 Cross Examination SCFI 2011 SJK. Why is CX Important?  Clarification  Concessions  Control.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Strategies for Clear Communication
Advertisements

How to Give Quality Medical Care By Kirsten Morrise.
Welcome to plexiom! Thank you for taking a few minutes to see what we’re about. plexiom.com.
It was mid-year, I’d say around November when I would have to face the consequences of a life time. I was off on my own a lot more and having fun. More.
By Mark Veeder-SCFI How to properly construct an AC and NC -Getting the most out of cross-ex -How to structure a rebuttal.
How to be an Effective Listener.
Stoa Debate Judges Orientation. Volunteers make it Happen! 2 YOU are here for a very special purpose YOU are making an investment in the future YOU assist.
Kat and Cai What to do about clash?. What is clash? Clash is vital to debate. Why? Interact with the other team Simply put, clash is pointing out the.
Expert Witness Cross Examination
Points of Information(POIs)) Training Session
Question and Answer Session
Lets take a little quiz….. By Mrs. Holm. Read the statements below and answer whether you agree or disagree. It won’t take long……………
Discussion Skills For the 2nd semester.
Step 4 Learning to Learn. For a lot of people, learning doesn’t come naturally. Learning to Learn.
Anatomy of a debate Austin Layton.
Public Forum Debate The Rules in Brief. Pre-Debate Two people debate two people. One team flips a coin and the opposing team calls heads or tails. Whoever.
Communication Strategies It Takes Two to Tango. Don’t try to hide your hearing loss Listener: Acknowledge your hearing loss and tell who you are communicating.
THE COIN TOSS Prior to each round the teams will flip a coin. The team winning the coin toss may choose either Side of Topic: Pro or Con or Order of Speaking:
Cross Examination.
Strategies for Arguing Constructively Do’s and Don’ts for effective arguing.
“As is our confidence, so is our capacity
10 MAIN POINTS TO PUT ON THE BOARD What is expected…
Researching for a Debate. What is a debate? A debate is an argument. But rather than being a shouting match between two sides, a debate has strict rules.
Socratic Seminar #1 WHY ETHNIC STUDIES?
Unit 2: Socratic Seminar
Do Now: In your journal, write about a memory in your life (good/bad) that has had a major impact on who you are today. What is the memory? How has it.
How to Debate Disadvantages. Selecting disadvantages to run  Be strategic in selecting them—a few things to remember—  Don’t run multiple disadvantages.
Crossfire CODEY HAWKINS UNIVERSITY OF WEST GEORGIA 2015 GEORGIA DEBATE INSTITUTES.
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF THE SPEECHES
4 minute Affirmative Constructive This speech is prepared ahead, rehearsed and should be perfectly timed. It is a presentation of the affirmative's position.
UCLA UCLA Moot Court Honors Program Oral Argument Workshop.
REBUTTALS (the second speech for your team…) David Childree.
A Brief Introduction to LD Jonathan Waters Grovetown High School.
LINCOLN DOUGLAS DEBATE. Table of Contents  What is it  LD Debate Structure  Terms to Know  Constructive Arguments  Affirmative  Negative  Cross.
How to Flow And why you should do it – always, all the time, in every round.
Time Management If you cannot manage yourself for effectiveness, you cannot expect to manage others” (Peter Drucker).
Debate 101 Basic Debate Workshop. Your Turn! What comes to mind when you think of debate?
Socratic Seminar By participating in Scholars will practice academic behavior and language that will be expected in a 21 st century classroom & worksplace.
WELCOME TO MILESTONES DEBATE TOURNAMENT. Qualifications for Judging RELAX!  You are fully qualified and you are brave!  It's not your job to be a debate.
Before we begin, on a sheet of paper let’s guess what word the numbers spell out. To figure this out, you must write the letter to each of the numbers.
SCFI 2011 SJK. Understand how to structure and write basic LD constructives Understand the basic components of contention-level argumentation Begin to.
Introduction to Debating. What Is Debating? A debate is when two teams present opposite sides of an issue before judges.
Cross Examination. Coming Up With Questions When you’re listening to your opponent’s speeches, it can be tempting to focus only on jotting down rebuttals,
30 ways to get 30s SCFI 2011 How to get better speaks or die trying.
WHY!? Sponsored by:. Recap 4 teams of 2 people, with 2 teams in favour of each side 4 teams of 2 people, with 2 teams in favour of each side 15 minutes.
Basic Structure of a Round. a) Before the Round Pre-flowed arguments.
Chapter 25 Cross-Examination Techniques. Purposes of Cross-Examination Clarify arguments Clarify arguments Point out misinterpretations Point out misinterpretations.
Cross Examination.
Affirmative vs. negative
LD Debate Study Information
Developed by Jenny Alme, The Harker School
Cross Examination in LD
Analyze a problem Conduct research Utilize principles of argumentation
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF THE SPEECHES
CX- 3 minutes Example of CX in Pufo.
Points of information.
A Brief Introduction to LD
Public Forum Debate Format
Beginning Strategies Novice Debate Henrichsen
Let’s talk cross-ex!.
PUBLIC FORUM DEBATE.
Debate 101 Basic Debate Workshop.
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF POLICY SPEECHES
Welcome to Debate! Cross-examination
Public Forum Debate.
CX Purpose and Strategies
Analyzing and Evaluating Arguments
Flowing & Cross-Examination
CX Purpose and Strategies
CX Purpose and Strategies
Presentation transcript:

 Cross Examination SCFI 2011 SJK

Why is CX Important?  Clarification  Concessions  Control

Clarification  If you miss something, or you need something explained to you, don’t be afraid to ask about it in CX. If you don’t get it, it’s likely that your judge doesn’t either.  Disclaimer – don’t rely on CX for this. If you can get around this by reading their case instead of asking about it in CX, that’s a good thing! The more time you have to poke holes in the case, the better.  Don’t use CX to ask for taglines, card authors, etc. Ask for the case to see those things. You’re wasting time if you clarify excessively.

Concessions  Getting concessions and weakening the position of your opponent is the primary goal of cross examination.  A couple of different strategies  Socratic method two-step trap  Asking them questions to which they could reasonably agree to get them to realize contradictions in their case  Reverse-logic trap  Getting them to wax lyrical about their case in some way that links them to your position  Terror talk, fear of death K, etc.

Control  Begin to frame the round and gain control of it  Poke holes in the case to prepare you for rebuttals, where you will rip them open  Ask “yes” or “no” questions – do not let them explain themselves in CX, especially when they make a concession  Move on right away after the concession is made  Don’t give it away, be on the offensive but don’t pull the trigger and make the argument in CX necessarily. Saving it for the rebuttal speeches is very strategic

As a Cross-Examiner…  Keep control of your own time – don’t give your opponent an extra three minutes to make their case.  Yes or no questions  As little clarification as possible  Keep driving on one point to get them to make concessions, but don’t give away the strategy  The judge and your opponent should know what argument is coming without you having made the argument

As a Cross-Examiner…  Other things to give you the perception of control:  Stand or sit slightly ahead of your opponent, it will make you look like the dominant personality  NO PAUSES. Keep asking questions and keep driving your opponent to concessions until they break under the pressure  Don’t wait after your opponent stops speaking. Stand up and start right away to catch them off guard

As a Cross-Examinee…  Don’t be bullied  Seem certain of yourself and strong – if they point out a contradiction or try to get you to make a concession, act like they don’t get the argument, regardless of the validity of the concession they are trying to get you to make.  Try not to look at your case when questions are asked. Knowing a lot about the cases and appearing as though you do is very strategic.

As a Cross-Examinee  Don’t let them control CX  When they ask yes or no questions, keep explaining after yes or no if you can. Humans are naturally resistant to interrupting their compatriots and if you keep talking, you are controlling CX  If they pause, keep talking about the previous question instead of just sitting there waiting for them to continue  Don’t get defensive – make them the defensive ones by controlling the perception of CX