 21 CFR 601.12 Guidance for Industry: Changes to an Approved Application: Biological Products: Human Blood and Blood Components Intended for Transfusion or for Further Manufacture, July 2001 http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/Blood/ucm076729.htm