EU FORMAL REGULATION – TYPES OF STANDARDS ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY OBJECTIVES ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY STANDARDS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Best Available Techniques (BAT)
Advertisements

© European Communities, 2007 Purpose The European Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Bureau (European IPPC Bureau) of the JRC/IPTS was set up.
EU FORMAL REGULATION – TYPES of STANDARD MINIMUM EMISSION STANDARD (sometimes known as LIMIT VALUES) UNIFORM EMISSION STANDARD.
The Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) 2010/75/EU
Jerevan November Tailing dams inspection Juliane Knaul Legal Expert, Agency of Mining, Geology and Minerals of Brandenburg, Germany AGENCY.
IPPC and Industry By Dr. Ken Macken Dublin Regional Licensing Manager.
Waste minimization, water management and energy efficiency techniques in the Soft Drinks Industry PROJECT COORDINATOR: Mr. Patrick J. Tanck, M.Sc, Foundation.
Industrial Pollution Control and Risk Management: IPPC Neil Emmott Environment Directorate-General 7 April 2006.
Substantive environmental provisions Prof. Gyula Bándi.
Practical use of newly developed BAT conclusions Valts Vilnītis.
Grupowa Oczyszczalnia Ścieków Łódzkiej Aglomeracji Miejskiej Fot: U. Czapla Practical aspects of compliance with the Integrated Permit requirements based.
IPPC IN MINING AND METALLURGY IN THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Bosko Nikov
European Commission, DG Environment Unit B.1: Water, Marine and Soil EU Substitution Conference - Hamburg, 13/14 June 2002 Slide 1 EU Conference on Substitution.
The European IPPC Bureau Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS) Seville, Spain Internet E.mail : Don.
The IPPC Directive and EPER Iksan van der Putte. Objectives of IPPC (Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control) To prevent or minimise emissions To.
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND REPORTING BY ENTERPRISES FEASIBILITY OF DEVELOPING MONITORING GUIDELINES FOR CHEMICAL INDUSTRY IN EASTERN EUROPE, CAUCASUS.
1 Inspection of LCPs: System for Inspection. ECENA Training Workshop Bristol, March 2008.
BAT as a main tool for minimisation of the negative impact of industrial activities Aivi Sissa Tallinn – Estonia 27 – 28 March 2008.
The Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) 2010/75/EU Gabriella Gerzsenyi & Menno Verheij European Commission, DG Environment Industrial Emissions Unit 03.
The Sevilla process for supporting the implementation of the IPPC Directive Michael Parth Tallinn – Estonia 27 – 28 March 2008.
Workshop, 12/3/2004 Banska Bystrica – SLOVAC REPUBLIC “INTEGRATED LICENCE PROCEDURE (Greek case)” Katerina Iakovidou-Anastasiadou Hellenic Ministry for.
Air Quality Governance in the ENPI East Countries Regulation of non-Annex I activities in the CR and UK Monika P ř ibylová.
BULGARIAN APPROACH TO THE BAT IN THE IPPC PERMITTING BOYKO MALINOV MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND WATER BULGARIA.
Economic and Cross Media aspects Bo Jansson Swedish Environmental Protection Agency
IPPC Directive state of play and future developements
Directive on the protection of the environment through criminal law Anna Karamat European Commission DG Environment Unit A.2 ‘Infringements’
The IPPC Directive and its implementation Alexandre Paquot European Commission Environment Directorate-General Phare Capacity.
Ministry of Waters and Environmental Protection, ROMANIA 1 BERCEN 1 st Exchange program – November 2002 Croatia PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS IN COOPERATION.
1 Permitting of industrial facilities in Croatia.
The Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) 2010/75/EU Gabriella Gerzsenyi & Menno Verheij European Commission, DG Environment Industrial Emissions Unit 03.
Energy Efficiency in IPPC Installations, Wienna Oct/2004 Petr Honskus (SPF Group) Chairman of EE TWG CR Vladimíra Henelová, Monika Přibylová Members.
1IndustrialEmissionsDirective. 2 The European Parliament is discussing the Industrial Emissions Directive as adopted by the Council for the second reading.
MODULE 1 Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification Environmental.
The European IPPC Bureau Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS) Seville, Spain Internet E.mail : Don.
IPPC vs Emissions Trading Lesley James Friends of the Earth (England, Wales & N.Ireland) and the European Environmental Bureau.
The legal background for implementing the IPPC, EPER, and PRTR Protocol Requirements Orsolya Adamovics Department for Conservation of Environment Ministry.
Strengths and weaknesses of the permitting system and enforcement process in RIEW – Veliko Turnovo Regional Inspectorate of Environment and Water - Veliko.
REVISION OF THE IPPC DIRECTIVE  DIRECTIVE ON INDUSTRIAL EMISSIONS.
Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 providing for Minimum Criteria for Environmental Inspections in the Member.
How to start with the implementation of IPPC Directive Czech Republic Czech Environmetal Inspectorate.
CROATIA Country Report IPPC Directive: implementation, problems, constraints, open questions,… Anita Pokrovac Patekar, B. Sc. Pharm. Ministry of Environmental.
Group EIA 1: Screening for Annex 2 Both:- case-by-case - thresholds < 10% goes to EIA All Countries have problems with “Salami Slicing” Little Information.
The current legal situation
VNPIVNPI 1 IPPC Practice Netherlands Refineries Commission Workshop on IPPC Brussels, July 4, 2008 VNPI Mr. Pieter Thomassen and Mr. Frans Driessen.
1 Review of the IPPC Directive and related legislation Second Meeting Of Working Group E On Priority Substances 17 October 2007 Filip FRANCOIS – DG ENV.
IPPC recast and air emissions Gergely Simon Lisbon.
Main flexibility tools for the adoption of high emission standards for LCPs set in the new Industrial Emissions Directive Gerard Lipinski Coordinator of.
Ministry for Ecology, Energy, Sustainable Development and Sea in charge of Green Technologies and Climate Negotiations
IPPC Permit Procedure in the UK Kiev, 26 January 2011 Alex Radway Senior Advisor Environment Agency for England & Wales, United Kingdom.
Integrated and Planned Enforcement of Environmental Law Phare Twinning Project CZ03/IB/EN/01 1 The IPPC Directive Introduction to the philosophy Rob Kramers.
IPPC A general overview Nigel Barraclough Policy Adviser Industrial Pollution Control Branch Air and Environment Quality Division. Taiwanese Environmental.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 27 – Environment Bilateral screening:
Introduction to the philosophy
BMRA Legislative Policy Group – Shredder Sub Group
BAT - BREF Their scope Rob Kramers Senior advisor InfoMil.
First position of the Belgian industry about the
INTEGRATED PERMITTING IPPC DIRECTIVE: BEST PRACTICE
The Public Sector Equality Duty (PSED) & Integration Joint Boards
Diffuse Sources of Water Pollution
IPPC and refineries: England and Wales
EU REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO CONTAMINATED LAND
Aleksandra Antonowicz Green Federation GAJA/CCB
Expert Advisory Forum on priority substances
IPPC Review Stakeholder Hearing
Diffuse Sources of Water Pollution
Drafting group Mixing Zones
13th Working Group E meeting March 2011 Jorge Rodriguez Romero
A general introduction
Industrial Emissions Directive Targeted stakeholder survey
WFD CIS Working Group Meeting Brussels, 4/4/2019
Presentation transcript:

EU FORMAL REGULATION – TYPES OF STANDARDS ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY OBJECTIVES ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY STANDARDS

EU FORMAL REGULATION – TYPES of STANDARD MINIMUM EMISSION STANDARD (sometimes known as LIMIT VALUES) UNIFORM EMISSION STANDARD

CONFLICTS BETWEEN EQS AND ES APPROACHES Advantages and disadvantages of each? Dangerous substances in waters

LARGE COMBUSTION PLANT DIRECTIVE 2001/80/EC Exceptions - Art 2(7) National emission reduction plans– Art 3(1) Member State bubbles and no equal Art – Art 3(2) and Annex I For existing plant, Member States choose whether to apply emission limits for new plant OR subject to national reduction plant Art 4(3)

LARGE COMBUSTION New plant subject to licences and comply with emission limits in Annexes III-VIII Art 4 Member States may apply more stringent emission standards and to other pollutants Art 4(5) Stack heights to be calculated by Member States Art 9 Penalties determined by Member State – effective, proportionate persuasive Art 16 Emission limits subject to Integrated Pollution and Prevention Control Directive Emission limits must not prejudice air quality standards

Directive 2008/1/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2008 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control Art 3. Member States shall take the necessary measures to provide that the competent authorities ensure that installations are operated in such a way that: (a) all the appropriate preventive measures are taken against pollution, in particular through application of the best available techniques; (b) no significant pollution is caused…….

BEST AVAILABLE TECHNIQUES “ the most effective and advanced stage in the development of activities and their methods of operation which indicate the practical suitability of particular techniques for providing in principle the basis for emission limit values designed to prevent and, where that is not practicable, generally to reduce emissions and the impact on the environment as a whole”:

BAT further defined (b) ‘available techniques’ means those developed on a scale which allows implementation in the relevant industrial sector, under economically and technically viable conditions, taking into consideration the costs and advantages, whether or not the techniques are used or produced inside the Member State in question, as long as they are reasonably accessible to the operator; (c) ‘best’ means most effective in achieving a high general level of protection of the environment as a whole.

Permit must include emission limits Art 9(3) The permit shall include emission limit values for polluting substances, in particular those listed in Annex III, likely to be emitted from the installation concerned in significant quantities, having regard to their nature and their potential to transfer pollution from one medium to another (water, air and land).

Emission limit values and flexibility the emission limit values……… “ shall be based on the best available techniques, without prescribing the use of any technique or specific technology, but taking into account the technical characteristics of the installation concerned, its geographical location and the local environmental conditions”. (art 9(4)

Environmental Quality Standards trump BAT (art 10) Where an environmental quality standard requires stricter conditions than those achievable by the use of the best available techniques, additional measures shall in particular be required in the permit, without prejudice to other measures which might be taken to comply with environmental quality standards.

BAT INFORMATION and BREF REFERENCE NOTES The Commission shall organise an exchange of information between Member States and the industries concerned on best available techniques, associated monitoring, and developments in them. (Art 17) IPPC Bureau established Has developed in highly complex Seville Process with production of BAT Reference Notes