Dichotomous Tests (Tom). Their results change the probability of disease Negative testPositive test Reassurance Treatment Order a Test A good test moves.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bayes rule, priors and maximum a posteriori
Advertisements

2) Multilevel Tests (Michael) Likelihood ratios for results other than + or -
Diagnostic tests Subodh S Gupta MGIMS, Sewagram
Performance of a diagnostic test
DiseaseNo disease 60 people with disease 40 people without disease Total population = 100.
TEACHING ABOUT DIAGNOSIS
Validity and Reliability of Analytical Tests. Analytical Tests include both: Screening Tests Diagnostic Tests.
Welcome to the Webinar “Live” Review for Test 3 (MAC 1105)
Chemistry.
Ch 6, Principle of Biostatistics
Power and sample size.
Type I & Type II errors Brian Yuen 18 June 2013.
Lecture 3 Validity of screening and diagnostic tests
SCREENING CHP400: Community Health Program-lI Mohamed M. B. Alnoor
How do we delay disease progress once it has started?
Chapter 4 Pattern Recognition Concepts: Introduction & ROC Analysis.
Step 3: Critically Appraising the Evidence: Statistics for Diagnosis.
Is it True? Evaluating Research about Diagnostic Tests
Diagnostic Tests Patrick S. Romano, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine and Pediatrics Patrick S. Romano, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine and Pediatrics.
CRITICAL APPRAISAL Dr. Cristina Ana Stoian Resident Journal Club
Statistical Fridays J C Horrow, MD, MSSTAT
Baye’s Rule and Medical Screening Tests. Baye’s Rule Baye’s Rule is used in medicine and epidemiology to calculate the probability that an individual.
Making sense of Diagnostic Information Dr Carl Thompson.
Statistics for Health Care
Chapter 4 Probability Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
EPIDEMIOLOGY Why is it so damn confusing?. Disease or Outcome Exposure ab cd n.
Diagnosis Concepts and Glossary. Cross-sectional study The observation of a defined population at a single point in time or time interval. Exposure and.
Statistics in Screening/Diagnosis
Medical decision making. 2 Predictive values 57-years old, Weight loss, Numbness, Mild fewer What is the probability of low back cancer? Base on demographic.
Stats Tutorial. Is My Coin Fair? Assume it is no different from others (null hypothesis) When will you no longer accept this assumption?
DEB BYNUM, MD AUGUST 2010 Evidence Based Medicine: Review of the basics.
Basic statistics 11/09/13.
Diagnostic Testing Ethan Cowan, MD, MS Department of Emergency Medicine Jacobi Medical Center Department of Epidemiology and Population Health Albert Einstein.
Division of Population Health Sciences Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Coláiste Ríoga na Máinleá in Éirinn Indices of Performances of CPRs Nicola.
Statistics for Health Care Biostatistics. Phases of a Full Clinical Trial Phase I – the trial takes place after the development of a therapy and is designed.
Vanderbilt Sports Medicine How to practice and teach EBM Chapter 3 May 3, 2006.
Dichotomous Tests Thomas B. Newman, MD, MPH September 27, 2012 Thanks to Josh Galanter and Michael Shlipak 1.
Evidence Based Medicine Workshop Diagnosis March 18, 2010.
EBCP. Random vs Systemic error Random error: errors in measurement that lead to measured values being inconsistent when repeated measures are taken. Ie:
. Ruling in or out a disease Tests to rule out a disease  You want very few false negatives  High sensitivity 
Diagnosis: EBM Approach Michael Brown MD Grand Rapids MERC/ Michigan State University.
1 Epidemiological Measures I Screening for Disease.
MEASURES OF TEST ACCURACY AND ASSOCIATIONS DR ODIFE, U.B SR, EDM DIVISION.
Appraising A Diagnostic Test
Likelihood 2005/5/22. Likelihood  probability I am likelihood I am probability.
Evidence-Based Medicine Diagnosis Component 2 / Unit 5 1 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0 /Fall 2010.
Stats Facts Mark Halloran. Diagnostic Stats Disease present Disease absent TOTALS Test positive aba+b Test negative cdc+d TOTALSa+cb+da+b+c+d.
1. Statistics Objectives: 1.Try to differentiate between the P value and alpha value 2.When to perform a test 3.Limitations of different tests and how.
Assessing Information from Multilevel and Continuous Tests Likelihood Ratios for results other than “+” or “-” Michael A. Kohn, MD, MPP 10/13/2011.
Predictive values prevalence CK and acute myocardial infarction –sensitivity 70% –specificity 80% –prevalence - 40% –prevalence - 20% –PPV and NPV.
Diagnostic Tests Studies 87/3/2 “How to read a paper” workshop Kamran Yazdani, MD MPH.
Diagnostic Test Characteristics: What does this result mean
Evaluating Classification Performance
Objective Evaluation of Intelligent Medical Systems using a Bayesian Approach to Analysis of ROC Curves Julian Tilbury Peter Van Eetvelt John Curnow Emmanuel.
Diagnosis Examination(MMSE) in detecting dementia among elderly patients living in the community. Excel.
Timothy Wiemken, PhD MPH Assistant Professor Division of Infectious Diseases Diagnostic Tests.
Diagnostic Likelihood Ratio Presented by Juan Wang.
CHAPTER 3 Key Principles of Statistical Inference.
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Receiver- Operator Characteristic Curves 10/10/2013.
Critical Appraisal Course for Emergency Medicine Trainees Module 5 Evaluation of a Diagnostic Test.
GP ST2 Group, 28/9/11 Tom Gamble
Diagnostic Test Studies
Evidence-Based Medicine
Class session 7 Screening, validity, reliability
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم Clinical Epidemiology
Pattern Classification All materials in these slides were taken from Pattern Classification (2nd ed) by R. O. Duda, P. E. Hart and D. G. Stork, John.
Refining Probability Test Informations Vahid Ashoorion MD. ,MSc,
Figure 1. Table for calculating the accuracy of a diagnostic test.
Patricia Butterfield & Naomi Chaytor October 18th, 2017
Evidence Based Diagnosis
Presentation transcript:

Dichotomous Tests (Tom)

Their results change the probability of disease Negative testPositive test Reassurance Treatment Order a Test A good test moves us across action thresholds. 0%100% T+ T- The best tests are definitive What tests do

Post-Test Probability of Disease Depends on 2 Things 1. Where you started from (low, medium, high) 2. Length and direction of the arrow Basic paradigm: What we thought before + test result = what we think now Prior probability + LR from test = post-test probability LR = P(Result|Disease)/P(Result|No Disease)

Assessing information from dichotomous tests (review): Disease +Disease -Total Test +aba+b True PositivesFalse PositivesTotal Positives Test -cdc+d False NegativesTrue NegativesTotal Negatives Totala+cb+dTotal N Total With Disease Total without Disease Sensitivity=a/(a+c)Specificity =d/(b+d) Positive predictive value (PPV) = a/(a+b); Negative predictive value (NPV) d/(c+d) Prior probability = P(D); Posterior probability = P(D|test result)

False-negative confusion Sensitivity of rapid strep test is 85% Therefore, false negative rate is 15% 15% is too high, so always culture to confirm negative rapid strep tests

Whats wrong? StrepNo StrepTotal Rapid Test + TPFPTP+FP Rapid Test - FNTNTN+FN TP+FNFP+TN 2 definitions of false negative rate 1-sensitivity = FN/(TP+FN). This one is easier because its (assumed to be) constant. 1 - negative predictive value = FN/(FN+TN). This one is harder because it depends on prior probability, but it is the one that should determine clinical decisions.

If prior probability of strep = 20% False negative rate (def #2) = 15/407 = 3.7% NNC (number needed to culture) = 1/.037 = 27 to identify 1 false negative rapid test. (Pre-test probability of 20%) At some prior probability of strep, culture after negative quick test is not indicated. (Assumes 98% specificity)

Similar examples: Sensitivity of UA for UTI is only 80%, therefore always culture after a negative UA Sensitivity of CT scan for subarachnoid hemorrhage is only 90%, therefore always do LP after a negative CT

Importance of Sampling Scheme If sampling separately from Disease+ and Disease– groups (case-control sampling), cannot calculate prevalence, positive predictive value, or negative predictive value.

Dx Test:Case-Control Sampling Disease + Sampled Separately Disease – Sampled Separately Test + a True Positives b False Positives Test - c False Negatives d True Negatives Total a + c Total With Disease b + d Total Without Disease Sensitivity = a/(a + c) Specificity = d/(b + d)

Dx Test: Cross-sectional Sampling Prevalence = (a + c)/N Positive Predictive Value = a/(a + b) Negative Predictive Value = d/(c + d) Disease +Disease -Total Test +a True Positives b False Positives a + b Total Positives Test -c False Negatives d True Negatives c + d Total Negatives Totala + c Total With Disease b + d Total Without Disease a + b + c + d Total N

R. henselae titers and Cat Scratch Disease* CaseControl R. henselae titer Positive38442 Negative *Zangwill, N Engl J Med. 1993;329:8-13. EBD Problem 3.2 Authors stated negative predictive value = 38/42 = 90.5%. Is there a problem?

Example from Chapter 3 65-year-old woman with mammogram suspicious for malignancy Pre-test probability LR(suspicious for malignancy) 100 Post-test probability = ?

Update Pre-Test Probability Using LR(test result) 1) Convert pre-test probability (P) to pre- test odds. Pre-Test Odds = P/(1-P) 2) Calculate LR. P(result|D+)/P(result|D-). 3) Post-Test Odds = Pre-Test Odds × LR 4) Convert post-test odds to post-test probability. Prob = Odds/(1+Odds)

Update Pre-Test Probability Using LR(test result) 1) Pre-test probability P = Pre-test odds = P/(1-P) ) LR(Suspicious for Malignancy) = 100 3) Post-Test Odds = × 100 = 1.5 4) Post-test probability = Odds/(1+Odds) = 1.5/2.5 = 0.60

Can Use Slide Rule

Threshold Model Single disease (D+,D-) with single treatment (no further testing available) Cost of failing to treat D+ = B Cost of treating D- unnecessarily = C Treat if P(D) > C/(C+B) C/(C+B) = Treatment Threshold Probability = P TT Pauker SG, Kassirer JP.. N Engl J Med Jul 31;293(5):

Define Costs B and C

X-Graph

Introduce a Dichotomous (+/-) Test P(+|D+) = Probability of positive test given D+ = Sensitivity P(-|D-) = Probability of negative test given D- = Specificity P(+|D-) = 1 – Specificity or False Positive Rate P(-|D+) = 1 – Sensitivity of False Negative Rate T = Cost of Test

Pauker SG, Kassirer JP. N Engl J Med May 15;302(20):

X-Graph

New X-Graph

Threshold Formulas

Assumptions in the Threshold Model Threshold Model: One disease One dichotomous test Only two post-test options: treat and no treat Real world: Multiple possible diseases Multiple possible test results (not just +/-) Multiple possible tests Multiple post-test options including observation and additional testing

2) Multilevel Tests (Michael) Likelihood ratios for results other than + or -