Preparing for the Challenges and Opportunities of the Common Core State Standards Willard R. Daggett, CEO April 18, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Academics and CTE at a Crossroads June 21, 2007.
Advertisements

International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Why Should We Consider School Reform? April 11, 2008.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Community Choices for Wisconsins Young Children March 17, 2010.
Rigor & Relevance for ALL Students
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett What Makes Successful Schools Work June 18, 2008.
Understanding the Classroom Implications of the Transition to the Common Core State Standards Willard R. Daggett, CEO January 10, 2012.
The Need and Urgency to Personalize Education Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman December 6, 2012.
Verona Area School District Willard R. Daggett, CEO July 18, 2012.
Take Charge of Preparing Students for their Future Willard R. Daggett, CEO November 18, 2011.
Rigor and Relevance for ALL Students.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Nations Most Successful Secondary Schools Lessons Learned January 9, 2009.
International Center for Leadership in Education
International Center for Leadership in Education
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Leadership Strategies for Integrating CTE and Academic Education Using the R &
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Milan Special School District February 16, 2011.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Preparing for the Challenges and Opportunities of the Next Three Years June 16,
Preparing for the Challenges and Opportunities of the Common Core State Standards Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman December 6, 2012.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Preparing for the Challenges and Opportunities of the Next Three Years February.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Granite School District January 15, 2009.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Granite School District January 16, 2009.
WELCOME To 2013 CONNECTION CONFERENCE. Preparing Students for the 21 st Century – Lessons Learned from our Nations Most Rapidly Improving Schools Bill.
Preparing for the Challenges and Opportunities for the Next Three Years Willard R. Daggett, CEO November 21, 2011.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Agricultural Education Leaders Summit February 5, 2009.
Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman
A Comprehensive Solution to School Improvement Willard R. Daggett, CEO October 7, 2011.
Creating Culture of High Expectations Common Core State Standards Rigor, Relevance, Relationships Willard R. Daggett, Founder and Chairman August 21, 2012.
Systemwide Focus on Effective Instruction Willard R. Daggett, Founder and Chairman June 12, 2012.
Preparing Students for the 21 st Century Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman September 27, 2012.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett What Makes Successful Schools Work November 8, 2010.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Leadership Skills for the 21 st Century February 1, 2011.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett The State of Education The Future and Important Challenges January 25, 2011.
Preparing Students for the 21 st Century Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman May 15, 2013.
Preparing Students for the 21 st Century Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman January 22, 2013.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Rigor and Relevance.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Preparing Students for Their Future April 19, 2009.
Daggett System for Effective Instruction: Creating an Action Plan Willard R. Daggett Raymond McNulty.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Our Changing Education Landscape December 2, 2010.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Components and Characteristics of the Most Successful U.S. Schools October 14,
Preparing Pennsylvanias 21 st Century Workforce: An Education & Workforce Development Symposium Willard R. Daggett, CEO February 21, 2012.
Florida Regional Meeting Broward County Willard R. Daggett, CEO January 25, 2012.
Leading Change During Challenging Times Lessons Learned from our Nations Most Rapidly Improving Schools Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman May 2, 2013.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Rigor & Relevance for ALL Students August 17, 2010.
Daggett System for Effective Instruction Deep Dive
Common Core State Standards High Expectations 21 st Century Willard R. Daggett, CEO March 15, 2012.
Preparing Title I Eligible Students for the Challenges and Opportunities of the Common Core State Standards Willard R. Daggett, Founder and Chairman March.
Brunson Elementary – Mr. Jeff Faullin, Principal
CALENDAR.
The 5S numbers game..
Common Core Standards: What they havent told you! Mel Riddile Associate Director High School Services
The basics for simulations
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Scholastic Superintendents Leadership Summit October 9, 2009.
2011 WINNISQUAM COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=1021.
Before Between After.
2011 FRANKLIN COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=332.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Merced Union School District May 18, 2011.
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
Lynn Radicello, Lisa Schlegel, Patrick Shaw
Introduction Embedded Universal Tools and Online Features 2.
Middle School Math Initiative for Florida Rigor Relevance Reading Florida and the Islands Comprehensive Center at ETS International Center for Leadership.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett High Schools & Careers: The New Value Proposition April 29, 2008.
Preparing Students for Their Future Preparing Students for Their Future Teaching for Rigor & Relevance An Introduction CTE Technical Assistance Center.
International Center for Leadership in Education Tom Welch Greyhills Academy High School August 8, 2008.
Leading Change in Schools Today Willard R. Daggett, CEO October, 2011.
Hebrew proverb Do not confine your children to your own learning, for they were born in another time.
Today’s Theme is… RigorRelevance Relationships. Look into the future through the eyes of a child?
Many Languages: One Core Mr. Stephen R. Adamson and Dr. Freddie A. Bowles ACTFL Annual Conference Many Languages: One United Voice November 16-18, 2012.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Madison County Business League Salute to Excellence in Education Education = Economic.
Classroom Management: Teaching for Rigor and Relevance.
Presentation transcript:

Preparing for the Challenges and Opportunities of the Common Core State Standards Willard R. Daggett, CEO April 18, 2012

5-year study with CCSSO and Gates Foundation Point of Reference

5-year study with CCSSO and Gates Foundation Rigor and Relevance Framework became framework for CCSS and NGA Point of Reference

5-year study with CCSSO and Gates Foundation Rigor and Relevance Framework became framework for CCSS and NGA Race to the Top Point of Reference

5-year study with CCSSO and Gates Foundation Rigor and Relevance Framework became framework for CCSS and NGA Race to the Top Private sector initiatives Point of Reference

5-year study with CCSSO and Gates Foundation Point of Reference

School Improvement Schools are Improving

School Improvement Changing World

Skills Gap

School Improvement Changing World Schools are Improving

School Improvement Changing World Schools are Improving

School Improvement Changing World Schools are Improving

Organizational Leadership Student Achievement

Organizational Leadership Student Achievement

Teaching Organizational Leadership Instructional Leadership Student Achievement

Teaching Organizational Leadership Instructional Leadership Student Achievement

Teaching Organizational Leadership Instructional Leadership Student Achievement

Teaching Organizational Leadership Instructional Leadership Student Achievement

Rigor and Relevance Teaching

Common Core State Standards Fewer Higher

2011 TN state reading test (grades 3-8) and NAEP Group TN State 2011 P&A NAEP 2011 P&A Point Spread Grade 444.7%26.0%18.7% Grade 845.3%27.0%18.3%

Common Core State Standards Fewer Higher Different

Common Core State Standards Content VS. Instruction

Application Model 1.Knowledge in one discipline 2.Application within discipline 3.Application across disciplines 4.Application to real-world predictable situations 5.Application to real-world unpredictable situations

Knowledge Taxonomy 1.Awareness 2.Comprehension 3.Application 4.Analysis 5.Synthesis 6.Evaluation

Blooms CDCDABABCDCDABAB Application Levels

A B D C Rigor/Relevance Framework Express probabilities as fractions, percents, or decimals. Classify triangles according to angle size and/or length of sides. Calculate volume of simple three- dimensional shapes. Given the coordinates of a quadrilateral, plot the quadrilateral on a grid. Analyze the graphs of the perimeters and areas of squares having different-length sides. Determine the largest rectangular area for a fixed perimeter. Identify coordinates for ordered pairs that satisfy an algebraic relation or function. Determine and justify the similarity or congruence for two geometric shapes. Obtain historical data about local weather to predict the chance of snow, rain, or sun during year. Test consumer products and illustrate the data graphically. Plan a large school event and calculate resources (food, decorations, etc.) you need to organize and hold this event. Make a scale drawing of the classroom on grid paper, each group using a different scale. Calculate percentages of advertising in a newspaper. Tour the school building and identify examples of parallel and perpendicular lines, planes, and angles. Determine the median and mode of real data displayed in a histogram Organize and display collected data, using appropriate tables, charts, or graphs.

A B D C Analyze the graphs of the perimeters and areas of squares having different-length sides. Determine the largest rectangular area for a fixed perimeter. Identify coordinates for ordered pairs that satisfy an algebraic relation or function. Determine and justify the similarity or congruence for two geometric shapes. Obtain historical data about local weather to predict the chance of snow, rain, or sun during year. Test consumer products and illustrate the data graphically. Plan a large school event and calculate resources (food, decorations, etc.) you need to organize and hold this event. Make a scale drawing of the classroom on grid paper, each group using a different scale. Calculate percentages of advertising in a newspaper. Tour the school building and identify examples of parallel and perpendicular lines, planes, and angles. Determine the median and mode of real data displayed in a histogram Organize and display collected data, using appropriate tables, charts, or graphs. Express probabilities as fractions, percents, or decimals. Classify triangles according to angle size and/or length of sides. Calculate volume of simple three- dimensional shapes. Given the coordinates of a quadrilateral, plot the quadrilateral on a grid. Rigor/Relevance Framework

A B D C Express probabilities as fractions, percents, or decimals. Classify triangles according to angle size and/or length of sides. Calculate volume of simple three- dimensional shapes. Given the coordinates of a quadrilateral, plot the quadrilateral on a grid. Analyze the graphs of the perimeters and areas of squares having different-length sides. Determine the largest rectangular area for a fixed perimeter. Identify coordinates for ordered pairs that satisfy an algebraic relation or function. Determine and justify the similarity or congruence for two geometric shapes. Obtain historical data about local weather to predict the chance of snow, rain, or sun during year. Test consumer products and illustrate the data graphically. Plan a large school event and calculate resources (food, decorations, etc.) you need to organize and hold this event. Make a scale drawing of the classroom on grid paper, each group using a different scale. Calculate percentages of advertising in a newspaper. Tour the school building and identify examples of parallel and perpendicular lines, planes, and angles. Determine the median and mode of real data displayed in a histogram. Organize and display collected data, using appropriate tables, charts, or graphs. Rigor/Relevance Framework

Blooms CDCDABABCDCDABAB Application Levels

A B D C

Teaching Organizational Leadership Instructional Leadership Student Achievement

High expectations Instructional Leadership

Reading Study Summary Text Lexile Measure (L) High School Literature College Literature High School Textbooks College Textbooks Military Personal Use Entry-Level Occupations SAT 1, ACT, AP* * Source of National Test Data: MetaMetrics Interquartile Ranges Shown (25% - 75%)

Common Core State Standards Fewer Higher

2005 Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score Mississippi 88 % Tennessee 88 % Georgia 87 % Texas 81 % New York 71 % Florida 71% California 48 % Massachusetts 48 %

2009 Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score Tennessee 90 % Georgia 87 % Texas 84 % New York 77 % Florida 74% California 60 % Massachusetts 60 % Mississippi 52 %

2005 Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score Mississippi 88 %161 Tennessee 88 %170 Wisconsin 82 %189 Texas 81 %190 New York 71 %207 Florida 71%202 California 48 %210 Massachusetts 48 %234

2009 Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score Tennessee 90 %178 Georgia 87 %188 Texas 84 %192 New York 77 %200 Florida 74 %206 California 60 %202 Massachusetts 54 %234 Mississippi 52 %210

2009 Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score Tennessee 90 % (0)170 (+2) Georgia 87 % (0)178 (+3) Texas 84 % (+3)188 (-2) New York 77 % (+6)200 (-7) Florida 74% (+3)206 (+4) California 60 % (+17)202 (-8) Massachusetts 54 % (+6)234 (0) Mississippi 52 % (-36)210 (+49)

2009 Proficiency Grade 8 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score Texas 94 % (+11)201 (-24) Tennessee 93 % (+6)211 (-11) Wisconsin 85 % (-1)232 (+3) New York 68 % (+19)247 (-21) North Carolina 66% (-22)246 (+29) Florida 54% (10)262 (-3) Mississippi 48 % (-10)254 (+7) California 48 % (+9)259 (-3)

2009 Proficiency Grade 4 Mathematics Proficient Required NAEP Score Tennessee 90 % (+3)195 (-5) Texas 85% (+3)214 (-5) Ohio 78 (+13))219 (-5) Florida 75 % (+12)225 (+3) California 65% (+14)220 (-11) Mississippi 58 % (-21)223 (+17) Massachusetts 48 % (+9)255 (0) Missouri 45 % (+4)246 (+4)

2009 Proficiency Grade 8 Mathematics Proficient Required NAEP Score Tennessee 90 % (+2)229 (-1) Texas 83 % (+22)254 (-19) New York 80 % (+24)249 (-26) Florida 66 % (+8)266 (-3) Oklahoma 59 % (+8)269 (-9) Mississippi 54 % (+1)264 (+2) Massachusetts 49 % (+7)300 (-1) Missouri 47 % (+32)287 (-24)

PISA Shanghai-China556 2 Korea539 3 Finland536 4 Hong Kong-China533 5 Singapore526 6 Canada524 7 New Zealand521 8 Japan520 9 Australia Netherlands United States Germany Ireland France United Kingdom Spain Russian Federation Mexico Brazil Indonesia402 Overall Reading Scale Significantly Above OECD Average Not Significantly Different (OECD Average 493) Significantly below OECD Average

PISA 2009 Overall Math Scale Significantly Above OECD Average Not Significantly Different (OECD Average 496) Significantly below OECD Average 1 Shanghai-China600 2 Singapore562 3 Hong Kong-China555 4 Korea546 6 Finland541 9 Japan Canada Netherlands New Zealand Australia Germany France United Kingdom United States Ireland Spain Russian Federation Mexico Brazil Indonesia371

PISA 2009 Overall Science Scale Significantly Above OECD Average Not Significantly Different (OECD Average 501) Significantly below OECD Average 1 Shanghai-China575 2 Finland554 3 Hong Kong-China549 4 Singapore542 5 Japan539 6 Korea538 7 New Zealand532 8 Canada Australia Netherlands Germany United Kingdom Ireland United States France Spain Russian Federation Mexico Brazil Indonesia383

Teaching Organizational Leadership Instructional Leadership Student Achievement

Rigor and Relevance Relationships Teaching

A B D C Calculate with numbers, including decimals, ratios, percents, and fractions. Understand two- dimensional motion and trajectories by separating the motion of an object into x and y components. Rigor/Relevance Framework

A B D C Know the characteristics and phenomena of sound waves and light waves. Understand the effect of sounds, words, and imagery on a listening audience. Rigor/Relevance Framework

Rigor and Relevance Relationships Content Teaching

Rigor and Relevance Relationships Content Teaching How students learn

A B D C

How Students Learn

A B D C

Rigor and Relevance Relationships Content Teaching How students learn Instructional strategies

Data systems should enable us to personalize learning but it has caused us to standardize it

Next Navigator

12345

Road Map State Standards to State Test

State Tests State Standards A A

Road Map State Standards to State Test State Standards to Research

National Essential Skills Study (NESS)

NESS Study Subgroup Rankings ELA Skill: Write clear and concise directions or procedures. GroupRank Overall9 Business/Industry2 Other Non-educators10 English Language Arts Teachers25 Other Educators8

NESS Study Subgroup Rankings ELA Skill: Give clear and concise oral directions. GroupRank Overall7 Business/Industry3 Other Non-educators9 English Language Arts Teachers28 Other Educators7

NESS Study Subgroup Rankings Math Skill: Apply the Pythagorean Theorem to right triangles. GroupRank Overall20 Business/Industry29 Other Non-educators31 Mathematics Teachers4 Other Educators24

NESS Study Subgroup Rankings Math Skill: Understand accuracy and precision of measurement, round off numbers according to the correct number of significant figures, and determine percent error. GroupRank Overall12 Business/Industry3 Other Non-educators10 Mathematics Teachers30 Other Educators8

Proficiency

Reading Study Summary Text Lexile Measure (L) High School Literature College Literature High School Textbooks College Textbooks Military Personal Use Entry-Level Occupations SAT 1, ACT, AP* * Source of National Test Data: MetaMetrics Interquartile Ranges Shown (25% - 75%)

NESS & Lexile State Tests State Standards A

Common Core Standards NESS & Lexile State Tests State Standards A

TN. Standards CCSS

CCSS TN. Standards

Road Map State Standards to State Test State Standards to Research State Standards to CCSS CCSS to State Standard

Road Map State Standards to State Test State Standards to Research State Standards to CCSS CCSS to State Standard State Test to CCSS Samples to NGA

Road Map State Standards to State Test State Standards to Research State Standards to CCSS CCSS to State Standard State Test to CCSS Samples to NGA

State Test NGA Create a large spinner for a game that has at least eight sectors. Each sector should be assigned a different prize. Prizes should range in value from most appealing to least appealing. Vary the sectors so that the probability to win a desired prize is much less that the probability to win a lesser desired prize. Calculate the theoretical probability of landing on each prize. Conduct multiple trials with the spinner and determine the experimental probability of landing on each prize. Which price has the greatest probability and which prize has the least probability?

Performance Task drawn from the Ohio Performance Assessment Project.

Common Core Standards NESS & Lexile State Tests State Standards Consortium Assessment DA

A B D C

Gold Seal Lessons

Read 180 System 44 Existing Solutions

Read 180 System 44 Next Navigator Existing Solutions

Read 180 System 44 Next Navigator Gold Seal Lessons Existing Solutions

Rigor and relevance Relationships Content How students learn Instructional strategies Assessment to guide instruction Teaching

To often student assessments have become the object of learning rather than the assessment of learning

Culture Organizational Leadership

Culture Vision Organizational Leadership

Where are the Jobs Non-Routine Routine Rules Driven Problem Solving Less Innovation/Creativity Results Driven Decision Making More Innovation / Creativity

Where are the Jobs Write an Algorithm Can be Digitized Can be Outsourced Cannot Write an Algorithm Cannot be Digitized Cannot be Outsourced Non-Routine Routine

Quad D Skills and Knowledge Decision Making Innovation/Creativity Goal Setting/Results Driven Multi Tasking Work with others

Culture Vision Structure and systems Organizational Leadership

Organizational Changes Looping

Organizational Change Looping Interdisciplinary Chairs

Repeating Grades SOURCE: US Dept of Education

Organizational Changes Looping Interdisciplinary Chairs 9 th Grade Electives

Flipped Classrooms Technology -Gaming 21 st Century Learners

Cut the Rope Kids wont even know that you consider Cut the Rope educational! Using elements of physics (gravity and vectors), you move a ball of candy around the screen to collect three stars and then end up in the little green monsters mouth. You accomplish this by cutting different types of ropes at the right time and in the right order, by using air blowers, popping bubbles, etc. It is fairly addictive, very fun and stimulating. There are currently nine levels, each with 25 puzzles, and the puzzles get progressively more difficult. Each level adds a new tool to work with. Cut the Rope is best for 1st-4th graders, but it is fun for adults as well, and for some kindergarteners. Skills: Physics, problem solving

Flipped Classrooms Technology -Gaming -Apps 21 st Century Learners

Flipped Classrooms Technology -Gaming -Apps -On line 21 st Century Learners

Online Learning Facts 30 states have full-time online schools 96% of LEAs have students enrolled in distance education courses at the HS level

US Average per Pupil Expenditures Fully online model - $6,400 Blended-learning model - $8,900 Traditional school model - $10,000

Teaching Organizational Leadership Instructional Leadership Student Achievement

Recommendations Needs Assessment

Recommendations Needs Assessment Model Schools Conference

Recommendations Needs Assessment Model Schools Conference Next Navigator and Gold Seal Lessons

12345

Gold Seal Lessons

Recommendations Needs Assessment Model Schools Conference Next Navigator and Gold Seal Lessons Focused and Sustained Professional Development

Recommendations Needs Assessment Model Schools Conference Next Navigator and Gold Seal Lessons Focused and Sustained Professional Development Leadership Development – including Executive Coaching

Recommendations Needs Assessment Model Schools Conference Next Navigator and Gold Seal Lessons Focused and Sustained Professional Development Leadership Development – including Executive Coaching Start with Leadership Teams

Recommendations Build on what is working -Read 180 -System 44 -Expert Space

1587 Route 146 Rexford, NY Phone (518) Fax (518)