O Adopted in 1972, the CWA is known mostly to the public by its mandate for “swimmable and fishable” waterways. o With the CWA, states evaluate all of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
creating a sustainable world The Chesapeake Bay TMDL A Policy Model for Nutrient Pollution Reductions James Noonan October.
Advertisements

(your state) Master Farmer Program
Ann D Hirekatur Project Manager State of Lake Wisconsin Meeting July 13, 2013 Wisconsin River Basin Water Quality Improvement Project.
Presented by Melanie Williams. Plan Schedule Water Quality Status Trends Chain of Lakes Basinwide Issues Recommendations & goals Public Review Comments.
What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
Watershed Monitoring and Assessment: Federal Regulations and Local Processes Seth Mason.
Stormwater Rulemaking Briefing US Environmental Protection Agency.
TMDL Development Mainstem Monongahela River Watershed May 14, 2014.
Development of a GIS Coverage of Impaired Streams in Texas Presented by Samantha Hon CE 394K Nov. 19, 2002.
Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality TMDLs 101 An Explanation of the Federal Clean Water Act’s TMDL Requirements and How they Impact Carter Lake.
MS4 Stormwater Permit Program and Great Bay. Brief Overview – EPA’s Stormwater Management Program Clean Water Act – NPDES Stormwater amendments.
Legislative Changes Affecting Water Quality at a Local Level October 2011 Robert Kollinger, P.E. Water Resources Manager Polk County Parks and Natural.
Austin Peay State University Stormwater Program Kristen Spicer, Ph.D.
Stormwater, Wellhead Protection and Drainage Issues Public Hearing.
NPDES Phase II Storm Water Regulations: WHAT MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS NEED TO KNOW.
By: Carrie Turner Prepared for: New Jersey Association of Environmental Authorities Annual Conference March 12, 2013 Watershed Management Planning Provides.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Chesapeake Bay and New York State Water Quality and the Potential for Future Regulations Presented by the Upper Susquehanna Coalition.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
Incorporating Climate Change Adaptation in EPA Region 10 Programs: An example based on a newly initiated pilot in the Office of Water and Watershed’s Total.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Item No. 13 Recommendation to the State Water Resources Control Board Regarding the Section 303(d) List Lahontan Water Board June 19, 2014 Carly Nilson.
Rogue Basin Water Quality Implementation Plans Greg Stabach, Natural Resources Project Manager Rogue Valley Council of Governments.
 Why are we here?  Without regulations, rivers used to catch fire. Rules and Regulation.
Rules Overview: Why Do We Do What We Do Alisa Max, P.E. Harris County Alisa Max, P.E. Harris County.
Hillsborough River Fecal Coliform BMAP Process Oct. 22, 2008.
Animal Agriculture and Water Resources in Texas Ned Meister Director of Commodity and Regulatory Activities Texas Farm Bureau Steel Maloney Principal Hydrologist.
Regional Stormwater Management Coordinating Council Meeting Summary of May 13 th Meeting Summary of May 13 th Meeting Regulatory Updates Regulatory Updates.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Water Quality Management Plan Update Board of Directors March 25, 2009.
Stormwater… Problems & Solutions Jim Nash. A water resources commissioner Then… Unique to Michigan Initially cleared swamps and marshes Each township.
Eric Agnew Environmental Regulations February 15, 2006.
Understanding the TMDL and I-Plan process Austin’s water quality & possible solutions Improving Austin Streams process and your involvement Welcome!
Region 2000 Local Government Council 828 Main Street, 12th Floor Lynchburg, VA March 4, :30 – 8:30 p.m.
SFEP/EPA Proposal Background- prior NBWA grant EPA Funds and Process SFEP Process EPA Approval and Schedule NBWA Proposal-$1.5 Million Other Funds.
KWWOA Annual Conference April 2014 Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Paulette Akers Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY.
Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) in 4 Austin Watersheds Presented to the City of Austin Environmental Board November 7, 2012.
Chowan River TMDL Development and Source Assessment Tidewater Area October 20, 2004.
One Water LA is a collaborative approach to develop an integrated framework for managing the City’s watersheds, water resources, and water facilities in.
STREAM MONITORING CASE STUDY. Agenda  Monitoring Requirements  TMDL Requirements  OCEA Initial Monitoring Program  Selection of Parameters  Data.
76. The central U.S. law regulating water quality is the Clean Water Act (CWA), adopted in The Act initially focused on point sources, which it.
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.
BMAP Forward & Septic Tanks 2012 Environmental Symposium John P. Pappas, P.E. Department of Public Works.
What is Stormwater? Direct result of rainfall Recharges groundwater by infiltration Produces “runoff” (excess rainfall after infiltration) May be concentrated.
CLEAN WATER ACT AND MUNICIPAL STORMWATER CALIFORNIA STORMWATER WORKSHOP David W. Smith, Manager NPDES Permits Section EPA/Region 9.
Nutrients and the Next Generation of Conservation Presented by: Tom Porta, P.E. Deputy Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection President,
MS4 Permit – Meaning, History, and Annual Report Results Watershed Partners 4/13/
Williamsburg’s Local Strategies to meet the ChesBay TMDL March 2012 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Virginia Maryland Pennsylvania New York Delaware West Virginia.
1 How the Water Board Protects California’s Water Quality Kate Hart, Board Member Chair Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board.
1 Staff Public Workshops Fall 2011 Policy for Siting, Design, Operation and Management of Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems San Luis Obispo: October.
Improving Austin Streams: An Implementation Plan for Total Maximum Daily Load Allocations in 4 Austin Watersheds Chris Herrington, PE Manager, Water Resource.
Watershed Management for Urban Water Supply. Why use NYC as a case study? Comprehensive, long-range watershed protection program Illustrates a multifaceted.
Briefing regarding the new State General Stormwater Pollution Control Permit.
Integrated Watershed Management
Hampden Township Stormwater Management Program
Mulberry River Watershed
Stormwater Management and MS4 Compliance
The Basin–Wide Approach New 303(D) Vision
Total Maximum Daily Load Program
Water Quality Improvement Through Implementation of a Watershed Protection Plan in the Leon River Watershed Lower Rio Grande Valley Stormwater Conference.
Mulberry Watershed Management Plan
Bacteria Loadings Watershed Model:
John Tinger U.S. EPA Region IX
Watershed Planning and Protection for Lavon Lake
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
Nonpoint Source Program
Water Resources Council
Vineyards and Water Quality
Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards
Presentation transcript:

o Adopted in 1972, the CWA is known mostly to the public by its mandate for “swimmable and fishable” waterways. o With the CWA, states evaluate all of their lakes, rivers, streams, and reservoirs every two years to see if those waterways meet established criteria for a variety of potentially problem causing pollutants. It begins with the Clean Water Act Why participate in the Regional Implementation Plan (I-Plan) for the Greater Trinity River Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Project?

o In 1996, the state realized the Upper Trinity and Lower West Fork Trinity Rivers were impaired for bacteria; meaning bacteria levels were too high for people in direct contact with the water (swimmers, water skiers, waders). o In 2006, 13 tributaries joined the Upper Trinity and West Fork on the list of waterways with too much bacteria. Eleven tributaries stem off of the Lower West Fork Trinity; two others are tributaries of the Elm Fork Trinity.

We are not alone in this effort

o When the bacteria levels are too high, stakeholders in the watershed come together to develop an Implementation Plan (I-Plan) to address the problem. o This is not just for those directly along the river or creek – water in a river is the sum of those creeks flowing into it, so a watershed approach is needed. o The area covered by the watersheds of our impaired river segments and tributaries required a regional approach to the bacteria problem. Bacteria? Is this our problem? o The sources of high bacteria are many: wildlife, pets, livestock, sanitary sewer overflows, malfunctioning septic systems, urban stormwater runoff, permitted discharges from water treatment plants, and illicit discharges.

o In late 2010, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality asked the North Central Texas Council of Governments to bring together all the cities and other stakeholders in impacted watersheds to begin to address the bacteria in the waterways in the form of an I-Plan. o At the heart of this I-Plan are the implementation strategies appropriate for reducing bacteria levels in our region. From 2011 to 2012, this city participated in numerous meetings and discussions hosted by NCTCOG to determine the best possible – and most flexible strategies to deal with bacteria from a variety of possible sources. o Many of the strategies are things we are already doing as part of our TCEQ-required MS4 stormwater permit. Those strategies proposed in the I-Plan that not in our permit are voluntary and may be selected by our community on a menu-style basis. Working as a Region

Implementation Strategy Examples Sanitary sewer overflow prevention, effluent monitoring Regional stormwater management program participation Wastewater & Stormwater Green infrastructure and low impact development standards Pet and livestock waste control measures Planning & Development & Animals

More examples Septic system education for homeowners and real estate agents Evaluating water testing results to see if Best Management Practices are working Onsite Sewage Facilities & Monitoring Coordination Bacteria-specific outreach and adding information about bacteria to existing education materials Online BMP Library for stakeholders with information on the topics above Education & Outreach & Best Management Practices Library

Where are we now? o The I-Plan, formally referred to as the, “Implementation Plan for Seventeen Total Maximum Daily Loads for Bacteria in the Greater Trinity River Region,” has now been reviewed at two levels. Locally by the stakeholders who helped create it and by the TCEQ. o In July, the I-Plan will go out for public comment and should be approved by TCEQ’s Commissioners by the end of the calendar year. o The Commissioners would like to see that the stakeholders who helped create this I-Plan also support it and would like a letter of support or resolution from our city.

Why support the I-Plan?  The city has been an active participant in this voluntary regional initiative.  We’ve helped make it a very flexible tool that will enable us to ‘do the right thing’ by doing the things we already do.  We can expand if we want, or not, but this partnered effort enables us to take advantage of the experiences of the other stakeholders to have the best water quality programs possible – within budget.

The Trinity River has the potential to be a tremendous draw to the region, meaning more visitors, who will stay longer and take advantage of all the region has to offer.