Statewide Local Streets & Roads Needs Assessment City of San Buenaventura Public Works Department Engineering and Operations Division January 25, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Michigan Department of Transportation Michigans Infrastructure Needs and Funding 2013.
Advertisements

County of Fairfax, Virginia 1 Department of Transportation Bus Stop Improvement Program Fairfax County Department of Transportation Transit Services Division.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Review and Discussion of Draft Scope of Work for Study of Issues Associated with Increasing Transportation.
R O A D U S E R F E E T A S K F O R C E 1 OREGONS TRANSPORTATION FUNDING CHALLENGE.
ODOT Pedestrian and Bicycle Program Sheila Lyons, PE Local Area Government Conference 2011.
Safe Routes to School: INSERT SCHOOL INSERT NAME.
October An educational facility will feature: child-sized miniature buildings, streets, crosswalks, traffic lights, a railroad crossing, Bicycle.
TURN RESTRICTIONS SPEED LIMITS IMPROVEMENTS. SOUTHBOUND US MILLER CREEK ROAD OFF RAMP MARINWOOD AVE./MILLER CREEK RD. INTERSECTION 6:00 am to 10:00.
Michigan’s Transportation Funding Act
2011 WINNISQUAM COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=1021.
Before Between After.
California Department of Transportation. Storm Water Drivers Clean Water Act (CWA) requires NPDES permits for storm water discharges from municipalities,
2011 FRANKLIN COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=332.
Statewide Local Streets & Roads Needs Assessment Moraga Town Council February 24, 2010 RTPA RCTF Left click to continue.
OPSB & RSD LEAP/GEE Scores in Context Cowen Institute for Public Education Initiatives Tulane University May 2008.
Transit $315 million/year Bus service continues New rapid transit lines Regional Investment Direction Bridge $74 million/year Gets better Walking and.
HB 1048 / SB 518 Adjustments for Local Programs May 13, 2014 Jennifer B. DeBruhl Director, Local Assistance Division.
Louisiana Safe Routes To School Program
UNDERSTANDING THE ISSUES. 22 HILLSBOROUGH IS A REALLY BIG COUNTY.
ESTONIAN ROAD ADMINISTRATION Pärnu mnt. 463a Tallinn, Estonia Tel (0) Fax (0)
Pedestrian Safety Action Plans (PSAP) and Focus State / Focus Cities Initiatives for Pedestrian Safety in California David Cohen Safety Specialist FHWA.
Statewide Transportation Funding At Risk Your Name or Agency Date RTPA RCTF.
Background Why Plan For Transportation? Facts You Should Know Expectations Projects and Costs Conclusions/ Next Steps.
California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
Proposition 1B and the Strategic Growth Plan Randell Iwasaki California Department of Transportation.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Mission Statement Plan, Design, Construct, Operate and Maintain the roadway system under the jurisdiction of Lee County.
Leadership Champlain Energy Day “The Future Ain’t What it Use to Be” February 8, 2011.
Interchanges, Arterials, And Networks Last Week. Interchanges Freeway – Multilane highway Ramps and weaves are the same Problem comes in when you have.
Mandy Chu Office Chief Highway System Information and Performance Division of Research, Innovation and System Information Introduction to HPMS Highway.
1 Colorado Transportation Issues July 10, These unique polling results are based on 1,001 live telephone surveys among likely 2014 voters statewide.
California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
By Syd Bowcott, URS Corp Bayne Smith, URS Corp.  Purpose of this Presentation  Overview of Project Area  Background  Project Goals  Stakeholders.
Brett Hondorp Alta Planning + Design. Suggested Routes to School Details Primary Goals 1.To develop suggested route maps for 18 elementary and middle.
Kern Motorist Aid Authority Services And Operations.
Michigan’s Roads Crisis: Study Findings, Conclusions and Where Do We Go From Here? Best Practices Conference Rick Olson, State Representative, 55 th District.
Moving the Most People for the Least Cost Preserving the American Dream Conference Friday, September 24, 2010.
Washington State Transportation Commission March 20, 2007 Jeff Monsen, PE Intergovernmental Policy Manager.
1 Governance Council Meeting Fiscal Year 2004 LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY GATEWAY CITIES SERVICE SECTOR December 18, 2003.
California’s Strategic Growth Plan Ken De Crescenzo Federal Liaison California Department of Transportation.
Mark Nelson, Program Manager for Statewide Planning and Data Analysis TRB International Partnership Meeting January 14, 2015.
Draft Transportation 2035 Plan for the San Francisco Bay Area ACT February 24, 2009.
Council Policy Forum Feb. 23, 2015 CAPITAL PLANNING & INFRASTRUCTURE.
Chicago Department of Transportation Bobby L. Ware, Commissioner Richard M. Daley, Mayor Metropolitan Planning Council November 3,
“People should have transportation options.” TRANSPORTATION MOVING PEOPLE AND COMMERCE WHERE THEY WANT AND NEED TO GO.
Quality Avenue “Safe Streets” Improvements City of Lakeland, Minnesota Paul Pinkston Hamline University August 18, 2015.
All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Doug Bish Traffic Services Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation November 2014.
All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Angela Kargel Region 2 Traffic Manager Oregon Department of Transportation January 2015.
Regional Transportation Issues Infrastructure Maintenance New Facilities Air Quality Pollution Congestion Freeway System Surface Streets Income.
Prop 1B: Infrastructure Bonds 2007 Bay Area Vendor Fair Oakland, CA May 24,2007 Bay Area Transportation:
Express/Rapid Bus Opportunities for Priority Bus Transit in the Washington Region Sponsored by National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Chun.
1 Streets and Highways: Not Making the Grade Hamid Bahadori Automobile Club of Southern California (AAA)
SR 256 Road Rehabilitation Town of Austin January 18, :00pm Austin Elementary School.
Department of Public Works Approval of a Journal Voucher Amending Projects in the FY 2011 Capital Improvement Program Budget and Appropriate $125,000 in.
1 Planning Andrea Stevenson. 2 What’s the Big Deal About Ohio’s Transportation System? Ohio is within a single day’s drive (600 miles) of 60% of the United.
Statewide Transportation Funding At Risk Your Name or Agency Date RTPA RCTF.
KING COUNTY BRIDGES AND ROADS TASK FORCE Roads Services Division Financial Review September 16, 2015.
City of Belmont Pavement Reconstruction Project October 15, 2014.
Planes, trains & automobiles… Transport. Roads – some facts… Six million more vehicles on our roads now than in 1997 More two car households than no car.
1 City Council Work Session September 24, 2012 State of Transportation in San Leandro.
1. Accurate & Timely intelligence shared by all 2. Effective tactics and strategies 3. Rapid deployment of resources 4. Relentless follow-up and assessment.
District 7 (Los Angeles and Ventura Counties) State Highway System San Gabriel Mountains National Monument Area SAN GABRIEL MOUNTAINS NATIONAL MONUMENT.
Transportation Asset Management PM Peer Exchange Performance Reporting and Target Setting (Section 2): VDOT’s Experience Connie Sorrell Chief of System.
The Roads Most Traveled: California’s Transportation Funding Needs
Citizens Academy 2016 Public Works and RTS.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Efforts to Pass Prop 69 & Protect SB 1
Early Voting Starts Oct. 20 | Election Day Nov
SE 12th Street Roadway Improvements February 8, 2005.
Efforts to Pass Prop 69 & Protect SB 1
KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION KDOT Update JULY 2018.
Presentation transcript:

Statewide Local Streets & Roads Needs Assessment City of San Buenaventura Public Works Department Engineering and Operations Division January 25, 2010 RTPA RCTF

The Need for a Statewide Study California’s local streets and road system reaching a point of crisis Every trip begins and ends at City and County Streets Whether by bike, bus, rail, truck, or family car, Californians need the local system. This report provides critical analysis on the local network condition and funding needs

Study Objectives What are conditions of local streets & roads? How much will it cost to improve/maintain pavements in an acceptable condition? What are safety, traffic & regulatory needs? Is there a funding shortfall? If so, what is it?

Local Streets & Roads are Huge Part of State Network 81% of California’s pavements are owned by cities and counties!

It’s Not Just Pavements … Sidewalks ADA ramps Curb & gutter Storm drains Lighting

Study Assumptions 10 year analysis period Constant 2008 $ Pavement goal is best management practices Inclusion of safety, traffic & regulatory elements Does not include new streets or capital improvements.

Data Collection Total of 406 agencies –56 counties –350 cities Missing 130 agencies –Mostly small cities –No data –No resources 71% data rec’d 29% no data Data received 93% of centerline miles No Data 7% of centerline miles

Quality Assurance Validation checks –Lengths – compared with HPMS –Areas – simple checks –Math errors –Mismatched units –Tests of reasonableness Made follow-up calls/ s – only medium/large agencies

How Good Are Pavement Data?

Quality of Safety, Traffic & Regulatory / $$ Data Safety, traffic & regulatory –188 partial, 58 complete Funding/expenditures –29 counties & 108 cities responded

Quick Facts from California Statewide Needs Assessment Study Current Statewide Pavement Condition is 68, but will decline to 48 in 25 years Requires $5 Billion PER YEAR over next 10 years to bring pavement only up to “good condition” Requires $1.8 Billion/year to maintain pavement afterwards Requires add’l $2 Billion/year to bring non- pavement components to good condition.

Quick Facts from California Statewide Needs Assessment Study (cont.) Sponsored by: –California State Association of Counties –League of California Cities –County Engineers Association of California –County of Los Angeles –California Regional Transportation Planning Agencies –California Rural Counties Task Force

PCI Rating Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Very Poor Failed Pavement Condition Index (PCI)

City of Ventura – Public Works Engineering & Operations - Streets 39 % of Our Roads are in this condition

48 % of Our Roads are in this condition City of Ventura – Public Works Engineering & Operations - Streets

9 % of Our Roads are in this condition City of Ventura – Public Works Engineering & Operations - Streets

3 % of Our Roads are in this condition City of Ventura – Public Works Engineering & Operations - Streets

<1% of Our Roads are in this condition City of Ventura – Public Works Engineering & Operations - Streets

Statewide Average PCI = 68

Why is 68 Critical? 68 $2/sy $15-40/sy $40-70/sy $60-100/sy

Statewide Funding Sources Funding Sources Annual Funding FY 2006/07 & 07/08 FY 08/09 FY 09/10 onward State41.0%40.5%52.9% State - Prop 1B10.0%0% Federal with ARRA*10.8%35.9%10.4% Local38.1%23.6%36.8% * ARRA local share is assumed to be 40% of $1.6 billion.

Critical Revenue Streams Proposition 42: Cities and Counties will receive approximately $592 million in FY –City of Ventura received $800,000 in 2009 –Primarily Used for Slurry Seal Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA/Gas Tax): Cities and Counties will receive $986 million in FY –City of Ventura receives $2.2 million –Most flexible source of revenue used for operations and maintenance and rehabilitation of local roads.

Transportation Funds in Jeopardy in FY The State deferred the first two quarters of Proposition 42 funds to cities and counties in FY The State also deferred seven months of gas tax subventions to cities and counties in FY The Legislative Analysts’ Office projects another approximately $20 billion budget deficit over the next 18 months alone. Transportation revenues continue to be in jeopardy.

What Happens If We Don’t Get More Funding State-wide? 68 (at risk) 48 (poor) PCI Backlog ($ billion) $37B $79B

Total 10 Year Shortfall ($B) Transportation Asset 10 Year Needs Existing Funding 10 Year Shortfall Pavements$ 67.6 $ 15.9 $ 51.7 Essential Components $ 32.1 $ 12.4 $ 19.7 Total shortfall $ cents/gal 38 cents/gallon!

Funding Shortfall for City of Ventura City of Ventura has a funding shortfall of $95 million for the next ten years. City of Ventura has a backlog of $74 million.

Summary Good News –Data received represents 93% of local system –Statewide average PCI = 68 –Gas is $3.00/gallon today Not so good news –PCI = 68 is at risk category & drops to 48 by 2033 with existing funding –Need to more than double existing funding to maintain transportation assets

Questions?