Co-Teaching EDPS 410/665 Spring 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ACCOMMODATIONS MANUAL
Advertisements

Autism Observation Instrument General Education Classrooms
Evaluation of Special Education Teachers
M eeting the Needs of All Students in a Collaborative Model: Co-Teaching The School District of Philadelphia A Collaborative Effort Office of Empowerment.
Co-Teaching Overview Mason City Community School District 2010.
Co-Teaching in an Inclusive Setting
Breakfast & Conversation
Co-Teaching Team 2 AKA (Dan DeLuca, Jen Borman, Tim Jump, Regina Ratzlaff & Christine Nystrom)
Co-Teaching? What’s That?
Purpose of Instruction
PORTFOLIO.
Building Capacity for Effective Co- Teaching EdPower Teacher Institute Summer 2013.
IEP Training for Kansas Schools 2013 – 2014 Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Services Special Factors/Considerations.
Least Restrictive Environment: A World of Options and Opportunities Training provided by the Connecticut State Department of Education in cooperation with:
Fall 2002Northeast Regional Education Cooperative A Look at Inclusion and the Least Restrictive Environment Best Practices For Collaboration and Co-Teaching.
Co-Teaching Basics and Strategies.
IEP DEVELOPMENT STAFF DEVELOPMENT OCTOBER 14, 2008 PATRICIA GRIFFIN ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION/PPS.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008Chapter 4: Creating Partnerships through Collaboration Chapter 3 Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 This multimedia product.
Johns Hopkins University Center for Technology in Education Principles of Effective Collaboration Success Strategies in the Inclusive Classroom Module.
Why Inclusive Education for Heritage High #425?
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Understanding Inclusion Kristin McChesney. Review…  Based on the article, what is the definition – or concept – of inclusion?  The generally accepted.
LRE, Inclusion, & Co-Teaching
Special Education Review & Update for Regular Educators.
Chapter 2 Ensuring Progress in the General Curriculum Through Universal Design for Learning and Inclusion Each Power Point presentation can be viewed as.
Presentation by D. McDonald. A Dose of Magic This resource for general education teachers describes 60 strategies for helping learners with special needs.
Preparing for Success: The Individualized Education Program August 2015 New Teacher Institute 1.
Lecturette 2: Inclusion at the Classroom level Strategies for Including All Students.
Co-Teaching as a Service Delivery Model
ASSESSMENT ACCOMMODATIONS How to Select, Administer, and Evaluate Use of Accommodations for Instruction and Assessment of Students with Disabilities Ohio.
Successful Strategies for Sp-Ed Co-Teaching. Objectives 1. What is co-teaching? 2. What does co-teaching look like? 3. What collaboration skills do teachers.
ED 315 Inclusive Practices for Students with Learning Problems Spring 2013.
Fostering Independence: A Team Approach. Maximum independence High Support.
Co-Teaching as Best Practice in Student Teaching
CO-TEACHING INSTRUCTION
WELCOME!!!. NTO Science / Social Studies Michele Dorsey (ITL, Gen Ed Inclusion)- Longfellow Rebecca Allwang- (Gen Ed Inclusion) Bryant Woods Sonya Robinson.
1 Teach 1 Assist —one teacher is responsible for teaching. One teacher circulates throughout the classroom monitoring progress and providing assistance.
Effective Practices Co-Teaching Presented by: Cynthia Debreaux, Regional Consultant DPI/ECU August 21, 2012 Hertford County Schools 1.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
Iowa Department of Education 2006 Consultative Collaboration.
“I long to accomplish a great and noble task, but it is my chief duty to accomplish humble tasks as though they were great and noble. The world is moved.
Exceptional Lives: Special Education in Today’s Schools, 6e ISBN: © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 2 Ensuring Progress.
Co-Teaching Webinar 3: Evaluation Webinar
1 Special Education Seminars “The What, Why and How of Collaboration” UFT Teacher Center Networks, Conferences & Seminars Broadway New York,
1 Building Collaborative Relationships to Improve Student Learning Presented by Auburn Montgomery School of Education.
COACHING. Coaching focuses on partnering with families. This is a shift from the expert telling parents what to do in a top down fashion to a coach who.
SPED 618: Lifelong Integration Definitions and Dimensions of the Interactive Team.
Collaborative Team Teaching with the Special Service Provider Keita Edwards-Adams MS, CCC-SLP,TSSH.
Mentors and beginning teachers teaching together in a collaborative setting AIP & Co-Teaching.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Danielle DerwichMelissa Scire English Teacher EC Teacher
Ensuring Progress in the General Education Curriculum ED 222 Spring 2010.
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. School, Family, and Community Collaboration Chapter 3.
Accommodations and Modification in Grades Do NOT fundamentally alter or lower expectations or standards in instructional level, content, or performance.
EdHD 5016 Teaching a Class of Mixed Abilities: Differentiated Instruction Instructional Intervention Ideas Fall, 2012.
Collaboration and Co-Teaching School Improvement Technical Assistance Train-the-Trainer Sessions Summer 2015 Division of Special Education and Student.
INCLUSION The Road to Success for Students with Disabilities.
Kim Taylor Denise Arseneau Tammy Gallant
Special Education Tier 4 Levels of Support Inclusive Services Educational Support Services 2015.
Co-Teaching at Wolf Meadow. Co-Teaching Pairs Co-Teaching Defined Co-Teaching is a service delivery option Co-Teachers share instructional responsibility.
Chapter 1 Inclusive Education: An Introduction
INCLUSIVE PRACTICES Co-Teaching Models
Promoting Inclusion with Classroom Peers
CO-TEACHING in the CLASSROOM
One Teach, One Observe One Teach, One Support/Assist Parallel Teaching
Fundamentals of Collaboration, Consultation, and Teaming
One Teach, One Observe One Teach, One Support/Assist Parallel Teaching
Co-Teaching Latricia Trites, Ph.D. September 8 & 10, 2008.
Visible Learning WHAT REALLY WORKS in Special and Inclusive Education
Presentation transcript:

Co-Teaching EDPS 410/665 Spring 2014

Consider: accommodations, modifications, personnel supports, settings LRE Decision Process Document current level of performance Develop student IEP objectives Determine how the objective or related set of objectives can be taught in the general education classroom. Consider: accommodations, modifications, personnel supports, settings

LRE process cont. Determine alternative LRE instructional settings for those objectives that cannot be taught in the general ed setting with the “use of supplementary aids and services.” Identify what additional settings or activities will provide opportunities for interactions with nondisabled peers. 6. Determine how student performance on IEP objectives will be evaluated

Personnel Supports General Education: student with a disability is served in the general ed class with no additional personnel support. Consultation: student receives at least one segment per month of direct service from the special education teacher Supportive instruction: student receives services from personnel other than a certified teacher in the general education classroom

The LRE Process Determine & document current levels of performance Develop student’s IEP objectives How can the objective(s) be taught in the general ed classroom? The LRE Process Mods & Accomms. Settings Personnel Supports For objectives that can’t be taught in GenEd, identify SpEd & community settings Identify additional settings/activities to provide opportunity for interaction with nondisabled peers

What is Co-Teaching? Co-teaching involves two or more certified professionals who contract to share instructional responsibility for a single group of students primarily in a single classroom or workspace for specific content or objectives with mutual ownership, pooled resources and joint accountability. Friend & Cook, 2000

Co-Teaching Involves two or more professionals Involves heterogeneous groups of students Shared delivery of instruction Shared physical space

Advantages to the General Educator ALL students learn - label or not . More time to learn content & share learning strategies. Less focus on individual problems. 2X the opportunity to assist students. Background info on special education students is provided. With help of special educator, meet the needs of individual student learning styles. Support for students who need organizational strategies! Peer pressure for appropriate behavior--negative behaviors are decreased. Professional growth . . . greater personal satisfaction!

Advantages for the Special Educator Time effective Teach with a content area expert and learn the expectations of the general education classroom. Spend more time and energy in assisting students to develop motivation, effort, and responsibility for their own learning. Have more opportunities to use learning strategies within content areas and to move toward generalization. "Reality check" for student goals within the general education setting. Partnership with a colleague in support of student IEP goals. Rewards of viewing first hand students' success and establishing credibility among their peers. Improved student behaviors. Mutual learning and appreciation for each other's expertise. Professional growth . . . greater personal satisfaction!

Advantages for ALL Students More time spent working cooperatively, learning content, and understanding students with different abilities. Strong emphasis on learning skills, organizational responsibility and preparedness. Diverse learning techniques and teaching techniques available. More contact time with teachers for school and personal issues. Unique learning needs met to the greatest extent possible Improved self-esteem. Opportunities for leadership and growth within the least restrictive environment. Less fear of failure due to successful experiences. Enhanced sense of responsibility. Better / more meaningful grades

Framework for Co-Teaching Shared system of beliefs Prerequisite skills Collaboration Classroom Practices Administrative Issues

Shared system of beliefs Teacher roles Student participation level Behavior management styles Equal partnership

Category of teacher belief How my co-teacher believes Sharing Beliefs Category of teacher belief How my co-teacher believes How I believe Noise Noisy classrooms interfere with some students’ learning A noisy classroom can be a busy and productive place Maintaining student notebooks for a grade All students responsible for maintaining daily updated notebook Students w/ organizational difficulties need structure built into the class for this

Prerequisite Skills Individual prerequisites Personal qualities and skills Pedagogical qualities and skills Discipline-specific qualities and skills

Collaboration Levels Planning Presenting Processing Problem-solving

Approaches to Co-Teaching One teach/one observe One teach/one circulate Station teaching model Parallel teaching Alternative teaching Team teaching

Cooperative Learning All students are assigned to heterogeneous groups and, under the guidance of the teacher, help one another master content previously presented by the teacher.

Administrative Issues Create culture for collaboration Creates opportunities for problem-solving A neutral 3rd party Creates logistics that make co-teaching feasible

Issues for Co-Teaching Content and modifications Planning Instructional format Parity Use of classroom space Noise level Routines Discipline Feedback Student assessment Teaching chores Confidentiality Pet peeves Whose students are these?

Lesson Planning General education teachers usually plan for groups of students Special education teachers typically plan for individuals

Co-Planning Lessons Who will be in each group or activity? What activities will keep each student motivated and busy? When, where, and for how long will the lesson plan be taught? Who is primarily responsible for each of the activities and assessments? Identify theme, topic, or goal of lesson Locate content in textbook and/or printed curriculum Which students cannot benefit from that content? all or nearly all students? by most of the students? some of the students? None of the students? How will activities take place?

Definitions “…to make fit or suitable by changing or adjusting” (Webster’s Third World Dictionary, 1994) “a thing resulting from adapting; a change in structure, function, or form that improves the chance of survival…within a given environment.” “any device or material that is used to accomplish a task in everyday life.” To adapt An adaptation Adaptive device

Deciding to Use an Adaptation Instruction in specific skills cannot quickly meet the student’s need because the students disability prohibits the completion of the task in the same manner as the other students

Considerations Is the adaptation portable for use across environments? Is the adaptation age-appropriate? Is the adaptation durable for frequent use or use over time? Does the adaptation appear to be the least intrusive during activities and the natural flow of events? Will funding of the adaptation be an issue? Is the adaptation accessible within the team and resource parameters of the education team?

Successful Adaptations Must be feasible for teachers to implement Must be lively, engaging, and fun Must be developed with the goal of working toward independence, with a gradual fading and eventual elimination of the adaptation Must have a definite purpose

Successful Adaptations Should be part of a comprehensive plan Should benefit the student and enhance, or at least not detract from the learning of other students Do not place undue attention on the student or put the student in a potentially embarrassing situation Are continually evaluated

4 Types of Adaptations Environmental Material Instructional Activity

Environmental Adaptations Behavioral arrangement Physical arrangement Sensory arrangement

Material Adaptations Alter COMPLEXITY of format Alter MOTOR requirements Alter SENSORY requirements Use of technology

Instructional Modifications Instructional Groupings Teaching Format Rate of Instruction Alternative Approaches

Instructional Modifications cont. Adjust language level Reduce amount of instruction given at one time Sequence activities in a logical manner Settings where skills can be functionally taught Advanced organizers

Activity Adaptations Use adapted or functional materials that parallel the regular activity Determine the functional outcome of the activity and allow for alternative student responses Engage student in selected parts of an activity

Activity Adaptations Reduce the number of required responses Within an activity, define different outcomes Allow additional time to complete an activity Increase amount of demonstrations and hands on experiences