January 2002 Khaled Turki et. al, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/022r0 Submission TID Field Usage in QoS CF-Poll Khaled Turki and Matthew.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /272a Submission June 2001 S. Choi, Philips Research Slide 1 Problems with IEEE (e) NAV Operation and ONAV Proposal Javier del.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /402r0 Submission July 2001 Baruch Altman, CommPrize Inc.Slide 1 H²CF: Hiperlan2 Hybrid Coordination Function; Ideas on coexistence.
March 2001 Sid Schrum, et al., Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 doc.: IEEE /163 Submission p-DCF Proposal Summary Sid Schrum, Jin-Meng Ho, Khaled Turki.
Doc.: IEEE /037 Submission January 2001 Khaled Turki et. al,Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Simulation Results for p-DCF, v-DCF and Legacy DCF Khaled.
Doc: IEEE /705ar0 Submission Javier del Prado et. al November 2002 Slide 1 Mandatory TSPEC Parameters and Reference Design of a Simple Scheduler.
Doc.: IEEE /080r0A Submission January 2003 Black/Kasslin/Sinivaara, NokiaSlide 1 A Framework for RRM Simon Black, Mika Kasslin, Hasse Sinivaara.
Doc.: IEEE /412r0 Submission S. Choi, Philips Research July 2001 Slide 1 Aligning e HCF and h TPC Operations Amjad Soomro, Sunghyun.
Doc.: IEEE /220r0 Submission March 2002 A. Batra et al., Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Proposal for a 4 Channel Option to Increase Capacity in the.
Doc.: IEEE /301R0 Submission May 2002 Terry Cole, AMDSlide 1 A More Efficient Protection Mechanism Terry Cole AMD Fellow +1.
Doc.: IEEE /413r0 Submission S. Choi, Philips Research July 2001 Slide 1 Can EDCF Support QoS? Sunghyun Choi Philips Research-USA Briarcliff Manor,
Doc.: IEEE /082r0 Submission January 2001 Anuj Batra et al., Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE /026r1 Submission March 2001 Jie Liang, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Jie Liang Texas Instruments Incorporated TI Blvd. Dallas, Texas.
Doc.: IEEE /081r0 Submission January 2001 Shoemake, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.:IEEE /0859r0 July 2012 Simone Merlin, Qualcomm Inc Short Block Ack Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0802r0 Consideration on UL MU transmission Date: Slide 1Jinyoung Chun et. al, LG Electronics July 2014 Authors:
Doc.:IEEE /223r1 Submission March 2002 J. del Prado and S. Choi, Philips Slide 1 CC/RR Performance Evaluation - Revisited Javier del Prado and.
Doc.: IEEE /080r1 Submission January 2001 Jie Liang, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Jie Liang Texas Instruments Incorporated TI Blvd. Dallas,
Doc.: IEEE /026r0 Submission January 2001 Jie Liang, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /318r0 Submission May 2002 Martin Lefkowitz, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Implicit Initialization Vectors Martin Lefkowitz, Texas Instruments.
Doc. :IEEE /314r0 Submission Sai Shankar et al., Philips ResearchSlide 1 May 2002 TXOP Request: in Time vs. in Queue Size? Sai Shankar, Javier.
Doc.: IEEE /0640r0 Submission Jun Li, Thomson Inc..Slide 1 Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ Date:
Doc.: IEEE /630r1a Submission S. Choi, Philips Research November 2001 Slide 1 HC Recovery and Backoff Rules Sunghyun Choi and Javier del Prado.
Doc.:IEEE /321r0 Submission May 2002 Y. Liu, et al Slide 1 CC/RR Performance Evaluation Yonghe Liu, Jin-meng Ho, Matthew B. Shoemake, Jie Liang.
Doc.: IEEE /0342r0 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Power Efficient PS Poll Date: Authors: Date: March, 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0608r2 Submission May 2012 Shoukang Zheng et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 Low-Power PS-Poll Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0328r0 Nokia Internal Use Only March 2012 Slide 1 Date: Authors: PS-Poll Enhancements Chittabrata Ghosh, Nokia.
Doc.: IEEE /1325r0 Submission Nov PS-Poll TXOP Date: Authors: David Xun Yang, Huawei, et. al.Slide 1.
PS-Poll TXOP Using RTS/CTS Protection
Doc.: IEEE /630r4a Submission S. Choi, Philips Research January 2002 Slide 1 HC Recovery and Backoff Rules Sunghyun Choi and Javier del Prado.
Doc.: IEEE /289r0 Submission Bobby Jose,Slide 1 March 2002 CC/RR Alternatives HCF Adhoc Discussion Work Sheet V00.04 Bobby Jose, et.al
Doc.: IEEE /1123r0 Submission September 2010 Zhu/Kim et al 1 Date: Authors: [TXOP Sharing for DL MU-MIMO Support]
Slide 1 doc.: IEEE /1092r0 Submission Simone Merlin, Qualcomm Incorporated September 2010 Slide 1 ACK Protocol and Backoff Procedure for MU-MIMO.
Doc.: IEEE /1190r2 September 2014 Submission Kaiying Lv (ZTE) Frame Exchange Control for Uplink Multi-user transmission Slide 1 Date:
Doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 Submission January 2004 Mathilde Benveniste, Avaya Labs -- ResearchSlide 1 Clarifications on APSD Mathilde Benveniste Avaya.
1 Medium Access Control Enhancements for Quality of Service IEEE Std e TM November 2005.
1 Medium Access Control Enhancements for Quality of Service IEEE Std e TM November 2005.
Doc.: IEEE /678r1 Submission January 2003 Mark Bilstad, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 Uniform e Admissions Control Signaling for HCF and EDCF Bob.
Doc.: IEEE /494r0 Submission July 2001 Michael Fischer, Intersil (TGe Editor)Slide 1 Provisional Tge Ballot Comment Resolutions from the May,
January 2001 Don Shaver, et.al. Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 doc.: IEEE /036 Submission Enhanced Contention Period Proposal for QoS and Throughput.
Doc.: IEEE /0126r1 Submission January mc HEMM Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.
November 2000 Jin-Meng Ho, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 doc.: IEEE /367 Submission p-DCF for Prioritized MAC Service Jin-Meng Ho, Sid Schrum, and.
Doc.: IEEE /102r0 Submission January 2003 Sid Schrum, Texas Instruments, Inc.Slide 1 QBSS Downlink Broadcast and Multicast Data Frame Handling.
Doc.:IEEE /517r0 Submission August 2002 IBM Research Slide 1 Some Clarifications to IEEE e, Draft 3.2, August 2002 H.L. Truong and G. Vannuccini.
Doc.:IEEE /566r2 Submission November 2001 S. Choi, Philips & M.M. Wentink, Intersil Slide 1 Multiple Frame Exchanges during EDCF TXOP Sunghyun.
Doc.: IEEE /248r0 Submission Bobby JoseSlide 1 February 2002 Contention Free TXOP Request and Allocation Issues Bobby Jose,
Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ
Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ
MAC Capabilities Info. in HE Capabilities IE
Some Power-save changes in e Draft
Texas Instruments Incorporated
Use of EDCA Access During HCF Polling
Regarding HE fragmentation
Burst Transmission and Acknowledgment
EDCF Issues and Suggestions
Terminology Corrections and Improvements for the TGe Draft
QoS Poll Modifications Allowing Priority
Uniform e Admissions Control Signaling for HCF and EDCF
Overlapping BSS Proposed Solution – “OSQAP”
Suggested changes to Tge D3.3
Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ
Uniform e Admissions Control Signaling for HCF and EDCF
Suggested changes to Tge D3.3
802.11e EDCA-APSD TXOP Handoff September 2003
HCCA TXOP handling difficulties
Schedule Element Synchronization and Simplification
HCF Channel Access And Inter-BSS Channel Sharing
Burst Transmission and Acknowledgment
Proposed Resolution for Draft 3.0
Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ
TXOP Request: in Time vs. in Queue Size?
Presentation transcript:

January 2002 Khaled Turki et. al, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 doc.: IEEE /022r0 Submission TID Field Usage in QoS CF-Poll Khaled Turki and Matthew B. Shoemake Texas Instruments Incorporated TI Blvd. Dallas, Texas (214) {khaled,

January 2002 Khaled Turki et. al, Texas InstrumentsSlide 2 doc.: IEEE /022r0 Submission Currently The TID field identifies the traffic category or traffic stream to which the MSDU, or fragment thereof, in the frame body field of the present MPDU belongs. The TID may therefore be used at the receiver to sort data and identify traffic streams. What is the current meaning of the TID field in a QoS+CF-Poll? QSTAs responding to a QoS-CF-Poll ignore the TID field of the incoming frame and make a local decision on what frame to respond with. The HC cannot use the TID field to solicit a frame belonging to a certain traffic category or traffic stream from a QSTA

January 2002 Khaled Turki et. al, Texas InstrumentsSlide 3 doc.: IEEE /022r0 Submission Bits 0-8Bit 9Bit 10 Bit 11 Bits 12-15Usage TXOP limit, units of 16 microsecondsFECNon- final No Ack TIDQoS data type frames that include CF-Poll sent by the HC reserved (0)FECNon- final No Ack TIDQoS data type frames without CF-Poll sent by the HC TC queue size, units of 128 octetsFECNon- final No Ack TIDQoS data (non-null) frames sent by WSTAs bit 15 =0: TXOP duration requested, units of 16 microseconds bit 15 =1: TC queue size, units of 128 octets rsrv (0) Non- final No Ack TIDQoS null frames sent by WSTAs bit 15 =0: TXOP duration requested, units of 16 microseconds bit 15 =1: TC queue size, units of 128 octets rsrv (0) TIDRR frames Current QoS Control Field

January 2002 Khaled Turki et. al, Texas InstrumentsSlide 4 doc.: IEEE /022r0 Submission Potential use of the TID field QoS+CF-Poll (no data): –The TID should indicate the traffic category the HC is soliciting from the recipient of the poll –If the “request TID” or RTID bit is one, it shall indicate that the HC is soliciting a particular traffic category or traffic stream (as specified by the TID), and the polled QSTA shall respond with data of that TID only –When the RTID bit is zero in QoS+CF-Poll, there shall be no restriction on the traffic category of the upstream and a QSTA shall make a local decision –If the RTID bit is set to one and no frames match the TID requested, the station shall respond with a null frame QoS+CF-Poll+Data: –The TID shall indicate the traffic category of the data.  No change with respect to current draft! –If the RTID bit is set to zero, the polled QSTA makes a local decision  No change with respect to current draft! –If the RTID bit is set to one, it shall indicate that the HC is requesting that the station respond with a frame belonging to the same traffic category as the data it received as indicated by the TID –If the RTID bit is set to one and no frames match the TID requested, the station shall respond with a null frame

January 2002 Khaled Turki et. al, Texas InstrumentsSlide 5 doc.: IEEE /022r0 Submission Bits 0-8Bit 9Bit 10 Bit 11 Bits 12-15Usage TXOP limit, units of 16 microsecondsRequ est TID Non- final No Ack TIDQoS data type frames that include CF-Poll sent by the HC reserved (0)rsrvNon- final No Ack TIDQoS data type frames without CF- Poll sent by the HC TC queue size, units of 128 octetsrsrvNon- final No Ack TIDQoS data (non-null) frames sent by WSTAs bit 15 =0: TXOP duration requested, units of 16 microseconds bit 15 =1: TC queue size, units of 128 octets rsrv (0) Non- final No Ack TIDQoS null frames sent by WSTAs bit 15 =0: TXOP duration requested, units of 16 microseconds bit 15 =1: TC queue size, units of 128 octs. rsrv (0) TIDRR frames Proposed Requested TID field RTID bit can replace the FEC bit in data frames of subtype QoS+CF-Poll and the FEC bit can be moved to the Frame Control field

January 2002 Khaled Turki et. al, Texas InstrumentsSlide 6 doc.: IEEE /022r0 Submission Benefits Gives the HC the flexibility to control the upstream traffic Enables the implementation of more efficient scheduling algorithms at the HC In situations where a local decision is best, the RTID bit can be set to zero to allow a local decision by the QSTA When the RTID bit is set, complexity is lowered at the QSTA –The QSTA will have reduced frame look up time, as it will know the exact traffic category requested Enables tight control by the HC over critical traffic such as voice. HC can send downstream voice data and simultaneously poll for upstream voice data without the possibility of the QSTA transmitting non-voice data

January 2002 Khaled Turki et. al, Texas InstrumentsSlide 7 doc.: IEEE /022r0 Submission Motion Move to direct the editor to modify the draft standard to include an RTID bit in the QoS Control Field with the following functionality: QoS+CF-Poll (no data): –The TID should indicate the traffic category the HC is soliciting from the recipient of the poll –If the “request TID” or RTID bit is one, it shall indicate that the HC is soliciting a particular traffic category or traffic stream (as specified by the TID), and the polled QSTA shall respond with data of that TID only –When the RTID bit is zero in QoS+CF-Poll, there shall be no restriction on the traffic category of the upstream and a QSTA shall make a local decision –If the RTID bit is set to one and no frames match the TID requested, the station shall respond with a null frame QoS+CF-Poll+Data: –The TID shall indicate the traffic category of the data. –If the RTID bit is set to zero, the polled QSTA makes a local decision –If the RTID bit is set to one, it shall indicate that the HC is requesting that the station respond with a frame belonging to the same traffic category as the data it received as indicated by the TID –If the RTID bit is set to one and no frames match the TID requested, the station shall respond with a null frame