Waiver Day May 15, 2013. Today’s presentation would not be possible without the hard work of the Evaluation Committee and Mad River staff. ◦ Cristi Fields.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation Pilot September 1, 2011 – September 30, 2012 NJ State Board of Education, July 13, 2011.
Advertisements

Common Formative Assessment Initiative In 2008, Colorado Legislature passed Senate Bill titled Colorado Achievement Plan for Kids (CAP4K) Expand.
Springboro Community City School District Todd Petrey, Superintendent Jamie Miles, 8 th Grade Science Teacher SEA Vice-President.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
SEED – CT’s System for Educator and Evaluation and Development April 2013 Wethersfield Public Schools CONNECTICUT ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION Overview of.
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
BRISTOL WARREN REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Implementation of RI Educator Evaluation System
Comparison of School and KSU Assessment of Teachers
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
SLG Goals, Summative Evaluations, and Assessment Guidance Training LCSD#7 10/10/14.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
TEACHER EVALUATION What it is going to look like….
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation August 20, 2014 Elizabeth M. Osga, Ph.D.
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
McRel’s Evaluation System Training Session 1 May 14, 2013 Herbert Hoover Middle School.
Support Professionals Evaluation Model Webinar Spring 2013.
Teacher Evaluation System LSKD Site Administrator Training August 6, 2014.
Math Content Network Update The Power of Mistakes Student Engagement Culture of Learning Growth Mindset Congruent Tasks.
Professional Learning
Student Growth Measures Category “B” Teachers VENDOR (STAR)
Utah Effective Teaching Standards-based Jordan Performance Appraisal System Orientation (UETS-based JPAS)
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
ComprehensiveFocused  Evidence needs to be collected for all 27 components found in all 8 Criteria  Evidence needs to be collected in one of the 8 Criteria.
Collaboration and continuous learning are the focus.
What should be the basis of
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Teaching and Learning Elementary Math November 27, :30 am – 12:30 pm.
DATA RETREAT PRINCIPAL’S MID-YEAR REPORT Vandercook Lake Schools Townsend Elementary Principal: Diane McQuillan Subject Area: Reading &Writing.
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
Something for Every Child!. Grade 1 Teachers Karen Feeney Jane Merrill Principal Patty de Garavilla.
1 Great Things Are Happening In Paramount Schools - Where We Inspire Great Learning Through Great Teaching Great Things Are Happening In Paramount Schools.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Glendale Elementary School District Professional Development August 15, 2012.
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
SLOs for Students on GAA February 20, GAA SLO Submissions January 17, 2014 Thank you for coming today. The purpose of the session today.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Verona Public Schools DEAC Meeting Agenda: PARCC vs Marzano Configuration Discussion Marzano Moving Forward: Administrator/Supervisor/Teacher.
A New Approach to Assessment Based on extensive research that has identified teaching and instructional practices that are most effective in impacting.
Teacher Performance Evaluation System Data Sources.
South Dakota’s Teacher Effectiveness Model February 20, 2015 Presented by Dr. Sally Crowser and John Swanson, TIE.
From Mad River Schools Waiver Day Presentation May 15, 2013.
Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Professional Performance Process OPD 864 – Writing the Mid-Year and Summative Evaluation Report Our Journey Continues! 21 st Century Supervision and Evaluation.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Oregon Standards: An Update 2009 Superintendent’s Summer Institute Oregon Department of Education August 3, 2009.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP) Toronto District School Board January 20, 2015.
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
Worthington Teacher Evaluation System Dr. Trent Bowers.
Quality Review Updates for Presented by Mary Barton, SATIF CFN 204 Assistant Principals’ Conference September 2, 2011.
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
Teacher Evaluation & CEL 5 D
“The Diocese is committed to schools of academic excellence in faith filled environments that foster Communities of faith.” From the Diocese of Allentown.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Avon Grove School District October 2009
Teacher Evaluation Timeline
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Licensed Educator Professional Growth and Evaluation Process
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
BANKED DAY #8 REFLECTION AND REVISION December 13, 2016.
TDES Think Tank September 25, 2018 Jill Cabe, Director of Performance Management Megan Scully, TDES Coordinator Time: 1 Minute.
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Information July 15, 2015.
Presentation transcript:

Waiver Day May 15, 2013

Today’s presentation would not be possible without the hard work of the Evaluation Committee and Mad River staff. ◦ Cristi Fields ◦ Bernie Gearon ◦ Pam Hillard ◦ Amy Holbrook ◦ Mary Isaacs ◦ Nora Monnin ◦ Necia Nicholas ◦ Beth Schmidt ◦ Brad Sims ◦ Krista Wagner ◦ Liz Wolfe-Eberly ◦ Chad Wyen

 Understand the “Big Picture” of the OTES Evaluation System for next year  Practice with different pieces of OTES Evaluation System  Leave with a peace of mind to enjoy your summer

- It is 7 step process beginning with a self assessment and ending with a final summative rating.

Value-Added Vendor (STAR) Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) We will discuss this half of OTES later in the day.

 Step 1: Self Assessment  Step 2: Creating a Growth Plan  Step 3: Pre-Conference  Step 4: Observation  Step 5: Post-Conference  Step 6: Walkthroughs/Informal Evaluations  Step 7: The Final Summative Rating

 Record evidence of strengths and areas for growth in each of the 7 Standards for the Teaching Profession.  Identify two priorities for the upcoming year by placing check marks in the far-right column.  Use these two priority areas for writing your Professional Growth Plan.  May want to use this form during first pre- conference with evaluator to finalize selection of growth goals.

 Using the two priorities from the Self- Assessment or input from your evaluator, write two goals.  Use Teacher Performance Evaluation Rubric to select focus and wording.  Determine Evidence Indicators for each goal, as well as areas for professional growth.  Will be used to inform your holistic Teacher Performance rating.

 S pecific  M easurable  A ttainable  R elevant  T imely

 Collaborative Learning: ◦ By March 2014, I will develop, teach, and evaluate 6 collaborative learning lessons, and share them with my grade-level team for feedback.  Parent Communication: ◦ By April 2014, I will make at least 5 positive contacts with my 10 lowest-performing students’ families, and will update my evaluator on their progress.

 Goal Statement: Differentiation ◦ By April 2014, I will provide evidence of matching strategies, materials, and pacing to individual student needs in each of my science units of instruction.  Evidence Indicators: ◦ Pre-assessment data of students in each unit; Inventory of individual student learning styles; Plans of differentiated lessons with samples of strategies, materials and pacing  Date: ◦ September 27, 2013; January 21, 2014  Areas for Professional Growth: ◦ Differentiated instruction books and websites; Collegial visit to Mrs. X’s room to observe differentiation; Team meetings to discuss student needs

 Step 1: Self Assessment  Step 2: Creating a Growth Plan  Step 3: Pre-Conference  Step 4: Observation  Step 5: Post-Conference  Step 6: Walkthroughs/Informal Evaluations  Step 7: The Final Summative Rating

 Review questions and consider how they could be answered based on your upcoming observation.  Not every question will be asked, these are just suggested questions.  Your pre-conference will be used to inform your Teacher Performance rating.  At pre-conference you will also discuss Professional Growth Goals and Student Growth Measures.

 Every teacher will have 2 formal observations.  The observations will be for an instructional period of no less than 30 minutes. ◦ Observation 1- Between September and November 15 th ◦ Observation 2- Between December and February 15 th  The OTES rubric is the focus of the observation.

 Review the criteria and consider how they will be addressed in your upcoming observation.  Evaluator will use these criteria and collect evidence during your observation to inform a holistic ranking.  These criteria are the basis for both formal and informal observations.  Your ratings on these criteria will be used to inform you Teacher Performance rating.

1. Focus of Learning 2. Assessment Data 3. Prior Content Knowledge/Sequence/Connections 4. Knowledge of Students 5. Lesson Delivery 6. Differentiation 7. Resources 8. Classroom Environment 9. Assessment of Student Learning 10. Professional Responsibilities

 Goal is to reflect on the outcomes of the lesson.  Teachers should be prepared to discuss with evaluator: ◦ Strengths of the lesson ◦ Areas for refinement or improvement

 Step 1: Self Assessment  Step 2: Creating a Growth Plan  Step 3: Pre-Conference  Step 4: Observation  Step 5: Post-Conference  Step 6: Walkthroughs/Informal Evaluations  Step 7: The Final Summative Rating

 Fits into the Holistic Approach to Evaluation  Everyone will have a minimum of 2 walkthroughs no more than 4  Walkthroughs should be about10-15 minutes.  Walkthroughs can be conducted anytime except for the three days before winter break and any day after the final summative rating.  The teacher will receive feedback within 5 school days

 Step 1: Self Assessment  Step 2: Creating a Growth Plan  Step 3: Pre-Conference  Step 4: Observation  Step 5: Post-Conference  Step 6: Walkthroughs/Informal Evaluations  Step 7: The Final Summative Rating

 Professional Growth Plan  1 st round of the Observation Process  1st Walkthroughs  Instruction

 2 nd round of the Observation Process  Walkthroughs  Instruction

 Walkthroughs  Finalize Professional Growth Plan  Final Summative Rating

Value Added Vendor (STAR) Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)

 Find out your Student Growth Category  Take a 10 minute break  Report to the correct place based on Student Growth Category ◦ Category A: Room ? ◦ Category B: Library ◦ Category C: Cafeteria

 Teachers with only Value Added  Report to Room  Teachers ONLY ◦ 4 th - 6 th Grade teachers that ONLY teach Math and Language Arts

 Teachers with Value Added and another growth measure  Report to Room  Teachers ◦ 4 th - 6 th Grade teachers that teach Math or Language Arts and another subject with an SLO.

 Teachers with STAR and another growth measure  Remain in cafeteria  Teachers ◦ Preschool-3 rd Grade teachers that have STAR or team with teachers that do.

 Teachers without Value Added or STAR  Teachers that use SLOs as their growth measure.  Report to Room 104  Teachers ◦ K-6 PE ◦ K-6 Music ◦ Resource room only SpEd

 Kindergarten-104  1st Grade-106  2nd Grade-111  3rd Grade-112  4th Grade-117  5th Grade-208  6th Grade-212  PE-Conference Room  Music-Music Room  Title I and Special Ed – Staff CO