WFD Monitoring Doug Wilson Monitoring Policy Manager.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 Role of monitoring programmes developed under the Water Framework Directive for future data flow Tim Lack.

Advertisements

Convention of the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes Setting the scene for Session 1 National information systems.

WISE SOE reporting on Transitional and Coastal waters Beate Werner.

Monitoring network development for the WFD in The Netherlands: State of affairs Jos Timmerman RIZA.

Review of mechanisms to control ecological impacts resulting from hydromorphological changes Alice Baverstock.

1. 2 Content Principles of the Water Framework Directive WFD and Agriculture WFD and CAP.

Wet Woodlands and the Water Framework Directive Ben Bunting, South West River Basin Programme Manager.

Water Framework Directive: a diffuse perspective June 5 th IW0/CIWEM Dr Stephen Bolt Head of Integrated Water and Environmental Management.

GIS development. Danube Commission+ISRBC meeting Sava GIS Sava GIS establishment –Performed in accordance with the Sava GIS Strategy EU WFD INSPIRE Directive.

Water Framework Directive – Coastal issues Will Akast Catchment Delivery Manager-Suffolk.

Anne Lyche Solheim, Norwegian Institute for Water Research, Oslo, Norway Workshop on ”In situ trialing for ecological and chemical studies in support of.

Characterization Report Module 2: Water Budget, Pressures and Impacts, Significant Water Management Issues, Monitoring, Characterization Report Characterization.

An overview of water quality monitoring schemes for compliance with the WFD An Overview An overview of water quality monitoring schemes for compliance.

National Environmental Research Institute Department of Freshwater Ecology WFD-Monitoring in Denmark NOVANA Brian Kronvang NERI.

WSNTG Annual Conference September 2007 Water Services National Training Group 11 th Annual Conference 6 th September 2007.

IPPC Discharges Monitoring Workshop Water Framework Directive Overview (and its implications for Industry) Peter Webster Regional Chemist (EPA Cork)

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE IN HUNGARY Eszter HAVAS-SZILÁGYI Ministry of Transport and Water Management Eszter HAVAS-SZILÁGYI Ministry.

South Eastern River Basin District - Environmental Quality Standard Development-

Monitoring Programme Design in Transitional and Coastal Waters - Classification Issues Dave Jowett, Coast Group Chair and NEA GIG Co-ordinator CIS Workshop.

LVĢMA, 2006 LATVIJAS VIDES, ĢEOLOĢIJAS UN METEOROLOĢIJAS AĢENTŪRA Water data availability Normunds Kadiķis.

River Basin Characterisation 2 Risk Assessment outputs River Basin Management Team Environment Agency.

Water Framework Directive An Introduction David Whiles Anglian River Basin Manager.

Implementation of WFD River Basin Management Plans for Northern Ireland Bridgeen Magorrian.

MODULE 1 Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification River.

Water Framework Directive Implementation and Risk Analysis John Sadlier Water Quality Section.

River Basin Management Planning Cath Preston Senior Planning Officer (River Basin Planning) 2 nd March 2006.

WFD Characterisation Report Dr Tom Leatherland Environmental Quality Manager 29 October 2003.

© WRc plc 2010 Agenda item 3b: Summary of WISE electronic delivery: presentation of an example.

RiverLife and Implementation of the WFD Satu Maaria Karjalainen North Ostrobothnia Regional Environment Centre PRB Workshop , Ghent.

Europe-wide monitoring obligations under the EU Water Framework Directive Jos G. Timmerman Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste Water Treatment.

1 European Topic Centre on Water Workshop on: Identification of surface water bodies under the Pilot River Basin Initiative Monitoring Water Bodies Steve.

River Basin Management Plan Steps, Status and Objectives.

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR THE CONVERSION OF RBPAPs INTO RBMPs MONITORING INCEPTION WORKSHOP ISTAMBUL February Alfredo CORROCHANO CODORNÍU Carmen.

Building WFD into impact assessment Richard Sharp Geomorphology IEMA webinar Thursday 31 March 2016.

Thematic assessments based on results from RBMPs Coastal and transitional ecological status & related presures Inland surface waters Hydromorphological.

National Sampling Programme Carol McCarthy, A/Senior Engineer LAWCO/ Kilkenny County Council Environmental Services Training Group Annual Conference 26.

Monitoring, assessing and classifying the environment

Relationship between EUROWATERNET and the Water Framework Directive, and for broader water reporting Steve Nixon ETC/WTR.

EEA 2017 State of European waters

Dave Jowett, Chair UK Marine Task Team

State of Implementation of CEA in Germany

Daughter Groundwater Directive

One-out-all-out and other indicators

Assessment of 1st FRMPs and 2nd RBMPs State-of-play

Experiences of designing WFD-monitoring networks in the Netherlands

EU Water Framework Directive

Monitoring, assessing and classifying the environment

One-out-all-out and other indicators

Philippe QUEVAUVILLER

One-out-all-out and other indicators

Change and adapt the Eionet water data flow to meet WFD requirements

Monitoring programs in Sweden

Assessment of 1st FRMPs and 2nd RBMPs State-of-play

Assessment of the Implementation of the Programmes of Measures

Project 2.7 Guidance on Monitoring

CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT SCG Meeting in Brussels

confidence in classification

EU Water Framework Directive

ECOSTAT 2013 – 2015 Tasks and Deliverables

Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive

3rd meeting, 8 March 2006 EEA Copenhagen

Preparation of the second RBMP in Romania

IMPRESS Guidance and Policy Summary Water Directors Copenhagen, 21-22nd November 2002 Working Group leaders: Volker Mohaupt, Umwelt Bundes Amt Isobel.

Water Framework Directive implementation: RBMP assessment

Philippe Quevauviller

WFD & Agriculture – Article 5

WISE – Freshwater WFD visualization tool

EU Water Framework Directive

UK experience of Programmes of Measures

Assessment of Member States‘ 2nd River Basin Management Plans

Presentation transcript:

WFD Monitoring Doug Wilson Monitoring Policy Manager

Current situation  WFD monitoring operational from 22nd December  Classification in 1st plans  Improve risk assessments  Drive 2nd planning cycle and beyond

Types of monitoring  Surveillance - all parameters  trends and overview  Operational monitoring - specific parameters  pressures and risks  Investigative monitoring  cause and solutions

Starting point  organic enrichment  nutrient enrichment  abstraction  chemical pollution  dredging and shoreline reclamation (TraC)  mining and acidification (Wales) R. Blythe

Pressures and biological elements

Rivers monitoring  432 surveillance waterbodies  125 waterbodies for Annex 8 and 10 substances  2967 operational waterbodies  maximises use of historic data and existing monitoring programme

Surveillance Water Body River Tone (Somerset) Key Invertebrate survey Diatom survey Fish survey Water Quality sampling (FWF) Water Quality sampling plus scan DSD sampling  All elements monitored 1 in 3 yrs  Hydromorphology and hydrology data to be collection

Groundwater monitoring  Strategic quality and existing level networks  Quality network covers 265 groundwater bodies  No specific surveillance or operational monitoring

Lakes monitoring  50 surveillance lakes  operational monitoring of 73 natural lakes  nutrient enrichment, acidification in Wales  relies on water company data for reservoirs

Transitional and coastal waters  52 surveillance waterbodies  further operational monitoring will be developed as we classify waterbodies  need dynamic monitoring programmes

Future developments  Network onto WISE (March ‘07)  Third party data (2007)  Monitoring for groundwater fed wetlands (2008)  Annual review of monitoring programme  input from Liaison Panels  results from initial classifications  changing pressures

Summary  Significant increase in coverage of lakes, coasts and estuaries monitoring  Some areas for further work  Maximises use of existing data and monitoring programmes  Annual review is key  Dynamic and innovative