EPA Proposed Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cathy Beahm Technical Assistance Specialist NH DES, Air Resources
Advertisements

Greenhouse Gases: Federal Regulatory Experience Spring Environmental Law & Texas Regulatory Symposium Austin, Texas April 15, 2010 James W. Yarbrough U.S.
Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency – Climate Change Division 1 U.S.
North Carolina Division of Air Quality 1641 Mail Service Center - Raleigh, NC (919) Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reporting.
Reporting 2012 Emissions Inventories. Emissions Inventory Workshop Introduction and General Issues Mark Gibbs.
Reporting 2011 Emissions Inventories WELCOME! Major Facilities.
Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule Mr. Charles Frushour U.S. EPA Clean Air Markets Division EPRI CEM User Group Meeting Cleveland, Ohio May 2010.
Green house Effect Simulation
Impacts of the New Boiler MACT Rules Les Oakes King & Spalding.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency April 13, 2011 Final Rules to Reduce Air Toxics from Boilers.
NSR Regulations Update November 14, 2012 Atlanta, GA Katy R. Forney Energy Sector Technical Authority EPA – Region 4 Atlanta, Georgia.
Preparing for the GHG MRR - Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
General Monitoring Requirements and Options
Harmonization of Part 60 and Part 75 CEM Requirements Robert Vollaro
EPA Proposed Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule.
EPA Proposed Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule.
EPA Proposed Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule.
National Inventories of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Yamil Bonduki Coordinator National Communications Support Programme.
EPA’s Clean Power Plan Proposed Rules for Reducing GHG Emissions from Power Plants Presentation to ACPAC June 16,
Quantifying GHG Emissions Using the General Reporting Protocol (GRP) December 10 & 11, 2009 Kati Price and Robyn Camp GHG Reporting Workshop.
Reporting 2013 Emissions Inventories. Emissions Inventory Workshop 2014 Introduction Introduction Mark Gibbs 2.
Canada’s Offset System for Greenhouse Gases Dean Stinson O’Gorman New Brunswick Climate Change Hub meeting October 7, 2009.
Implications of Climate Change on Beet Sugar Manufacturing.
GHG Applicability Criteria. Introduction to PSD GHG Applicability As stated earlier, Tailoring Rule does not change basic applicability process Incorporation.
Greenhouse Gases & Carbon Footprinting AIB Sustainability Essentials December 1, 2009 Jerry Hancock Vice President of Environmental and Regulatory Affairs,
Recent EPA Regulation Development Presented by Bill Luthans to the 56 th Meeting of the Joint Advisory Committee Meeting for the Improvement of Air Quality.
1 The US EPA GHG Tailoring Rule – The Actual Regulatory Language.
1 Katy R. Forney Energy Sector Technical Authority Air Permits Section EPA Region 4 PSD and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule 14 th Annual Power Generation.
Michael Hopkins Assistant Chief, Permitting Ohio EPA Update on GHG Permitting in Region V.
EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting – Subpart W Fugitive methane emissions John Erickson, PE American Public Gas Association EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting – Subpart.
Carbon Footprint and the New Facilities Vocabulary Peter O’Konski PE, PMP, LEED AP Director, Facility Policy Office of Management Department of Energy.
USEPA Mandatory Reporting of GHGs for Manure Management Systems Covers for Manure Storages: Workshop and Field Day October 29, 2009 Goodwins and Miedema.
EGEE Energy Conservation and Environmnetal Protection (EGEE 102)
Introducing EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program and Data Tool Lesley Jantarasami Presentation to the National Tribal Forum May 23, 2012.
The Shaw Group Inc. ® 05M052007D_ EPA’s Proposed Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule Technical Considerations Presented to Louisiana Section.
1 Voluntary GHG Reporting & The Climate Registry Ann McCabe NATF June 4, 2009.
Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Legislation, Regulation, and DWR Policies Andrew Schwarz P.E. June, 2014 Division of Statewide Integrated Water Management.
GHG Regulations Update AWMA Southern Section September 12, 2012 Biloxi, MS Katy R. Forney Energy Sector Technical Authority EPA – Region 4 Atlanta, Georgia.
OTC Mobile Source Committee OTC Committee Meeting September 2009 Buffalo, New York 1.
Building the Green Team For Reporting to the Climate Registry (866) x3
ESTABLISHING A CARBON BASELINE FOR THE CITY OF MADISON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS Report to the City of Madison Sustainable Design and Energy Committee Madison,
Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Federal Energy Management Program Executive Order Matt Gray FEMP Program Analyst Federal Leadership.
Electric Utility Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Second Rule Development Workshop December 5, 2007 Department of Environmental Protection Division of.
Comments on Canada’s Large Final Emitters (LFE) and Domestic Offsets Climate Change Plans GRAY E. TAYLOR 1 First Canadian Place, 44 th.
August 4, 2011 Heather Ceron US EPA Region 4 1. Greenhouse Gases 2.
Voluntary Programs and Mandated Actions Susan Wickwire Energy Supply & Industry Branch Office of Atmospheric Programs March 23, 2010.
Air Quality Regulations – What’s New? (for Ethanol Plants) Shelley Schneider Air Quality Division Administrator.
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Permit Training Region 4 – Atlanta, GA Dec , 2010.
Greenhouse Gases (GHGs) and You 1. The Regulated GHGs CO 2 (Carbon Dioxide) CH 4 (Methane) N 2 O (Nitrous Oxide) SF 6 (Sulfur Hexafluoride) HFCs (Hydrofluorocarbons)
GHG Mandatory Reporting Rule: Proposal Overview Presented to Philadelphia Diesel Difference Working Group By Jim Smith, EPA Region 3 November 9, 2009.
Introduction to The Climate Registry Gary Gero Washington Department of Ecology November 5, 2007.
© 2012 The Williams Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. GHG Reporting Update Rocky Mountain EHS Peer Group January 17 th, 2013 Laura London, P.E.
CO 2 Emissions from Cars, Trucks & Buses in the Metropolitan Washington Region Presentation to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.
1. Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) – Naturally occurring and man- made. 5,505.2 mmts emitted in 2009, GWP = 1 Methane (CH 4 ) - Naturally occurring and man-made.
CLIMATE LITERACY 101 State Actions for Mitigation Matt Correa Water Resources Engineer DSIWM – Climate Change Program.
Massachusetts Greenhouse Gas Reporting Regulation 310 CMR 7.71 Stacy DeGabriele & Will Space MassDEP Climate Strategies December 10 th and 11 th, 2009.
Integrating GHG Programs in an ISO EMS 33rd National Energy & Environmental Conference Loews Ventana Canyon Resort Tucson, Arizona Presented by:
CDM Project Cycle LGED Bhaban, Dhaka 8 – 9 April 2008 Presented by Khandaker Mainuddin Fellow, BCAS.
REGULATIONS & LEGISLATION BIG TEN ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP GROUP STEVE MARUSZEWSKI – PENN STATE Greenhouse Gases.
1 Greenhouse Gas Inventories for Tribes Melinda Ronca Battista, ITEP.
Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule aka GHG Permitting Rule.
Update on EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Rulemakings Norman W. Fichthorn Hunton & Williams LLP 2010 American Public Power Association Energy and Air Quality Task.
Joint Intersectoral Task Force on Environmental Indicators Fifth session Geneva, 4 – 6 July 2012 Grenhouse Gas Emissions Introductory Overview Vladislav.
Global Warming by Alex Kiss. Natural Warmth The Earth’s surface is heated primarily by sunlight The Earth’s surface is heated primarily by sunlight It.
Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Reporting at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Kirk Stoddard Air Quality Program Manager June 3, 2009.
Climate Change Advisory Committee March 27, 2009.
CHE 670 Sustainability Seminar
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory
Healthy Kansans living in safe and sustainable environments.
CHE 670 Sustainability Seminar
Presentation transcript:

EPA Proposed Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule

The purpose of the rule is to collect “comprehensive and accurate” data on GHG emissions that can be used to inform future policy decisions The purpose of the rule is to collect “comprehensive and accurate” data on GHG emissions that can be used to inform future policy decisions No direction on the development of emission reduction or control No direction on the development of emission reduction or control It is not meant to be a registry tracking individual projects or reductions It is not meant to be a registry tracking individual projects or reductions After it is published in the Federal Register, there will be a 60 day comment period (probably w/ additional 30 days) After it is published in the Federal Register, there will be a 60 day comment period (probably w/ additional 30 days) EPA wants to publish the final rule before the end of the year EPA wants to publish the final rule before the end of the year The proposed rule and preamble are extensive (1400+ pages) The proposed rule and preamble are extensive (1400+ pages) In addition In addition Technical Support Documents Technical Support Documents Regulatory Impact Statement Regulatory Impact Statement Overview of the Reporting Rule

Regulated Gases Mandatory reporting of GHGs would require reporting of annual emissions of: Mandatory reporting of GHGs would require reporting of annual emissions of: Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 ) Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 ) Methane (CH 4 ) Methane (CH 4 ) Nitrous Oxide (N 2 O) Nitrous Oxide (N 2 O) Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF 6 ) Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF 6 ) Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) Perfluorochemicals (PFCs) Perfluorochemicals (PFCs) Other Fluorinated Gases (e.g. NF 3, HFEs) Other Fluorinated Gases (e.g. NF 3, HFEs)

Proposed Sectors and Sources

Schedule for Reporting Facilities and suppliers would begin collecting data on January 1, 2010 Facilities and suppliers would begin collecting data on January 1, 2010 First emissions report would be due on March 31, 2011 First emissions report would be due on March 31, 2011 New vehicles and engine manufacturers would start reporting w/ the 2011 model year New vehicles and engine manufacturers would start reporting w/ the 2011 model year Reports would be submitted annually Reports would be submitted annually

What Information Would be Reported? Total GHG emissions in MT of CO 2 E from all source and supply categories: Total GHG emissions in MT of CO 2 E from all source and supply categories: Gas Gas Breakdown emissions w/in each source category (e.g. unit or process level) Breakdown emissions w/in each source category (e.g. unit or process level) Activity data Activity data

How Would Reports be Submitted? Facilities would report directly to the EPA Facilities would report directly to the EPA Electronic reporting Electronic reporting Self-certification by Designated Representative Self-certification by Designated Representative

Stationary Combustion

Who Reports? Facilities w/ stationary fuel combustion sources that have emissions greater then 25,000 MT CO 2 E Facilities w/ stationary fuel combustion sources that have emissions greater then 25,000 MT CO 2 E In combination w/ other source categories process emissions In combination w/ other source categories process emissions CO 2, N 2 O and CH 4 would be reported CO 2, N 2 O and CH 4 would be reported *Table only includes facilities w/ stationary combustion equipment not covered in other subparts of the rule **CO2 emissions from biomass are not considered as part of the determination of the threshold level

CO 2 From Fuel Combustion Based on the fuel combusted and the size of the stationary equipment Based on the fuel combusted and the size of the stationary equipment Facilities w/ and aggregate maximum heat input capacity of less then 30 mmBtu/hr are automatically exempt from the proposed rule Facilities w/ and aggregate maximum heat input capacity of less then 30 mmBtu/hr are automatically exempt from the proposed rule Combustion units that are subject to the reporting requirements under the ARP would continue to measure CO 2 mass emissions (using the 40 CFR part 75 methods) and continue quarterly reporting of CO 2 emissions (cumulative short tons would be converted to MT) Combustion units that are subject to the reporting requirements under the ARP would continue to measure CO 2 mass emissions (using the 40 CFR part 75 methods) and continue quarterly reporting of CO 2 emissions (cumulative short tons would be converted to MT) 4-tiered approach 4-tiered approach Tier 4 –large stationary combustion units fired w/ solid fuels and have existing CEMS equipment Tier 4 –large stationary combustion units fired w/ solid fuels and have existing CEMS equipment Tier 3 –large stationary combustion units fired w/ liquids or gaseous fuels Tier 3 –large stationary combustion units fired w/ liquids or gaseous fuels Tiers 1 and 2 – simplified emissions calculations Tiers 1 and 2 – simplified emissions calculations

NO Does Unit Have Existing CEMS? YES NO 2 Do CEMS and Unit Meet Certain Conditions? 1 Tier 4: Use CEMS Similar to 40 CFR 75 YES Does Unit Burn Wood Biomass Fuels? Is Unit >250 MMBtu/hr Heat Input? Is Measured High Heating Value (HHV) Available? Tier 1 3 : Use Default HHV and CO 2 Emission Factor Tier 2 2 : Use Measured HHV and CO 2 Emission Factor Tier 3 3 : Measure Fuel Carbon Content Is a CO 2 Emission Factor for the Fuel Provided in Rule? Tier 3 3 : Measure Fuel Carbon Content Are Emission Factors and HHV for Fuel Provided in the Rule? NO YES NO YES NO YES General Stationary Fuel Combustion Requirements for CO 2 Proposed 40 CFR 98 Subpart C 1 Conditions for requiring CEMS: - >250 MMBtu/hr or >250 tons/day MWC. - Operates >1,000 hours/year. - Has Part 60 or Part 75 or state-certified gas monitor or flow rate monitor. - Meets QA/QC requirements as above. OR - <250 MMBtu/hr or <250 tons/day MWC. - Operates >1,000 hours/year. - Has Part 60 or Part 75 or state-certified certified gas monitor and flow rate monitor. - Meets QA/QC requirements as above. 2 MSW units that do not use CEMS would use Tier 2. 3 Reporters have the option of using any higher tier methodology. NO YES

CO 2 Emissions from Biomass Fuel Combustion Units that combust biomass fuels will have to report annual biogenic CO 2 emissions separately Units that combust biomass fuels will have to report annual biogenic CO 2 emissions separately This is consistent w/ IPCC and US GHG inventory framework This is consistent w/ IPCC and US GHG inventory framework Where Tier 4 is not required, reporters can use Tier 1 method for fuels in which default CO 2 emission factors and HHVs are provided Where Tier 4 is not required, reporters can use Tier 1 method for fuels in which default CO 2 emission factors and HHVs are provided If no default values are provided then reports have to use Tiers 2 or 3 If no default values are provided then reports have to use Tiers 2 or 3 For units required to use Tier 4, the rule has procedures to calculate the porting of CO 2 that is from fossil fuel vs. biogenic fuels For units required to use Tier 4, the rule has procedures to calculate the porting of CO 2 that is from fossil fuel vs. biogenic fuels For MSW, the rule has procedures to determine the portion of the CO 2 that is from biogenic fuel using the ASTM method For MSW, the rule has procedures to determine the portion of the CO 2 that is from biogenic fuel using the ASTM method

CH 4 and N 2 O Emissions Units subject to the ARP would calculate emissions from continuous measurements of fuel heat input and fuel specific emission factors Units subject to the ARP would calculate emissions from continuous measurements of fuel heat input and fuel specific emission factors Simplified emissions calculation methods Simplified emissions calculation methods Emissions would be estimated using the EPA- provided default factors and annual heat input Emissions would be estimated using the EPA- provided default factors and annual heat input

CO 2 Emissions from Sorbent Calculate CO 2 emissions from fluidized bed unit w/ sorbent injection controls or FDG using ratio of CO 2 released upon capture of acid gas Calculate CO 2 emissions from fluidized bed unit w/ sorbent injection controls or FDG using ratio of CO 2 released upon capture of acid gas

EPA Requests Comment on… Reporting of emissions from portable equipment or generating units designated as emergency generators in issued permits Reporting of emissions from portable equipment or generating units designated as emergency generators in issued permits Integration of fuel supplier requirements (e.g. fuel HHVs) w/ both the tier 1 and 2 calculation methodologies Integration of fuel supplier requirements (e.g. fuel HHVs) w/ both the tier 1 and 2 calculation methodologies Use of more technology-specific CH 4 and N 2 O emission factors that could be applied in unit-level calculations Use of more technology-specific CH 4 and N 2 O emission factors that could be applied in unit-level calculations Exemption for facilities that have an aggregate combined heat input capacity of less then 30 mmBtu/hr from stationary combustion units Exemption for facilities that have an aggregate combined heat input capacity of less then 30 mmBtu/hr from stationary combustion units