Essential Questions for English 12: Literature of Justice 1. How does an author convey the truth within the context of his or her fiction? How do you.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Argument Writing “Argument literacy is fundamental to being educated… Because argument is not standard in most school curricula, only 20% of those who.
Advertisements

Essential Questions for English 12: Literature of Justice 1. How does an author convey the truth within the context of his or her fiction? How do you.
Classical Argument Outline. The basic plan for organizing an argument along classical lines includes six major components: Introduction Statement of Background.
Writing Circle Map: “Persuasion”
Pathos Reader Ethos Writer Logos Text.  Is the writer trustworthy?  Does she treat the other side with respect?  Does he try to establish common ground.
Essential Questions for English 12: Literature of Justice 1. How does an author convey the truth within the context of his or her fiction? How do you.
Argumentation and Core Paragraph
Persuasion Rhetoric: The art of persuasion.
Vocabulary Week 13—Quiz FRIDAY!
The Art of Persuasion. What is the Difference between Persuasion and Argument? The words "argument" and "persuasion" are often used interchangeably.
Toulmin’s argument model
Standards  Writing  1.0 Writing Strategies: Students write coherent and focused texts that convey a well-defined perspective and tightly reasoned argument.
--- Hephizibah Roskelly and David A. Jolliffee, Everyday Use
THE ARRANGEMENT OF RHETORIC THE CLASSICAL MODEL AP English Language Mr. Gallegos.
Three Methods for Building Arguments
12/8/14 Do Now: - Using the list of rhetorical devices, complete the rhetorical strategies pre- assessment. Homework: - None Content Objective (What):
Argumentation Structure and Development. On Argumentation: “The aim of argument, or of discussion, should not be victory, but progress.” - Joseph Joubert,
Persuasion Getting people to agree with you Part II: Types of Arguments.
Persuasive Writing Assignment The Hunger Games and Night.
Types of editorials. Editorials that PERSUADE (Start copying into notes section of binder) These editorials use facts and argument to persuade readers.
 Look up online the words “rhetoric”  Define it then in your own words.
Ethos, Pathos, Logos Rhetorical Strategies. Rhetoric Rhetoric—the art of speaking or writing effectively (Webster's)Rhetoric—the art of speaking or writing.
Persuasion Getting people to agree with you Part I: Organizing your paper.
The Rhetorical Triangle: Ethos, Pathos, Logos. Aristotle’s Rhetorical Triangle Aristotle taught that persuasive speaking is based on how well a speaker.
Parts of a Debate. Opening Statements Organization It must have an intro, body, and conclusion Try to think of a slogan to tie everything together Argument.
Rhetoric The goal of argumentative writing is to persuade your audience that your ideas are valid, or more valid than someone else's. The Greek philosopher.
The Art of Persuasion. Every Persuasive Argument: Questions of fact Questions of fact Questions of value Questions of value Questions of policy Questions.
Recognizing Modes of Persuasion Objective: I will learn to recognize and apply rhetorical strategies.
Rhetoric In the study of rhetoric, the focus should be how a writer uses elements of language – diction, detail, image, tone, syntax, logical ordering,
Welcome to American Literature Warmup: What do you expect a sermon titled “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” to be like?
Aristotelian Appeals. What are Aristotelian Appeals?
Descriptions Concrete Ideas Examples Vivid details Energetic Language Strong Voice Strong Tone Direct Address to Audience Interesting Topic WHAT MAKES.
Elements of Persuasion in “Speech to the Virginia Convention”
Aristotelian Argument Classic Argument Format
The Art of Rhetoric Rhetoric: Aristotle defined rhetoric as the power of finding the available arguments suited to a given situation. Rhetoric helped people.
Essential Questions 1.How does an author convey the truth within the context of his or her fiction? How do you think each of the authors we are reading.
A Lesson on Rhetorical Appeals: Ethos, Pathos, Logos Pre-AP English II.
Aristotle’s PeRsuasive Audience appeals. ARISTOTLE In Rhetoric, Aristotle describes three main types of rhetoric: ethos, logos, and pathos. Rhetoric (n)
 College requires critical reading and writing skills. This tutorial is designed to get you started by teaching you to attend to critical features of.
Essential Questions for English 12: Literature of Justice 1. How does an author convey the truth within the context of his or her fiction? How do you.
What is rhetoric? What you need to know for AP Language.
The Open Prompt: Timing 1-3 minutes reading and working the prompt. 3 minutes deciding on a position minutes planning the support of your position.
Daily Warm-up: What points would you make if you were presenting an argument against the uniforms to Ms. Rains and Ms. Roach? Homework: Reading Plus due.
Aristotle: The Rhetorical Triangle
A Change of Heart About Animals
Speech Drafting Basics June 1/2 Do Now – 5 Minutes List 5 Promises You would make if elected President Number them Most Important to You 1 Least.
Rhetorical Elements of Persuasion
The Rhetorical Triangle (Aristotelian Triangle)
Writing to influence others
Elements of Argument and Persuasion
BA 3: AUDIENCE, PURPOSE, & RHETORICAL STRATEGIES
Three Methods for Building Arguments
Ethos, Logos, and Pathos Composition
Ethos, Logos, and Pathos Composition
Structuring and Analyzing Arguments: Toulmin, and Rogerian Models
Structuring and Analyzing Arguments: Toulmin, and Rogerian Models
Elements of Persuasion in “Speech to the Virginia Convention”
Everything is an Argument.
Rhetoric Rhetoric: Using language to persuade..
Is using persuasive techniques deceptive?
Constructing Arguments
Persuasive Language Techniques
Rhetorical Appeals.
Rhetorical Appeals ETHOS, PATHOS & LOGOS.

Argumentation and Persuasion
Rhetoric Notes.
Type of Rhetorical Appeals
Writing to influence others
September 25, 2017 AP English 3 Mr. Bell
Presentation transcript:

Essential Questions for English 12: Literature of Justice 1. How does an author convey the truth within the context of his or her fiction? How do you think each of the authors we are reading might define truth? Do you agree or disagree with their visions of truth? 2. What role does truth play in the lives of the characters? Does it change over time? In your own life, what role has truth played? Has it changed over time? If so, how? 3. What is the relationship between truth, justice, and leadership? 4. How does the author or playwright portray issues of justice in the text and through the characters? How do you relate to these issues of justice? How have you come to understand justice? 5. How does literature provide guidance with which to move out of the middle ground so that we do not become a “white moderate”?

GOOD MORNING! 123 Good Morning!

English 12: Literature of Justice Unit #4 – The Rhetoric of Dr. King Today’s Title: “Why bother?” Homework: Due Class #3 (Friday) Read Dr. King’s “I have a Dream” speech. FCA#1: Create a one page outline deconstructed from this speech. FCA #2: Identify and write down the example of an one of the three argument types about how King uses it effectively to move the speech forward and to be persuasive. FCA#3: Minimum response of 350 words. Put word count at the bottom of the page. Please stand for your…. Declaration of Preparation & Conscience: 1! 2! 3!  “I’m here and I’m ready” November 29, 2012 LP #2

English 12: Literature of Justice November 29, 2012 Unit #4 – The Rhetoric of Dr. King LP #2 “Why bother?” Today’s Objectives: The Student Will (TSW) review the fall exam TSW review Aristotelian Argument TSW compose and expose examples of Aristotelian Argument TSW be introduced to the format of Rogerian Argument

English 12: Literature of Justice November 29, 2012 Unit #4 – The Rhetoric of Dr. King LP #2 “Why bother?” Do Now – Type One Activity (Respond to each – Just do it!) Write down five things you know about Aristotelian Argument. Of these five, you may use or create examples for two. If you have no idea, ask a question…

English 12: Literature of Justice November 29, 2012 Unit #4 – The Rhetoric of Dr. King LP #2 “Why bother?” REMINDER: We will look at three different methods or strategies: Aristotelian Rogerian Toulmin

English 12: Literature of Justice November 29, 2012 Unit #4 – The Rhetoric of Dr. King LP #2 “Why bother?” Aristotelian Argument Logos: An appeal to readers’ sense of reason or logic. Pathos: An appeal to the reader’s emotions. Audience’s emotions are aroused by language, images, examples or personal narratives. Ethos: An appeal to reader’s sense of ethics and credibility. This appeal focuses on developing credibility in the source of information.

English 12: Literature of Justice November 29, 2012 Unit #4 – The Rhetoric of Dr. King LP #2 “Why bother?” Composed Examples: Working in pairs, create examples for each of the three parts of Aristotelian Argument.

English 12: Literature of Justice November 29, 2012 Unit #4 – The Rhetoric of Dr. King LP #2 “Why bother?” Letter from Birmingham Jail: Pull out your “Letters” Homework Review: Find an example of each in this letter

English 12: Literature of Justice November 29, 2012 Unit #4 – The Rhetoric of Dr. King LP #2 “Why bother?” Pass in your homework from last night. All parts of it.

English 12: Literature of Justice November 29, 2012 Unit #4 – The Rhetoric of Dr. King LP #2 “Why bother?” “Rogerian Argument” Summarize the opponent’s position using neutral language Demonstrate your understanding of the opposing opinion by showing you accept at least part of that position. State your opinion in the context of values, beliefs, and experiences that both sides share.

English 12: Literature of Justice November 29, 2012 Unit #4 – The Rhetoric of Dr. King LP #2 “Why bother?” ““Toulmin Argument” – Part I Claim – statement of writer’s position

English 12: Literature of Justice November 29, 2012 Unit #4 – The Rhetoric of Dr. King LP #2 “Why bother?” ““Toulmin Argument” – Part I Support – data that supports the claim

English 12: Literature of Justice November 29, 2012 Unit #4 – The Rhetoric of Dr. King LP #2 “Why bother?” ““Toulmin Argument” Warrant – conclusion drawn from support that confirms claim

English 12: Literature of Justice November 29, 2012 Unit #4 – The Rhetoric of Dr. King LP #2 “Why bother?” ““Toulmin Argument” – Part I Claim – statement of writer’s position Support – data that supports the claim Warrant – conclusion drawn from support that confirms claim

English 12: Literature of Justice November 29, 2012 Unit #4 – The Rhetoric of Dr. King LP #2 “Why bother?” ““Toulmin Argument” – Part II Nonessential but sometimes included: Backing – additional support for the warrant Rebuttal – a response to opposing arguments Qualifier – restatement of the claim in order to make it more acceptable to more members of the audience.

English 12: Literature of Justice November 29, 2012 Unit #4 – The Rhetoric of Dr. King LP #2 “Why bother?” ““Toulmin Argument” Claim – statement of writer’s position Support – data that supports the claim Warrant – conclusion drawn from support that confirms claim Nonessential but sometimes included: Backing – additional support for the warrant Rebuttal – a response to opposing arguments Qualifier – restatement of the claim in order to make it more acceptable to more members of the audience.

English 12: Literature of Justice November 29, 2012 Unit #4 – The Rhetoric of Dr. King LP #2 “Why bother?” I Have a Dream Deconstruction of Dr. King’s words.