Ion Source Modelling and Field Index Improvements by Scott Lawrie.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Numbers Treasure Hunt Following each question, click on the answer. If correct, the next page will load with a graphic first – these can be used to check.
Advertisements

C) between 18 and 27. D) between 27 and 50.
Solve this equation to find x
Circle Theorems Bingo!. Use any 9 of these numbers 105 o 240 o 55 o 14 o 65 o 50 o 90 o 45 o 60 o 40 o 110 o 155 o 15 o 74 o 120 o 12 o.
Fill in missing numbers or operations
6-6 Volume of prisms and Cylinders
Area of Triangles.
Oblique Triangles.
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Multiplication X 1 1 x 1 = 1 2 x 1 = 2 3 x 1 = 3 4 x 1 = 4 5 x 1 = 5 6 x 1 = 6 7 x 1 = 7 8 x 1 = 8 9 x 1 = 9 10 x 1 = x 1 = x 1 = 12 X 2 1.
Division ÷ 1 1 ÷ 1 = 1 2 ÷ 1 = 2 3 ÷ 1 = 3 4 ÷ 1 = 4 5 ÷ 1 = 5 6 ÷ 1 = 6 7 ÷ 1 = 7 8 ÷ 1 = 8 9 ÷ 1 = 9 10 ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = 12 ÷ 2 2 ÷ 2 =
Add Governors Discretionary (1G) Grants Chapter 6.
Multiplying binomials You will have 20 seconds to answer each of the following multiplication problems. If you get hung up, go to the next problem when.
(x + 4)(x + 7) = x2 + 11x + 28 (x + 14)(x + 2) = x2 + 16x + 28
1 1  1 =.
2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt ShapesPatterns Counting Number.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Year 6 mental test 10 second questions
Relational or operational: Primary students understanding of the equal sign Jodie Hunter University of Plymouth BSRLM November 2009.
Multi Beamlett Extraction Experiments and Sector Magnet Field Investigation.
Example:                                         Calculate how many squares altogether (2 x 5 = 10)
LaB6 Scanning Electron Source
The basics for simulations
Jongsok Choi M.A.Sc Candidate, University of Toronto.
Factoring Quadratics — ax² + bx + c Topic
1 Photometric Stereo Reconstruction Dr. Maria E. Angelopoulou.
© Richard A. Medeiros 2004 x y Function Machine Function Machine next.
QUANTITATIVE METHODS FOR BUSINESS 8e
Maths Trail. How many hanging baskets are there in the garden? 1.
Look at This PowerPoint for help on you times tables
Trigonometry Application Review
Surface Area of Irregular Shapes Volume of Irregular Shapes
Benchmark Series Microsoft Excel 2013 Level 2
Abstract Calculations of Harmonics of Quadrupole Magnets Rybitskaya Tatyana, Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Russia Design of pole profile and chamfers.
An electron has a velocity of {image} in the positive x direction at a point where the magnetic field has the components {image} {image} and {image} What.
Integrated Plug-in for NX Users
Fraction XI Adding Mixed Numbers With Unlike Denominators
Solve by Substitution: Isolate one variable in an equation
1..
X-ray Survey of the ATLAS SCT Hardware Overview Nick Brett and Jim Loken
The Distributive Property. The distributive property is mental math strategy that can be used when multiplying. 43 x 5 =?
Do Now 1/11/12 Take out your HW from last night. Text p. 166, #1-19 all, 23 &24 Text p. 166, #1-19 all, 23 &24 Copy HW in your planner. Text p. 170, #1-11.
2011 WINNISQUAM COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=1021.
2011 FRANKLIN COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=332.
WK 2 Homework – due Friday, 9/16
Subtraction: Adding UP
Chemical Reaction Engineering (CRE) is the field that studies the rates and mechanisms of chemical reactions and the design of the reactors in which they.
PSSA Preparation.
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Eric Prebys, FNAL. USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014 Lecture 13 - Synchrotron Radiation 2 For a relativistic particle, the total radiated power (S&E.
Copyright Tim Morris/St Stephen's School
1 Dr. Scott Schaefer Least Squares Curves, Rational Representations, Splines and Continuity.
MA 1128: Lecture 06 – 2/15/11 Graphs Functions.
EMMA Magnet Design Ben Shepherd Magnetics and Radiation Sources Group ASTeC STFC Daresbury Laboratory.
Mechanical Analysis of Dipole with Partial Keystone Cable for the SIS300 A finite element analysis has been performed to optimize the stresses in the dipole.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design. Outline. Design considerations. Stresses and deformations. Mechanical assembly.
Magnet rotated by 5.9 degree Distance from entrance point to magnet right bottom corner m.
Optics and magnetic field calculation for the Hall D Tagger Guangliang Yang Glasgow University.
FETS Ion Source Installation progress UKNF Meeting Trinity College, September Dan Faircloth, Scott Lawrie, Alan Letchford, Christoph Gabor,
FETS H - Ion Source Experiments and Installation Scott Lawrie, Dan Faircloth, Alan Letchford, Christoph Gabor, Phil Wise, Mark Whitehead, Trevor Wood,
Calculation of the beam dynamics of RIKEN AVF Cyclotron E.E. Perepelkin JINR, Dubna 4 March 2008.
RAL Muon Beam Line Properties. ISIS 70 MeV H- injection Ring accelerates up to 800 MeV in about 10 ms 50 Hz cycle - Dual Harmonic System ~ 2 x 1.5 MHz;
Magnet Design & Construction for EMMA
RF source, volume and caesiated extraction simulations (e-dump)
2 July 2002Realistic Fields for a Ring Cooler Magnet System -- S.Kahn Page 1 Realistic Fields for a Ring Cooler Steve Kahn 2 July 2002 NuFact’02 Meeting.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design Jim Kellie Glasgow University.
Understanding Extraction And Beam Transport In The ISIS H - Ion Source D. C. Faircloth, A.P Letchford, C. Gabor, S. Lawrie M. O. Whitehead and T. Wood.
Momentum and Momentum Spread Measurements
PROGRESS REPORT OF A NLNS-FFAG ADS MAGNET
Presentation transcript:

Ion Source Modelling and Field Index Improvements by Scott Lawrie

Current goals Decrease emittance of beam Study the influence of the sector magnet Confirm field index, n = 1 Widen magnet poles Find optimum pole separation and angle Plot good field region Make improved poles and test them …Then move on to the extractor!

The model

Coordinate system layout 5 H2H2 Cs 4321 θ r r = 105 mm r = 55 mm B B

Cold box top view

Pole piece close-up Angle of Pole-face Pole Width Spacer Thickness Shim Width Shim Height Maximum pole width = 74mm (ISIS standard = 50mm). Allows 1.5mm clearance from bottom of cold box. Centre of pole face; used to measure separation of poles

Scan field along curves

Comparison of magnetic fields 8.88 ° faces, 24.00mm separation 7.00° faces, 19.16mm separation

Calculating the field index Sum up the z-components along curve Multiply by angle difference  integral

Field index of ISIS dipoles Pole pieces separated by 25mm, with face angles of 8.88°

How the field index varies with pole separation Optimum pole separation = 28.6 mm

How the shape of the field index varies Pole face angle Separation of poles modified to give an n = 1 field at R = 80 for each angle. 7 degree poles couldn’t be squeezed close enough together without hitting the extract.

Angle / separation relation for n = 1

Field indices for wide poles with fixed 32mm pole separation and varying angle

Field indices for wide poles with different parameters

Comparing fields off centre 11 degree pole faces, 36 mm separation 14 degree pole faces, mm separation

Mapping the good field region Current ISIS poles Wide poles with same face angle as ISIS poles, separated a bit so as not to collide with extract. Field index, n

Mapping the good field region Current ISIS poles Wide poles with same face angle as ISIS poles, separated a bit so as not to collide with extract. Field index, n

Mapping the good field region Current ISIS poles Wide poles with same face angle as ISIS poles, separated a bit so as not to collide with extract. Field index, n

Mapping the good field region Current ISIS poles Wide poles with same face angle as ISIS poles, separated a bit so as not to collide with extract. Field index, n

Mapping the good field region Current ISIS poles Wide poles with same face angle as ISIS poles, separated a bit so as not to collide with extract. Field index, n

Mapping the good field region Current ISIS poles Wide poles with same face angle as ISIS poles, separated a bit so as not to collide with extract. Field index, n

Mapping the good field region Current ISIS poles Wide poles with same face angle as ISIS poles, separated a bit so as not to collide with extract. Field index, n

Mapping the good field region Current ISIS poles Wide poles with same face angle as ISIS poles, separated a bit so as not to collide with extract. Field index, n

Mapping the good field region Current ISIS poles Wide poles with same face angle as ISIS poles, separated a bit so as not to collide with extract. Field index, n

Mapping the good field region Current ISIS poles Wide poles with same face angle as ISIS poles, separated a bit so as not to collide with extract. Field index, n

Explanation for the cobra-head? Current ISIS poles with large error Field index, n

Still to do… Check the field map is optimal Get new poles built Test new poles Move on to improving the extract