Interim Report Charter Schools in New Jersey. Charter Landscape Expand Options and Encourage Innovation Charters provide families—especially low-income.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European Commission Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs New question on capacity utilisation in services - state of play and way forward.
Advertisements

Transforming Secondary Education in New Jersey Lucille E. Davy, Commissioner Willa Spicer, Deputy Commissioner Jay Doolan, Assistant Commissioner New Jersey.
Newark Kids Count 2011 A City Profile of Child Well-Being Advocates for Children of New Jersey 35 Halsey Street Newark, NJ
New Jersey Statewide Assessment Results: Highlights and Trends State Board of Education, February 6, 2008 Jay Doolan, Ed.D., Assistant Commissioner,
Undergraduates in Minnesota: Who are they and how do they finance their education? Tricia Grimes Shefali Mehta Minnesota Office of Higher Education November.
Title I Site Eligibility Ranking & Serving Schools NCLB Technical Assistance Audio March 28, :30 PM March 29, :30 AM Alaska Department of.
Board of Early Education and Care Retreat June 30,
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
August 8, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon Housson, Director Overview of.
1 Approaches to Implementing the 2% Cap for Adequate Yearly Progress NCES Summer Data Conference Washington, DC July 2008.
An in-the-ballpark estimate based on hypothetical situations and their potential effects on earnings and tax revenue for the State of Nebraska. Presented.
Title I, Part A and Section 31a At Risk 101
Accountability Reporting Webinar: Parent/Guardian Communications, NCLB School Choice and SES August 23, :00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. Kenneth Klau.
The Funding of Public Education in Wisconsin: Is a Crisis Brewing? Andrew Reschovsky Professor of Public Affairs and Applied Economics Robert M. La Follette.
Education Writers Association National Seminar May 18-20, 2014 Presenter: Dr. Dan Showalter, Rural School and Community Trust 1.
Session 9: Per-Capita Financing of Education and Equity Issues C ONFERENCE O N I NCLUSIVE E DUCATION F OR C HILDREN W ITH D ISABILITIES Organized by: UNICEF.
Title I, Part A District Budget Planning The “Small” Stuff Julie McGuire, MEd Federal Funds Coordinator Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD.
District Advisory Council (DAC) 1 October 22, 2012 Westlawn Elementary School.
Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
Michael Griffith School Finance Consultant Education Commission of the States.
Dr. Howard Fleeter Education Tax Policy Institute
Life After Vouchers: Expansion, Accountability & Outcomes.
Understanding Common Concerns about the Focus School Metric August
Commission Briefing Low Performing Schools in Urban High Poverty Communities November 11, 2014 House Committee on Education.
North Santiam School District State Report Cards
1 Volume measures and Rebasing of National Accounts Training Workshop on System of National Accounts for ECO Member Countries October 2012, Tehran,
School Report Cards 2004– The Bottom Line More schools are making Adequate Yearly Progress. Fewer students show serious academic problems (Level.
The Future of School Integration: Socioeconomic Integration as an Education Reform Strategy Richard D. Kahlenberg, Senior Fellow, The Century Foundation.
School Report Cards For 2003–2004
To Accompany “Economics: Private and Public Choice 10th ed.” James Gwartney, Richard Stroup, Russell Sobel, & David Macpherson Slides authored and animated.
Marc Duff, Chief Financial Officer Racine Unified School District Worked in RUSD Finance Department for over 7 years Worked in RUSD Finance Department.
Poverty: Facts, Causes and Consequences Hilary Hoynes University of California, Davis California Symposium on Poverty October 2009.
Grade 3-8 Mathematics Test Results. 2 The Bottom Line This is the first year in which students took State tests in Grades 3,4,5,6,7, and 8. With.
Grade 3-8 English. 2 The Bottom Line This is the first year in which students took State tests in Grades 3,4,5,6,7, and 8. With the new individual.
A Changing Metric: Low Income vs. Economically Disadvantaged Revised July 6, 2015.
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT TITLE I PARENT MEETING PRESENTATION.
Charter Schools. What is a Charter School? Charter schools are public schools that are granted a specific amount of autonomy, determined by state law.
Charter Schools: Reinventing Public Education. Charter Schools… Are independent public schools of choice Serve ALL student populations Are tuition-free.
High Performing Black Led Charter Schools (HPBLCs) Study.
September 26, 2006 Schools in NCLB Restructuring: National Trends Kerstin Carlson Le Floch James Taylor Yu Zhang.
Student Achievement in Chicago Public Schools
1 Results for Students and Individuals with Disabilities September 2008.
Instruction, Teacher Evaluation and Value-Added Student Learning Minneapolis Public Schools November,
An Update on Charter Schools Presentation to the New Jersey State Board of Education November 3, 2010.
Bruce D. Baker © 2010 Charter School Demographics Newark Charters and Traditional Public Schools.
State Charter Schools Commission of Georgia SCSC Academic Accountability Update State Charter School Performance
Community Eligibility Provision, Title I and Accountability Bridgette Hires and Elena Sanders, 10/2/2014.
Briefing to the Virginia State Board of Education Committee on Lowest-Performing School Systems James Monroe Building, Richmond Don Soifer Lexington Institute.
Wisconsin Education Challenges 2015 Federal Funding Conference Jeff Pertl, Senior Policy Advisor.
Although Affluent, Montgomery Co. has Low- and Moderate-Poverty Elementary Schools PERCENT OF CHILDREN RECEIVING FREE OR REDUCED PRICE OF LUNCH 0%–10%
University of Pittsburgh Overview of Teach For America I. Our nation’s most pressing issue –13 million children growing up in poverty today.
TITLE I, PART A ESEA ROLLOUT SPRING 2013 Version Title I, Part A Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
School Funding: Facts and Figures A library of PowerPoint slides compiled by the Association of Metropolitan School Districts Kevin Sampers, Research Director.
Custom Reports: SCGs and VCGs. Standard Comparison Group (SCG)
ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), – Is part of the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) – makes schools.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Title I: Ranking, Serving, and Allocating Funds to Schools 2016 ESEA Directors Institute August 23, 2016.
What you need to know About Title I Parent Meeting Presentation.
School Choice: Can It Improve the Quality of Education in America?
New Jersey Department of Education December 2012
What you need to know About Title I
A SHARED OPPORTUNITY AGENDA
Build Your Own ESSA Explainer
Community Eligibility Provision
Legislative Council Study Committee on the Identification and Management of Dyslexia Dee Pettack, Legislative Liaison Barb Novak, Literacy Consultant.
Why PS 25 Eubie Blake school in D16 should not be closed
Chronic Absence in Oregon
FY20 House 1 Budget Overview
Early Warning System Dashboard prepared by Ellis Ott, Ph.D., Research & Accountability Department.
Presentation transcript:

Interim Report Charter Schools in New Jersey

Charter Landscape Expand Options and Encourage Innovation Charters provide families—especially low-income families—with much- needed alternatives within public education. The charter sector provides a supportive environment for innovative programs We recently approved 23 new charters, including a number in struggling districts as well as the first virtual charters. This fall, we will have nearly 100 charters across the state, making NJDOE the nation’s 4 th largest charter authorizer Accountability But not all charters are high-performing—and that’s our standard. “Just better than the nearby neighborhood school” is not good enough. We will continue to support charter school expansion, but it will always be with an eye on quality. We will not hesitate to close charters failing to live up to their promise. We recently placed two charters on probation.

Charter Performance: Initial Data Charters and Districts Charter advantage across Abbotts: In LAL, 79 percent of charters outperformed their home districts In math, 69 percent of charters outperformed their home districts Newark 7 of 9 charters outperformed district Several charters outperformed the state average Camden: 4 of 4 charters outperformed district But this is high level data, requiring much deeper analysis

Ongoing Analysis While these data are directionally informative, we will continue to pursue deeper analysis to understand: Charter performance for all student groups; The reasons why some charters out / under perform their home districts We will expand the quantity and quality of data that is on the internet about all schools, including charters, to encourage thoughtful analysis and transparency. In the very near future, we will commission an independent analysis of all this data to further inform our charter policies

Special Education On average, charters serve a smaller number of students with disabilities than traditional public schools District public school average:15.87% Charter public school average:8.24% Although lower, this figure dispels the myth that charters aren’t serving special needs children As of October 2009, more than 1,700 students with disabilities were attending charters. New Jersey ‘s special education classification rate consistently ranks among the nation’s highest In Camden, 30% of district 8 th grade test takers are identified as students with disabilities

Special Education It is also important to note the variation in classification percentages within the charter sector.

Special Education Do charters push out special education students? Some charter schools may directly or indirectly indicate to families of students with disabilities that they are not able to address the individual needs of the students. Other possible explanations: Parents of some special education students with intensive needs are satisfied with the specialized services their children receive Charters might successfully educate students in their general education programs and not need to refer students for special education Some parents of students with disabilities are reluctant to send their children to new programs that do not have a history of serving students with disabilities. Charters currently serve fewer high grades, and in some urban district schools, special education classifications grow each year

Free and Reduced-price Lunch The state aid formula does not distinguish between “free” and “reduced”-price lunch count. Federal programs and accountability, such as AYP, also combine the two categories All students in both these categories are generally used by researchers throughout the country as a good enough proxy for “economically disadvantaged” And most important, research shows that concentration of poverty in schools creates unique challenges, and most charters in NJ cross a threshold of concentrated poverty that makes these distinctions meaningless

Urban Student Poverty, by Sector

Free vs. Reduced-price Lunch

Charter Performance: Follow-up Data Removed special education and ELL from comparison Still a charter advantage: more charters outscored their local districts statewide. The charter advantage appears to grow in higher grades

Student Performance

Pride North Star

Student Performance Lady Liberty

Student Performance NPS North Star

Student Performance Foundation Emily Fisher TPS

Student Performance Foundation TPS Emily Fisher

Student Performance

Charter Advantage Grows

Charter Advantage Grows

Next Steps Continue internal research Increase transparency – expand the quantity of data available online Commission independent researchers to conduct deeper analysis Restructure charter schools office to improve services, accountability and support