University of California Berkeley Extension Copyright © 2007 Patrick McDermott Barry Boehm, discussed in “Barry Boehm’s “Theory W” Principle.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Basics of Conflict Management CRETE Day 2 Training Tricia S. Jones, Ph
Advertisements

Productive Conflict Management. Defining Conflict within a Communication Context 1.Conflict within Systems Expressed Struggle Incompatible Goals Scarce.
List & Combo Box The University of California Berkeley Extension Copyright © 2012 Patrick McDermott.
Understanding Individual Differences
E X treme Programming & Agile Modeling Copyright © 2003 Patrick McDermott UC Berkeley Extension
Chapter 12 The Supervisor as Leader
Mining Group Gold Team Dynamics. Stages of Team Development Forming Storming Norming Performing.
Conditions for Using Negotiation Two or more parties –Conflict of interest such that what one party wants is not what the other party wants –Both willing.
Principled Negotiation 1. Separate People from Problems 2. Focus on Interests not Positions –negotiating positions often obscures what you actually need.
Collaborative Skills Enhancement South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project Session 1 Wednesday, January 21, 2004.
DECISION-MAKING STRATEGIES FACULTY TEAMS THAT REACH CONSENSUS.
Negotiating and Resolving Conflict. How often do you negotiate? Often Seldom Never.
MODULE 23 CONFLICT AND NEGOTIATION
3.1 Capon: Understanding Organisational Context 2nd edition © Pearson Education 2004 Understanding Organisational Context 2e Slides by Claire Capon Chapter.
CHAPTER 8 MOTIVATING YOUR EMPLOYEES. 1. Define motivation 2. Identify & define 5 personality characteristics relevant to understanding behavior of employees.
The Nature of Negotiation
The Skill That Makes The Difference
Strategic Business Planning for Commercial Producers
Chapter 5 Training for Organizations Learning Theory.
10-1. Business in a Changing World McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 10 Motivating the.
The Evolution of Management Thinking
Douglas MacGregor Theory X and Theory Y.
Communicating for Results Seventh Edition Cheryl Hamilton, Ph.D.
Managing Conflict and the Art of Negotiation
Copyright 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Chapter 4 Negotiation and the Management of Conflict.
Strategy And Tactics of Integrative Negotiation
Behavioural Management Theories
Chapter 1 Leadership.
Stewart L. Tubbs McGraw-Hill© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 7 C H A P T E R Conflict Management.
Principles of Interpersonal Leadership
Educational Leadership. Douglas McGregor ’ s Theory X Assumptions that the administrator may hold: 1. The average person inherently dislikes work and.
Part 4 E – 1 V3.0 THE IIA’S CIA LEARNING SYSTEM TM 1.Conflict resolution 2.Added-value negotiating Section Topics Part 4, Section E.
History of Management Thought. F. M. Taylor & Scientific Management Launch a radical revolution focusing on productivity after the industrial revolution.
Motivating Employees.
© 2007 by Prentice Hall1 Chapter 7: Managing Conflict 7 -
©2011 Discovery Learning, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Now What….. I want the last remaining orange and so do you.
Management Practices Lecture 4 1. Recap The Evolution of Management Theory – Scientific Management theory – The 4 Principles – Problems of Scientific.
FSA Psy Organizational Culture and Management.
16 Personality Types What 4 letter are you?. Intraverted Individuals are …. …thought oriented, prefer to gain insights and depth of knowledge, prefer.
Getting Your Boss to Say “Yes!” Dr. Rita Martinez-Purson Dean of Continuing Education The University of New Mexico.
The History of Management
The History of Management Appendix Chapter One Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Chapter 4 Managing Conflict and the Art of Negotiation.
UNIT II ORGANIZATION THEORY APROACHES
Goals Chapter 2.2 Explain the principles of total quality management.
Supervision Motivating your employees. Content Group presentation Questions and answers Motivating your employees Questions about the mid-term.
Unions and the collective bargaining process MIR 810 Unions and Collective Bargaining.
Page 1 Page 2 Program Objectives (1 of 2)  Understand past, present and future concepts/trends.  Develop.
Negotiation and Bargaining Distributive or integrated Negotiation ?
Douglas McGregor ’ s Theory X Assumptions that the administrator may hold: 1. The average person inherently dislikes work and will avoid it whenever possible.
Motivation By:- Ranjana Singh. Motivation Motivation:- Motivation refers to the process by which a person’s efforts are energized, directed and sustained.
Johnny Nick Rehder. Douglas McGregor was an American social psychologist. His famous X-Y theory was used in his 1960 book The human side of Enterprise.
Inventory of Human Relations 1.How do you get a long with each person at work? 2.What are you attitudes toward each person? 3.Check your responses to.
Communicating for Results 9e 2 Key Ideas Formal and Informal communication Coordination of people and groups Organization Models Organizational Communication.
Conflict. Examples of conflict Think back on cases, exercises etc. Others.
The Art and Science of Decision-Making April 28, 2014 Robert S. Duboff
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Sick Leave Negotiation Debriefing Questions
What Makes Integrative Negotiation Different?
Strategy And Tactics of Integrative Negotiation
Working and Partnering with Others
Managerial Behaviour and Effectiveness
نظرية الادارة التربوية مدرس المساق : الدكتور اشرف الصايغ
INDIVIDUAL INTERVENTIONS
Achievement Motivation
Project Human Resource Management
Managing Conflict and the Art of Negotiation
MANA 5350 Dr. Jeanne Michalski
Chapter 7: Managing Conflict © 2007 by Prentice Hall 7 -
Presentation transcript:

University of California Berkeley Extension Copyright © 2007 Patrick McDermott Barry Boehm, discussed in “Barry Boehm’s “Theory W” Principle of Software Project Management” in Glass, Robert L., Software Conflict 2.0: The Art and Science of Software Engineering, Atlanta, Georgia: developer.* Books ( ), 2006 (Software Creativity: Essays on the Art and Science of Software Engineering, 1990), pp

Sources Theory X (Authoritarian) Theory Y (Participatory) –Douglas McGregor, MIT –Scientific vs. Humanistic Theory Z (Consensus) –Japanese Management Theory –Consensus –Based on Deming Boehm Theory W –Win Win Management Ouchi, William, Theory Z: How American Business can meet the Japanese Challenge, Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley ( ), 1981.

Theory X People inherently dislike work. They have to be coerced into working. They prefer being told what to do. “Theory X is based on an assumption that people must be prodded into doing work; this tends to result in an adversarial management-developer relationship, and in fact does not accurately reflect the nature of software people.” —Barry Boehm

Theory Y People don't inherently dislike work. People can exercise self-direction. Commitment to objectives depends on resulting rewards. People can learn to seek responsibility. Work creativity is widely distributed. People potential is only partly utilized. “Theory Y is based on an assumption that people will work well if they are rewarded properly; this tends to result in the creation of a self-oriented work force, and tends to break down when conflict is encountered.” —Barry Boehm

Theory Z People work best toward goals which they have helped establish. Once people have bought into goals, you can trust them to perform. If people share a common set of values, they can develop workable project goals. “Theory Z, the so-called “Japanese-style management,” is useful in a single community of workers, but tends to break down when multiple organizations, such as software’s managers, customers, developers and maintainers are involved.” —Barry Boehm

The Theory Z Bar

Theory W W stands for “Make Everyone a Winner” 1.Establish a set win-win preconditions. Understand what the win conditions for each player really are. Establish objectives which include making those wins possible. Provide a supportive environment in which all participants accept the possibility of a win-win solution. 2.Structure a win-win software process. Establish a realistic process plan, including the flagging of win- lose and lose-lose situations as risks. Provide feedback which keeps involved as negotiation and compromise proceed. 3.Structure a win-win software product. Define a final software product which matches all the win conditions, those of the user and the maintainer.

A Win for Each Player

Boehm’s Steps 1.Separate the people from the Problem. 2.Focus of Interests, not positions. 3.Invent Options for mutual gain. 4.Insist on using objective Criteria to analyze the results. “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you —if you were like them” —Barry Boehm