TEXT-DEPENDENT QUESTIONS building a critical foundation of knowledge needed for comprehending complex texts.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding the ELA/Literacy Evidence Tables. The tables contain the Reading, Writing and Vocabulary Major claims and the evidences to be measured on.
Advertisements

Addressing Common Core Standards Using
Reading and Writing Grounded in Evidence from Text Presented by Sara Hall and Lisa Zekanis, Peterson Elementary.
TEXT-DEPENDENT QUESTIONS building a critical foundation of knowledge needed for comprehending complex texts.
1. Introducing Text-Dependent Questions 80-90% of the CCSS standards for reading and literacy require textual analysis.
DDI and Assessments in ELA Designing Assessments that Provide Meaningful Data David Abel, Fellow for Curriculum and Assessment/ELA EngageNY.org.
Understanding the Common Core Standards and Planning Lessons to Address The Standards.
Curriculum Shifts in Reading and Writing Whetstone Elementary School Literacy Night October 2013.
DELAC Meeting February 19, 2014 CA Common Core Standards English Language Arts.
Reading and Writing and the Common Core Standards Jen Fiegen Laura Norris Eva Petersen.
2 From NECAP to the Common Core and New Assessments English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects Fall 2010,
CCSS/ES in CMS. Argumentation Students form and express opinions, derive supporting reasons, and draw conclusions from a variety of sources. Students.
Mid-Year BT Symposium Spring 2013 WCU Brooke Mabry, Instructional Coach, McDowell County Schools.
Text Dependen t Question ing Patricia Coldren Lee County Schools k 12. nc. us.
It all DEPENDS! Shift 2 – ELA CCSS March 26 th, 2013.
Close Reading Instruction
The Common Core State Standards A Districtwide Dialogue for the Los Angeles Unified School District.
Text-Dependent Analysis Session 1
Instructional Implications for PARCC Assessment in the Science and Social Studies Classroom Maryland College and Career Readiness Conference Summer 2014.
Evidence Based Selected Response (EBSR) Items
Systems of Professional Learning Module 1 Grades K–5: Focus on Instructional Shifts Activity 1.
Close Reading. What is close reading? Also known as “analytic reading” Reading to uncover layers of meaning that lead to deep comprehension An instructional.
NetLEAD Winthrop University August 2012
Student Response Systems as a means to demonstrate content understanding.
Fall Conference - Keynote Speaker Sunday, September 25 th, 2011 – Don Shalvey from the Gates Foundation 3 Ambitious Goals of the Gates Foundation 1.80%
Denise Wright, BCPS Elementary Instructional Coach.
1 Investigating the Standards: K-12 English Language Arts Bruce Bufe, Ann Craig, Kathy Learn, Leigh McEwen, Nicole Peterson, Pat Upchurch, Martha Yerington.
Common Core State Standards. Instructional Shifts Implementation of the Common Core State Standards College & Career Ready Students Data.
November 7 th What are Common Core State Standards? Aligned with college and work expectations Focused and coherent Include rigorous content and.
Presented by Nicki Harrelson, Julia Yang, and Bonnie English October 12th, 2012 Common Core Cohort B K-2.
Eden Central School District CCLS Training Resources March 6, 2012
ISLN November, 2012 Meeting November ISLN Meeting Corbin, KY.
ELA Common Core Shifts. Shift 1 Balancing Informational & Literary Text.
PEARSON COMMON CORE LITERATURE GRADES 11 AND 12 (2015)
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous English Language Arts Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department.
Understanding PARCC and Disciplinary Literacy November
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards Professional Learning Module Series.
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy in History/ Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects.
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS MODULE 4 FEBRUARY 2013 Reading Common Core Focus: Text Complexity.
English Language Arts DPI Updates August 16, 2012.
ELA Educator Effectiveness Academy.Summer 2011.© Maryland State Department of Education Educator Effectiveness Academy English Language Arts & Literacy.
Session 1: CCR Anchor Standards and Structure of the CCSS in ELA & Literacy ELA Educator Effectiveness Academy Summer 2011.© Maryland State Department.
Got Citizenship? September 12, 2013 Common Core: Close Reading.
Examining the Modules: Instructional Practices related to Finding and Using Evidence LT 2a. I can describe the impact of content-rich curriculum on students’
 Common Core catches up with the International Baccalaureate.
COMMON CORE TRANSITION. TRAINING TIMETABLE Reading- Literary Reading- Informational Writing Language Speaking & Listening Foundational.
Close Reading. AGENDA Demands of complex text on the reader Close reading tools for comprehending complex text Question and answer opportunities with.
“I Hear Teachers Don’t Like Common Core”: Enhancing Pre-Service Teacher’s Knowledge, Understanding and Implementation of ELA Common Core Standards May.
Common Core State Standards English Language Arts Identical Anchor Standards K-12 Each grade level has its own content standards: – English Language.
Tools for Teachers: Close Reading –What is it? Why do it? Implementing Key Shifts in the CCSS Level 2 – Session 1.
Understanding the Common Core Standards and Planning Lessons to Address The Standards.
Reading like a Detective Deeper Reading with Text- Based Questions.
Literacy Shifts Text Dependent Questions
CLOSE READING INSTRUCTION Dr. Barbara Bishop Prepared by: Dr. Barbara Bishop, Director of School Improvement & Professional Learning,
1 TEXT-BASED SYNTHESIS WRITING: INFORMATIVE / ARGUMENT OPINION NARRATIVE Silver Shores Elementary.
An overview for parents and families Butler Avenue School Julie Gillispie--March st Century Community Learning Center.
EXAMINING THE MODULES: Instructional practices related to finding and using evidence LT 2a. I can describe the impact of content-rich curriculum on students’
Ask & Answer Questions about key details K- with prompting 1 st - no prompting K-1 Ask & Answer Questions to demonstrate understanding 2 nd -Answers the.
Common Core State Standards ELA and Literacy 2012 Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Publisher Meeting Today: Common Core State Standards Oregon Shifts 1 ODE.
Activity 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 1 Grades 6–12: Focus on Instructional Shifts.
Digging Deep into Reading Informational Text CCSS Standards 1-3.
Observing Close Reading. Close Reading What do you remember about close reading ?
Building Context for the Narrative: The Abolition Movement.
Casimir Middle School TUSD Transition to the Common Core.
California Common Core Standards Session 2 of 5: English Language Arts SOAR WITH THE COMMON CORE.
Instructional Implications for PARCC Assessment in the Science and Social Studies Classroom Maryland College and Career Readiness Conference Summer 2014.
November ISLN Meeting Corbin, KY
COMMON CORE AND THE LIBRARIAN
Common Core Learning Standards in Social Studies
Building Context for the Narrative: The Abolition Movement
Presentation transcript:

TEXT-DEPENDENT QUESTIONS building a critical foundation of knowledge needed for comprehending complex texts

Background  A priority of the Common Core State Standards is that students must closely read texts of increasing complexity to acquire knowledge.  The standards strongly focus on students gathering evidence, knowledge, and insight from what they read and therefore require that a majority of questions and tasks that students ask and respond to (both orally and in writing) be based on the text under consideration.  Questions and tasks should require thinking about the text carefully and finding evidence in the text itself to support the response. Rhode Island Department of Education 2/2012

80-90% of (CCSS) reading standards require text- dependent analysis yet over 30% of questions in major textbooks do not. Rhode Island Department of Education 2/2012

Why adjust the way we question?  Asking students to make connections to themselves, other texts and the world is a common style of questioning that guides students away from the text. This type of questioning does not lead to a deep understanding of the text.  We often ask students simple questions that require very literal thinking to ensure they have read the text. Students expend too much time and energy answering these questions rather than slowing down to consider the meaningful text-specific questions that will bring them to a deeper understanding. Rhode Island Department of Education 2/2012

Studying the Standard Using a Learning Trajectory  We are going to explore the learning trajectory of reading standard 1in order to more deeply develop an understanding of the alignment of that standard within the K-12 context.  This activity will allow us to understand how the standard builds and increases in rigor throughout the grades. Rhode Island Department of Education 2/2012

College and Career Readiness Anchor Standard for Reading - Standard 1 This CCR anchor standard is our goal. All students must demonstrate this skill in order to be prepared for college or a career. R.CCR.1: Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences from it; cite specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions drawn from the text. Rhode Island Department of Education 2/2012

Learning Trajectory READING CLOSELY TO ANALYZE TEXT R.CCR.1: Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences from it; cite specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions drawn from the text. RI.K.1 With prompting and support, ask and answer questions about key details in a text. RI.1.1 Ask and answer questions about key details in a text. RI.2.1 Ask and answer such questions as who, what, where, when, why, and how to demonstrate understanding of key details in a text. RI.3.1 Ask and answer questions to demonstrate understanding of a text, referring explicitly to the text as the basis for the answers. RI.4.1 Refer to details and examples in a text when explaining what the text says explicitly and when drawing inferences from the text. RI.5.1 Quote accurately from a text when explaining what the text says explicitly and when drawing inferences from the text. D: prompting and support A: Who, what, where, when, why, and how are specific questions to be asked and answered CC: demonstrating an understanding of the key details D: Specific questions such as who, what, where, when, why, and how A: Refer explicitly to the text as a basis for the answers D: Ask and answer questions A: Refer to details and examples when explaining what the text says explicitly and when drawing inferences D: Refer to details and examples A: Quote accurately from the text

RI.5.1 Quote accurately from a text when explaining what the text says explicitly and when drawing inferences from the text. D: Refer to details and examples A: Quote accurately from the text RI.4.1 Refer to details and examples in a text when explaining what the text says explicitly and when drawing inferences from the text D: Ask and answer questions A: Refer to details and examples when explaining what the text says explicitly and when drawing inferences RI.3.1 Ask and answer questions to demonstrate understanding of a text, referring explicitly to the text as the basis for the answers. D: Specific questions such as who, what, where, when, why, and how. A: Refer explicitly to the text as a basis for the answers RI.2.1 Ask and answer such questions as who, what, where, when, why, and how to demonstrate understanding of key details in a text. A: Who, what, where, when, why, and how are specific questions to be asked and answered CC: demonstrating an understanding of the key details RI.1.1 Ask and answer questions about key details in a text. D: prompting and support RI.K.1With prompting and support, ask and answer questions about key details in a text. A Learning Trajectory Big Idea: Reading Closely to Analyze Text R.CCR.1: Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences from it; cite specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions drawn from the text. Rhode Island Department of Education 2/2012

Reflection  Consider the following questions and then discuss with a colleague: How does the learning from this trajectory activity impact/expand our understanding of text-dependent questioning? How does the learning from this trajectory activity emphasize the need for questions that are text- dependent? Rhode Island Department of Education 2/2012

Text-Dependent Questions…  are questions that can only be answered correctly by close reading of the text and demand careful attention to the text.  require an understanding that extends beyond recalling facts.  often require students to infer.  do not depend on information from outside sources.  allow students to gather evidence and build knowledge.  provide access to increasing levels of complex text.  call for careful and thoughtful teacher preparation.  require time for students to process.  are worth asking. Rhode Island Department of Education 2/2012

What are we looking for?  Rich and rigorous evidence-based conversations about text amongst students and with teachers  Discussions that stay deeply connected to the text so that students make evidentiary arguments  Students revisiting text for evidence to support their argument in a thoughtful, careful, and precise way  Students slowing down to explore and learn from the evidence Rhode Island Department of Education 2/2012

Which question requires students to read closely for text-specific information?  How did Frederick Douglass’ ability to read contribute to his emotional struggle for freedom?  After reading Frederick Douglass’ narrative, In what ways does America represent the hope for freedom that lived in the heart of Frederick Douglass? Questions based on: Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, An American Slave by Frederick Douglass Cite examples from the text to support your answer. Rhode Island Department of Education 2/2012

A Conversation about Text-Based Answers This 11 minute video features a discussion between New York State Commissioner of Education John B. King Jr., David Coleman (contributing author to the Common Core) and Kate Gerson (a Sr. Fellow with the Regents Research Fund) that addresses the shift to Text-Based Answers. Rhode Island Department of Education 2/2012

Questions to Consider After Viewing Video Independently answer the following questions and then discuss with a colleague:  What does it mean to ask text-based questions?  How will this impact our instruction?  What challenges will we face as we make this shift?  What are the implications for teacher planning and for teacher planning time in schools?  What questions will take the students deeper into this text and cause them to pay careful attention to it? Rhode Island Department of Education 2/2012