Query Health Concept Mapping Activity November 10, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
State Historic Preservation Plan City & County of Honolulu May 22,
Advertisements

BioPortal Status and Plans September 2011 Ray Fergerson NCBO Project Director Stanford University 1.
13 September 2012 SDMX Technical Working Group1 Report of the SDMX Technical Standards Working Group SDMX Expert Group Meeting, Paris, September 2012.
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Project Meeting Content Group
EDOS Workgroup Update Laboratory Orders Interface Initiative.
1 QUESTIONS FOR DEBATE Opening session: What do I bring to this meeting and what would I like to learn?
Overview of Market Research. Market Research2 Market Research Module Schedule of Activities Time Activity Day 1: 9: :00-Overview of Market Research.
NLP as a Data Integration Tool for Your CIO James M. Maisel, MD Chairman, ZyDoc
25 August |1 | Health Data Standards Health Data Standards 25 August 2014 Global Standards Symposium: Global Standards Challenges Dubai, United.
1 Sep 15Fall 05 Standards in Medical Informatics Standards Nomenclature Terminologies Vocabularies.
Healthcare Coalitions: What Wisconsin Hospital Leaders Need to Know Jason M. Liu, MD, MPH (Medical College of Wisconsin) Michael R. Clark, MD (Ministry.
Update on Vocabularies and Value Sets for Meaningful Use
VXQFQ2 Monday June 3, 2013Trillium Bridge Negotiations Meeting1.
FRED Interlinked Registries DRAFT roadmap for consideration.
MedlinePlus Connect Sarena Burgess
QIDAM Issues and proposals for a logical model For discussion during HL7 WG Meeting in Jan 2014 Thursday Q3.
S&I Framework Provider Directories Initiative esMD Work Group October 19, 2011.
Amy Sheide Clinical Informaticist 3M Health Information Systems USA Achieving Data Standardization in Health Information Exchange and Quality Measurement.
Update on Vocabularies and Value Sets for Meaningful Use Betsy Humphreys, MLS, FACMI Deputy Director National Library of Medicine National Institutes of.
HealthBridge is one of the nation’s largest and most successful health information exchange organizations. An Overview of the HealthBridge Data Analytics.
Overview of Biomedical Informatics Rakesh Nagarajan.
University of Pittsburgh Department of Biomedical Informatics Healthcare institutions have established local clinical data research repositories to enable.
A Primer on Healthcare Information Exchange John D. Halamka MD CIO, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.
Inter-institutional Data Sharing, Standards and Legal Arthur Davidson, MD, MSPH Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Washington, DC June 9, 2005.
1 Definitions Value set: A list of specific values, which may – or may not – contain subsets of one or more standard vocabularies, that define or identify:
Development Principles PHIN advances the use of standard vocabularies by working with Standards Development Organizations to ensure that public health.
Carlos Lamsfus. ISWDS 2005 Galway, November 7th 2005 CENTRO DE TECNOLOGÍAS DE INTERACCIÓN VISUAL Y COMUNICACIONES VISUAL INTERACTION AND COMMUNICATIONS.
Allied health student training Pre-placement training requirements Welcome to the video-conference. This video-conference will be recorded. Your participation.
Update on Newborn Screening Use Case Advisory Committee on Heritable Diseases in Newborns and Children - Advisory Committee on Heritable Diseases in Newborns.
1 Federal Health IT Ontology Project (HITOP) Group The Vision Toward Testing Ontology Tools in High Priority Health IT Applications October 5, 2005.
Our Joint Playing Field: A Few Constants Change Change Our missions (if defined properly) Our missions (if defined properly) Importance of Community Engagement.
Betsy L. Humphreys, MLS National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Standards (including Vocabulary):
10/3/2015DRAFT1 Public Health & Clinical LOINC - Jan 28 th 2011 CDC Vocabulary Team Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology and Laboratory Services (OSELS)
Guidance for Editors Working with care maps © 2008 Map of Medicine Ltd. Commercial and in confidence.
Survey of Medical Informatics CS 493 – Fall 2004 September 27, 2004.
EHR-S Functional Requirements IG: Lab Results Interface Laboratory Initiative.
Client Registry An enterprise master patient index (EMPI), or Client Registry manages the unique identity of citizens receiving health services with the.
MDPHnet: Real-time Public Health Surveillance Joshua Vogel, MPH Epidemiologist Massachusetts Department of Public Health.
Managing Organizational Change A Framework to Implement and Sustain Initiatives in a Public Agency Lisa Molinar M.A.
Updating the Health Care Service Data Reporting Guide (HCSDRG) Webinar June 12, 2013 Robert Davis, Standards Consultant.
Briefing: HL7 Working Group Meeting Update for the VCDE Community Dianne M. Reeves Associate Director, Biomedical Data Standards NCI CBIIT VCDE Meeting.
OpenHIE Improving health for the underserved. The Open Health Information Exchange (OpenHIE) Community: A diverse community enabling interoperable health.
Special Topics in Vendor- Specific Systems Unit 6 Vendor strategies for terminology, knowledge management, and data exchange.
Query Health Vendor Advisory Meeting 12/15/2011. Agenda Provide Overview of Query Health Seek Guidance and Feedback on Integration Approaches.
Panel: Problems with Existing EHR Paradigms and How Ontology Can Solve Them Roberto A. Rocha, MD, PhD, FACMI Sr. Corporate Manager Clinical Knowledge Management.
Concept to Codes Approach. Visual Representation PSMA Code 1 Code 2 PSMA Code 1 Code 2 LOINC Code Code LOINC Code Code SNOMED.
Component 3-Terminology in Healthcare and Public Health Settings Unit 17-Clinical Vocabularies This material was developed by The University of Alabama.
CIMI Survey results 1 Presented by Nicholas Oughtibridge.
Query Health Concept-to-Codes (C2C) SWG Meeting #11 February 28,
TalkingQuality: Tools for Public Reporting Session 1B: Quality and Patient Safety Reporting Tools AHRQ Annual Meeting September.
HIT Standards Committee Vocabulary Task Force Task Force Report and Recommendation Jamie Ferguson Kaiser Permanente Betsy Humphreys National Library of.
HIT Standards Committee Clinical Operations Workgroup Report on Gaps and Next Steps Jamie Ferguson Kaiser Permanente John Halamka Harvard Medical School.
Understanding Access to Health Care Services Forsyth Futures 2014 November 10, 2015 Community Indicators Consortium Austin, TX.
SNOMED CT Vendor Introduction 27 th October :30 (CET) Implementation Special Interest Group Tom Seabury IHTSDO.
Implementation of National Standards (LOINC, SNOMED) for Electronic Reporting of Laboratory Results: BioSense Experience Nikolay Lipskiy 1, DrPH, MS, MBA;
All Recurring Key Themes The below list includes themes across many of the different presentations to date. The next 2 slides address how these may be.
DSRIP OVERVIEW. What is DSRIP? 2  DSRIP = Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment  An effort between the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH)
Pharmacy Health Information Technology Collaborative Date: April 28, 2016 Presenter:Shelly Spiro, RPh, FASCP Pharmacy HIT Collaborative Executive Director.
NAACCR CDA Pilot Project - Overview, Status, and Findings 2009 NAACCR Conference Ken Gerlach, Co-Chair, NAACCR Clinical Data Work Group; Health Scientist,
3M Health Information Systems 1© 3M All Rights Reserved. 3M Health Information Systems Data Standardization Interoperability.
Frequent Criticisms too ambitious recreation of a Textbook of Medicine competing with SNOMED-CT replicates the work done elsewhere: DSM, ICPC, too academic.
Demonstration for AHIMA
Achieving Semantic Interoperability of Cancer Registries
Federal Health IT Ontology Project (HITOP) Group
Public Health Reporting – S&I Framework CEDD Overview
LOCAL EXPERIENCES Innovation practices and experiences related to FIC development and implementation Ariadna Rius Clinical Dictionary for iSalut.
Project Title Name Contact .
Undergraduate Courses
Data Standardization Interoperability 3M Health Information Systems
Interoperability with SNOW SHRINE
Presentation transcript:

Query Health Concept Mapping Activity November 10, 2011

Overview A (very basic) background on concept mapping The problem that the Concept Mapping workstream is trying to solve Five questions for you Any questions for us and general discussion 2

Background The majority of healthcare systems maintain their own dictionaries The terms in these dictionaries are not compatible with others –‘PA/Lateral CXR’ vs. ‘2-view chest x-ray’ In order to speak the same ‘language’, we have to: –Agree on the same language –Translate what we say into this agreed upon language –Translate what we hear back into our own language This translation exercise is what is termed ‘concept mapping’ 3

County Hospital Private Hospital Community Hospital A Community Hospital B Tertiary Care Center Health Departments Global Patient Index Concept Dictionary Referral Labs, Pharmacies, etc… Provider Directory

Concept Mapping Illustrated 5 Other Code Set Code 1 Code 2 Other Code Set Code 1 Code 2 LOINC Code Code LOINC Code Code SNOMED CT Code DE Code DE SNOMED CT Code DE Code DE ICD 9 Code Code ICD 9 Code Code ICD 10 Code J 18.9 Code J 18.1 ICD 10 Code J 18.9 Code J 18.1 UMLS, etc. Clinical Concepts Map Vocabulary Codes ↔ Concept Dictionary

The Importance of Concept Mapping… and the problem at hand Query Health will disseminate queries to many data sources It is unlikely that any of these data sources will understand that format natively –Each data source will have to map their own concept dictionary to the concepts expressed by the query –Some larger organizations and information exchanges may already have mappings to standard vocabularies, but many others may not In order to ease the burden of participating in Query Health, how can we facilitate the concept mapping exercise? 6

Where the Concept Mapping Activity comes in As part of the Query Health initiative, we suggest undertaking work to discover the best practices in concept mapping The ultimate goal of this effort would be a guide describing these best practices Question 1 Should we undertake this work? 7

Question 2 How should we do this study? Semi-structured interviews Structured survey Focused group discussions Literature Review Another methodology 8

Question 3 If we use a methodology that collects information from experts (surveys, interviews, FGDs), who should we target? Information Exchange Implementers Creators of tools to facilitate mapping (i.e. RELMA for LOINC) Other groups? From which organizations? 9

Question 4 If we perform a literature review, what terms should we include? AND Mapping AND (LOINC or SNOMED or SNOMED-CT or ICD-9 or ICD-10 or ICD-9-CM or ICD-10-CM or ICD-10-PCS or RxNorm or CPT) Other terms 10

Question 5 How should we (your support team) proceed before the activity starts in 3-4 weeks? Do nothing; all work from study design onward should be in the Concept Mapping workstream Have the Implementation workgroup approve a study design and the support team should begin collecting data; all data analysis should be done in the Concept Mapping workstream Have the Implementation workgroup approve the study design and the support team should collect data and analyze it; the Concept Mapping workstream can review the analysis Another approach 11

Questions and General Discussion 12