The Great Toilet Paper Experiment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Example 12.2 Multicollinearity | 12.3 | 12.3a | 12.1a | 12.4 | 12.4a | 12.1b | 12.5 | 12.4b a12.1a a12.1b b The Problem.
Advertisements

SADC Course in Statistics Tests for Variances (Session 11)
Chapter 10: The t Test For Two Independent Samples
Proportions and Inference 1 and 2 – proportion z-tests
Hours Listening To Music In A Week! David Burgueño, Nestor Garcia, Rodrigo Martinez.
Small differences. Two Proportion z-Interval and z-Tests.
Chapter 15 ANOVA.
Designing Experiments
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 10 One- and Two-Sample Tests of Hypotheses.
1 Important Terms Variable – A variable is any characteristic whose value may change from one individual to another A univariate data set consists of.
Testing Hypotheses About Proportions
Chapter 13 Comparing Two Populations: Independent Samples.
Regression and correlation methods
Rapid Rising Water Name.
Science Fair Project Comparison in Strength of Wet Paper Towels
The Scientific Method. Consumer Reporting Magazine Helping consumers make smart choices! To Robert R. Lazar Middle School: We here at Consumer Reporting.
Angela Wolfe. Molly Flynn. It is important to know which brand of freezer bag is the strongest because you want the best quality bag for your frozen foods.
Information contained here is taken from Junction Hill.
Paintball Barrel Accuracy 9-4 Project 3. Purpose My purpose is to find out which paintball marker barrel is the most ball on ball accurate between the.
General Set up of the exam. Two Sections Multiple Choice Multiple Choice 90 minutes 90 minutes 40 questions 40 questions Free Response Free Response 90.
Tips for Writing Free Response Questions on the AP Statistics Exam Laura Trojan Cannon School.
Objectives (BPS chapter 15)
QBM117 Business Statistics Statistical Inference Sampling 1.
Section 7.1 Hypothesis Testing: Hypothesis: Null Hypothesis (H 0 ): Alternative Hypothesis (H 1 ): a statistical analysis used to decide which of two competing.
Statistics Micro Mini Threats to Your Experiment!
Stat 512 – Lecture 17 Inference for Regression (9.5, 9.6)
7-2 Estimating a Population Proportion
Confidence Intervals: Estimating Population Mean
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 8-1 Chapter Sampling Distributions 8 © 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Step 1: Choose a Topic. Get a notebook to record all information collected for your project. Do research to learn as much as you can about the experiment.
Tests of significance: The basics BPS chapter 15 © 2006 W.H. Freeman and Company.
PAPER TOWEL TESTING By Jahon and McKenzie.
Copyright © 2012 by Nelson Education Limited. Chapter 8 Hypothesis Testing II: The Two-Sample Case 8-1.
Review of Statistical Inference Prepared by Vera Tabakova, East Carolina University ECON 4550 Econometrics Memorial University of Newfoundland.
Tests of significance: The basics BPS chapter 15 © 2006 W.H. Freeman and Company.
Confidence Intervals for the Regression Slope 12.1b Target Goal: I can perform a significance test about the slope β of a population (true) regression.
Section Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture Slides Elementary Statistics Twelfth Edition and the Triola Statistics Series.
The Sampling Distribution of a Difference Between Two Means!
Does More Powerful Really Mean More Power?
Introduction to inference Tests of significance IPS chapter 6.2 © 2006 W.H. Freeman and Company.
1 In this case, each element of a population is assigned to one and only one of several classes or categories. Chapter 11 – Test of Independence - Hypothesis.
Sullivan – Fundamentals of Statistics – 2 nd Edition – Chapter 10 Section 1 – Slide 1 of 34 Chapter 10 Section 1 The Language of Hypothesis Testing.
COMPILED BY: GARRETT SCHATTE SCIENTIFIC METHOD. OBJECTIVES 1.Develop a hypothesis 2.Develop an experiment to test a hypothesis 3.Collect data 4.Make measurements.
Lecture 16 Section 8.1 Objectives: Testing Statistical Hypotheses − Stating hypotheses statements − Type I and II errors − Conducting a hypothesis test.
Sta220 - Statistics Mr. Smith Room 310 Class #18.
Section 10.1 Confidence Intervals
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Section 7-1 Review and Preview.
Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing 9.1 The Language of Hypothesis Testing.
By: Hanna Briestensky Problem Determine how the height from which the ball is dropped, effects how high that the ball will bounce back up.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 12 Analysis of Variance.
How To Experiment By Mr. Reiner. Observation You notice something, and wonder why it happens. You see something and wonder what causes it. You want to.
Introduction to inference Tests of significance IPS chapter 6.2 © 2006 W.H. Freeman and Company.
1 Module One: Measurements and Uncertainties No measurement can perfectly determine the value of the quantity being measured. The uncertainty of a measurement.
By: Will Schubert. Determine how the height you drop a ball from affects the height the ball bounces back up. Problem.
Nabisco Hundred Calorie Packs Lorna Doone Short Bread Cookies Laurie Doyle, Beth Connolly, Helen Kushnir.
AP Statistics.  If our data comes from a simple random sample (SRS) and the sample size is sufficiently large, then we know that the sampling distribution.
Tests of significance: The basics BPS chapter 14 © 2006 W.H. Freeman and Company.
How to write an effective conclusion Also known as putting it all together.
AP Stat 2007 Free Response. 1. A. Roughly speaking, the standard deviation (s = 2.141) measures a “typical” distance between the individual discoloration.
STA248 week 121 Bootstrap Test for Pairs of Means of a Non-Normal Population – small samples Suppose X 1, …, X n are iid from some distribution independent.
Unit 5: Hypothesis Testing
By: Dabao Zhu and Eva Chao
Tips for Writing Free Response Questions on the AP Statistics Exam
Tips for Writing Free Response Questions on the AP Statistics Exam
Tests of significance: The basics
Step 1: Choose a Topic. Get a notebook to record all information collected for your project. Do research to learn as much as you can about the experiment.
CHAPTER 8 Confidence Estimating with Estimating a Population 8.3 Mean
Chapter 10 Analyzing the Association Between Categorical Variables
How to Make a Data Chart.
CHAPTER – 1.1 UNCERTAINTIES IN MEASUREMENTS.
Presentation transcript:

The Great Toilet Paper Experiment By Robert Feasley and Allie O’Hora AP Statistics period 1

Problem Statement We want to find out: which brand of toilet paper is the strongest? In other words, is the price of a certain brand of toilet paper correlated with its strength and quality?

The Goods 1. Seventh Generation Organic 2. Charmin Ultra 4-pack: $3.99 at Whole Foods 2. Charmin Ultra 4-pack: $4.49 at Giant Food

The Goods, continued 3. Cottonelle Double with Ripples 4. Scott 1-ply 4-pack: $3.79 at Giant Food 4. Scott 1-ply 4-pack: $2.49 at Giant Food

Hypothesis Because we are testing the correlation between price and strength, we hypothesize that the most expensive brand, Charmin Ultra, will perform the best in a strength test. H0: Dampened Charmin Ultra toilet paper will sustain larger amounts of weight than the other brands under the same conditions. HA: Another brand of toilet paper, when dampened, will sustain a larger amount of weight than Charmin Ultra.

Experimental Design We bought two rolls of each brand of toilet paper. We assume that these four rolls can be considered a random sample of all rolls manufactured by that brand. We then unrolled 20 feet of used a random number table to select values, 0-9, to determine which part of that 20-foot section we would use for our sample. For example, a value of “9” meant that we would use feet 18 and 19 as the selected 2 foot section from the 20 feet of toilet paper. In this way, we randomized the portion of the paper used as well as the selection of the roll itself. We did this for each roll, meaning that for each brand tested we had two trials. To minimize any sources of error, we also standardized the weights we used (nickels), the amount of water we applied to each (2 tablespoons), the location and spread of the water on the paper, and the way in which the experiment was set up.

Process Measure two feet of toilet paper determined by randomized experimental design (see previous slide) Stretch length of toilet paper across two chairs, supports or similar so that 1 foot is suspended without any support. Secure with two equally sized weights Apply 2 tablespoons of water in a circular motion so that the center of the paper is uniformly soaked. Drop a nickel onto the center of the paper from a height of about 2 inches. Repeat step four until the paper breaks. Count the number of nickels used and calculate the weight that the toilet paper withstood. Record data. Repeat as necessary – two trials for each brand, four trials in total.

Assumptions/Constants The weight of 1 nickel is 4.5 grams. We assume each roll of toilet paper can be considered a SRS of their brand and that each 2-foot section is a random sample of the roll itself. There is no reason to believe that the rolls of toilet paper or the separate sections from each roll are not independent from one another. Though sample size is small, we will perform the sample anyway, carefully maintaining conditions to ensure that we do not introduce any bias or confounding.

Data/Results Brand Trial 1 – weight sustained Charmin 45g (10 nickels) 49.5g (11 nickels) Seventh Generation 40.5g (9 nickels) 31.5g (7 nickels) Cottonelle 54g (12 nickels) Scott 27g (6 nickels) 18g (4 nickels)

Conclusion and Application We concluded that Cottonelle brand toilet paper is the strongest. Our hypothesis – that price is correlated with strength – was somewhat correct in that the higher-priced toilet papers (Cottonelle, Charmin) performed better. However, our H0 was ultimately incorrect; Cottonelle outperformed Charmin toilet paper in the tests. We noted that two-ply toilet papers, which are also the more expensive varieties, supported significantly more weight in our tests than did the one-ply brands. In terms of application, if you are looking for a strong, sturdy toilet paper, you should consider shelling out the extra cash for a two-ply brand like Cottonelle or Charmin.

Possible Confounding Factors/ Sources of Error A few possible sources of error might include: Human error: unequal distance/force of nickel drop, etc. Inconsistencies in the quality of the toilet paper Inherent differences in the papers themselves, i.e. 1-ply vs. 2-ply

THE END!