Ellen Seguin Jackson Public Schools Sharp Park Academy Math Goal Mid-Year Report 2009-2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NYC Teacher Data Initiative: An introduction for Teachers ESO Focus on Professional Development December 2008.
Advertisements

Connecticut Mastery Test Larry Hillman, Presenter
INSERVICE GOALS: Understand TEKS Understand the difference in difficulty between TAAS & the TAKS Recognize the TAKS critical thinking skills required in.
SuccessMaker Enterprise Reports. Cumulative Performance Students in IPM Acceptable Performance Gain (progress in the course) Current Course Level.
/4/2010 Box and Whisker Plots Objective: Learn how to read and draw box and whisker plots Starter: Order these numbers.
1 Learning for employment vocational education and training policy in Europe in Europe Greece.
Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation Pilot September 1, 2011 – September 30, 2012 NJ State Board of Education, July 13, 2011.
Shore Acres Elementary Restructuring Plan Transformation Model May 11, 2010.
Data Analysis Training PDP Goals & Strategies September, 2012.
Core Pre-K Standards Review & Comment
Eight Week Intervention Program for Preschool Children Prior to Kindergarten Entry Board of Early Education and Care December 8, 2009.
Sixth Grade Advanced Math Parent Information Meeting April 23, 2009.
APS Teacher Evaluation
The SCPS Professional Growth System
Square Peg and Round Hole… As parents and educators, the change in grading systems requires a fundamental switch in our thinking… 4=A 1=F 2=D 3=B.
School Improvement Plans and School Data Teams A specific, data-driven process to create powerful changes in instruction in any school.
Elko County School District CCSS Math Professional Development Module 3, Week 2 Digging into the CCSS, part 1.
Scoring Terminology Used in Assessment in Special Education
Shawboro Elementary School Home of the Mustangs School Improvement Plan Results and Next Steps October, 2009.
Physics Large-Course Redesign Project Introductory-level Algebra-based and Calculus-based Physics I and Physics II Courses PHYS 1101, PHYS 1102 Serve Pre-Med/Health.
School Improvement Advisory Committee October 15, 2008 Welcome!
Changes to Assessing and Reporting Shawn Whyte Assessment Coach.
DPAS II Jessica Baker & Cheryl Cresci MED 7701 Dr. Joseph Massare.
Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.
Fast ForWord in British Columbia Update: April 14, 2011.
Reaching At Risk Students in Algebra 1 and Algebra 2
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation Module 3: Using Data to Inform Growth Targets and Submitting Your SLO 1.
DPAS II: Component V The Process: Step 1: MUST use a minimum of two (2) measures MUST use Measure A for all students assessed by DCAS in reading and/or.
Parent Math Information Meeting.  1. Introductory Remarks – Dr. J. Crisfield, Superintendent  2. Grades K-5 - Dr. C. Huss, Principal of Woodland  3.
Common Core Aligned Report Card Report Card
The INDIVIDUAL Professional Development PLAN
SMART GOALS APS TEACHER EVALUATION. AGENDA Purpose Balancing Realism and Rigor Progress Based Goals Three Types of Goals Avoiding Averages Goal.
Teacher Practice in  In 2012, the New Jersey Legislature unanimously passed the TEACHNJ Act, which mandates implementation of a new teacher.
The SCPS Professional Growth System
Fall 2014 MAP NWEA Score Comparison Alliance Dr. Olga Mohan High School October 22, 2014.
Mary Jo Racz-Shannon Jackson Public Schools Hunt Elementary Principal’s Mid-Year Report.
Objectives, Activities and Assessment. Anyone feeling frazzled?
Diverse Populations in Small Rural Schools Presented by: Amy Trujillo-Conway Amy Trujillo-Conway Madalena Barboa-Archuleta.
Learning Trajectory Everyday Mathematics Program Goals.
George Long Elementary Math Mid-Year Report Grass Lake Community Schools Team Members: Lindsay Gaddy, Lisa Stark, Paul Dwyer, Barb Palmer, Jane.
Mathematics Indicators and Goals. Math Tier II Indicator Indicator 1.8: All junior high students will meet or exceed standards and be identified as proficient.
K-12 MONITORING REPORT HIGHLIGHTS DECEMBER ELEMENTARY NOTES  ELA & MATH NEW COMMON CORE FULLY IMPLEMENTED  HIGHER LEVEL THINKING SKILLS  EVIDENCE.
Benchmark Data. World History Average Score: 56% Alliance: 96%
Hawthorne Elementary Board Report 2008 – 2009 Kennewick School District.
DATA RETREAT PRINCIPAL’S MID-YEAR REPORT Vandercook Lake High School Principal: Mark Schonhard Subject Area: Writing.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
Principal’s Mid-Year Report Shelley Jusick Napoleon Middle School Math Goal.
Principal’s Mid-Year Report Frances L. Reeves, Jackson Public Schools, McCulloch Academy Math.
Third Grade Team PLC Improve: Number Sense and Operations: Base Ten Carson Deck, Rosemary Sirmans, & Tasha Stephan.
DATA RETREAT PRINCIPAL’S MID-YEAR REPORT Vandercook Lake Middle School Principal: Renee Rudloff Subject Area: Writing.
Mid-Year Report Dibble Elementary Jackson Public Schools Pamela Perlos, Principal Math Focus.
Max Marchitello and Will Ragland September 16, 2015
South Elementary School Des Plaines, Illinois Mary Ellen Bleeden, Principal Beatriz Cruz-Bradley, 1st Gr. Bilingual Teacher Keys To Success: Assessment,
Assessment without Levels September Effective  Effective Assessment Systems should;  Give reliable information to parents about how their child,
Principal’s Mid-Year Writing Report Johanna Pscodna Keicher Elementary Michigan Center.
Mobile County School District SPED 6-9 End of Year Consultative Session
Participation in Math Class: The Effect on Student Achievement By: Nicolas Millet.
ABC School Data Wall Our priorities for District Goals – 1) Ensure individual students continuously exhibit academic and personal.
FES State of the Schools. Reading – 85% of FES students will meet or exceed state standards on the MCA-II in reading. We will improve scores on DIBELS.
1 Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013 Roanoke Virginia Department of Education Division of Teacher Education and Licensure.
Success through Technology and Assessment August 1 st -3 rd Attended workshops and training to prepare for the grant o Achievement Series o eMetric o Obtaining.
Mobile County School District At-Risk/SPED 2-5
North Elementary Building Goals Mid-Year Review
Two Questions to Ask During Data Analysis:
Region 14 Mathematics Curriculum Update K-8
Science Matters September-October 2012.
The Portfolio Process.
Parent Information & Training Session #1
BAS DATA.
Presentation transcript:

Ellen Seguin Jackson Public Schools Sharp Park Academy Math Goal Mid-Year Report

Math Goal We the complete staff at Sharp Park Academy will improve student skill sets in identifying, describing, comparing common attributes and classifying geometrical shapes in all grades preschool through 4 th. We will use the geometric strands in CCC to assess that 90% of K-2 students reach mastery. All 3 rd and 4 th grade students will obtain a score of 77% (as found in the summary report) or higher on the geometry strands as given in Fall of 2009 MEAP math assessment. Additionally all preschool through 4 th grade will use pre and post tests so that 90% of students score an 80% or better on assessments administered 3 times during the school year.

Objective from Math Goal Teachers in preschool through fourth grade will create pre and post test based on GLCEs, specifically incorporating geometry strands.

Evidence of Action Preschool Geometry Data

Kindergarten Geometry Data

First Grade Geometry Data

Second Grade Geometry Data

Third Grade Geometry Data

Fourth Grade Geometry Data

Is It Working? Expected Level of Implementation Based on the S.I.P.? All 11 teachers have participated in developing the pre and post test for their Geometry strands. We had 100% participation. We agreed to use the assessment three times a year and we are at 66% completion. The average amount of time would be 1 to 2 lessons each trimester. Students progress based on the S.I.P. goal? Results at each grade level reflect positive growth leading me to conclude that the students are committed to the geometry goal. 90% of Kindergartner's have mastered the AB/ABB/ABC pattern 49% of 1 st gr. Scored 80% or above, 25% of the students moved from 0%-50% to 51%-79% 47% of 2 nd gr. scored 80% and above, 25% moved from level % of students moved from a level 1-2 this strand has not been taught is grade 3 yet. 70% of 4 th gr. is scoring 80% or higher on assessments. 35% of students moved from the 51%-79% range. Our result have been implemented and we have seen positive growth in all grade levels preschool through fourth grade. Yes, its working!

Whats Next? Specific Action Steps from our S.I.P. that still need to occur to implement our math objective are…...We will be looking at the MEAP data from 2011 to see if our school improvement objective has improved student achievement in the geometry strand and revise the goal as needed.

Whats Next? Additional Action Steps that still need to be added to our S.I.P. and occur so that EACH objective is implemented to ensure success ? Teachers need to document observation times in their lesson plans of students working on their GLCEs in the geometry strands.

Whats Next? What revisions or expansions may need to occur to meet the objectives? If students have not obtained a score of 80% after the second round of re-teaching and re-testing we will need to scaffold the concept finding the holes in their learning and administer the assessment in smaller pieces.