 Individual Growth and Development Plan with 35% Student Growth Data  Peer Review  Student Engagement Walkthrough Data  Summative Evaluation.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Rhode Island Model for Educator Evaluation Systems August 2010.

Advertisements

1 Survey of Super LEAs Evaluation Systems Performance Evaluation Advisory Council July 16 th, 2010.

Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation Pilot September 1, 2011 – September 30, 2012 NJ State Board of Education, July 13, 2011.

The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.

Assessment and Evaluation. Assessment and evaluation Evaluation is a judgement Evaluation is a judgement. How well is this course (part of the course)

St. Michael-Albertville School District. Voluntary program that allows school districts and exclusive representatives of the teachers to design and collectively.

SLG Goals, Summative Evaluations, and Assessment Guidance Training LCSD#7 10/10/14.

Update on Teacher and Principal Evaluation Implementation of ARS

Monitoring Monday 4 years later Lessons Learned. WHAT WE NEEDED FIRST TRUST, TRUST,TRUST We still make it perfectly clear this is not an evaluation -

Simpson County Schools: New Teacher Support Program A Proposal.

Teacher Evaluation System LSKD Site Administrator Training August 6, 2014.

Developing Principals One State’s Initiative Dr. Sharon Brittingham RTTT Project Director, Development Coaches Dr. Jacquelyn Wilson Director, Delaware.

Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.

Ramapo Teachers’ Association APPR Contractual Changes.

The Webster Groves School District’s Journey to a More Effective Evaluation Process September, 2014.

Differentiated Supervision

Accountability Assessment Parents & Community Preparing College, Career, & Culturally Ready Graduates Standards Support 1.

March, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%

DEVELOPING DEEPER AND MORE MEANINGFUL EVALUATION SYSTEMS Lisa Hood, Center for the Study of Education Policy Funded by a grant through the McCormick Foundation.

March 28, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%

Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) Evaluation Process for Teachers.

Annual Evaluation Phase 1 Report For Teachers Office of Professional Growth Teacher Observation and Evaluation System (T.O.E.S.)

1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.

Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.

TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING November 1 st, 2012 General Admin Meeting BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources John McKelvey– Teachscape November.

TEACHER DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION, AND PEER SUPPORT Overview Session for MPS Staff March 10, 2014.

Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.

TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING November 1 st, 2012 General Admin Meeting BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources John McKelvey– Teachscape November.

Politics Everywhere Courageous Journey Presentation by: Glenn Maleyko, Ph.D February 4, 2014.

The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II (DPAS II) for Teachers Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Teachers.

Educator Growth & Evaluation Marshall Public Schools.

Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.

Educator Growth & Evaluation Marshall Public Schools.

Teacher Evaluation System Administrator Training June 5 & 6, 2012.

BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.

Student Growth Percentiles Basics Fall Outcomes Share information on the role of Category 1 assessments in evaluations Outline steps for districts.

 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.

What you need to know about changes in state requirements for Teval plans.

Module 2: Joint Committee Decisions Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

MA EDUCATOR EVALUATION SYSTEM Only when all gears work together does an engine produce power. SCHOOL COMMITTEE & SUPERINTENDENT FACULTY and STAFF ADMINISTRATION.

Educator Effectiveness Summit School District’s Recommendation for the School Year.

MSBSD Teacher Evaluation

Using the framework to ground decisions in the quality of teacher practice.

Student Achievement Through Teacher Evaluation Presenters Dr. Jane Coughenour Dr. Karen Chapman Mr. Michael Matta.

LAKES COUNTRY SERVICE COOPERATIVE JOSH NELSON & EILEEN WEBER SEPTEMBER Teacher Evaluation Day III.

Quality Review Updates for Presented by Mary Barton, SATIF CFN 204 Assistant Principals’ Conference September 2, 2011.

UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.

Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.

KPBSD Effective Instruction Evaluation Committee LaDawn Druce Marina Bosick Daniel Olson Margaret Griffen Troy Minogue Juliana DeBoard Megan.

Arizona Framework for Teacher Effectiveness Governing Board Meeting May 1, 2012.

Professional Growth & Effectiveness System. DECISION REQUIRED BY MARCH 2013 Current Evaluation and PD Models The current evaluation plan was last revised.

Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Update Kentucky Board of Education August 8,

Educator Supervision and Evaluation Clarke and Diamond MS September 2013.

Performance Evaluation Reform Act (PERA) Student Growth No Stakes Pilot for CTE Teachers PRESENTED BY: JEN NEWENDYKE, SYSTEM DIRECTOR, EFE #220, ELIZABETH.

District State of the Schools. AIM I: Unity-Bringing together students, parents, staff, and community 1.Increase the number of website hits by 50%, increase.

Quality Compensation Program

Avon Grove School District October 2009

Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.

By: Alice Tackett and Jill Maynard

Licensed Educator Professional Growth and Evaluation Process

Glenn Maleyko, Superintendent, Ph.D

Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”

Baldwin FLEXIBLE CLERICAL AND PROFESSIONAL LEARNING and DIFFERENTIATED SUPERVISION.

TeachNJ By Heather Perruso.

Owatonna Public Schools Teacher Development PLAN (TDE)

Teacher Development & Evaluation Statute (TDE)

The best way to predict the future is to create it.

The Administrator’s View of a Staff Profile Page

Annual Professional Performance Review APPR

Presentation transcript:

 Individual Growth and Development Plan with 35% Student Growth Data  Peer Review  Student Engagement Walkthrough Data  Summative Evaluation

 Completed annually by all staff members  Baseline data needed  Aligned to building strategic plan  Goal tied to a measurable student data point  Principal approval of goal  Mid-year check  Individual assesses his/her student data using rubric Individual Growth and Development Plan

 Embedded in your IGDP  Teacher-created goals including valid and reliable assessment  Incorporated into summative evaluation  A zero in the rubric will result in a PIP  Calculated over the course of three years as opposed to just one year

 Completed annually by tenured staff only  Teacher selects partner  Completed by March 31 st  Confidential Peer Observation

 Done by administrators during walk-throughs  Evaluated as part of Danielson

 Danielson Framework will be utilized  65% of evaluation based on Danielson  Once every three years for tenured staff

 Remember Education Minnesota and Minnesota School Board Association agree that local districts and associations should create a plan.  Vote on December 4 th !

 Teacher Representatives (Building Locations) ◦ Brandon Button ( I.J. Holton) ◦ Jens Levisen (High School) ◦ Jill Rollie (Ellis) ◦ Erin Schoen (Southgate) ◦ John Sullivan (Specialist and AEA executive committee) ◦ Greg Wehner (Special Ed Rep)  Administrative Representatives (Locations) ◦ John Alberts (District Office Educational Services) ◦ Brad Bergstrom (High School) ◦ Mary Burroughs (District Office Human Resources) ◦ Jessica Cabeen (Woodson) ◦ Edwina Harder (Southgate)