January 6, 2002doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/044r0 SubmissionRishi Mohindra, MAXIMSlide 1 Proposal for IEEE802.11g Receiver Adjacent Channel Rejection Requirement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Brief Introduction to the IEEE802.11h Draft
Advertisements

Scrambler Mismatch and MAC FEC: Is there a problem?
Doc.: IEEE /220r0 Submission March 2002 A. Batra et al., Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Proposal for a 4 Channel Option to Increase Capacity in the.
Doc.: IEEE /320r0 Submission May 2002 Gerhard Fettweis, Systemonic AGSlide 1 ¼ Giga-Bit/s WLAN Gerhard Fettweis Gunnar Nitsche Systemonic AG.
Doc.: IEEE /015r0 Submission March 2003 Andy Gowans - UK RA Bands A & B update Andy Gowans Private Business Systems Unit UK Radiocommunications.
Doc.: IEEE /202r1 Submission July 2000 Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 1 of 22 Frequency Domain Modulators for b Mark Webster Intersil Corporation.
Frequency Domain Modulators for b
1 IEEE MBWA Standard Project Contribution: C xx Date: May RF Performance Evaluation Criteria Dan Gal
Simulation and Evaluation of Various Block Assignments Evaluation of multiple carriers deployed in a channel block evaluation criteria section.
Doc.: IEEE Submission July 2003 Andy Gowans (UK RA) UK Ultra Wide Band (UWB) Compatibility Study Andy Gowans & Bharat Dudhia UK.
Doc.: IEEE /081r0 Submission January 2001 Shoemake, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANS) Submission Title: [Staccato UWB PHY Proposal for TG4a] Date Submitted:
Submission Page 1 January 2002 doc.: IEEE 802.RR-02/018A-d1 Andrew Myles, Cisco Systems Report of ad hoc group relating to DFS and JPT5G proposal Andrew.
Slide 1 doc.: IEEE COEX 02/019r0 Submission May 2002 Art Astrin, Apple Computer Inc. Impact of Bluetooth on b and vice-versa.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
PHY Abstraction for TGax System Level Simulations
Doc.: IEEE /0060r0 Submission January 2004 Christopher Hansen, BroadcomSlide 1 Thoughts on TX Spectral Masks for n Christopher J. Hansen.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0852r0 July 2014 Lee Armstrong, Armstrong Consulting, Inc.Slide 1 ITU/ETSI Liaison Action Needed Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1515r0 Submission November 2011 Timo Koskela, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide ah Wi-Fi Offloading Considerations Date:
256-QAM TX EVM and RX Sensitivity
Doc.: IEEE /543r0 Submission April 2006 Richard van Nee, Airgo NetworksSlide 1 Transmitter CCA Issues in 2.4 GHz April /543r0 Richard van.
Doc.: IEEE /1255r0 Submission TX Mask for Noncontiguous 160 MHz Date: Youhan Kim et al.Slide 1 Authors: November 2010.
Doc.: IEEE /0613r0 Submission May 2012 Ron Porat, Broadcom US Channelization Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0353r0 March 2014 Dongguk Lim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Suggestion on PHY Abstraction for Evaluation Methodology Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0785r0 Submission July 2009 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Investigation of PA Model Sample Rate for TGac Date:
Doc.: IEEE g Submission May 11, 2011 Steve Jillings, SemtechSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE /0071r1 Submission January 2004 Aleksandar Purkovic, Nortel NetworksSlide 1 LDPC vs. Convolutional Codes for n Applications:
Doc.: IEEE /286r0 Submission May 2001 Shoemake and Batra, TI Range vs. Rate Comparison of Remaining IEEE g Proposals: PBCC and CCK-OFDM.
Doc.: IEEE /1342r1 Submission November 2010 Matthew Fischer, BroadcomSlide 1 Spectral Mask Absolute vs Relative Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE r0 Submission November 2002 Je Woo Kim, TeleCIS WirelessSlide 1 PAPR Reduction of OFDM by Unitary Transformations Je Woo Kim TeleCIS.
Doc.: IEEE /381r0 Submission September, 2003 Razzell(Philips), Dabak(TI)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE /825r0 Submission November 2003 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 1 Comparison of 128QAM mappings/labelings for n.
Cyclic Shift Diversity Design for IEEE aj (45GHz)
Doc.: IEEE p Submission September 2008 Carl Kain, Noblis (USDOT) Response to Comments on Optional Enhanced ACR and AACR Values Date:
2.4-GHZ RF TRANSCEIVER FOR IEEE B WIRELESS LAN UF# UF#
Doc.: IEEE /1074r0 Submission September 2004 WKFisher/ARINCSlide 1 IEEE p Draft Review Wayne Fisher Broady Cash ARINC, Inc Annapolis, MD.
NTU Confidential Packet Format Report of OFDM-based Agile Baseband Transceiver for Future Spectrum Pooling Wireless Systems Advisor : Tzi-Dar Chiueh Student.
Doc.: IEEE /283 Submission Sept/00 M. Webster and K. HalfordSlide 1 Spectral Mask Considerations for HRb Mark Webster and Karen Halford.
Doc.: IEEE /383 Submission November1998November 1998 Jamshid Khun-Jush, ETSI-BRANSlide 1 BRAN#11 PHY Decisions & Issues to Resolved with
July 2002doc.: IEEE /420r0 Submission Rishi Mohindra, MAXIMSlide 1 2-Channel Option for 11g (proposal) Rishi Mohindra MAXIM Integrated Products.
Doc.: IEEE /0909r0 Submission July 2012 Jong S. Baek, AlereonSlide 1 Analysis, simulation and resultant data from a 6-9GHz OFDM MAC/PHY Date:
Doc.: IEEE m SubmissionSlide 1 September 2012 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks(WPANs) Submission.
Doc.: IEEE g Submission May 1, 2009 Rishi Mohindra, MAXIM Slide 1 Rishi Mohindra, MAXIM Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Simulation Data for Letter Ballot Comments on Quasi-guard Subcarriers and Reverse Link Waveform Lai King (Anna) Tee January 15, 2007.
Doc.: IEEE g Submission 6 July, 2009 Partha Murali, Redpine Signals Inc.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Validation items and major Conditions
Adjacent Channel results for Four Channels
Channelization for HRb OFDM
CCA Sensitivity Date: September 2017
SC 64-QAM in clause 21 PHY Date: Authors: November 2015
Adjacent Channel results for Four Channels
Selectivity / Channel Rejection
2-Channel Option for 11g (proposal)
Error Rate Results of OFDM from Bluetooth Interference
Rishi Mohindra MAXIM Integrated Products
Submission Title: FPP-SUN Bad Urban GFSK vs OFDM
Submission Title: FPP-SUN Bad Urban GFSK vs OFDM
6 July, 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: FPP SUN Simulation Results – Redpine Signals.
Spectral Control Issues for TGg
CCA Sensitivity Date: September 2017
Response to Comments on Optional Enhanced ACR and AACR Values
Response to Comments on Optional Enhanced ACR and AACR Values
STBC in Single Carrier(SC) for IEEE aj (45GHz)
White Space Regulatory Issues
Physical Layer Model of the Impact of Bluetooth on IEEE b
TGg Submissions List for January 2002 Session
Month Year doc.: IEEE y18/r0 March 2018
Performance Analysis of Outer RS Coding Scheme
Month Year doc.: IEEE y18/r0 March 2018
Presentation transcript:

January 6, 2002doc.: IEEE /044r0 SubmissionRishi Mohindra, MAXIMSlide 1 Proposal for IEEE802.11g Receiver Adjacent Channel Rejection Requirement when receiving 11b or QPSK packets in presence of OFDM blocker Rishi Mohindra MAXIM Integrated Products

January 6, 2002doc.: IEEE /044r0 SubmissionRishi Mohindra, MAXIMSlide 2 Why is Adjacent Channel Rejection of OFDM jammer a concern for the receiver when receiving 11b or QPSK packets ? 11a standard allows large out-of-band transmitter power spectral density. –Pages 3 & 4 show some possible OFDM jammer spectral plots. The adjacent channel OFDM jammer spills about –32 to -39 dB relative power into the 11b receiver pass band, for a 25 MHz center frequency separation. –Graph on page 5 shows simulated OFDM Adjacent Channel Power ratio as a function of center frequency separation between the 11b pass band and the OFDM jammer. For a -70 dBm 11b received signal, the OFDM jammer (25 MHz away) should not be more than about –55 dBm in order to get about 15 dB S/Interference ratio with some margin.

January 6, 2002doc.: IEEE /044r0 SubmissionRishi Mohindra, MAXIMSlide 3

January 6, 2002doc.: IEEE /044r0 SubmissionRishi Mohindra, MAXIMSlide 4 dBm, In 1 MHz

January 6, 2002doc.: IEEE /044r0 SubmissionRishi Mohindra, MAXIMSlide 5

January 6, 2002doc.: IEEE /044r0 SubmissionRishi Mohindra, MAXIMSlide 6 Proposal for IEEE802.11g Receiver Adjacent Channel Rejection Requirement of OFDM Blocker when receiving 11b or QPSK packets: For a -70dBm 11b or QPSK received signal and a –55dBm OFDM blocker 25 MHz away, the PER should be 10% or less. It is preferable to actually state the type of modulation (e.g. 64- QAM) and data rate (e.g. 54 Mbits/s) of the OFDM blocking signal, since a higher out-of-band spectral power (spectral regrowth) can be transmitted for BPSK or 4-QAM compared to 64-QAM, when meeting the constellation error and spectral template requirements of 11a.