1 MAKING DECISIONS: EVALUATING IMPACTS AND TRADEOFFS ON WILDERNESS CHARACTER Arthur Carhart National Wilderness Training Center, March 2012 Wilderness.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation at NRCan: Information for Program Managers Strategic Evaluation Division Science & Policy Integration July 2012.
Advertisements

Child Rights Toolkit Comprehensive Toolkit To Address Children's Rights In Development & Humanitarian Cooperation And Government Programming.
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Definitions Innovation Reform Improvement Change.
ERA-LEARN Supporting the ERA-NET Learning Platform by creating a toolbox for the ERA-NET community Roland Brandenburg, FFG.
2 Session Objectives Increase participant understanding of effective financial monitoring based upon risk assessments of sub-grantees Increase participant.
Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
Financial Condition Reporting NASACT Conference, August 2011 Oregon Secretary of State Audits Division Gary Blackmer Audits Director 1.
The Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement (RIAS) in Canada
PACE EH Redefining Local Environmental Health PACE EH National Summit Louisville, Kentucky March 28-29, 2006 The PACE EH Methodology.
TEN-T Info Day for AP and MAP Calls 2012 EVALUATION PROCESS AND AWARD CRITERIA Anna Livieratou-Toll TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Policy & Programme Coordinator.
1 Common Core State Standards What they are! & How they came to be! Implications for New Jersey New Jersey State Board of Education May 4, 2011 Dorothy.
Illinois Transition Planning Institute Facilitator Prep. Webinar Preparing for Your Role as a Team Facilitator: Part I April Mustian, Illinois State University;
Managing the Statutory Requirements for Assessment April 2011.
June 28, Performance Management Overview. Performance Management Agenda Objectives Current and future environment What weve done to create future.
W ORKING A CROSS A GENCY L INES. P RESENTATION O VERVIEW K EY T ERMS AND C ONCEPTS U PDATE ON THE I NTERAGENCY V ISITOR U SE M ANAGEMENT C OUNCIL ( THE.
1 Division of Aging and Adult Services (DAAS) Knowledge Management and Transfer Project 7/30/12.
Managing Government Records Directive ACERA Meeting November 6, 2012 Don Rosen Director of Policy, Analysis and Enforcement Office of the Chief Records.
Data Quality Considerations
Common Core at CPS Scope and Sequence Implementation Plan
New Employee Orientation: Performance Management
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: July 2011.
Delivering Workforce Capability Through Technology John Viljoen – Managing Director Julie Cooke – Business Solutions Manager 12 October, 2010.
SCOH Technical Meeting October 18,  Why the new approach?  Risk-based Project Involvement  Required Project Actions  Compliance Assessment Program.
1 Department of State Program Evaluation Policy Overview Spring 2013.
1 INTEGRATING WILDERNESS CHARACTER INTO PLANNING Arthur Carhart National Wilderness Training Center, March 2012 Wilderness Character Webinar #3 Arthur.
UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights
Education initiatives: HR implications Cathy Brearley 30 January 2013.
The Design and Implementation of Educator Evaluation Systems, Variability of Systems and the Role of a Theory of Action Rhode Island Lisa Foehr Rhode Island.
“Reaching across Arizona to provide comprehensive quality health care for those in need” Our first care is your health care Arizona Health Care Cost Containment.
The Need To Improve STEM Learning Successful K-12 STEM is essential for scientific discovery, economic growth and functioning democracy Too.
1 This document is contained within the Traditional Tools and Skills Toolbox on Wilderness.net. Since other related resources found in this toolbox may.
Business Architecture
CFSAN’s Peer Review for Risk Assessments Robert L. Buchanan, Sherri Dennis, and Marianne Miliotis.
New York State District-wide Growth Goal Setting Process: Student Learning Objectives Webinar 2 (REVISED FEBRUARY 2012)
Standards for Internal Control in the Government Going Green Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government 1.
Session 3 - Plenary on implementing Principle 1 on an Explicit Policy on Regulatory Quality, Principle 3 on Regulatory Oversight, and Principle 6 on Reviewing.
Policy Development – Helpful Hints School Councils
 This document is contained within the Visitor Use Management Toolbox on Wilderness.net. Since other related resources found in this toolbox may be of.
Reporting and Using Evaluation Results Presented on 6/18/15.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Unit 2 – Principles of Health and Social Care
Standards for Internal Control in the Government Going Green Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government 1.
1 Introduction to Evaluating the Minnesota Demonstration Program Paint Product Stewardship Initiative September 19, 2007 Seattle, WA Matt Keene, Evaluation.
Alaska Staff Development Network – Follow-Up Webinar Emerging Trends and issues in Teacher Evaluation: Implications for Alaska April 17, :45 – 5:15.
Presidential Memorandum on Managing Government Records Paul Wester Chief Records Officer for the U.S. Government National Archives and Records Administration.
Open University Learning Design Initiative Reading University, SeLCs lunchtime meeting 26 th February 2010.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Western and Central Africa Dakar, May 2007.
This file is part of the FS Resources section at: This presentation should be reviewed and.
1 The Washington State Board of Education Applying to Authorize: Authorizer Application and Evaluation Jack Archer, Senior Policy Analyst State Board of.
Senior Evaluation Officer GEF Independent Evaluation Office Minsk, Belarus September 2015 Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations.
UNEP EIA Training Resource ManualTopic 14Slide 1 What is SEA? F systematic, transparent process F instrument for decision-making F addresses environmental.
GNC Blanket Supplementary Feeding Programming (BSFP) Ali Maclaine Senior Humanitarian Nutrition Advisor January 2013.
This file is part of the FS Resources section at:
Why preserve it? What is it? How to monitor it? Citizen stewardship WILDERNESS CHARACTER.
Executive Order Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews Priority Issues.
Risk Assessment and Risk Management: Improving Quality and Integrity Professor Hazel Kemshall De Montfort University.
PETER A. APPEL ALEX W. SMITH PROFESSOR UNIVERSITY. OF GEORGIA SCHOOL OF LAW UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PRESENTED AT LEWIS AND CLARK LAW SCHOOL APRIL 11,
New Ecological Science Advice for Ecosystem Protection The EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) Staff Office supports three external scientific advisory committees.
Framework for Risk Assessment Management and Evaluation - FRAME
IT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK Pertemuan 3-4
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Human Resources Competency Framework
This file is part of the FS Resources section at:
FOR 2012 WILDERNESS FELLOWS
This document is contained within the Traditional Tools and Skills Toolbox on Wilderness.net. Since other related resources found in this toolbox may be.
Green Cleaning in Schools
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Session 9 Recap on LFM and IL.
DMCS Data Ethics Framework principles
Presentation transcript:

1 MAKING DECISIONS: EVALUATING IMPACTS AND TRADEOFFS ON WILDERNESS CHARACTER Arthur Carhart National Wilderness Training Center, March 2012 Wilderness Character Webinar #2: Arthur Carhart National Wilderness Training Center, March 2012 Wilderness Character Webinar #2:

KEY REVIEW POINTS Wilderness character is composed of five qualities that are comprehensive, nationally consistent, and locally applied 2 This framework of wilderness character is a tool to improve discussion among staff, leading to informed recommendations and decisions These ideas are relatively new, so HOW they are implemented will likely improve over time

WILDERNESS STEWARDSHIP COMMONLY REQUIRES EVALUATING TRADEOFFS 3

THERE IS NO SINGLE PATH TO EVALUATE TRADEOFFS, BUT THERE ARE TOOLS AND TIPS 1.Minimum Requirements Analysis 2.Wilderness character baseline assessment 3.Account for all qualities, benefits and adverse impacts, in the short and long term 4.Identify “wicked” problems to ensure transparent and thorough evaluation 5.Both art and science may be needed because there is little agency guidance and no case law 1.Minimum Requirements Analysis 2.Wilderness character baseline assessment 3.Account for all qualities, benefits and adverse impacts, in the short and long term 4.Identify “wicked” problems to ensure transparent and thorough evaluation 5.Both art and science may be needed because there is little agency guidance and no case law 4

TOOLS AND TIPS #1 Minimum Requirements Analysis 5

Step 1: Is action necessary? Step 2: What is the minimum activity? MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS 6

7 TOOLS AND TIPS #2 Wilderness character baseline assessment Baseline assessments in the National Wildlife Refuge System

8 Undeveloped Natural Solitude Untrammeled Can evaluate effects of all qualities together or any one quality, and the entire area or any one area TOOLS AND TIPS #2 Wilderness character baseline assessment

TOOLS AND TIPS #3 Account for all qualities, benefits and adverse impacts, in the short and long term 9

TOOLS AND TIPS #4 Identify “wicked” problems to ensure transparent and thorough evaluation Right versus Right Dilemma 10

TOOLS AND TIPS #5 Both art and science are needed because there is little agency guidance and no case law TOOLS AND TIPS #5 Both art and science are needed because there is little agency guidance and no case law “Preserving wilderness character” is law and policy, but there is little guidance on HOW to do this and keep wilderness “in contrast” to all other areas There is no case law on the qualities of wilderness character or evaluating tradeoffs; the courts have only said “preserve wilderness character” Be comprehensive, thorough, and transparent to disclose effects and tradeoffs; explain in the decision document why the agency made the decision to preserve wilderness character as a whole “Preserving wilderness character” is law and policy, but there is little guidance on HOW to do this and keep wilderness “in contrast” to all other areas There is no case law on the qualities of wilderness character or evaluating tradeoffs; the courts have only said “preserve wilderness character” Be comprehensive, thorough, and transparent to disclose effects and tradeoffs; explain in the decision document why the agency made the decision to preserve wilderness character as a whole 11

Please enter into the Q & A pane any questions you have about evaluating the impacts and tradeoffs of management decisions on wilderness character 12

KEY POINTS Wilderness character does not drive decisions; it’s a tool to make informed recommendations and decisions There may be complex tradeoffs among the qualities of wilderness character and other laws and agency guidance There is no perfect knowledge; evaluating tradeoffs may (most likely will) require professional judgment so transparency is key for defensibility in preserving wilderness character as whole Wilderness character does not drive decisions; it’s a tool to make informed recommendations and decisions There may be complex tradeoffs among the qualities of wilderness character and other laws and agency guidance There is no perfect knowledge; evaluating tradeoffs may (most likely will) require professional judgment so transparency is key for defensibility in preserving wilderness character as whole FOR MORE INFORMATION: Wilderness.net > Management Tools > Toolboxes > Wilderness Character 13

YOUR QUESTIONS AND ISSUES 3