EPSC Europlanet – Potsdam, Germany. Sep 16 2009 MSSL/UCL UK In-situ Science on the surfaces of Ganymede and Europa with Penetrators Rob Gowen (MSSL/UCL,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

You have been given a mission and a code. Use the code to complete the mission and you will save the world from obliteration…
Istituto di Fisica dello Spazio Interplanetario V. Iafolla, E. Fiorenza, C. Lefevre, S. Nozzoli, R. Peron, M. Persichini, A. Reale, F. Santoli Istituto.
SuperDARN is a network of HF radars (8-20 MHz) used to study the convection in the Earth's ionosphere at altitudes between 90 and 400 km and at magnetic.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
I3/CA Europlanet - EC Contract EUROPLANET in FP-7 Tentative overall structure of Europlanet in FP7 and further Preparations.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULTIPLYING MONOMIALS TIMES POLYNOMIALS (DISTRIBUTIVE PROPERTY)
ADDING INTEGERS 1. POS. + POS. = POS. 2. NEG. + NEG. = NEG. 3. POS. + NEG. OR NEG. + POS. SUBTRACT TAKE SIGN OF BIGGER ABSOLUTE VALUE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
ZMQS ZMQS
Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale e Fisica CosmicaIstituto di Fisica dello Spazio Interplanetario Roma, 5-6 novembre 2003 Relatore: Maria Teresa Capria.
G.Barbiellini -- 1 AGILE 1yr G. Barbiellini on behalf of the AGILE team.
Biosignatures on Exoplanets Workshop – Mulhouse, France. June MSSL/UCL UK Astrobiological Signatures with Penetrators on Europa Astrobiological.
Photo Composition Study Guide Label each photo with the category that applies to that image.
ABC Technology Project
© S Haughton more than 3?
© Charles van Marrewijk, An Introduction to Geographical Economics Brakman, Garretsen, and Van Marrewijk.
© Charles van Marrewijk, An Introduction to Geographical Economics Brakman, Garretsen, and Van Marrewijk.
1 First EMRAS II Technical Meeting IAEA Headquarters, Vienna, 19–23 January 2009.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
1 Chapter 13 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy.
Igone Urdampilleta 29 May 2014, UCM, Madrid. Space Penetrators 2 Contents What is a Space Penetrator? Internal Architecture Heritage Scientific Motivation.
A Polar Volatiles Laboratory A. Smith, R. A. Gowen, I. A. Crawford Shackleton Crater ESA Smart-1.
IAC 2008 : Glasgow, Oct’08 MSSL/UCL UK An Update on MoonLITE MSSL/UCL UK Rob Gowen on behalf of the UK Penetrator Consortium IAC 2008 : Glasgow, Oct’08.
8’th ILEWG Conference, Beijing, July 23-27, 2006 MSSL/UCL UK. Lunar Exploration with Penetrators A.Smith, R.Gowen, A.Coates – MSSL/UCL I.Crawford – Birkbeck/UCL.
Jupiter-Europa Cosmic Vision Meeting, London, Nov 23-24, 2006 MSSL/UCL UK Towards a Viable Europa Penetrator A. Smith, R. Gowen, A. Coates, etc – MSSL/UCL.
EUROPA Joseph T. Wunderlich, Ph.D.. Talk Agenda 1977: NASA Voyager : NASA Voyager : NASA Galileo 2020 ESA/NASA Europa Jupiter System Mission”(EJSM)
IPPW-7, Barcelona, 17 Jun 2010 Potential Applications of Micro- Penetrators within the Solar System Presented by Rob Gowen, MSSL/UCL on behalf of the Penetrator.
An Astrobiology Payload Complement for a Europa Penetrator
“ PHOBOS - SOIL ” Phobos Sample Return Mission 1. goals, methods of study A.Zakharov, Russian academy of sciences Russian aviation.
Introduction Low mass, high speed impacting projectiles, performing science investigations from below surface. Objectives: ground truth, unique science.
Space for science, enterprise and environment MoonLITE and LunarEX Rob Gowen and Alan Smith Mullard Space Science Laboratory, UCL PI Penetrator consortium.
Intelligent Robotics Group NASA Ames Research Center Intelligent Robotics Group NASA Ames Research Center Planning for the Mapping and Exploration of Human.
Main task  Understanding the physics of planetary near-surface layers, including comets, Mars & Moon Main research topics  Study of the mechanisms controlling.
5 th IPPW, Bordeaux, June 25-99, 2007 Kinetic Micro-Penetrators For Exploration Of Solar System Bodies. R. Gowen & A. Smith, MSSL/UCL.
ILEWG-9 Conference, Sorrento, Oct 22-26, 2007 Technical Trade Studies for a Lunar Penetrator Mission Alan Smith 1, Rob Gowen 1, Yang Gao 2, and Phil Church.
To the Moon and beyond Bremen Sep MSSL/UCL UK Penetrators in the Solar System MSSL/UCL UK Alan Smith on behalf of the UK Penetrator Consortium.
Mullard Space Science Laboratory Planetary Micro-Penetrators Dr Rob Gowen on behalf of Glyn Collinson international - Germany, France, Austria,
Titan Saturn System Mission Workshop - Paris, Mar 17-19, 2008 MSSL/UCL UK Penetrators for Enceladus Titan Saturn System Mission Workshop - Paris, Mar 17-19,
Titan Enceladus Meeting,Paris, Feb 14-15, 2007 MSSL/UCL UK Possible Probes and Scientific Instruments for Titan, Enceladus and the Saturnian system Kinetic.
AMSAT-UK : University of Surrey, July MSSL/UCL UK ‘Shoot for the Moon’ MSSL/UCL UK Rob Gowen on behalf of the UK Penetrator Consortium AMSAT-UK:
Royal Astronomical Society, January 11, 2008 MoonLite a UK led penetrator mission to the Moon Professor Alan Smith On behalf of the UK Penetrator Consortium.
Julian Chela-Flores The Abdus Salam ICTP, Trieste, Italia and Instituto de Estudios Avanzados, Caracas, Republica Bolivariana de Venezuela Can a future.
Laplace Meeting - Frascati, April 2008 MSSL/UCL UK Penetrators for Europa MSSL/UCL UK Professor Andrew Coates on behalf of UK Penetrator Consortium.
TSSM Meeting - Monrovia, Jun MSSL/UCL UK Penetrators for TSSM MSSL/UCL UK Rob Gowen on behalf of UK Penetrator Consortium TSSM Meeting - Monrovia,
EGU Conference,Vienna, April15, 2008 An Update to MoonLITE Lunar Mission Rob Gowen, MSSL/UCL On behalf of the UK Penetrator Consortium + international.
Europa Penetrator Design and Survivability Testing IPPW10 Sanjay Vijendran, ESA ESTEC Marie-Claire Perkinson, Lester Waugh, Mike Williams, Astrium Tom.
Mission to Pluto Using the satellites and missions described here, plan a mission to Pluto and choose the instruments.
Turin. ALTEC. DESCENT MODULE AND SURFACE PLATFORM ExoMars Science Working Team
Science investigations in the framework of expedition to Europa
Enabling Capabilities A Robotic Field Geologist Access to a site mapped from orbit Long life, mobility, capability to explore a local region Remote sensing.
LEAG 2008 : Florida, Oct 30 MSSL/UCL UK Progress of MoonLITE Penetrators Progress of MoonLITE Penetrators MSSL/UCL UK Rob Gowen on behalf of the UK Penetrator.
Development of an Astrobiology Penetrator and Delivery System
JUpiter Icy Moons Explorer (JUICE)
F. Tosi, A. Longobardo, O. Prieto-Ballesteros, G. Choblet
The Europa Initiative for ESA’s M5 mission JEM SCIENCE PLAN
The Akon Europa Penetrator
Europa Kaitlyn Young.
Presentation transcript:

EPSC Europlanet – Potsdam, Germany. Sep MSSL/UCL UK In-situ Science on the surfaces of Ganymede and Europa with Penetrators Rob Gowen (MSSL/UCL, UK) Adrian Jones (UCL) on behalf of Penetrator Consortium 1: Mullard Space Science Laboratory, University College London, 2: Planetary and Space Sciences Research Institute, Open University, UK. 3:Birkbeck College, University of London, UK. 4: Surrey Space Centre, Guildford, UK. 5: Imperial College, London, UK, 6: University of Leicester, UK. 7: University College London, UK. 8: Lancaster University, UK. 9: Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge, UK. 11: University of Aberystwyth, UK. 12: Istituto di Fisica dello Spazio Interplanetario-INAF, Roma, Italy. 13: DLR, Berlin, Germany. 14: Institute of Microelectronics and Microsystem-CNR, Roma, Italy. 15: Université Paris, France. 16: Centro de Astrobiologia-INTA-CSIC, España. 17: Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP), Trieste, Italy. 18: DLR, Bremen, Germany. 19: Joint Institute for VLBI in Europe (JIVE), Dwingeloo, The Netherlands. 20: IWF, Space Research Institute, Graz, Austria. 21: Royal Observatory, Belgium

EPSC Europlanet – Potsdam, Germany. Sep MSSL/UCL UK Contents  Introduction  Current status  Europa & Ganymede compare and contrast  Europa  Ganymede  Summary

EPSC Europlanet – Potsdam, Germany. Sep MSSL/UCL UK Descent Module release from Orbiter Reorient Spin-up & Decelerate Penetrator Separation Penetrator & PDS surface Impact Spin-Down Penetrators Delivery sequence courtesy SSTL Operate from below surface  Low mass projectiles  High impact speed ~ up to 400 ms -1  Very tough ~10-50kgee  Penetrate surface and imbed therein  Undertake science- based measurements  Transmit results

EPSC Europlanet – Potsdam, Germany. Sep MSSL/UCL UK Penetrator cm 5-15 kg Payload ~2 kg

EPSC Europlanet – Potsdam, Germany. Sep MSSL/UCL UK Radiation sensor Magnetometers Batteries Mass spectrometer Micro-seismometers Drill assembly Accelerometers Power Interconnection Processing Accelerometers, Thermometer Batteries,Data logger Test Penetrator – internal architecture

EPSC Europlanet – Potsdam, Germany. Sep MSSL/UCL UK Current status   Penetrators proposed for EJSM (JGO & JEO) Ganymede & Europa (launch ~2020)   Funding to develop candidate instruments in UK and Europe   ESA ITT for study of descent module and penetrator platform elements study expected to commence Oct/Nov Today - focus on science … as applied to penetrators

EPSC Europlanet – Potsdam, Germany. Sep MSSL/UCL UK GanymedeEuropa Both :- Icy bodies Varied terrains Some common surface features But distinct differences

EPSC Europlanet – Potsdam, Germany. Sep MSSL/UCL UK GanymedeEuropa Galileo images Much rugged terrain Not all ! Ridges, cracks, bands, chaos Few craters Different surface material Much rugged terrain Not all ! Ridges, cracks, bands, chaos Many craters Different surface material

EPSC Europlanet – Potsdam, Germany. Sep MSSL/UCL UK In-situ Science Capability   Geophysics – seismic activity, subsurface ocean, internal structure   Local geophysics – crustal strength, layering, mineralogy, temperature, conductivity, dielectric properties   Chemistry – chemical inventory (sample, volumetric)   Astrobiology – organic/inorganic chemical balance, UV flourescence, specific molecules, radioistopes   Ground truth – will also help interpretation of orbital data from other bodies   Support to future missions – landing sites characteristics (hardness), surface environment (radiation, temperature, magnetic field, quakes)

EPSC Europlanet – Potsdam, Germany. Sep MSSL/UCL UK In-situ Science Instruments radio beacon, seismometer, magnetometer, microphone, tiltmeter, descent cameraGeophysics – radio beacon, seismometer, magnetometer, microphone, tiltmeter, descent camera thermometer, conductivity, permittivity, microscope, accelerometerLocal geophysics – thermometer, conductivity, permittivity, microscope, accelerometer mass spectrometer, gamma-ray densitometer, neutron spectrometer, etc...Chemistry – mass spectrometer, gamma-ray densitometer, neutron spectrometer, etc...   Astrobiology – mass spectrometer, microscope, micro- thermogravimeter, redox, pH.   Ground truth – all   Support to future missions – accelerometer, seismometer, radiation monitor, thermometer, mass spectrometer.

EPSC Europlanet – Potsdam, Germany. Sep MSSL/UCL UK Geophysics & Astrobiology… Adapted from K.Hand et. al. Moscow’09, who adapted it from Figueredo et al habital zone on ocean floor adjacent to nutrients 2. communication of life forms to surface 3. Penetrator impact into upwelled zone of potential astrobiological material

EPSC Europlanet – Potsdam, Germany. Sep MSSL/UCL UK Europa - Impact Sites  Pointy penetrator – better for chemistry, seismometry. – slopes <~30  (to avoid ricochet)  Spherical penetrator – any area, but reduced science capability. E.g. Castalia Macula Candidate sites of potential upwelled biogenic material a) gray dilational bands [Schenk, 2009] – small slopes (average 5±2 ,15%>10  ) ~20km wide. – other regions analysed slopes<30  – age ? (effect of radiation) b) chaos, lenticulae regions [Proctor et al., Moscow, Feb09]. –reasonably flat/smooth in some areas –young. [Schenk, 2009] [Proctor et al., Moscow, Feb09]. What are slopes for much smaller scale lengths ? Can we use knowledge of likely regolith mechanical structures ?

EPSC Europlanet – Potsdam, Germany. Sep MSSL/UCL UK Ganymede  Largest of Jupiter’s Moons. Almost as big as Mars.  Only satellite known to have a magnetosphere (although swamped by Jupiter) – so magnetometer emplaced beneath the surface could be effective ?  Magnetosphere attributed to either an iron-rich core or to a salty sub-crustal ocean. - An ocean could harbour life, together with tidal energy source and connection to silicate nutrients (?) Detection and characterisation desired (e.g. seismometer, radio beacon, magnetometer) (orbital ground penetrating radar less effective with thick crust) [Wikipedia]

EPSC Europlanet – Potsdam, Germany. Sep MSSL/UCL UK Ganymede continued..  Bright material on peaks & dark material in troughs – support theory of deposition [Oberst et al.,1999] - So dark material could be soft, thick and indicate areas of stable low slopes ? (could be good for impact)  Bright material believed to be ice, and dark material consistent with hydrated silicate minerals. - No current definitive knowledge of chemistry of this dark material (just consistent with spectra of such minerals) (direct chemical measurement required (e.g.mass spectrometer) Portion of Galileo Regio (old dark terrain) Note smoother area on right 25km Giese [1998], Oberst [1999] infer slopes in region 0-20  Uruk Sulcus and 0-30  for Galileo Regio.

EPSC Europlanet – Potsdam, Germany. Sep MSSL/UCL UK Summary   Many benefits of in-situ science on Europa and Ganymede. – –As individual objects – –Supporting each others measurements – –Supporting orbital data (ground truth) for Ganymede, Europa – –Supporting orbital data of other bodies such as Callisto and Io. – –Support for future soft lander missions.   Identified potential impact sites of low slopes, sizes and impact hardness characteristics   Further investigations in-progress

EPSC Europlanet – Potsdam, Germany. Sep MSSL/UCL UK - End - /Micro_Penetrators.php

EPSC Europlanet – Potsdam, Germany. Sep MSSL/UCL UK Scenarios  Pointy penetrator – better for chemistry, seismometry. – slopes <~30  (to avoid ricochet)  Spherical penetrator – impact any area – but reduced science capability for same mass.  2 or more penetrators – improved seismic ability – investigate more terrain types – natural redundancy

EPSC Europlanet – Potsdam, Germany. Sep MSSL/UCL UK Why penetrators ? Advantages:   Low mass   Simpler architecture   Low cost   Explore multiple sites   Natural redundancy   Direct contact with sub-regolith (drill, sampling)   Protected from environment (wind, radiation) Limitations:   Low mass limits payload options   Impact survival limits payload options   Limited lifetime   Limited telemetry capacity Complementary to Soft Landers for in-situ studies