MGT Efficiency Review Report Response Process Information that may inform budget development processes.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Colorado Audit A Case Study in Audit Resolution 1 Bonnie Little, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.
Advertisements

You have been given a mission and a code. Use the code to complete the mission and you will save the world from obliteration…
Alabama Primary Health Care Association
Chapter 1 The Study of Body Function Image PowerPoint
Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
Slide 1 FastFacts Feature Presentation May 28, 2009 We are using audio during this session, so please dial in to our conference line… Phone number:
UNITED NATIONS Shipment Details Report – January 2006.
1 Superintendents FY 2004 Proposed Budget. 2 Where We Started Moderate county revenue growth – 7% Over $1.2 billion state budget deficit Continued student.
County of Fairfax, Virginia 1 Department of Transportation Bus Stop Improvement Program Fairfax County Department of Transportation Transit Services Division.
1 North Carolina Office of the State Auditor Excellence, Responsibility, Can-Do Attitude, & Teamwork.
1 OAS Financial Management Challenges and Program- Budget Implications 1 SECRETARIAT FOR ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE October 2008.
Submitted by: Nathalie Means, Special Assignment Dr. Carlinda Purcell, Chief Academic Officer
Building Our Future: One Community, One School, One Child at a Time Goals of the Special Administrative Board St. Louis Public Schools October 14, 2008.
Elements of High Quality Preschool Programs New Jersey Administrative Code N.J.A.C. 6A:13A.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Status Report on Administrative Response to December 11, 2006 Alleghany Co. School Board Resolution on Alleghany High School Presented by Dr. Robert P.
1 CREATING AN ADMINISTRATIVE DRAW REQUEST (HBA) Complete a Checklist for Administrative Draw Requests (Form 16.08). Draw Requests amount must agree with.
1 CREATING AN ADMINISTRATIVE DRAW REQUEST (OCC) Complete a Checklist for Administrative Draw Requests (Form 16.08). Draw Requests amount must agree with.
February, 2010 LEA Support Advisory Council. Agenda 2:30-3:00Discuss plan revision process (feedback and support) 3:00-3:30Discuss February workshops.
2 HOME DELIVERED MEALS Waiver Workshop Presented by: Regional and Local Services (RLS) Access and Intake /Area Agency on Aging (A&I/AAA) May 27-28, 2009.
Year 6 mental test 5 second questions
Year 6 mental test 10 second questions
2010 fotografiert von Jürgen Roßberg © Fr 1 Sa 2 So 3 Mo 4 Di 5 Mi 6 Do 7 Fr 8 Sa 9 So 10 Mo 11 Di 12 Mi 13 Do 14 Fr 15 Sa 16 So 17 Mo 18 Di 19.
ZMQS ZMQS
Presenter:Dr. Maureen White Developer: Dr. Chuck Wiseley 12/9/10 1.
Richmond House, Liverpool (1) 26 th January 2004.
Assessment Cycle or Circular File: Do Academic Librarians Use Information Literacy Assessment Data? Megan Oakleaf & Lisa Hinchliffe Library Assessment.
Town Hall Presentation January 9-10, 2002 Curtis Powell Vice President for Human Resources The Division of Human Resources and William M. Mercer, Incorporated.
2009 Strategic Planning playbook
1 Commonwealth of Virginia Executive Branch Strategic Planning, Service Area Planning, and Performance-Based Budgeting Productivity Measurement June 2008.
ABC Technology Project
EU market situation for eggs and poultry Management Committee 20 October 2011.
1 Presentation on the Cross-Boundary Municipalities Laws Repeal & Related Matters Amendment Bill, 19 February 2009 NCOP Select Committee, Parliament, Cape.
Mississippi Special Education Advisory Panel Annual Report to the State Board of Education July 2009.
VOORBLAD.
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT State Purchasing Division SHARE e-Procurement Enhancement Project Certification-Implementation Phase April 22, 2009.
Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting
School District U-46 Elementary Language Arts Literacy Framework Survey Results Created and distributed by the District Teacher Leader Curriculum Liaisons.
1 ASPEN-SBM (State Based Marketplace) Project Certification February 19, 2014.
Recommendations to the Union Management Committee from the Pink Sheet Work Group January 2014.
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
Understanding Generalist Practice, 5e, Kirst-Ashman/Hull
City Council Meeting Agenda Items October 28, 2013.
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
General Fund Budget Calendar Review Niagara Falls City School District Budget Cynthia Bianco Superintendent of Schools Tim Hyland Rebecca Holody.
Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP.
25 seconds left…...
Januar MDMDFSSMDMDFSSS
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
District Leadership Team Stakeholder Involvement in the District Strategic Plan! Session #4 April 12th, 2011.
Intracellular Compartments and Transport
PSSA Preparation.
Fourth Quarter Oklahoma Data (October-December 2011)
Christina School District StubbsBancroftBayard BOARD OF EDUCATION UPDATE OCTOBER 14, 2014 Priority Schools 2014/2015 October Update.
Instructional Hours Required Instructional Time / OAR
Proposed School Budget RTSD Board of School Directors Investing in Excellence Radnor Township School District February 24, 2009.
27 February 2012 Provost's Report to College Senate.
Dedham Public Schools proposed FY14 operating budget
Budget Planning Calendar
Presentation transcript:

MGT Efficiency Review Report Response Process Information that may inform budget development processes

Introduction In the fall 2008, our school division contracted with the Virginia Department of Planning and Budget (DPB) to have an efficiency review conducted. MGT of America, Inc. (the consulting group who assisted in the development of our current Strategic Plan) was hired by the DPB to examine all operational areas in the division—division administration, human resources, finance, purchasing, educational service delivery costs, special education, facilities, transportation, technology management, and food service. This process was undertaken to identify best practices as well as opportunities for increased efficiency. As stewards of public funds, it is important that we fully use our available resources and ensure as much funding as possible goes to instruction. The cost to the school division for the review is $30,000, which reflects 25% of the total cost. In exchange for the state subsidy of $90,000, the DPB requires that a school division implement a minimum of 50% of the recommendations in the final report. If the school division chooses not to implement the recommendations, they will be charged an additional 25% of the cost. The details concerning what constitutes adequate implementation are agreed upon between the school division and the DPB. There is a two-year time frame for implementation.

Budget Development Process Date Response to Efficiency Review Report Presentation and approval of proposed budget calendar and public comment October 2, 2008 Distribution of budget materials to principals and budget holders October Budget meetings completed with budget holdersOctober 31, 2008 Introduction of Superintendent’s budget and processNovember 6, 2008 Principals introductionNovember 17, 2008 Coordinators introductionNovember 17, 2008 PTO Presidents lunchNovember 24, 2008 Budget update and public commentDecember 4, 2008 Town Hall MeetingDecember 9, 2008 Principals MeetingDecember 10, 2008 Budget Review CommitteeDecember 18, 2008 Budget update and public commentDecember 18, 2008 Budget update and public comment Public release of MGT efficiency review recommendations January 8, 2009 School Board receives the report Budget Process & Response to MGT Report

Budget Development Process Date Response to Efficiency Review Report January 9, 2009 Principals review report summary and provide preliminary feedback. January 9 &12, 2009 Principals meet with school staff for report review and feedback Budget Review Committee meets to discuss MGT recommendations January 13, 2009Budget Review Committee discusses the report Budget Work SessionJanuary 15, 2009 Budget Review Committee finalizes report to the Superintendent January 21, 2009 PTO Council Coffee to discuss the efficiency review report Finalize budget priorities and public commentJanuary 22, 2009 Budget Work Session –School Board and Superintendent set budget priorities January 24, 2009 February 2, 2009TACC discusses staff feedback on report Presentation of Superintendent’s proposed budget and public hearing February 5, 2009 ONGOING THROUGH JANUARY 2011 and BEYOND… School Board and Superintendent discuss report and provide direction to staff regarding implementation of recommendations. Superintendent and staff discuss implications of implementing recommendations, seek parents/community input as appropriate, develop implementation plans including associated costs, and provide periodic updates to the School Board and community. Update of Superintendent’s budget and public comment February 19, 2009 School Board approval of Superintendent’s budget February 26, 2009 Presentation of approved budget to City CouncilMarch 2, 2009 City Council approval of budgetApril 14, Budget Process & Response to MGT Report