Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/1282r0 Submission November 2010 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 PLCP Rx Procedure Date: 2009-11-08 Authors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VHT-SIG-A and VHT-SIG-B Field Structure
Advertisements

Legacy Coexistence – A Better Way?
Doc.: IEEE /0534r1 Submission Duration in L-SIG Date: Youhan Kim, et al.Slide 1 Authors: May 2010.
Doc.: IEEE /1290r0 Submission November 2010 Allert van Zelst, QualcommSlide 1 VHT-SIG-B in NDPs Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE yy/0847r0 Submission Slide 1Leonardo Lanante, Ochi Lab, KIT July 2009 IEEE802.11ac Preamble with Legacy a/n Backward Compatibility.
Doc.: IEEE /0847r1 Submission Slide 1Leonardo Lanante, Ochi Lab, KIT November 2009 IEEE802.11ac Preamble with Legacy a/n Backward Compatibility.
Doc.: IEEE /0627r00 Submission Yuichi Morioka, Sony Corporation Date: Why we need Length Field in VHT SIG May 2010 Slide 1 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1812r0 Submission November 2006 Eldad Perahia (Intel)Slide 1 More RX Procedure Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE.
Doc.: IEEE /543r0 Submission April 2006 Richard van Nee, Airgo NetworksSlide 1 Transmitter CCA Issues in 2.4 GHz April /543r0 Richard van.
Doc.: IEEE /0313r1 Submission March 2011 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 SU-MIMO Type for Group Addressed Frames Date: Authors:
Doc.:IEEE /1281r0 Submission Nov Brian Hart, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 Bandwidth Indication and Static/Dynamic Indication within Legacy Date:
Doc.: IEEE / r1 Submission November 2006 Bill McFarland, Atheros Communications, Inc.Slide 1 TXTIME Calculation for MM-only HT STA Notice:
Doc.: IEEE /1731r0 Submission November 2006 Eldad Perahia (Intel)Slide 1 Green Field Compromise Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE /1731r2 Submission December 2006 Eldad Perahia (Intel)Slide 1 Green Field Compromise Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/772r0 July 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Non-HT Duplicate PPDU FILS Advertisement Frame Date: Authors:
Doc.:IEEE /0037r0 Submission Jan. 17, 2011 Yong Liu, MarvellSlide 1 BW Indication in Non-HT Frames Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1277r0 Submission MU-MIMO support for Heterogeneous Devices Date: Authors: Nov 2010 Slide 1Byeongwoo Kang, LG Electronics.
GroupID Concept for Downlink MU-MIMO Transmission
Doc.: IEEE /1244r1 Submission Nov.2010 Sun Bo, ZTE CorpSlide 1 Authors: Transmission Mechanism in MU-MIMO Date:
Doc.: IEEE / r0 Submission November 2006 Bill McFarland, Atheros Communications, Inc.Slide 1 TXTIME Calculation for MM-only HT STA Notice:
Doc.: IEEE /0772r0 Submission July 2004 J. Boer, J. Gilbert, E. Perahia, J. Sadowsky, N. Waes, W. Houtum, T. Kunihiro, M. Takagi Slide 1 40 /
Doc.: IEEE /1190r2 September 2014 Submission Kaiying Lv (ZTE) Frame Exchange Control for Uplink Multi-user transmission Slide 1 Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1489r0 Submission Nov Heejung Yu, ETRISlide 1 Green-Field 11ac Packet for TGah Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0621r2 May 2015 John Son, WILUS InstituteSlide 1 Design Principles for HE Preamble Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE 11-14/1432r1 Submission Nov Minho Cheong, ETRISlide 1 Proposed ax Specification Framework - Background Date: Authors:
Discussions on the Definition of CCA Threshold
Doc.:IEEE /0316r0 Submission Mar Brian Hart, Cisco SystemsSlide ac Preamble Authors: Date:
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
Doc.: IEEE /0825 Submission July 2012 Smoothing Bit and Beam-Change Indication Bit for 2MHz Preamble Date: Authors: Slide 1Jianhan.
Doc.: IEEE /1484r1 Submission November 2011 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 11ah Data Transmission Flow Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1207r1 Submission September 2013 Matthew Fischer et al (Broadcom)Slide 1 CID 205 BSSID Color Bits Date: Authors:
Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1091r0 September 2015 Considerations on Range Extension with SIG-A Repetition Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0562r0 Submission May 2011 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 CCA – CID 537 discussion Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 11-14/1432r0 Submission Nov Minho Cheong, ETRISlide 1 Proposed ax Specification Framework - Background Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /618r0 Submission August 2002 Bobby Jose,Slide 1 RRM Requirements discussion on CCA Bobby Jose.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0098r0 January 2016 Assaf Kasher, IntelSlide 1 Channel bonding proposals Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0617r0 Submission NDP sounding May 2012 Yongho Seok (LG Electronics), Hongyuan Zhang (Marvell)Slide 1 Date: Authors:
VHT Frame Padding Date: Authors: Month Year
Secondary Channel CCA of HE STA
EDMG Header Encoding and Modulation
CCA Sensitivity Date: September 2017
40 MHz Coexistence in 2.4 GHz Tutorial
SU-MIMO Type for Group Addressed Frames
VHT Packet Duration Signaling
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
SU-MIMO Type for Group Addressed Frames
The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
TGac Preamble Auto-detection Comparisons
TGac Preamble Auto-detection Comparisons
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
802.11ac Preamble Discussions
CCA Sensitivity Date: September 2017
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
VHT Packet Length Calculation
Bits Consideration for SIGNAL fields
Duration in L-SIG Date: Authors: May 2010 Month Year
TGac Preamble Auto-detection Comparisons
Discussion on PHY CIDs 2773 and 2775
F3-6A, Huawei Base, Bantian, Shenzhen
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
Green Field Compromise
NGV PPDU Format Date: Authors: doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
F3-6A, Huawei Base, Bantian, Shenzhen
Preamble Autodetection for 11be
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /1282r0 Submission November 2010 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 PLCP Rx Procedure Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE /1282r0 Submission November 2010 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 2 Abstract PLCP Rx procedure for TGac

doc.: IEEE /1282r0 Submission November 2010 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 3 Background PLCP receive procedure is clause in 11n First decision: Auto-detection between 11n MF and 11n GF preamble Second decision: Auto-detection between 11a/g and 11n MF HT-SIG processing and CRC –Check for unsupported preamble, unsupported mode, and Reserved HT-SIG indication Data symbol processing Signal extension: time alignment with 11b 2.4GHz devices

doc.: IEEE /1282r0 Submission November 2010 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 4 CCA Behavior in 11n Carrier lost –Before HT-SIG => Energy detect (ED) based on minimum sensitivity + 20dB –After HT-SIG => defer for TXTIME HT-SIG processing –Not HT-SIG => 11a/g processing –CRC fail => ED based on minimum sensitivity + 20dB –Unsupported preamble (GF) => ED based on minimum sensitivity + 10dB –Reserved HT-SIG indication (MCS of , or Reserved field = 0, or STBC field = 3) => ED based on minimum sensitivity + 20dB –Unsupported mode => defer for TXTIME L-SIG parity –Can be ignored

doc.: IEEE /1282r0 Submission November 2010 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 5 Overview of Rx Procedure in 11ac First decision: Auto-detection between VHT and 11n GF preamble (is the first SIG field L-SIG?) Second decision: Auto-detection between VHT and 11n MF preamble (does HT-SIG follow L-SIG?) Third decision: Auto-detection between VHT and 11a preamble (does VHT-SIG-A follow L-SIG?) VHT-SIG-A processing and CRC –Check for unsupported mode and Reserved VHT-SIG-A Indication VHT-SIG-B receiver decoding optional for SU, mandatory for MU VHT-SIG-B CRC checking in SERVICE field optional for both SU and MU Data processing for N_sym symbols

doc.: IEEE /1282r0 Submission November 2010 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 6 CCA Behavior in 11ac (1/2) Carrier lost –Before L-SIG => Energy detect (ED) based on minimum sensitivity + 20dB –After L-SIG => defer for RXTIME L-SIG processing –Compute RXTIME from L_Length –If Parity fail => ED VHT-SIG-A processing –Not VHT-SIG => 11a processing –defer for RXTIME for CRC fail, unsupported modes, Reserved VHT-SIG Indication –Examples of Reserved VHT-SIG Indication Reserved bits equal to 0 Short GI set to 01 Unsupported combinations of N_sts and MCS

doc.: IEEE /1282r0 Submission November 2010 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 7 CCA Behavior in 11ac (2/2) VHT-SIG-B processing –Optional if SU transmission (indicated by Group ID in VHT-SIG- A equal to 63) If processed and Reserved VHT-SIG Indication, defer for RXTIME –For MU transmission, defer for RXTIME if unsupported mode Optional VHT-SIG-B CRC checking in SERVICE field –If checked and failed, defer for RXTIME

doc.: IEEE /1282r0 Submission November 2010 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 8 RXTIME and Rx N_sym Predicted duration of the transmitted frame is computed from L-SIG Computation of number of symbols in the PSDU for BCC –Correction for short GI ambiguity

doc.: IEEE /1282r0 Submission November 2010 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 9 Summary Only one preamble in 11ac, auto-detect is only between single VHT preamble type and legacy formats Duration of the PPDU (RXTIME) computed from L- SIG After valid L-SIG, any error in processing results in deferral based on RXTIME VHT-SIG-B processing optional for SU Checking VHT-SIG-B CRC in SERVICE field optional for both SU and MU