IV-E Waiver June 2006 Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Indiana IV-E Waiver Original Demonstration 1998 – 2002 Informal Extension 2002 – 2005 Current Extension
Advertisements

Expedited Family Reunification Project
Session I Chapters 1-5 Presented by… Lynn Boyer, Ph.D.
1 Advisory Council April 1, 2011 Child Care Development Fund – State Plan for Federal Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013.
1 EEC Board Meeting May 10, 2011 Child Care Development Fund – State Plan for Federal Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013.
Illinois Guardianship Assistance Waiver and GAP Implementation September 15, 2010.
1 Oregon Guardianship Assistance Program. 2 Oregon Guardianship Assistance Program Initial Planning Does your state have a current Title IV-E Guardianship.
Subsidized Guardianship Waiver Demonstrations: Key Evaluation Findings Elliott Graham, Ph.D. James Bell Associates Childrens Bureau Webinar: Applying Lessons.
 Federal Dollars for Assurances Which Protect Children Who are in Foster Care.
Child Welfare Federal Finance Reform Christine Calpin Joan Smith JooYeun Chang.
Department of Health and Human Services & Department of Probation October 28, 2014 Title IV-E California Well-Being Project.
Supervisor’s Core: Fiscal Essentials Version 2.0 July 2009.
YES Youth Empowerment Services A Medicaid Waiver Program for Children with Severe Emotional Disturbance June 11,2012 Mental Health Connection.
Community Based Care in Florida and the IV-E Waiver.
1115 Waiver Kick-Off Meeting October 18, 2013 Office of the Governor, State of Illinois 1.
First National Conference on Substance Abuse, Child Welfare and the Dependency Court Improving the Child Welfare System’s Response to Families Affected.
Subsidized Guardianship Permanency Initiative. SG Introduction Focuses on improving permanency outcomes for children in out-of-home care through a comprehensive.
HEARTH Act: Planning for Impact Julie Dixon The Planning Council.
National Innovations in CWS Funding: What’s Working? Michael Lawler Co-Director, Center for Public Policy Research and Director, The Center for Human Services.
Sequestration How Does it Work. Passed the Congress in August 2011 Established the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction It’s the Law! P.L
PBMA Conference 2006 Revenue Review Title IV-E, S 3525, TCM/MAA Slides Prepared by Al Lindeman.
Understanding Katie A and the Core Practice Model
Connecticut’s Spending Cap is in Need of Repair Update February 2007.
1 Public Hearings: May , 2013 Child Care Development Fund Massachusetts State Plan Federal Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015.
USDA Update: Shaping the Future of CACFP Tina Fritz Namian USDA, FNS.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
Georgia’s Universal Pre-K Marsha Moore, Executive Director Office of School Readiness.
Proposed 2011 Medical Plan Design June 8,  Background  Recommended Strategy  Summary  Next Steps  Action Requested Presentation Outline.
Linkages: CalWORKs and Child Welfare Collaboration to Improve Outcomes.
FY 2005 Indigent Care Trust Fund Disproportionate Share Hospital Program Presented to House Appropriations Health Subcommittee June 23, 2005.
Data Quality Initiative-Update May 14, Data Quality Initiative The eWiSACWIS Data Quality Initiative will support counties, the BMCW and the Special.
Federal-State Policies: Implications for State Health Care Reform National Health Policy Conference February 4, 2008.
County of Marin March 2004 County Budget Overview and Potential Impact of State Funding Cuts.
Making CWLA Work for You Presentation to CWLA Southern Region and Georgia Association of Homes and Services for Children Membership October 5, 2006 Atlanta,
DIAKON Lutheran Social Ministries/Family Design Resources Tools That Work Conference 11/03 Implementing Best Practice Standards in Permanency Planning.
Improvements to Child Care Business Practices CMSM/DSSAB Training - EFIS February 28, 2011.
Child and Family Service Review CFSR 101. Child and Family Service Review CFSR stands for the Child and Family Service Review. It is the federal government’s.
Los Angeles County Proposed RBS Demonstration Project RBS Forum Sacramento, CA September 4/5, 2008.
What We Will Discuss Social Services Realignment What programs were Realigned How the funding is structured Assessment for Social Services Challenges.
Los Angeles County’s Department of Children and Family Services Title IV-E California Well-Being Project and Strategic Plan June 3, 2015.
September Board Meeting FY08 and FY09 Spending Plan.
An Overview of the California Foster Care System Navigating the System.
Uma Ahluwalia October 15,  Most populous county in Maryland  Immigration was the largest component of population change since Source: U.S.
INVESTMENT IN MENTAL HEALTH WELLNESS GRANT PROGRAM INVESTMENT IN MENTAL HEALTH WELLNESS GRANT PROGRAM CALIFORNIA HEALTH FACILITIES FINANCING AUTHORITY.
1 Milwaukee County Child Welfare Legislative Audit Bureau March 2007.
11/28/12 1 CALIFORNIA FOSTERING CONNECTIONS TO SUCCESS ACT Version 2.0 Assembly Bill 12.
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare FY County Child Welfare Presentation to PCCYFS February 21, 2008.
1 DHS Board Meeting Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program Overview Mark Washington Division of Family and Children Services August 18, 2010.
The Role of Evaluation and Stakeholder Values in California’s Title IV-E Child Welfare Waiver Demonstration Project Evaluations Charlie Ferguson, Ph.D.
Butte County Department of Employment and Social Services
California Well-Being Project
Child Care Assistance Program Waitlist
The Role of Evaluation and Stakeholder Values in California’s Title IV-E Child Welfare Waiver Demonstration Project Evaluations Charlie Ferguson, Ph.D.
Using a Summary Score Approach to Analyze Performance Measures Over Time Charlie Ferguson, Ph.D. San Jose State University School of Social Work Demonstration.
Implementing a Title IV-E Claiming Program in Juvenile Justice: The Multnomah County Experience How Your Department Can Achieve the.
The Current State of Foster Care in Virginia
Child Protective Services Update
2018 National IV-E Roundtable for Child Welfare Training & Education
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services January 23, 2015
California Well-Being Project
January 2018 County Human Services Legislative Breakfast
Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services
Proposed Preliminary Budget
Foster Care to 21 Carl E. Ayers, MSW
Florida’s New Guardianship Assistance Program
Copyright © 2019, The University of Pittsburgh
California Well-Being Project
Review of Title IV-E Waiver Opportunity
Presentation transcript:

IV-E Waiver June 2006 Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services

Current IV-E Funding Pays for case management (administrative) activities and related overhead Also pays for room and board (maintenance costs) for eligible children in foster care No other direct services besides foster care costs are eligible for IV-E funds Eligibility is based on 1996 AFDC income standard and has not been adjusted since for cost of living

Causes for Continued Loss of Federal IV-E Funds Decrease in the number of families/children that meet the 1996 income standard Reductions in the number of children in care Reduction in the amount of time kids spend in care Deficit Reduction Act signed into law in in February 2006, further limits eligible IV-E administrative costs

The Problem Current IV-E funding does not support achievement of shortening the timelines to permanency by reducing the time children spend in out of home care.

The Waiver Capped IV-E funding allocation based upon 3 year historical average of IV-E funds received 2% growth per year on the allocation Savings achieved as a result of the waiver must be reinvested into child welfare services

Waiver components Removes Income eligibility criteria – funds can be used to support all families served by the system Expands types of services funds can be spent on (more direct services for families) Still requires safety standard are upheld (AFSA home approvals, use of licensed facilities, etc…) Reasonable efforts findings still required

Goals of the Waiver Improve array of services and engage families through individualized approaches Increase child-safety without over reliance on use of OHC Improve permanency outcomes and timelines Improve child and family well-being

Expenditures Included Current IV-E eligible administrative case management costs for child welfare and juvenile probation Foster Care Maintenance Costs

Expenditures Excluded Training Automated case management system (CWS/CMS) Licensing functions ILP funding Adoption Assistance - but is limited to 15% average annual growth per year over next 5 years Development and Evaluation Costs

Other features Up to 20 Counties can participate Allows for Counties to individually opt out if needed once participating in the waiver Currently Counties and State are working together to determine how state funding will work for Counties participating in the waiver Shooting for a January 1, 2007 implementation date

Evaluation Required No random assignment or control group is required for this evaluation Waiver will use “Interrupted Time Series” measurement (before, during waiver and after) of key outcome measures Process evaluation will compare alternative services developed under waiver verses traditional service prior to the waiver Cost Study evaluation will compare costs per child prior to the waiver verses cost per child under the waiver. Cost neutrality is set by the capped allocation amount.