RTT Analysis Workshop Species Status and Trend (Chapter 1) Casey Baldwin RTT Chairperson WDFW Research Scientist.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implementation, Limiting Factors, and Threats
Advertisements

Action Effectiveness Monitoring in the Upper Columbia (Chapter 4) Karl M. Polivka, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service.
COMPARATIVE SURVIVAL STUDY (CSS) of PIT-tagged Spring/Summer Chinook and PIT-tagged Summer Steelhead CBFWA Implementation Review Mainstem/Systemwide.
Interior Columbia Basin TRT Draft Viability Criteria June, 2005 ESU & Population Levels.
Comparative Survival Study Smolt Monitoring Program 2010 PIT Tag Mark Groups.
Develop Local Okanogan Steelhead Brood Stock Proposal # Sponsored By: Colville Confederated Tribes Presented By: Stephen Smith.
Annual Stock Assessment – Coded Wire Tag Program (ODFW & WDFW) BPA Project Numbers: and
Chinook Salmon Adult Abundance Monitoring Paul Kucera and Dave Faurot Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management BPA Project
Phase I Okanogan River Spring Chinook Production Proposal #29050 Sponsored By: Colville Confederated Tribes Presented By: Stephen Smith.
Evaluation of Juvenile Salmonid Outmigration and Survival in the Lower Umatilla River Project No Tara White, Shannon Jewett, Josh Hanson,
Assessment of A-run Steelhead population in the Clearwater Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.
Monitoring and Evaluation of Yearling Fall Chinook Salmon Released Upstream of Lower Granite Dam Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.
Lower Snake River Compensation Plan Hatchery Evaluations – Salmon River Project No Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.
Assessment of Bull Trout Populations in the Yakima River Watershed.
Salmonid Population and Habitat Monitoring in the Lower Columbia/Columbia Estuary Provinces Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.
WRIA 8 Fish in/Fish out Monitoring Summary
Frank Leonetti, Snohomish County
CSMEP Goal: Improve the quality and consistency of fish monitoring data, and the methods used to evaluate these data, to answer key questions relevant.
Life History Patterns and Habitat Use in the Upper Columbia Greer Maier Science Program Manager Upper Columbia Salmon Recovery Board.
Covariation in Productivity of Mid-Columbia Steelhead Populations S.P. Cramer & Associates, Inc. 600 N.W. Fariss Road Gresham, OR
Rachel C. Johnson Cramer Fish Sciences & University of California Davis The road to extinction is paved with good intentions: Can hatchery and natural.
Evolutionarily Significant Units and the U.S. Endangered Species Act Michael J Ford Northwest Fisheries Science Center Seattle, Washington.
Adult Steelhead Monitoring Challenges in Cedar Creek, WA Josua Holowatz & Dan Rawding.
Coordination of Tag and Mark Recovery Programs Dan Rawding WDFW.
National Marine Fisheries Service Steelhead Viability Analysis: Addressing Life History Variability Tom Cooney (NWFSC) March 14, 2012.
Coho Reintroduction in the Upper Columbia: Using Adaptive Management to Achieve Success Fisheries Resource Management Yakama Nation.
Salmon recovery does not just mean more fish Management decisions are driven by politics & logistics—science can only contribute if we provide technically.
COLUMBIA RIVER SALMON AND STEELHEAD RETURNS FPAC and TMT – March 2013 Presented by: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Variation in Straying Patterns and Rates of Snake River Hatchery Steelhead Stocks in the Deschutes River Basin, Oregon Richard W. Carmichael and Tim Hoffnagle.
Columbia River salmon : Who (or what) will save them? John Williams Klarälven meeting in Karlstad 9 May 2011.
Integrated Status & Trend (ISTM) Project: An overview of establishing, evaluating and modifying monitoring priorities for LCR Steelhead Jeff Rodgers (ODFW)
Russian River Salmonids Sean White MCRRFC&WCID. Salmonid 101 Taxonomy Life cycle Ecology Run timing Distribution Population status Recovery Efforts Questions.
1 Habitat Action Effectiveness Program for the FCRPS BiOp.
Preliminary Results Progress Coordinated Assessments Reports from the Field.
Monitor and Evaluate Salmonid Production in the Asotin Creek Subbasin - LSRCP (ID #200116)
Washington State Steelhead Status Review PACIFIC COAST STEELHEAD MEETING JON ANDERSON WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE MARCH 9-11, 2010.
Steelhead Stock Status Review and ESA Oregon Rhine Messmer ODFW District Staff Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Pacific Coast Steelhead Management.
Pacific Coast Steelhead Management Meeting What Are Managers Required to Provide Their Constituents? March 9-11, 2004 Bob Leland.
Habitat Status and Trend in the Upper Columbia ESU Chapter 3 John Arterburn.
Monitoring Challenges for VSP Parameters in the Oregon Portion of the Lower Columbia River Jamie Anthony Monitoring Coordinator.
Washington’s Lower Snake River Compensation Plan Steelhead Program – A retrospective and program adaptive management overview Mark Schuck and Joe Bumgarner.
Estimating integrative effects of the H’s on salmon populations.
The Status of Puget Sound Chinook Salmon What do we know? and How do we know it? Kit Rawson Tulalip Tribes.
Status & Trend Monitoring Data End User Management Questions, Directives, Research & Monitoring Plans and Other Strategies 1.Federal Columbia River Estuary,
Oregon Steelhead Status, Recovery Planning and Monitoring Kevin Goodson Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Pacific Coast Steelhead Management Meeting.
January 27, 2011 Examples of Recovery Evaluation Objectives in the Western U.S. Delta Stewardship Council Presentation by the Independent Consultant.
October 20 & 21, 2009 Stevenson, WA Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop Lower Columbia Sub-Basin.
Comparing Current and Desired Status: Gaps Analysis Brief overview: ICTRT Viability Criteria Abundance/Productivity Gaps: Concepts and Calculations Considering.
Estimating Viable Salmonid Population Parameters for Snake River Steelhead using Genetic Stock Identification of Adult Mixtures at Lower Granite Dam Tim.
Yakima O. mykiss Modeling Workshop Ian Courter Casey Justice Steve Cramer.
2010 work planned, new operations, and wrap up Presenter: Robin Ehlke CSS Annual Meeting Apr 2 nd 2010.
Yakima Steelhead VSP Project: Resident/Anadromous Interactions Gabriel M. Temple 1913 “Landlocked Steelhead”
Ocean rivers SARs LGR-LGR SARs LGR-LGR Harvest Mouth of Columbia predicted returns Mouth of Columbia predicted returns Juvenile travel time and survival.
November 3-5, 2009 Stevenson, WA Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop Upper Columbia Sub-Region 2 Listed ESU/DPS Steelhead-
Oncorhynchus mykiss : The Quandary of a Highly Polymorphic Species under the U.S. Endangered Species Act by: Kathryn Kostow Oregon Department of Fish and.
RTT Analysis Workshop Synthesis: Data Gaps and Research Needs (Chapter 5) Presented by Keely Murdoch MaDMC Chair Yakama Nation.
Improving Returns on Investments Upper Columbia Salmon Recovery Board Presentation to the NWPCC Julie Morgan, UCSRB Director May 15, 2008.
Payette MPG Sockeye Adult Tributary Juvenile Data Tributary Data
MPG Spring-Summer Chinook
Five basic objectives of ISTM
Snake River MPG Fall Chinook Adult Tributary Juvenile Data Tributary
Status of Washington Steelhead 2006
StreamNet Executive Committee Meeting
Application of Genetic Baseline: Aiding the Recovery of Steelhead
Yakima River Steelhead Status and Trends RM&E Project Overview:
Lagunitas Creek SPAWNER survey RESULTS
Dave Pflug & Ed Connor Seattle City Light
Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop
Risk Management of Non-target Fish Taxa as Related to Salmon Supplementation Presented by: Gabriel M. Temple.
Eagle Fish Genetics Lab (IDFG): Craig Steele Mike Ackerman
Presentation transcript:

RTT Analysis Workshop Species Status and Trend (Chapter 1) Casey Baldwin RTT Chairperson WDFW Research Scientist

Session 1. Species status and trend How are the fish doing with respect to the VSP parameters? VSP = Viable Salmonid Population 1)Abundance 2)Productivity 3)Spatial structure 4)Diversity

Key Management Questions: Is the status of the population/ESU/DPS improving? Is the abundance of naturally produced adult fish trending to the recovery criteria for each population? Is the population productivity of naturally produced fish trending to the recovery criteria for each population? Is the spatial structure of the populations trending to the recovery criteria for each population? Is the phenotypic and genotypic diversity of the population trending to the recovery criteria for each population? Is juvenile productivity of naturally produced fish increasing within each population?

Presentations / papers 1)Cooney et al. update to status assessments since the Recovery Plan. 2)Weigel et al.- genetic variation of O. mykiss for a portion of the Methow Population 3)RTT- after the workshop- Juvenile productivity (smolt trap summaries)

UC Spring Chinook = high risk UC Steelhead = high risk Species status and trend

UC Spring Chinook: Updated AP Status Metrics

Wenatchee River Spring Chinook Viability Curve

Species status and trend Wenatchee Okanogan Entiat Methow

Spatial Structure Spring Chinook = Low Risk for all populations Steelhead = Low Risk for all populations, except Okanogan Recent restoration efforts in Salmon Creek and Omak Creek are likely to reduce the risk level in future status updates.

Homogenization Upper Columbia Chinook Snake River Chinook Diversity Update Genetic Homogenization

Spawner Composition Trends pHOS = % hatchery spawners. high = bad

Diversity Management Action: ENFH stopped releasing out-of-ESU origin hatchery spring Chinook (2007).

Species status and trend Steelhead Entiat Methow Wenatchee Okanogan Spring Chinook Entiat Methow Wenatchee

Key Management Questions: Is the status of the population/ESU/DPS improving? Summary: Current trends in the data have little adaptive management significance given that populations are still so far from recovery levels and that they are based on such a short time series.

Adaptive Management Recommendations VSP parameters 1.Change will be slow, more actions are needed 2.Need to define a trend

Key Management Questions: Is the status of the population/ESU/DPS improving? Is the abundance of naturally produced adult fish trending to the recovery criteria for each population? Is the population productivity of naturally produced fish trending to the recovery criteria for each population? Is the spatial structure of the populations trending to the recovery criteria for each population? Is the phenotypic and genotypic diversity of the population trending to the recovery criteria for each population?

Adaptive Management Recommendations VSP parameters 1.Change will be slow, more actions are needed 2.Need to define a trend

Adaptive Management Recommendations VSP parameters 1.Change will be slow, more actions are needed 2.Need to define a trend 3.Need to incorporate Canadian Okanogan

Key Management Questions: Is the status of the population/ESU/DPS improving? Is the abundance of naturally produced adult fish trending to the recovery criteria for each population? Is the population productivity of naturally produced fish trending to the recovery criteria for each population? Is the spatial structure of the populations trending to the recovery criteria for each population? Is the phenotypic and genotypic diversity of the population trending to the recovery criteria for each population? Is juvenile productivity of naturally produced fish increasing within each population?

Juvenile Productivity Summary table (smolt trap summary) Snapshot of some data (smolts/redd) Discuss the future

Juvenile Productivity

Juvenile Productivity Summary Table

Adaptive Management Recommendations Juvenile Productivity 1.Change will be slow, more actions are needed 2.Need to define a trend 3.Evaluate statistics (variance, autocorrelation, duration) within and between trapping locations.

Questions?