Hunterdon County’s Stone Arch Bridges H unterdon County’s interest in stone arch bridges began in 1992, when a developer wanted to a raze a stone arch.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Orinthology Mill Creek Middle School Science Olympiad 2010.
Advertisements

The Heritage Health Index Report on the State of America’s Collections
Figure 1-1. Land use and cover in the Queenstown Planning Area.
US 491 South Corridor FLH-666-1(49)17 CN 2357 Navajo 9 to Sheep Springs (NM 134) MP 15 to MP 46 Public Information Meeting November 1, 2006.
City of Kalamazoo Early Retirement Incentive (ERI) 2011.
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Slide 1 Insert your own content. Slide 2 Insert your own content.
Pathways: An Alternate Route to Graduation December 1, 2010.
NORTHERN VIRGINIA HIGHLIGHTS for the Dulles Area Transportation Association June 19, 2013 Helen Cuervo VDOT District Administrator, Northern Virginia.
Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements
2008 MTA NYC Travel Survey Summary of Selected Results June 22, 2009.
Guideposts --Quality Work-Based Learning Programs
1 DG Regio Evaluation Network Meeting Albert Borschette, Brussels, 14 October 2010 Ex post evaluation of Interreg III - Presentation of Final Results Pasi.
1. 2 Why are Result & Impact Indicators Needed? To better understand the positive/negative results of EC aid. The main questions are: 1.What change is.
State of New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services Patient Safety Reporting System Module 2 – New Event Entry.
Civics: Government and Economics in Action
State Aid Programs An Introduction to: Local Bridge Replacement Program Local Road Improvement.
State Aid Programs Legislative Issues - Bonding Local Bridge Replacement Program Local Road Improvement Township Sign Replacement Program.
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
Dennis L. Edwards Tunnel
1 Career Pathways for All Students PreK-14 2 Compiled by Sue Updegraff Keystone AEA Information from –Iowa Career Pathways –Iowa School-to-Work –Iowa.
National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies 1 Phase II: Educating the 2020 Engineer Phase II: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century...
Addition Facts
Initiated in 2007 with a study population of bridges are considered historic and eligible or listed on the National Register 111 Bridges are.
Guidance on New CEs Emergency Repair Projects Operational Right-of-Way Limited Federal Funds EUM – March questions to:
TIGER PROGRAM LESSONS LEARNED Great PA/NJ Regional Trail Projects Presentation to the Circuit Coalition May 15, 2014 Chris Stanford, P.E., PTOE, PMP Michael.
MDOT University Region 10 county region 3 Transportation Service Centers (TSC) Jackson TSC Jackson County Jackson County Hillsdale County Hillsdale County.
permanent tsb House Price Index 10 Year Review 2 House Price Index 10 Year Review National annual price growth averaged 14.9% over the last 10 years.
IDENTIFYING, EVALUATING, AND PRESERVING MINNESOTA'S HISTORIC ROADSIDE FACILITIES.
1 Item 11, Presentation to the TPB, September 15, 2010.
Managing a Statewide Network An overview of the CDOT Pavement Management Program Eric Chavez Stephen Henry
Alamo Area Regional Public Transportation Plan Sharing Approaches Workshop October 19, 2005 Austin, Texas.
Drystone Retaining Walls Presentation to Bridge Owners Forum at Kings College, Cambridge 13 May 2008.
Journey Management Nigel DAth Journey Manager Bay of Plenty RTIM Seminar 18 March 2014.
Road Maintenance & Planning AUDUBON PARK. ASPHALT FAILURE TYPES ALLIGATOR CRACKING – AS SEEN ON CARDINAL.
ODOT’s Public Involvement Process PI and the Project Development Process Minimum PI Requirements.
Great Western Corridor Feasibility Study
International Partnership Opportunities for Hospice Palliative Care Providers [ADD SPEAKER INFO HERE]
Ohio Department of Transportation John R. Kasich, Governor Jerry Wray, Director Ohio Planning Conference Organizing for Reliability – A State Perspective.
Public Works Road Fund Overview May 2, 2013 Tanya Heaton, PW Budget Manager.
Addition 1’s to 20.
Paula J. Trigg, County Engineer Public Works and Transportation Committee April 2, 2014 OVERVIEW | SOURCE OF PROJECTS PROPOSED HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT.
©Ian Sommerville 1995/2000 (Modified by Spiros Mancoridis 1999) Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapters 1,3 Slide 1 Software Engineering Software Engineering.
Week 1.
World’s Largest Educational Community
D I S C O V E R A G R O U P O F C O L L E G E S T H A T H A S F A I T H I N Y O U R F U T U R E Comparative Alumni Research Comparison of 1990s Graduates.
ODOT STIP Process and Funding Jerri Bohard –Planning Section Manager –Transportation Development Division Jeff Scheick –Northwest Region Manager –Highway.
Carrollton Bridge Jonathon L. Sera, P.E. Approaches to Historic Bridge Rehabilitation Case Study #3 1.
Friends of the Fox River November 9, 2014 Longmeadow Parkway Fox River Bridge Corridor.
GASB#34 Asset Management TEAM Transportation Fair Presentation by: Charles J. Nemmers, P.E. Charles J. Nemmers, P.E. October 8, 2004St. Louis, Missouri.
South Side Red River Bridge Corridor Study Phase III Preliminary Geotechnical Study Phase IV New Alignment Alternatives Evaluation.
Paula J. Trigg, County Engineer Public Works and Transportation Committee May 7, 2014 MODERNIZATION PROJECTS EXPANSION PROJECTS PROPOSED HIGHWAY.
Restoring Our Heritage. Recognizing Our Future. Lockport’s Flight of Five: Erie Canal Locks #67-71.
Module 1: Introduction and the Context Concepts of Urban Planning Jeff Soule American Planning Association.
Longmeadow Parkway Fox River Bridge Corridor
Arch 04 UNIVERSITY OF MINHO 0 Daniel Oliveira & Paulo Lourenço U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I N H O Barcelona, November REPAIR OF STONE MASONRY.
Congressional District Projects New CD-1 Central Park Blvd/I-70 — $47.2 million project funded through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA).
Settlement Patterns.
Schools Jobs Revenues Services Recreation Environment Transportation Transportation Connectivity Housing Public Safety Pontiac’s.
Vision 21 Hunterdon County, NJ July, The Hunterdon County Planning Board is preparing a new Growth Management Plan.
Capital Improvement Program. During the Annual Strategic Action Plan (SAP) evaluation, long-term needs and priorities are identified by City Council Capital.
Nadine Peterson Preservation Planner NH Division of Historical Resources Lynne E. Monroe Preservation Company Christopher W. Closs Christopher W. Closs.
April 9, 2011 Mike Wieszchowski, P.E., PTOE Professional Traffic Operations Engineer Road Use Planning Guidelines to Protect Your Roadways.
Industrial System Natural System Industrial System.
Amherst County Comprehensive Plan (Update)
20 mph - The Cambridge Experience John Richards Acting Project Delivery & Environment Manager.
Evaluation and Redesign of Rojeeb Street. Objectives ▪ Evaluation of existing conditions of Rojeeb Street. ▪ Estimation of future conditions of Rojeeb.
Historical Resources SURVEY SAVVY Marie Nelson State Historian II OHP-Survey/CLG Coordinator Sep 07 – Chico.
West Linn Historic Resources and Architectural Styles Overview March 17, 2015.
Stenton Avenue Masonry Arch Rehabilitation Approaches to Historic Bridge Rehabilitation Case Study #1 Michael J. Cuddy, P.E. Principal Kara Russell Cultural.
Presentation transcript:

Hunterdon County’s Stone Arch Bridges H unterdon County’s interest in stone arch bridges began in 1992, when a developer wanted to a raze a stone arch bridge so that a road could be widened for a new development. The discussions that ensued sparked an interest in three County Departments to further research the bridges. The County began its own photographic inventory of the bridges, but later consulted outside professionals to help them inventory the bridges. continued...

Hunterdon County’s Stone Arch Bridges H unterdon County’s interest in stone arch bridges began in 1992, when a developer wanted to a raze a stone arch bridge so that a road could be widened for a new development. The discussions that ensued sparked an interest in three County Departments to further research the bridges. The County began its own photographic inventory of the bridges, but later consulted outside professionals to help them inventory the bridges. continued...

Hunterdon County’s Stone Arch Bridges Hunterdon County’s Stone Arch Bridge Inventory includes a wide range of information that will be used by the County to prepare a long term bridge maintenance and preservation plan and an illustrated brochure and tour guide for the public. The following slide presentation was presented to the Hunterdon County Planning Board on April 8,1999. For further information on this project, please contact Linda Weber, Principal Planner, at , or write to the Hunterdon County Planning Board, One East Main Street, Flemington, NJ

Hunterdon County’s Stone Arch Bridges Spring, 1999

Are these bridges of any historic value?

.…If so, how can we preserve the integrity of the bridges while at the same time accommodate new growth?

The NJ Historic Bridge Survey includes bridges with a 20 foot span or greater. Hunterdon County has more than 100 stone arch bridges excluded from this study because they have less than a 20 foot span.

So the County began its own bridge survey. The following three County Departments worked collaboratively on a photographic inventory of the stone arch bridges: Roads & Bridges Cultural & Heritage Commission County Planning Board

Local historians and other volunteers were recruited to help photograph the bridges.

NJ Historic Bridge Survey:12 stone arches County’s bridge records:106 stone arches Stone Arches on Private Roads:5-15 stone arches Total surviving stone arches:123+ stone arches The County discovered that it had many, many stone arch bridges still remaining.

L-18 A complete bridge inventory was commissioned by the County using ISTEA funds. The inventory was divided into two phases and offers: A complete history of the bridges Recommendations on how the bridges can be modified - if at all Comprehensive data for a future maintenance & preservation plan

Stone Arch Bridge Inventory, Phase I Hunterdon County, New Jersey (14 stone arch bridges) $10,000 ISTEA grant Consultant: Lichtenstein & Associates Contents... Historic Context of Stone Arch Bridges Evaluation of Stone Arch Bridges Bridges Recommendations for a Maintenance and Preservation

Stone Arch Bridge Inventory, Phase II Hunterdon County, New Jersey (92 stone arch bridges) $75,000 ISTEA grant Consultant:Thomas Boothby & Cecilia Rusnak Pennsylvania State University A Summary of Phase II follows……..

Q-106, Raritan Township The widespread use of stone arch bridges is credited to ancient Rome over 2,000 years ago.

D-449 The majority of Hunterdon County’s stone arch bridges were constructed in the last quarter of the 19th century.

In Hunterdon County, there are very few “engineered” stone arch bridges, ie, carefully designed bridges, typically at a larger scale, built by professionals.

Most of Hunterdon County’s bridges are “country” bridges: with a rustic appearance and constructed by anonymous masons, craftsmen,.....

….farmers,

…….and their friends and neighbors.

A typical bridge in the northern part of the County: Roughly dressed stones, uncoursed spandrel and a large humpback in the roadway.

W-115 A typical bridge in the southern part of the County: Dressed and shaped stones, smaller humpback in roadway, coursed spandrel, radial voussoir joints, arch ring inset.

E-250 In addition to the northern and southern style bridges, Hunterdon County has examples of skewed bridges,

E WPA bridges,

D-334 ….and bridges with an inset arch.

“….With over 100 surviving stone arch bridges, Hunterdon County, NJ represents the largest concentration of stone bridges in North America." Thomas E. Boothby, et al, Stone Arch Bridge Inventory, Phase II, Hunterdon County, New Jersey

The Inventory includes a Traffic Safety and Traffic Operational Analysis, including: Highway Alignment Considerations Bridge Safety Index Traffic Operational Analysis and Level of Service (LOS)

D-368 Many of the stone arch bridges are historically significant because of their integral part of the County’s early transportation network which supported the agriculture of the County.

Based upon the traffic and road analysis and the historical significance of the bridges, the Inventory recommends 13 specific bridges for preservation. In addition…...

…the Inventory recommends that a sufficient number of bridges be preserved within each of the six historic bridge types.

Categories of Historic Bridge Types I. Northern Crudely cut ringstones, non-radial joint alignment, low rise, rubble masonry (19 BRIDGES) II. Southern Intrados of ring cut to curve, radial joint alignment, coursed masonry (10 BRIDGES) III. Inset Wingwalls/parapet in different plan from spandrel/ring (8 BRIDGES) (continued)

Categories of Historic Bridge Types (continued) IV. Deep Inset Inset greater than 4 inches (2 BRIDGES) V. WPA 1930’s WPA style structure (1 BRIDGE) VI. WPA widening 1930’s WPA style widening (5 BRIDGES)

K-100, Kingwood Township Finally, the Inventory includes a recommended Routine Bridge Maintenance Program: Mortar Pointing and Patching Drainage Spandrel Walls and Parapets Arch Barrels

The Importance of the Stone Arch Bridge Inventory....

…it offers a regional perspective and, as such, observes the wide variety of styles and shapes...

…provides critical information that is necessary for a successful County maintenance and preservation plan...

…and it is a permanent record of our bridges as they exist today.

The End. On April 30, 1999, the New Jersey Planning Officials (NJPO) presented the Hunterdon County Planning Board with an “Achievement in Planning” Award for the Hunterdon County Stone Arch Bridge Inventory.