WG1 PROCESS FOR MONITORING AND FACILITATING IRRS MISSIONS IN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES IRRS coordination in EU countries.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How to form a consortium
Advertisements

INTERREG IVC Introduction to programme & application process
Share of population - GDP per capita (PPP), 2004 EU-15 and other West European countries Hungary Czech Republic Malta Slovenia Cyprus Portugal Greece Spain.
European EAM related higher education in Europe: An overview Thomas Fischer & Urmila Jha-Thakur Presented in Seminar on Experiences in S Korea, Japan and.
ENHANCING ATTRACTIVENESS OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT HIGHER EDUCATION Seminar on Experiences in China and the EU Nankai University, Tianjin,
Current Status of Notifications under the EU Consultation Procedure regarding Cable Networks CLEC Seminar - Electronic Communications Regulation and Cable.
We’re here for you. “European Exchange of Best Practice in Arson Investigation and Prevention” European exchange of best practice in arson investigation.
Drink-Driving in the European Union SMART Czech Republic Ministry of Transport, Prague Thursday 7 th May 2015 January 2015, Brussels Antonio Avenoso ETSC.
UNICA RECTORS’SEMINAR Brussels 5th of June 2007 Poul Petersen Tel
EP/Council Division of Power Commission proposes law, EP response based on one of three models: Co-decision (most issues, currently) – policy goes to EP,
Delegations III KAM, Bratislava 4th to 8th September 2013.
AGRI-MIGRATION WEBSITE A webpage for Migrant Workers inside
THE EUROPEAN UNION Lesson 5
1 Survey Data in ECA : Frequency, Coverage, Consistency and Access By Victor Sulla ECS-PE.
Delegations IV KAM Prague 3rd to 7th September 2014.
Institutional Visits ICM Cluj Napoca, 19 th to 26 th April 2015 Patrick Zischeck, Assistant for IV and SV.
Directive 95/50/EC TDG Checks Application of Annexes Erkki Laakso EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG ENERGY & TRANSPORT TDG Checks Riga June 2006.
Date: in 12 pts Education and Culture International mobility for students and staff 2015 Call for Proposals.
7 November 2006VI Eurosai Training Event - Prague1 Auditing EU funds – National SAI experiences Jan van den Bos – Netherlands Court of Audit.
THE EUROPEAN UNION. HISTORY 28 European states after the second world war in 1951 head office: Brussels 24 different languages Austria joined 1995.
THE EUROPEAN UNION. EU  1993 European Union  Main Aims  All states in the EU = a single market  One currency throughout the EU = the Euro  To have.
CAF Resource Centre at EIPA Open Days Patrick Staes Senior Expert European Institute of Public Administration THE COMMON ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK.
STATE OF PLAY : ESF FINANCIAL EXECUTION. 2 Overall 2012 ESF Budget Execution on 20/11/2012 Programmin g period 2012 Payment appropriation s mil.€ 2012.
1 st Workshop on issues and trends arising from the European IRRS missions Findings and Conclusions A.Munuera Brussels, 22 nd and 23 rd January 2014.
ELSA as the Franchise? LXV International Council Meeting Qawra, Malta 16 th - 23 rd of March 2014.
Role-play on EU decision-making. The European Union: 500 million people – 28 countries Member states of the European Union Candidate and potential candidate.
EXTREME MAKEOVER Members’ Magazine LXIV International Council Meeting Opatija, Croatia October 28 th - November 3 rd 2013.
Erasmus+ International Credit Mobility Call for Proposals 2016
1 st Workshop on issues and trends arising from the European IRRS missions Objectives of the workshop A.Munuera Brussels, 22 nd and 23 rd January 2014.
Information Security Systems Cost Effective Authenticity & Integrity in CEN/FISCALIS eInvoicing Good Practice Guidelines Nick Pope – Principal Consultant,
E u r o g u i d a n c e A Network of National Resource and Information Centres for Guidance Established in 1992.
E u r o g u i d a n c e A Network of National Resource and Information Centres for Guidance Established in 1992.
EIE- Surveyor 1 Financial aspects ► 40 % amount 45 days after initial contract (about December2005) ► 40 % 45 days after approval of the progress report.
The European Law Students’ Association Albania ˙ Austria ˙ Azerbaijan ˙ Belgium ˙ Bosnia and Herzegovina ˙ Bulgaria ˙ Croatia ˙ Cyprus ˙ Czech Republic.
Maps of Topic 2B Multilingualism in Europe Europe A Story of Empire (a united Europe) & Language.
CONFIDENTIAL 1 EPC, European Union and unitary patent/UPC EPC: yes EEA: no EU: no (*) (*) Also means no unitary patent Albania, Macedonia, Monaco, San.
EUROPEAN UNION – MAKING OFF European Economic Community
European Union Duy Trinh.
TRADE CONTACT GROUP Brussels 9th June 2009 Agenda item 3a) State of play of IT systems: Import Control System (ICS); Export Control System (ECS); New.
DISTRIBUTION AUTOMATIC - GENERATION
The European Parliament – voice of the people
The European Parliament – voice of the people
ESF FINANCIAL EXECUTION PART 1 STATE OF PLAY END 2016
Marine Strategy Framework Directive:
CAF Activities.
EU: First- & Second-Generation Immigrants
MSFD Scoreboard Status at 23 November 2012 Belgium Bulgaria Cyprus
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Transposition and Implementation
ESF FINANCIAL EXECUTION ESF Technical Working Group Meeting June 2018
General Delegate Euro Contrôle Route
Regional Accounts
European Union Membership
State of play of OP negotiations
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Transposition and Implementation
Overall 2011 ESF Budget Execution
ESF FINANCIAL EXECUTION ESF Technical Working Group Meeting June 2018
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Status of reporting
Marine Environment and Water Industry Unit
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Status of reporting Art. 8/9/10
Update on reporting status
REPORTING ON DELIVERY OF EU BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Transposition and Implementation
New voting rules in Regulatory Committe
ESF FINANCIAL EXECUTION ESF Technical Working Group Meeting June 2018
Regional Accounts ESA 95 Data Collection
Why a KETs Observatory ? Commission Communication on Key Enabling Technologies (2012) : "There is no validated market data on development and take-up of.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Status of reporting
Quality project regional GVA and employment
Future Developments Update MoU between ENSREG and IAEA considering the Waste Directive EC working to establishing a new financial contribution agreement.
Prodcom Statistics in Focus
Presentation transcript:

WG1 PROCESS FOR MONITORING AND FACILITATING IRRS MISSIONS IN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES IRRS coordination in EU countries

Content The Memorandum of Understanding The IRRS indicative programme (art 1 of the MoU) The ENSREG IRRS Coordination Group (art 2 of the MoU) The national contact points (art 5 of the MoU) The European pool of experts (art 5 of the MoU) Support for the IAEA (Art. 4 of the MoU) Feedback from the IRRS process (art 9 of the MoU)

The Directive Article 9.3 of the Council Directive 2009/71/Euratom : “Member States shall at least every 10 years arrange for self-assessments of their national framework and competent regulatory authorities and invite an international peer review of relevant segments of their national framework and/or authorities with the aim of continuously improving nuclear safety”

The Memorandum of Understanding Signed on 26 June 2011 between the IAEA (D. Flory, IAEA DDG, Head of department of nuclear safety and security) and ENSREG (A. Stritar, Chairperson) Valid for three years, implicitly reconducted

The MoU Article 1: Overall roles and responsibilities  ENSREG recognizes that IRRS are appropriate for implementing Art. 9.3 of the 2009/71 Directive  IAEA to establish, manage and Implement the IRRS programme; ENSREG to develop polices for and review the 10 year programme Art. 2 : Administration of the IRRS programme:  ENSREG to develop policies for Self-assessments; review missions and follow-up missions  Responsibilities remains within EU members state  ENSREG to monitor and facilitate the EU IRRS programme

The MoU (2) Art. 3: IAEA resources to implement the EU IRRS programme  Additional resources needed to implement the programme  Adequate funding  ENSREG to monitor and review annually the needed resources Art. 4 : Scope of self-assessments and peer reviews  According to the IAEA IRRS guidelines  IRRS modules 1-4, 5-9 as appropriate, 10, thematic areas and policy issues  Determination of the final scope is a decision of the EU Member State

The MoU (3) Art. 5: Team composition of EU IRRS missions  TL or DTL and the majority of experts from an EU MS  MS to assign contact point and nominate suitable experts. Responsibility for designating the team members rests within the IAEA Art. 6: Funding of missions:  Matter for EU Member states Art. 7: Reporting of peer reviews results :  Final report publically available and send with the action plan to ENSREG, EU MS and to the EC

The MoU (4) Art 8: Analysis and Feedback of the EU IRRS missions results  Joint IAEA/ENSREG workshop every 2 years Art 9 : Feedback to the IAEA on the conduct of the mission  To assist the development of IRRS guidelines and improve the implementation of future EU IRRS missions thor

EU IRRS indicative programme Developed end 2011, still valid IRRS missions in EU have been performed according to this programme 13 IRRS missions in :  Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Rep., Finland, Greece, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, (Switzerland), UK Most of the IRRS missions in Eu countries with NPPs are planned before

EU IRRS indicative programme SA= Self Assessment FS= Full scope FU= Follow-up RS= Reduced scope MSs with operating NPPs Belgium SA, FS FU* Bulgaria SAFS FU* Czech Republic SAFS FU* Finland FS FU* France SAFS FU* Germany SA RS Hungary SAFS FU* Netherlands SAFS FU* Romania FU* SAFS FU* Slovak Republic RS FU* Slovenia FU* Spain Sweden FS FU* United Kingdom FU* SAFS FU’ *With the assumption that the FU mission will take place 2 years after the mission

EU IRRS indicative programme SA= Self Assessment FS= Full scope FU= Follow-up RS= Reduced scope MSs with other nuclear installations Austria SARS//RS FU* Denmark SARS//RS//RS Estonia SA, FS FU* Greece RS Italy SAFS FU* Latvia SARS FU* Lithuania SAFS FU* Poland SARS FU* Portugal MSs with no nuclear installations Cyprus SARS FU* Ireland SAFS FU* Luxembourg SARS//RS FU* Malta

The WG1 - ENSREG IRRS Coordination Group Sub group of WG1, set up in May 2011 – Art 2 of the MoU Composed of WG1 Chairperson, EU commission representative, WG1 (WG-C) member(s) 1 meeting with the IAEA end 2011, no meeting in 2012 (A staff member of the IAEA attends the WG1 meetings as appropriate) Duties :  Maintain an updated indicative programme for IAEA IRRS missions, including self assessments and follow up missions, in EU Member States.  Maintain an updated list of Member States’ contact points to support the EU IRRS programme.  Maintain an updated list of the pool of experts for the EU IRRS programme.  Arrange together with the IAEA the meetings referred to in Article 2 (3) of the MoU  Arrange together with the IAEA the workshops referred to in Article 8 of the MoU.  Arrange the collection of experiences and learning points on the conduct of IRRS missions  Keep close contacts with the IAEA in the implementation of the EU IRRS programme thor

The national contact points Serve as contact point for the IAEA for nominating experts to IRRS missions (request for experts, proposing experts) Maintain of the updated list of national experts to the pool of experts, including the CVs of the experts As regards the Indicative Programme for IRRS Missions to EU Member States, keep the time schedules updated for their countries Provide the Coordination Group with feedback from the conduct of the IRRS missions to their countries Serve as a contact point in the implementation of the Memorandum of Understanding between the ENSREG and IAEA on international peer review missions to EU Member States (e.g. tasks related to Articles 7, 8 and 9 of the Memorandum) Serve as a contact point for the IAEA for other IRRS related activities, such as need for consultancies, information on seminars etc.

The European Expert Pool To complete the EU IRRS programme, MS state shall nominate :  5 to 8 experts for countries with a major nuclear programme (FR, D, UK)  3 to 5 experts for countries with NPPs  Experts as appropriate for countries without NPP for performing a mission annually

The European Expert Pool Currently ~180 Eu experts are available for performing IRRS missions: adequately staffed or 15 In average : ~10 from MS with NPPs, ~3 from MS with other/no nuclear installations

Experts needed for YearType of missionNumber of missionsNumber of experts needed (maximum) 2014FS3 (FR, NL, IT)55 (2x20+15) RS- FU3 (SK, RO, SW)30 (3x10) Total FS3 (HU, EST, IRL)50 (1x20+2x15) RS FU4 (BE, CZ, FI, PL)40 (4x10) Total FS1 (LT)15 RS2 (LV, CY)20 (2x10) FU3 (BG, FR, IT)30 (3x10) Total Estimation based on previous IRRS missions needs

Feedback from IRSS missions Member States (having received an IRRS mission) are expected to provide the ENSREG IRRS Coordination Group with a summary covering the following issues: general aspects on the conduct of the mission experts of the mission team (expertise, familiarity with the IRRS Guide-lines and IAEA Safety Requirements, familiarity with the advance material etc.) deficiencies in the IRRS Guidelines relevance of the mission findings (recommendations, suggestions) for the Member States' needs other issues

IAEA additional resources for implementing EU IRRS missions Support to the IAEA through EC Contract :  Additional staff for the IAEA  « Targetted Consultancies » were organized by the IAEA ( )  Basic IRRS Training Course organized by the IAEA (October 2013) for training of new EU experts

Conclusion The MoU is an effective tool for facilitating and monitoring the IRRS missions in EU countries The process is effective and efficient The EU pool of experts is adequately staffed Through feedback and support to the IAEA, opportunities for improvements to the IRRS process exist