IEC WG 19 Meeting Geneva, CH 2012/May/11 Architectural Methodology Joint NIST-SGAC / EU-M.490 RAWG Efforts.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SOA Masterclass - Fundamentals of SOA |11 February 2009 | Page 1 Fundamentals of SOA.
Advertisements

An Introduction and Overview Electric Power Research, Engineering and Consulting Why Interoperability? Erich W. Gunther Chairman and CTO.
© Telelogic AB Modeling DoDAF Compliant Architectures Operational Systems Technical.
Smart Grid: an Ontario Perspective Brian Hewson, Senior Manager Regulatory Policy Hamilton May 8, 2013.
2/11/2014 8:44 AM The CDA Release 3 Specification Stack September 2009 HL7 Services-Aware Enterprise Architecture Framework (SAEAF)
1 Service Oriented Architectures (SOA): What Users Need to Know. OGF 19: January 31, 2007 Charlotte, NC John Salasin, Ph.D, Visiting Researcher National.
Deliverables; Overview, Terminology and Use Cases
Multi-level SLA Management for Service-Oriented Infrastructures Wolfgang Theilmann, Ramin Yahyapour, Joe Butler, Patrik Spiess consortium / SAP.
Widespread Industry Challenges “Utilities need to prepare for an onslaught of data – as other industries have done. The challenge of upgrading IT systems.
Quality Manual for Interoperability Testing Morten Bruun-Rasmussen Presented by Milan Zoric, ETSI.
SG-Systems Boot Camp Use Case Process with TOGAF AMI-ENT Example Kay Stefferud Chair, SG-Systems Use Cases For more information visit:
“SG-Systems” (Smart Grid – Operational Applications Integration) “Boot Camp” Overview Greg Robinson, Co-Chair, SG-Systems Brent Hodges, Chair, SG-Systems.
An ecosystem for freight information services: the iCargo project
UCAIug HAN SRS v2.0 Summary August 12, Scope of HAN SRS in the NIST conceptual model.
May 2010 Slide 1 SG Communications Boot Camp Matt Gillmore 03/07/11.
"Safe and Secure Solutions for Smarter Cities" The value of standardization and certification in planning and managing Smart Cities 12/05/2014Euralarm.
September 30, 2011 OASIS Open Smart Grid Reference Model: Standards Landscape Analysis.
SMART GRID INTEROPERABILITY PANEL WINTER 2012 FACE-TO-FACE IRVING, TEXAS  DEC. 3-6, 2012 PAP8/14 Webconference December 4, 2012.
Overview of OASIS SOA Reference Architecture Foundation (SOA-RAF)
1 First Set of Standards for the grid Where are we today? Smart Grid Roadmap for India, 21st June ‘2013 Dinesh Chand Sharma Director – Standardization,
L4-1-S1 UML Overview © M.E. Fayad SJSU -- CmpE Software Architectures Dr. M.E. Fayad, Professor Computer Engineering Department, Room #283I.
Utilization of CIM at Progress Energy with the Smart Grid DSDR Project Top-down approach to Integration Software Development Jon Drew November 12, 2009.
# 1 Information Exchange Standards Development Collaboration for AMI and HAN For further information, contact: Wayne Longcore
Smart Grid Architecture Committee Semantic Working Party Update Jay Britton / Steve Ray Dec. 7, 2011.
SGAM-Template.
MTEI Methods & Tools for Enterprise Integration
Jerry FitzPatrick, NIST Chair Wednesday, May 26. Introduction - IKB PAP8 PAP14 DEWG Charter What should the T&D DEWG be doing? T&D DEWG or T and D DEWGs?
Smart Grid Standards Bill Moroney President & Chief Executive Utilities Telecom Council.
Towards a Distributed, Service-Oriented Control Infrastructure for Smart Grid ASU - Cyber Physical Systems Lab Professor G. Fainekos Presenter: Ramtin.
Smart Grid (Enterprise) Architecture /Dec/04.
B usiness T echnology S olutions AMI – Advanced Metering Infrastructure Consumers Energy Mark Ortiz March 9, 2011.
What is Business Analysis Planning & Monitoring?
1 CIM User Group Conference Call december 8th 2005 Using UN/CEFACT Core Component methodology for EIC/TC 57 works and CIM Jean-Luc SANSON Electrical Network.
Initial slides for Layered Service Architecture
John McDonald 05 November 2013 SGIP Members Meeting.
TDT4252/DT8802 Exam 2013 Guidelines to answers
FirstEnergy / Jersey Central Power & Light Integrated Distributed Energy Resources (IDER) Joseph Waligorski FirstEnergy Grid-InterOp 2009 Denver, CO November.
Common Information Model and EPRI Smart Grid Research
IHE Profile – SOA Analysis: In Progress Update Brian McIndoe December 6, 2010.
Doc.: IEEE /0047r1 Submission SGIP Liaison Report to IEEE Following the SGIP (2.0) Inaugural Conference Nov 5-7, 2013 Date:
Architectural Design Based on Chapter 11 of the textbook [SE-8] Ian Sommerville, Software Engineering, 8t h Ed., Addison-Wesley, 2006 and on the Ch11 PowerPoint.
Use Cases for TC57 and for other TCs… Eric Lambert EDF R&D CIM User group PRAGUES 2011.
“SG-Systems” (Smart Grid – Operational Applications Integration) “Boot Camp” Overview Greg Robinson, Co-Chair, SG-Systems Brent Hodges, Chair, SG-Systems.
Geneva, Switzerland, April 2012 Introduction to session 7 - “Advancing e-health standards: Roles and responsibilities of stakeholders” ​ Marco Carugi.
Common Information Model - enabling data exchanges and interoperability in the electric utility industry P&E Magazine, May 2015 Power & Energy Magazine.
IHE Profile – SOA Analysis: In Progress Update Brian McIndoe January 18, 2011.
Integration Framework for Analytics Semantic model for organizing ‘public’ (shared) information 3 Sets of standards maintained by 3 IEC TC57 Working.
Health eDecisions Use Case 2: CDS Guidance Service Strawman of Core Concepts Use Case 2 1.
1 SGIP PAP 11 PEV V2G DEWG Dec 2-3, 2010 Grid InterOp 2010 Eric Simmon, NIST Jerry Melcher, EnerNex SGIP PAP 11 PEV V2G DEWG Grid InterOp 2010 Meeting.
U NITED N ATIONS C ENTRE F OR T RADE F ACILITATION A ND E LECTRONIC B USINESS Under the auspices of United Nations Economic Commission for Europe UN/CEFACT.
IEC TC57 Smart Grid Activities Scott Neumann USNC TA IEC TC57 November 6, 2009.
# 1 AMI Enterprise Task Force of the Utility AMI Working Group SRS Team Plan Discussion For further information, contact Joe Zhou Team Lead
G. Suter CH Session 3 – Block 2 – 4 th Question Barcelona May “ System Interfaces for Distribution Management “ TC57 WG14 Standards IEC
ARCH-04 Before You Begin Your Transformation Project… Phillip Magnay Architect – Applied Technology.
“SG-Systems” ( Smart Grid – Operational Applications Integration ) Charter & Status Greg Robinson, Co-Chair, SG-Systems Brent Hodges, Chair, SG-Systems.
19-20 October 2010 IT Directors’ Group meeting 1 Item 6 of the agenda ISA programme Pascal JACQUES Unit B2 - Methodology/Research Local Informatics Security.
RT1b – EDF R&D Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011  Smart Grids require a system approach and modularity  Smart Components will rely on nodes of integration.
Jeju, 13 – 16 May 2013Standards for Shared ICT Smart Grids activities in ETSI Presenter: Adrian Scrase ETSI Chief Technical Officer (CTO) Document No:
Understanding Enterprise Architecture
CIM Modeling for E&U - (Short Version)
“SG-Systems” (Smart Grid – Operational Applications Integration) “Boot Camp” Overview Brent Hodges, Chair, SG-Systems Greg Robinson, Co-Chair, SG-Systems.
WG1: RELIABLE, ECONOMIC AND EFFICIENT SMART GRID SYSTEM
“SG-Systems” (Smart Grid – Operational Applications Integration) Charter & Status Brent Hodges, Chair, SG-Systems Greg Robinson, Co-Chair, SG-Systems.
Smart Grid (Enterprise) Architecture /Dec/04
OpenADR SRS Draft 1 Review
Smart Grids activities in ETSI
Semantic Model Working Party (SMWP) OpenSG EIM Outreach
ETSI Standardization Activities on Smart Grids
Use Case Process with Examples Kay Stefferud
The Role of CIM in Smart Grid & The SGAC Semantic Framework
Presentation transcript:

IEC WG 19 Meeting Geneva, CH 2012/May/11 Architectural Methodology Joint NIST-SGAC / EU-M.490 RAWG Efforts

NIST SGAC Conceptual Architecture Technical Architecture Interaction Architecture Automation Architecture Business Architecture Business Input from strategy & context Goals/ Contextual Why? Conceptual What? What services does the business fulfill What types of applications are required What information must be exchanged What ICT services are required Automation Technologies B Business Prelim A Prelim & AC IT SysTOGAFPhase C Data

Interaction Messaging Artifact Archetypical : 20 Actors 25 Message (interaction) 213 Business Services

Example: Iteration Services for Forecast Intermittent Generation Forecast Intermittent Generation Market Manager Measurement Environment Forecast

Suggested Methodology Alignment Semantics relating to EU M490 RAWG Apply Conceptual Architecture elements to DEWG DER use cases Integrate EU and DEWG Point-of-View Use Cases Business Services Business Processes (Interactions)

Suggested Methodology Alignment Cross-Cutting Cross-Cutting Requirements Define/create fundamental Solution Blocking Blocks (SBB)  Example: adopt/modify Open Group SOA practices Leverage common Smart Grid messaging and Cross- cutting requirements as SBB) Open Group SOA Quality of Service Building Block

Refinement of GWAC stack to SGAM layer associations Before: Business context associated to Function Layer After: Business context associated to Information Layer Reason:Business context deals with information used in specific context System A Business Context Semantic Understanding Network Interoperability Syntactic Interoperability Basic Connectivity Business Procedures Business Objectives Economic / Regulatory Policy Function System B Business Layer Function Layer Information Layer Communication Layer Component Layer

Methodology Alignment Activities Map EU’s Smart Grid Architectural Methodology to NIST Conceptual Architecture & CSWG approach Interactions, Semantics Automation Services Semantics-CDMs Use Cases, Business Services/Actors Business goals & requirements GWAC Stack Based Syntax Syntax & Communications Standards

Ongoing Work Aligning Processes 9 What services, standards semantics and interoperability requirements are needed support Smart Grid? Result Traceable architecture Set of architecture templates identified EG1 Report 6 High level services 2. Step Create Architectures Map onto Architecture Model Architecture Model 3. Step Locate standards usage 4. Step Identify common standards First set of standards Sources Expected outcome WG-RA Architecture Model t.b.d US Laws & Regulations Technical Architecture Interaction ArchitectureAutomation Architecture Business Architecture Business Input from strategy & context Goals/ Contextua l Why? Conceptual What? What services does the business fulfill What types of applications are required What information must be exchanged What ICT services are required Automation Technologies

Ongoing Work Aligning Processes 10 Result Identify “new” gaps Systematically investigate need for new standards How to systematically identify future gaps? Further findings: R&D, Pilots, Implementation 3. Step Locate require- ments for standards 4. Step Identify new gaps NEW Gap List (follow process 2. from here) Source Expected outcome t.b.d Target date from 2013 SGAM GAP 2. Step Create Architectures Map onto Architecture Model Technical Architecture Interaction ArchitectureAutomation Architecture Business Architecture Business Input from strategy & context Goals/ Contextu al Why? Conceptual What? What services does the business fulfill What types of applications are required What information must be exchanged What ICT services are required Automation Technologies

Methodology Results 11 Provide base architecture and process to vet future Smart Grid requirements Identify gaps in Smart Grid standardization Compare different architectures Identify Cross-cutting requirements Map regional differences Identify new services and interoperability requirements Coordinate work between different TCs and stakeholders

Next steps  Continue on term definitions  Continue on SGAM mapping process definition  Review of SGAC comments on RAWG document  Prioritize crosscutting requirements  Refine processes for semantic mapping and business context mapping  Gain more exercise with SGAM mapping (DER management UC)

Refinement of SGAM mapping process / 1 Required Input  UC including actors, roles, functions/services (acc. definition), sequence diagrams, func. and non-func. requirements

Refinement of SGAM mapping process / 2 Function Layer Develop Function Layer 1. Identify functions/services (in the functional layer, functions and services can be treated in the same manner) 2. Identify interactions of functions/services 3. Place functions/services on appropriate domain and zone

Refinement of SGAM mapping process / 3 Information Layer Need for business context and canonical data model (CDM) views to cover both instances and data model aspects of information Develop Business Context Layer 1. Place sequence of exchanged information between functions/services on smart grid plane on appropriate domain and zone

Refinement of SGAM mapping process / 4 Information Layer cont. Develop Canonical Data Model (CDM) Layer 1. Identify Canonical Data Model (CDM) that supports interfaces 2. Identify Canonical Data Model (CDM) that supports functions 3. Place CDMs on smart grid plane on appropriate domain and zone

Refinement of SGAM mapping process / 5 Communication Layer Tbd.

Example Use Case UC: DMS System controls reactive power of DER unit Business Service: Voltage control in distribution system  Service: RTU Data-acquisition  Service: Voltage/Var control  Service: Control/Supervision of DER  Service: Audit of control actions Precondition:  Data-acquisition is running  Feeder electric models are current Sequence of events :  RTU sends measurement to DMS  Voltage/Var-Control is triggered by event  Voltage/Var-Control calculates control value  Voltage/Var-Control sends control value to DMS  DMS sends controlable setpoint to DER  DER receives setpoint and acknowledges  DER adjusts reactive power injection  DMS posts DER control action to audit of control actions  CRM system obtains audit actions

Component Layer

Business Layer / Function Layer

Information Layer Business Context (Message) View Can. Data Model View

Communication Layer

Questions ? How does this work?

Back-up Slides S TEPHAN A MSBARY Director, Utility Enterprise Architecture Phone: FAX: Grants Mountain Rd, Marion, NC, Electric Research, Engineering, and Consulting