The Great Balancing Act: The Rights of the Accused vs

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Click on the arrow to begin the quiz.. Miranda v. Arizona (1966) Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) Texas v. Johnson (1989) Mapp v. Ohio (1961) Katz v. United.

Advertisements

Exclusionary Rule Chapter Rights of the accused The heart of the guarantee against unreasonable searches and seizures and self incrimination lies.

Supreme Court Cases You Need to Know

CH 14 Citizenship and Equal Justice

Chapter 14, Section 3 THE RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED

The American Legal System

Section 10.2 The Exclusionary Rule Section 10.2 The Exclusionary Rule.

Supreme Court Cases Use your knowledge of the Bill of Rights to determine how the Supreme Court should rule for each case.

Rights of the Accused th – Amendment Presumption of innocence Presumption of innocence Manzanar –one of our big failings Reasonable doubt Reasonable.

POP QUIZ How did the Courts increase the political power of people in urban areas and those accused of a crime? GIVE AN EXAMPLE.

Warren Court. Warm-up Do you have rights when you are being arrested? What rights do you have?

Civil Liberties: Due Process Rights of Accused Persons.

Cases and Terms – Chapter 8 – Rights of the Accused Module 8 Amendments 4 -7.

1. Supreme Court case that established judicial review 2. Amendment: suffrage cannot be denied based on race 3. A 3/5 th vote to end a filibuster 4. Creating.

The Criminal Amendments: Rights of the Accused Trends Over Time

RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED. I. OVERVIEW A. Due Process: The government, in whatever it does, must act fairly and follow established rules. 1.5 th Amendment:

The 4th & 5th Amendments Search & Seizure Search & Seizure Rights Against Self Incrimination Rights Against Self Incrimination.

Objective 29l-Analyze the rights of the accused Kelsey McLaughlin and Kelsey Bois Kelsey McLaughlin and Kelsey Bois.

LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES

Court Cases dealing with Individual Rights (Bill of Rights) J. Worley Civics.

Rights of the Accused Amendments 4, 5, 6, 8.

Defendant’s Rights and the Right to Privacy AMERICAN GOVERNMENT.

Rights of Criminal Defendants Are the due process rights and the procedural guarantees provided by the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments.

1. Supreme Court Cases Pt. 3.   SWBAT evaluate the ways the the Supreme Court has dealt with many controversial issues and analyze their impact on American.

Rights of the Accused Search & Seizure Search & Seizure Right Against Self Incrimination Right Against Self Incrimination Right to Counsel Right to Counsel.

The 4 th Amendment Chapter The 4 th Amendment Prevents Writs of Assistance Blanket Search warrants “The right of people…against unreasonable search.

Crime and Due Process. There is always a question as to how we should deal with “improper evidence” in the courtroom; different nations approach the question.

Our Legal System. The Sources of Our Laws Functions of Our Laws Create peaceful society Guarantee individual liberties Discourage criminal acts Set punishments.

Journal 1.Can a police officer “stop and frisk” you? 2.True or False - The 4th amendment protects us against all searches and seizures 3.Do the police.

 Most cases are handled by state courts  Arrest: When a person suspected of a crime is taken into custody Arrest warrant v. probable cause  A judge.

What does it all mean?! The 4th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees freedom from unreasonable search and seizure. This means that law enforcement.

Mapp vs. Ohio B. The Court decided that the Exclusionary Rule, excluding evidence taken illegally from a search, is not admissible in court. EXPANDS our.

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated;

How have the decisions of the Supreme Court protected people accused of crimes? What rights are accused people guaranteed? Landmark Supreme Court Cases.

Rights of Criminal Defendants

The Investigation.  Right to remain silent  Right to an attorney  No interrogation should take place before they read  Are a result of the US Supreme.

*Most cases are handled by state courts Analyze Figure 12.1 on page 127 to see an overview of the entire criminal justice process.

Slide 1 III. Criminal Procedure and the Constitution A.Analyze and Define Criminal Procedure B.Analyze the provisions of the 4 th and 5 th Amendments pertaining.

AP U.S. GOVERNMENT & POLITICS – Civil Liberties Civil Liberties part 3.

Essential Question How does the Constitution protect the rights of the accused?

Aim: How are defendants’ rights part of Civil Liberties? Chap 4, Day 4 Do Now: PAIR/SHARE 1.Put the following actions in chronological order. trial, prosecution,

How have the decisions of the Supreme Court protected people accused of crimes? What rights are accused people guaranteed? Landmark Supreme Court Cases.

DO NOW – Thursday, December 12 Take out your homework Review this definition: Reasonable suspicion – information which is enough to give an officer a reasonable.

DUE PROCESS. Procedural Due Process v. Substantive Due Process Procedural follows a set procedure, the same for all the accused Such as counsel, unreasonable.

LECTURE 4: THE CONSTITUTION AND DUE PROCESS. The Constitution and Due Process The US Constitution set out how US laws are passed and enforced. – The legislative.

Defendants’ Rights Characterize defendants’ rights and identify issues that arise in their implementation.

Substantive Due Process

Warm-up List 5 types of laws and give an example of each.

The Rights of the Accused

Crime and Due Process There is always a question as to how we should deal with “improper evidence” in the courtroom; different nations approach the question.

The 4th Amendment Notes 5-3.

Court Cases Brown v. Board of Education

Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual rights

Questioning, Searches, And Arrests

Supreme Court briefs.

Rights of Criminal Suspects

The American Legal System

Warm Up “We find that testing students who participate in extracurricular activities is a reasonably effective means of addressing the School District's.

LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES:

Chapter 16 Constitutional Right to a Fair Trial

The 4th Amendment Notes 5-3.

Rights of the Accused Amendments 4, 5, 6, 8.

Agenda- 1/25 Grab a chrome book and the worksheets!

The Great Society and warren Court

2.2 Civil Liberties 4th 5th, 6th, and 8th Amendments.

The Rights of American Citizens

Civil Rights Court Cases to Know

The Warren Court AP US History.

Presentation transcript:

The Great Balancing Act: The Rights of the Accused vs The Great Balancing Act: The Rights of the Accused vs. the Rights of Society Limits on Conduct of Police Officers & Prosecutors Defendant’s Pretrial Rights Trial Rights

The Great Balancing Act: The Rights of the Accused vs The Great Balancing Act: The Rights of the Accused vs. the Rights of Society Extending the Rights of the Accused Protect the innocent Due process Key SCOTUS cases: Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) Miranda v. Arizona (1966)

The Great Balancing Act: The Rights of the Accused vs The Great Balancing Act: The Rights of the Accused vs. the Rights of Society General Search Warrants Unconstitutional Exclusionary Rule A policy forbidding the admission at trial of illegally seized evidence  a demonstration of facts that permit a reasonable belief that a crime has been committed Mapp v. Ohio (1961)