PROJECT INTEGRATE END OF YEAR SUMMARY AUGUST 4, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Entry to Student Outcomes (ESO). Objective: Teachers will analyze student data to drive instruction and increase student achievement.
Advertisements

Instructional Coaching at Westminster
AUSD BTSA Induction Board Report September 11, 2007.
Teachers, administrators and staff continuously seek and share learning and then act on what they learn. The goal of their actions is to enhance their.
Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
1 DPAS II Process and Procedures for Teachers Developed by: Delaware Department of Education.
February, 2010 LEA Support Advisory Council. Agenda 2:30-3:00Discuss plan revision process (feedback and support) 3:00-3:30Discuss February workshops.
Open Future Doors through Succession Planning Principal? Curriculum Supervisor? Assistant Superintendent? Special Services Director?
June 13 and June 16, 2011 Analytical and Applied Sciences June/July
Principal Professional Development Mathematics KCAS June 13 and June 16, 2011 Analytical and Applied Sciences June/July
Career and College Readiness Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Assessment Literacy MODULE 1.
Assessment Literacy Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Career and College Readiness MODULE 1.
CCRS Implementation Team Meeting #3
Continuous Improvement Update The Integration of Continuous Improvement and Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment & Technology October 13 th, 2008.
Building Leadership Team October Agenda Big Picture Formative Overview PLC Overview SMART Goal and Action Plan Plan.
The 5S numbers game..
Educational Approval Board Approved Schools Conference EAB Effectiveness Survey Results David C. Dies, EAB Executive Secretary November 9, 2006.
Performance Appraisal Systems
PBM The Staging Process. Check the dates August In late August, districts receive their PBMAS summary report.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System
1. 2 Objectives Become familiar with the purpose and features of Epsilen Learn to navigate the Epsilen environment Develop a professional ePortfolio on.
1 SESSION 5- RECORDING AND REPORTING IN GRADES R-12 Computer Applications Technology Information Technology.
The SCPS Professional Growth System
Battle Hand-Off.
Enhancing Education Through Technology NCLB Title II Part D Cathy HigginsOffice of Educational Technology
Sample Service Screenshots Enterprise Cloud Service 11.3.
/nets-for-students.aspx.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
TCCI Barometer September “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Before Between After.
New Jersey School Districts Teachscape Reflect. Leona Jamison Teachscape Service Provider.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.
Subtraction: Adding UP
Planning Meeting Thursday, August 22, pm.
Title IID Grant Teaching Smarter in the 21 st Century.
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
Program Monitoring and Evaluation of French Immersion Alternative Program at King George School February 2011.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
Long Beach School District Stakeholder Survey Results Results from and Parent, Student, and Staff Surveys.
1 Maine’s Impact Study of Technology in Mathematics (MISTM) David L. Silvernail, Director Maine Education Policy Research Institute University of Southern.
Teacher Evaluation: Lessons Learned Teaneck Public Schools Dr. Marisa M. King Dr. Deirdre Spollen-LaRaia.
1 Literacy PERKS Standard 1: Aligned Curriculum. 2 PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1. Aligned Curriculum 2. Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction.
Introduction Embedded Universal Tools and Online Features 2.
Schutzvermerk nach DIN 34 beachten 05/04/15 Seite 1 Training EPAM and CANopen Basic Solution: Password * * Level 1 Level 2 * Level 3 Password2 IP-Adr.
The Impact of Immersion in a Local Research Problem on Technology Skills and Use CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY PREPARING TOMORROW’S TEACHERS TO USE TECHNOLOGY.
Title II D Sharing Session Wednesday, August 12 Partnering for 21 st Century Success Lead Agency: Brookings School District Partnering LEA: Castlewood.
Professional Development Wagner Community School District.
IA-DMM Measures and Results for Year 1. Cohort 1 as of 6/23.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing the Accountability of Teachers to Reach all Students and their Needs Raymon J. Smith References.
Local Evaluation Overview and Preliminary Findings Diane Schilder, EdD.
Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (PGES) Webcast July 24, 2013.
Developing Professional Learning Communities To Promote Response to Intervention Linda Campbell Melissa Nantais.
March 25, 2009 NHSTE Event at SERESC in Bedford, NH Dr. Cathy Higgins March 25, 2009 Spring Update from NH Department of Education Office of Educational.
Intel ® Teach Program Thinking with Technology Course Pn. Idawati Che Mat Jabatan Teknologi Pendidikan
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012.
The Evaluation of IMPACT V Jeni Corn, Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College of Education.
Villa Maria Academy Lower School PLP Plan. The Problem/Question Embracing 21 st Century Learning and Teaching –Comfort level of teachers –Understanding.
TIES E2T2 Grant Project Technology Integrationist Community of Learning (TICL)
Master Teacher Academy East Dakota Educational Cooperative Vickie Venhuizen & Janeen Outka.
Leading at All Levels to Support MDC Implementation
Governor’s Teacher Network Action Research Project Dr. Debra Harwell-Braun
Master Teacher Academy East Dakota Educational Cooperative Vickie Venhuizen & Janeen Outka.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Collaborative Action Research (CAR). Objective : Teacher will lead and participate in a collaborative action group exploring a topic based on student.
New Administrators’ Technology Guide Becca, Dana, José, Kim.
What does it mean to be a RETA Instructor this project? Consortium for 21 st Century Learning C21CL
Student Outcomes (SO) Objective: Teachers will analyze student data to drive instruction and increase student achievement.
Presentation transcript:

PROJECT INTEGRATE END OF YEAR SUMMARY AUGUST 4, 2011

Project Overview  Systemic Change within Districts by providing consistent training and support for teachers, technology integrationists and administrators  3 Cohorts of 40  Teacher Cohort- Jennifer Tschetter Teacher Cohort  Tech Integrationist Cohort- Melissa Goodwin Tech Integrationist  Administrator Cohort- Cate Sommervold Administrator Cohort

Student Achievement Goal  Student Achievement Goal #1  By August 2011, student achievement of student’s in participating schools will increase DSTEP scores by 2%.

Professional Development Goals  PD Goal #1  50% of grant participants will increase their level of 21 st century skill and tool comfort by one stage as measured by team created survey. GOAL EXCEEDED

71% increased by 1 stage

Disaggregated 21 st Century Skills Awareness  TI Cohort 25/36 moved up (69%) avg+1.11%  Teacher Cohort 28/31 moved up (90%) avg+2.16%  Admin Cohort 29/34 moved up (85%) avg +2.03% Technology Integration Comfort Levels  TI Cohort 25/36 moved up (69%) avg+.072%  Teacher cohort 23/31 moved up (74%) avg+.84%  Admin cohort 27/34 moved up (79%) avg+1.29%

Project Activities  Project Kick-off  Online Coursework  On-site Coaching visits  E-Portfolio results and reflection

Project Evaluation  What data was collected?  Coaching notes  Survey data (state, ESA2 created survey)  Online coursework (assignments & discussions)  E-Portfolio  What tools and processes did you use to collect the data?  Site Visits  WebCT  Coaching notes forms  Wikispaces  What were the measurable results?  Surveys  Pre/post test scores

Project Successes  What did you learn from this project?  Data driven practice  Collaboration  PLCs: home grown vs. instituted  What products were created as a result of your project? (i.e. units, wikis, websites etc.)  E-Portfolios  Technology integrated lesson plans  What advice would you have for future project leaders?  Timelines & expectations need to be provided in advance, refer to them often and regularly  Communication is paramount

Project Challenges  What were your major challenges and how did you meet those?  Online format  Collaboration challenges (coursework expectations and design)  Communication pitfalls (cohorts had different action plan focus)  Formative assessment of learning (for the cohorts)

Wisdom of Practice  Lessons Learned  More face-to-face  Less busy work  Collaborate early  More time for school groups  Advice to Future Project Leaders  Systemic is GOOD