National Training and Education System

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module 7 National Incident Management System:
Advertisements

NIMS ICS All-Hazard Position Specific Training – A Way Forward A Special Presentation for the All Hazards IMT Conference Houston, Texas November 4.
GIS Executive Council and Advisory Committee Update November 2010.
Introduction to VET Quality Assurance in the UK Mark Novels 6 th December 2011 Quality Assurance in Technical and Vocational Education and Skills Study.
CDCs 21 Goals. CDC Strategic Imperatives 1. Health impact focus: Align CDCs people, strategies, goals, investments & performance to maximize our impact.
Managing the Workforce Impact in a Government Transformation The Government of Canada Experience to date Margaret Van Amelsvoort-Thoms Executive Director,
The Implementation Structure DG AGRI, October 2005
International Telecommunication Union An Insight into BDT Programme 3 Marco Obiso ICT Applications and Cybersecurity Division Telecommunication Development.
1 Advisory Council April 1, 2011 Child Care Development Fund – State Plan for Federal Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013.
1 EEC Board Meeting May 10, 2011 Child Care Development Fund – State Plan for Federal Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013.
Minnesota Port and Waterway Security Working Group Meeting April 12, 2012.
Gaining Senior Leadership Support for Continuity of Operations
HE in FE: The Higher Education Academy and its Subject Centres Ian Lindsay Academic Advisor HE in FE.
WP3. Evaluation, Monitoring and Quality Plan Dr. Luis Sobrado 27 th May 2011.
1 Kentuckys Public Safety Awareness Initiative Program Coordination and Partnerships August 23, 2005.
Management Plans: A Roadmap to Successful Implementation
Portfolio Management, according to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-16 Supplemental Guidance, is the coordination of Federal geospatial.
INTEGRATING RISK MANAGEMENT INTO THE HOMELAND SECURITY ENTERPRISE Brief to OEMA Spring Directors Seminar 12 April 2012SPRING DIRECTORS' SEMINAR
A Roadmap to Successful Implementation Management Plans.
UWSEM Investment Guidelines and Strategy Frameworks for
A-16 Portfolio Management Implementation Plan Update
Collaborative Planning as an Effective Tool for Program Management and Sustainability … beyond UASI funding … Sandra Davis Sandra Davis Denise Barrett.
Effective Contract Management Planning
1 Division of Aging and Adult Services (DAAS) Knowledge Management and Transfer Project 7/30/12.
1. 2 August Recommendation 9.1 of the Strategic Information Technology Advisory Committee (SITAC) report initiated the effort to create an Administrative.
Building a Strategic Management System Office for Student Affairs, Twin Cities Campus Ground Level Work Metrics Initiatives Managing Change Change Management.
Directions for this Template  Use the Slide Master to make universal changes to the presentation, including inserting your organization’s logo –“View”
IS-700.A: National Incident Management System, An Introduction
Settlement Program Logic Model
Virtual National Training and Exercise Symposium April 17, 2013
National Preparedness Report Understanding Core Capabilities 16 April 2013.
National Exercise Program
NIMS Resource Management IS-703.A – August 2010 Visual 2.1 Unit 2: Resource Management Overview.
G-131 & E/L-131: Exercise Evaluation and Improvement Planning
Visual 3.1 Delegation of Authority & Management by Objectives Unit 3: Delegation of Authority & Management by Objectives.
HR Manager – HR Business Partners Role Description
Oregon State Library Transformation Project Launch
Unit 1: Introductions and Course Overview Administrative Information  Daily schedule  Restroom locations  Breaks and lunch  Emergency exit routes 
A Systemic Approach February, Two important changes in the Perkins Act of 2006 A requirement for the establishment of Programs of Study A new approach.
National Incident Management System Overview. Homeland Security Presidential Directive 5 Directed Secretary, DHS to develop and administer: 1.National.
THIRA FEPA Mid Year Work Session THIRA – EMPG/HSGP Grant Requirement Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA) “THIRA processes.
National Incident Management System Overview Briefing Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 Implementation.
Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Guide Comprehensive Preparedness Guide (CPG) 201.
IS 700.a NIMS An Introduction. The NIMS Mandate HSPD-5 requires all Federal departments and agencies to: Adopt and use NIMS in incident management programs.
1 Executive Office of Public Safety. 2 National Incident Management System.
Session 6 Integrated Emergency Management. Objectives of the Session Students will be able to 6.1 Define the principle of integration. 6.2Discuss the.
Session 121 National Incident Management Systems Session 12 Slide Deck.
From the IT Assessment to the IT Roadmap ( )
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
The National Incident Management System. Homeland Security Presidential Directive 5 To prevent, prepare for, respond to, and recover from terrorist attacks,
National Incident Management System. Homeland Security Presidential Directive – 5 Directed the development of the National Incident Management System.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
Part of a Broader Strategy
Overview of NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience October 2013 DRAFT.
National Preparedness All Hazards Consortium Corey Gruber Assistant Deputy Administrator, National Preparedness National Preparedness.
NIST Special Publication Revision 1
2008 New York - Member Forum Council for Responsible Jewellery Practices, Ltd. Overview of CRJP.
Critical Infrastructure Protection: Program Overview
United We Ride: Where are we Going? December 11, 2013 Rik Opstelten United We Ride Program Analyst.
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
The Regionalization Project New Regional Field Coordinator Orientation.
EPA Geospatial Segment United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information Enterprise Architecture Program Segment Architecture.
Emergency Management Training and Education System Protection and National Preparedness National Preparedness Directorate National Training and Education.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
1 An Overview of Process and Procedures for Health IT Collaboration GSA Office of Citizen Services and Communications Intergovernmental Solutions Division.
NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Department of Homeland Security Executive Office of Public Safety.
Mgt Project Portfolio Management and the PMO Module 8 - Fundamentals of the Program Management Office Dr. Alan C. Maltz Howe School of Technology.
Continuity Guidance Circular Webinar
Sam Catherine Johnston, Senior TA Specialist National AEM Center
Cynthia Curry, Director National AEM Center
Presentation transcript:

National Training and Education System April 16, 2013

Overview The National Training and Education System (NTES) will consist of policies, processes, and tools through which the requirements for homeland security training and education will drive the supply of training and education courses offered to the Whole Community 2

Background Pursuant to Presidential Policy Directive 8, the National Preparedness System (2011) called for the creation of the NTES “to enable the Whole Community to access training and education in support of preparedness” Under the Post Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act, 6 USC §748, “the [FEMA] Administrator, in coordination with the heads of appropriate Federal agencies, the National Council on Disability, and the National Advisory Council, carries out a national training program…” As with the National Exercise Program (NEP), NTES services the Whole Community, including Federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial (SLTT) governments

Right Student in the Right Course Core Functions of NTES Establish Training and Education Policy Right Course: Perform requirements analysis to identify the required courses for NTES funding Right Student: Institute a process to ensure that the correct selection of students will have access to NTES-funded programming Right Student in the Right Course Establish and Foster an Integrated Homeland Security Training and Exercise Community of Practice

National Training and Education System Status Update National Training and Education System (NTES) called for in PPD-8/NPS and a “National Training Program” called for under PKEMRA Initial draft NTES document approved by FEMA leadership was shared with Interagency through the PPD-8 working group By consolidating existing FEMA technology and administrative resources, all principal requirements to operate NTES should be met. Partnerships with other entities, both inside and outside of FEMA/DHS (e.g. DHS S&T analytical support), could dramatically reduce implementation timelines We have socialized NTES concept with key Whole Community (WC) partners including academics and S/L/T/T, and received feedback with wide acceptance and support (began 1/2012)

FEMA “AS IS” Environment Analysis completed of the re-programmable funding associated with specialized courses provided by CDP, EMI, and NTED: In FY12, Training Covered All Core Capabilities 583 distinct courses delivered across CDP, NTED and EMI Verified opportunity for validating “Right Student, Right Course” Law Enforcement personnel accounted for 45% of CDP and NTED course completions Awareness courses continue to account for the highest proportion of course completions in FY12 FY03-FY12, CHDS, CDP, and NTED training and education course completions were generally proportional to the average population within a given U.S. state/territory No mechanism to validate/corroborate training made available is most effective use of limited NTES funding

Problem Statement – “WHY NTES?” Provision of T&E is based on the training providers and/or the individual or organizational “wants” instead of national requirements or core capability needs identified in a risk-centric, capability based approach resulting in an open course catalog this is not mapped to core capabilities No risk-centric, capability-based application process exists to match the “right student” to the “right course” Interagency and FEMA resourcing is variable/not equitable and programming decisions are not grounded in risk or aimed specifically at building and sustaining core capabilities Need for prioritization between NTES funded programing focused on complex and unique programming that builds more progressive competency (e.g., ICS- 400, live agent training, etc.,) and more basic (e.g., awareness training that can be delivered locally), that would allow NTES to focus on “higher value”/payoff core capability training and education requirements

Key Functions of the National Training Education System 1 2 3

Requirements Drive Resource Allocation 1 Through the NTES, FEMA and its partners will continually collect and analyze training and education requirements from across the Whole Community and modify programming to address those requirements. Requirements Capability Estimation Other SPR THIRA Enrollment Data NPR SFI AARs Legislation/Policy Analysis Analyze requirements to prioritize resource allocation to address core capability needs NTES Outputs Manage FEMA and its partners modify programming of T&E assets (e.g., NDPC, EMI, NPS) Example mechanisms: Budget process; CTGP Influence FEMA and its partners modify grant guidance to reflect prioritization of core capability T&E needs Example mechanism: Preparedness Grants Program Inform NTES guidance is to intra- and interagency partners to inform grants, curricula, and programming Example mechanisms: Interagency grant programs, NTES working groups, bulletins to instructor portal Examine a broad range of potential requirements sources, including: Capability Estimations and shortfall analyses State Preparedness Reports Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessments (THIRA) Participant feedback and post-exercise/incident assessment tools Course enrollment data Organizational/employer needs

Linking Capabilities, Competencies, and Modules 1 Prioritize Shortfalls Collaborating with training partners and experts from the homeland security domains: Identify the competencies that support each core capability Identify the specific KSAs that build the competencies within each domain Identify and develop the modules that support development of those KSAs and competencies and where there are shortfalls and redundancies in current course offerings Assign “values” to the different modules, to determine the amount competency that each course provide and allow for the most efficient use of resources Successful mapping will allow for more precision in the allocation of resources to specific modules to maximize the competency gained/course

Right Courses for the Right Students 1 The NTES processes will maximize the efficiency of T&E resource allocation, increasing the competency gained per course 2013 Target: Training that focuses on requisite competencies to build and sustain relevant capabilities Current State NTES Target State Emphasis starting in 2001: Training for everyone on a broad array of subjects to raise awareness and performance without the boundaries now provided by the core capabilities Cost/Course Right Student Competency/Course

Creates and Fosters a Homeland Security T&E Community 2 NTES processes provide and encourage an exchange of information between training and education providers and academics in order to enhance competencies NTES benefits the Whole T&E Community not just traditional Training and Education providers

Creates and Fosters a Homeland Security T&E Community (cont’d) 2 The NTES is designed to address current shortfalls in the development and provision of homeland security T&E by building and strengthening a truly integrated community of practice No common framework for attaining academic degrees based on current course work NTES: facilitates development of academic articulation agreements that enable professionals to attain credits and transfer them efficiently No means for T&E providers and faculty to receive the latest USG policy and guidance NTES: implement mechanisms to communicate new/changes in policy and other critical information to the stakeholders who need it, so that trainers/educators remain aligned to national priorities Professionals, from the volunteer firefighter to the epidemiologist to the police officer, lack a common set of homeland security foundational knowledge NTES: develop and promote homeland security fundamentals for use in academics and training centers from all disciplines, to build baseline knowledge and a mutual understanding of roles and responsibilities within the enterprise

Creates and Fosters a Homeland Security T&E Community (cont’d) 2 No process by which institutions can establish pedagogic and exercise domain research agenda NTES: establish formal mechanism for homeland security professionals to transmit their pedagogic and exercise research and development needs T&E providers and instructors have no common means to list available courses and learn about courses offered by others NTES: establish a universal catalogue capability open to all providers that allows professionals to search for/find courses of interest that meet their criteria/needs No common mechanism for professionals to provide real-time or immediate, post-event feedback from training, exercises, and incidents NTES: develop a capability for professionals to both submit feedback on T&E needs/shortfalls from events and receive an automated-customized training recommendation in support of their Individual Development Plan No national-level means for enabling course developers to share course content with peers NTES: Establish processes and tools to allow sharing, use, and re-use of course content and materials

Creates and Fosters a Homeland Security T&E Community (cont’d) 2 No common platform for instructors to share their best practices and lessons learned NTES: fosters sharing of pedagogical best practices to promote innovation within the community No formal means for professionals to provide their real-time training requirements in response to an event and for providers to deliver that training quickly and easily NTES: implement ways to gather real-time training requirements and delivers just in time training that addresses those requirements, to support professionals during real-world operations Newly elected and appointed officials may not have access to formal T&E to support incident management and cross-functional coordination NTES: direct promotion of multi-disciplinary, inter-jurisdictional T&E that support mutual understanding, authorities, operational coordination, and joint decision-making among senior leadership No means for a professional to view and understand their qualifications and experiences NTES: develop a single standardized record to enable professionals, T&E institutions, and employers to have a common understanding of an individual’s education, training, exercises, and real-world experiences

Integrate T&E Processes and Systems 3 FEMA will integrate and develop the process and systems with integrated tools that enable all aspects of the NTES: Facilitate the collection and analysis of the T&E requirements Encourage community collaboration and innovation; for example: Local organizations will be able to post their own training and personnel needs and best practices The community can then be invited to comment or suggest improvements Provide an enterprise platform for end-users to Create personal development plans Access a universal open catalogue, Receive course recommendations, Establish a standardized record of training, education and experience

NTES Milestones Gain formal agreement on NTES system document Continue mapping courses to core capabilities Begin to map competencies to core capabilities Acquire Data for Training Requirements analysis Decompose courses into modules Continue ongoing efforts of working group of NPD representatives to oversee implementation activities

Summary The NTES is a fundamental and necessary transformation in the development and delivery of homeland security training and education Resourcing and accessing training and education programming based on requirements, not simply “wants” Allocation of training and education resources based on analysis of requirements and prioritized core capability needs and shortfalls Matches the right students to the right courses, increasing the efficiency of training delivery and maximizing the competency gained per dollar spent Connects instructors and stakeholders to foster information sharing and common practices Provides a host of tools and technologies to improve training and education planning, delivery, and outcomes NTES will create/support a T&E integrated community of practice based on sharing common practices, guidance and coordinated efforts

Background Information

Alignment to the National Preparedness System (NPS) The NPS Components Supports the “Building and Sustaining Capabilities” component of the NPS Balances T&E resources for priority core capability shortfalls and sustaining all core capabilities Maps competencies and programming to core capabilities Leverages existing tools, reports, and processes of the NPS, including: Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA) Capability Estimation (CE) Strategic National Risk Assessment (SNRA) Preparedness Grants Program National Preparedness Report (NPR) and State Preparedness Reports (SPR)

End of presentation