The Quality Matters Rubric ® ©MarylandOnline, Inc. 2012. All rights reserved.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality Matters Building a Quality Online Course.
Advertisements

Rhode Island Model for Educator Evaluation Systems August 2010.
Copyright © 2012 California Department of Education, Child Development Division with WestEd Center for Child & Family Studies, Desired Results T&TA Project.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
Outcome 4: Alignment PowerSchool. Think about Outcome 4. What comes to mind?
COBIT® 5 for Assurance Introduction
1. A Little Context… Online learning is not new…its just moving into the mainstream of higher education…and the MOOC mania has moved it into mainstream.
Troy University eTROY Colloquium April 17-18, 2012.
What is it? What is it? Quality Matters (QM) is a nationally recognized, faculty- centered, peer review process designed to certify the quality of online.
A Quality Matters “Quickie”
Session 2: Introduction to the Quality Criteria. Session Overview Your facilitator, ___________________. [Add details of facilitators background, including.
New Products for © 2009 ANGEL Learning, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential, 2 Update Summary Enrich teaching and learning Meet accountability needs.
Quality Matters TM Institution Representative Training: IR Role and Tools ©MarylandOnline, Inc All rights reserved.
February 29,  Name  Regional Rep & Location or Planning Committee  Organization.
Your Subscription to Quality Matters TM ©MarylandOnline, Inc All rights reserved.
Getting Started with Quality Matters TM ©MarylandOnline, Inc All rights reserved.
Institutional Policy & Quality Matters Standards: The impact of policy on course quality Deb Adair, QM Director Sloan-C Conference November 9-11, 2011.
Curriculum Maps Public Release: February 10, 2014
Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
Quality Matters! Using the Quality Matters Rubric to Improve Online Course Design Susan Bussmann and Sandy Johnson NMSU Quality Matters Institutional.
Using the Quality Matters Rubric to Improve Online Course Design
The Need To Improve STEM Learning Successful K-12 STEM is essential for scientific discovery, economic growth and functioning democracy Too.
Participation: Putting the Individual First Daisy Brooke, Participation Manager, Yachting Australia.
Quality Matters TM Intellectual Property ©MarylandOnline, Inc All rights reserved.
Quality Matters TM : Introduction to QM and to the Rubric The Quality Matters™ Rubric 2008 – 2010 Edition Updated July 08.
Supporting Quality of Student Learning Online: Using Quality Matters to Strengthen Online Teaching and Learning Valencia College - Orlando, Florida Charles.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Introducing the Quality Matters Continuing Education Rubric
Quality Matters TM Professional Development and Certifications ©MarylandOnline, Inc All rights reserved.
+ Taking the MSW Degree Online Pedagogy, Challenges, and Lessons Learned Sarah Bradley, MSSW, LCSW Associate Professor of Practice MSW Program Director.
Quality Matters TM K-12 Publisher QM Coordinator Training: QMC Role and Tools ©2014 MarylandOnline, Inc. All rights reserved.
Quality Matters : Inter-Institutional Quality Assurance in Online Learning Teaching with New Technologies May 2007.
STANDARDIZATION It’s Not a Bad Word!. Before Standardization Between 4 Adult Schools, CBET Classes and Offsite Classes, ALL ESL classes had different.
The ITIL V3 Intermediate RCV Capability Complete Certification Kit - Second Edition - IPAD VERSION Who Knew ITIL
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Quality Matters: Inter-Institutional Quality Assurance in Online Learning A Grant Initiative of MarylandOnline Sponsored by the U.S. Dept. Education Fund.
The BVSD Curriculum Essentials Document. Drama & Theatre Arts Essential Questions: 1.How were the Drama & Theater Arts Curriculum Essentials Documents.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Qualifications Update: Physical Education Qualifications Update: Physical Education.
A Project Sponsored by the McCormick Foundation LINC Consortium Meeting August 9, 2011.
K-12 Web Content Development Process
The IR Role in Subscriber Managed Course Reviews QM Institution Representative Training © MarylandOnline, Inc., All rights reserved.
Introduction to Quality Matters ™ Inter-Institutional Quality Assurance in Online Learning © MarylandOnline, Inc., All rights reserved.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
The IR Role in Internal Course Reviews QM Institution Representative Training © MarylandOnline, Inc., All rights reserved.
Quality Matters TM Course Reviews ©MarylandOnline, Inc All rights reserved.
Getting Started with Quality Matters TM © 2014 MarylandOnline, Inc. All rights reserved.
Getting Started with Quality Matters TM © 2014 MarylandOnline, Inc. All rights reserved.
Quality Matters TM Intellectual Property © 2014 MarylandOnline, Inc. All rights reserved.
QM for MOOCs: Results of QM Reviews of Gates Foundation-Funded MOOCs 5th Annual QM Conference October 1-4, 2013 Nashville, TN Deb Adair, QM Managing Director.
Quality Matters Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
All roads lead to Rome: Four system efforts in higher education web accessibility Panel: Cheryl Pruitt, CSU system; Rob Carr, OK ABLE tech; Brenda Boyd,
Mapping Your Online Course Susie Bussmann, Ph.D. & Sandy Johnson, M.A. & M.S.
Use of Quality Matters in the Faculty Mentor-Mentee Relationship
Online Quality Course Design vs. Quality Teaching:
The Academic Technology Center
By Ray Lum, MPhil, MS Kim Stott, PhD
A community of learners improving our world
From the Ground Up: RN to BSN Completion
Development of Quality Initiatives on a Less-Travelled Path: The Online Fellows Program Judith A. Giering, Ph.D. Karyn E. Holt, Ph.D. Drexel University.
Harvesting the Benefits of QM Culture for Institutional Accreditation
Professional Development
Instructional Design Model
Online Course Showcase
The Buggy Before the Horse
Leveraging Instructional Design Teams
Quality Matters Overview
Quality Assurance in Blended Learning Standards and Rubrics
Presentation transcript:

The Quality Matters Rubric ® ©MarylandOnline, Inc All rights reserved

Consisting of: 8 key areas (general standards) of course quality 41 specific review standards Including 21 essential standards and detailed annotations and examples of good practice for all 41 standards The Rubric is the Core of QM ©MarylandOnline, Inc All rights reserved

Annotations are Key to Rubric Standards only briefly articulate benchmarks Annotations provide the guidance for course designers and reviewers Rubric intended for use by faculty for faculty Annotation language is free of jargon and provides examples of both good and poor practice Course reviews must be guided by the application of the full rubric; including, and especially, the annotations ©MarylandOnline, Inc All rights reserved

Alignment in the QM Rubric Eight General Standards: 1. Course Overview and Introduction 2. Learning Objectives (Competencies) 3. Assessment and Measurement 4. Instructional Materials 5. Learner Interaction & Engagement 6. Course Technology 7. Learner Support 8. Accessibility Key components must align. Alignment: Critical course elements work together to ensure that students achieve the desired learning outcomes. ©MarylandOnline, Inc All rights reserved

Flexible, not Prescriptive The QM Rubric is built to apply broadly across online and blended courses in all disciplines and levels There are many ways to meet the standards and the annotations contain multiple examples to highlight this concept Rubric versions have been adapted for special contexts and are available to subscribers: – G6-12 Rubric – Publisher Rubric (for 3-party created courses) ©MarylandOnline, Inc All rights reserved

Standards Supported by Research Current literature review is conducted for every rubric edition released

Editions: Continuous Improvement 2002, 2004 & (Pre- and Grant-period) 2006/2007 edition edition edition Lit. review and users surveys 12-person committee (faculty, IDs, QM staff); 65 hours of committee work 10 month process ©MarylandOnline, Inc All rights reserved

Rubric Hallmarks Culturally inclusive and international Emphasizes focus on design v content – Update took 10 months, 12-person committee facult/IDs/QM staff), 65 hoursUpdate training provided free and self-paced Accessibility focus is more clear and less US-centric ©MarylandOnline, Inc All rights reserved

Rubric Update Training Update training for all certified QM reviewers is online, self-paced, and free Training is mandatory to maintain reviewer certification to service on official course reviews Link to training is available on your MyQM page as long as the workshop is open. For more information about the Rubric Update training, please see the Professional Development QM website ©MarylandOnline, Inc All rights reserved

Reported uses consist of: Course development checklists for faculty Faculty development Faculty engagement with national standards supported by research Course reviews both internal and for certification Quality process indicators for accreditation self- studies Uses of the Rubric ©MarylandOnline, Inc All rights reserved

Feedback: Privacy Policy Feedback
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
About project: SlidePlayer Terms of Service

© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc. All rights reserved.