Phenomenological systematics of the (d,p) cross sections A.V.Ignatyuk Institute of Physics and Power Engineering, Obninsk, Russia DWBA description of the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
Advertisements

Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, 1 st Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Nuclear Mass Unified atomic mass unit u based on 12 C. Replaced both physical.
? Nuclear Reactions Categorization of Nuclear Reactions
Accelerator Physics, JU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh).
Basic Nuclear Properties
Constraining nuclear symmetry energy from high-energy heavy-ion collisions Zhao-Qing Feng ( ) Institute of Modern Physics, Lanzhou, Chinese Academy of.
IAEA CRP on “Nuclear Data Libraries for Advanced Systems: Fusion Devices (FENDL-3)”- Contributions by FZK U. Fischer, A. Konobeyev, P. Pereslavtsev, S.
Stellar Structure Section 5: The Physics of Stellar Interiors Lecture 11 – Total pressure: final remarks Stellar energy sources Nuclear binding energy.
A Fractional Order (Proportional and Derivative) Motion Controller Design for A Class of Second-order Systems Center for Self-Organizing Intelligent.
Area Of Shapes. 8cm 2cm 5cm 3cm A1 A2 16m 12m 10m 12cm 7cm.
When you see… Find the zeros You think….
New evaluation of d+Li data up to 50 MeV for IFMIF P. Pereslavtsev, U. Fischer Association FZK-Euratom Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Germany Technical Meeting.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved Chapter 11 Simple Linear Regression.
Area Of Shapes. 8cm 2cm 5cm 3cm A1 A2 16m 12m 10m 12cm 7cm.
Shell model description of 0 and 1 ħω states in neutron-rich N = 18 and 19 nuclei with Z = 14 to 19 M. BOUHELAL (1), F. HAAS (2), E. CAURIER (2), F. NOWACKI.
Combined evaluation of PFNS for 235 U(n th,f), 239 Pu(n th,f), 233 U(n th,f) and 252 Cf(sf) (in progress) V.G. Pronyaev Institute of Physics.
Lorentzian-like models of E1 radiative strength functions V. A. Plujko, O. M. Gorbachenko, E. V. Kulich Taras Shevchenko National Kyiv University, Ukraine.
NUCLEAR REACTION MODELS FOR SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS OF FAST NEUTRON INDUCED (n,p) REACTION CROSS SECTIONS M.Odsuren, J.Badamsambuu, G.Khuukhenkhuu Nuclear.
Integral and derivative dispersion relations, analysis of the forward scattering data J.R. Cudell *, E. Martynov *+, O.V.Selyugin *# * Institut de Physique,
Microscopic time-dependent analysis of neutrons transfers at low-energy nuclear reactions with spherical and deformed nuclei V.V. Samarin.
Benchmark test with OKTAVIAN data and Comment on kerma factor Yukinobu Watanabe Department of Advanced Energy Engineering Science, Kyushu University 3nd.
Kazimierz What is the best way to synthesize the element Z=120 ? K. Siwek-Wilczyńska, J. Wilczyński, T. Cap.
Single particle properties of heavy and superheavy nuclei. Aleksander Parkhomenko.

EURISOL User Group, Florence, Jan Spin-Dependent Pre-Equilibrium Exciton Model Calculations for Heavy Ions E. Běták Institute of Physics SAS,
Status and needs of activation data for fusion Robin Forrest 1 and Jura Kopecky 2 1 Euratom/UKAEA Fusion Association Culham Science Centre, UK 2 JUKO Research,
Α - capture reactions using the 4π γ-summing technique Α. Lagoyannis Institute of Nuclear Physics, N.C.S.R. “Demokritos”
The Status of Nuclear Data above 20 MeV Masayoshi SUGIMOTO, Tokio FUKAHORI Japan Atomic Energy Agency IAEA’s Technical Meeting on Nuclear Data Libraries.
Studies of Deuteron and Neutron Cross-sections Important for ADS Research Vladimír Wagner Nuclear physics institute of CAS, Řež, Czech Republic,
JENDL/HE-2007 & On going Activities for JENDL-4 Japan Atomic Energy Agency S. Kunieda IAEA 1-st RCM of CRP on FENDL-3.0, 2-5 Dec Y. Watanabe Kyushu.
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholz-Gemeinschaft Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Nuclear Data Library for Advanced Systems – Fusion Devices (FENDL-3)
M. Matsuo, PRC73(’06) Matter Calc. Two-particle density.
Microscopic Modeling of Supernova Matter Igor Mishustin FIAS, J. W. Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany and National Research Center “Kurchatov.
Radiation damage calculation in PHITS
Update of uncertainty file in the EAF project J. Kopecky 1 and R.A. Forrest 2 1 JUKO Research, the Netherlands 2 EURATOM/UKAEA Association, Culham, UK.
Systematic studies of neutrons produced in the Pb/U assembly irradiated by relativistic protons and deuterons. Vladimír Wagner Nuclear physics institute.
TENDL for FENDL Arjan Koning NRG Petten, The Netherlands FENDL-3 meeting December 6-9, 2011, IAEA, Vienna.
FENDL-3 1st Research Co-ordination Meeting, 2-5 December 2008, IAEA, Vienna1 Marilena Avrigeanu Progress on Deuteron-Induced Activation Cross Section Evaluation.
Filling up FENDL with an all-in-one nuclear data evaluation and validation system around TALYS Arjan Koning NRG Petten, The Netherlands FENDL-3 meeting.
Neutron production study with the thick lead target and uranium blanket irradiated by 1.5 GeV protons Filip Křížek, ÚJF AV ČR.
NUCLEAR LEVEL DENSITIES NEAR Z=50 FROM NEUTRON EVAPORATION SPECTRA IN (p,n) REACTION B.V.Zhuravlev, A.A.Lychagin, N.N.Titarenko State Scientific Center.
NEUTRON SKIN AND GIANT RESONANCES Shalom Shlomo Cyclotron Institute Texas A&M University.
The concept of compound nuclear reaction: a+B  C  d+F The particle transmission coefficients T are usually known from cross sections of inverse reactions.
Nuclear Data Libraries for Advanced Systems: Fusion Devices FENDL-3 IAEA, Vienna, 2-5 December 2008 A Mengoni IAEA Nuclear Data Section.
Lomonosov Moscow State University Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics V.Varlamov, EMIN-2009 (21 – 26 September) 1 V.A. Chetvertkova, B.S. Ishkhanov,
THEORETICAL PREDICTIONS OF THERMONUCLEAR RATES P. Descouvemont 1.Reactions in astrophysics 2.Overview of different models 3.The R-matrix method 4.Application.
Reaction cross sections of carbon isotopes incident on proton and 12 C International Nuclear Physics Conference, Tokyo, Japan June 3-8, 2007 W. Horiuchi.
CHAPTER 2.3 PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS. 2.3 GAUSSIAN OR NORMAL ERROR DISTRIBUTION  The Gaussian distribution is an approximation to the binomial distribution.
PROPERTIES OF HIGH-ENERGY ISOSCALAR MONOPOLE EXCITATIONS IN MEDIUM-HEAVY MASS SPHERICAL NUCLEI M. L. Gorelik 1), S. Shlomo 2), B. A. Tulupov 3), M. H.
KIT – The cooperation of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH and Universität Karlsruhe (TH) Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor Technology Evaluation.
IFMIF d-Li neutron source: Status of codes and nuclear data S.P. Simakov Institut für Reaktorsicherheit, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe IEA Neutronics Meeting,
Systematical Analysis of Fast Neutron Induced Alpha Particle Emission Reaction Cross Sections Jigmeddorj Badamsambuu, Nuclear Research Center, National.
Muon-induced neutron background at Boulby mine Vitaly A. Kudryavtsev University of Sheffield UKDMC meeting, ICSTM, London, 27 June 2002.
KIT – The Research University in the Helmholtz Association INSTITUTE for NEUTRON PHYSICS and REACTOR TECHNOLOGY (INR) Nuclear Data for Calculation.
Lecture 4 1.The role of orientation angles of the colliding nuclei relative to the beam energy in fusion-fission and quasifission reactions. 2.The effect.
Improvements of microscopic transport models stimulated by spallation data for incident energies from 113 to MeV Umm Al-Qura University and King.
1 Alushta 2016 CROSS SECTION OF THE 66 Zn(n,α) 63 Ni REACTION at CROSS SECTION OF THE 66 Zn(n, α) 63 Ni REACTION at E n = 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 MeV I. Chuprakov,
1 Cross sections of neutron reactions in S-Cl-Ar region in the s-process of nucleosynthesis C. Oprea 1, P. J. Szalanski 2, A. Ioan 1, P. M. Potlog 3 1Frank.
Monte Carlo methods in spallation experiments Defense of the phD thesis Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
Shintaro Hashimoto1, Yosuke Iwamoto 1, Tatsuhiko Sato 1, Koji Niita2,
gamma-transmission coefficients are most uncertain values !!!
for collaboration “Energy plus transmutation”
TUNL Contributions in the US Nuclear Data Program
Performed experiments Nuclotron – set up ENERGY PLUS TRANSMUTATION
LAHET code simulations in comparison with bare Pb spallation target experiment Daniela Henzlova.
The need for cross section measurements for neutron-induced reactions
Effects of Deformation Parameter on Reaction Cross Section
V.V. Sargsyan, G.G. Adamian, N.V.Antonenko
Presentation transcript:

Phenomenological systematics of the (d,p) cross sections A.V.Ignatyuk Institute of Physics and Power Engineering, Obninsk, Russia DWBA description of the double deferential cross sections; DWBA calculations of the integral (d,p) cross sections; Empirical approximation of the (d,p) cross sections with the ALICE-D and EMPIRE-D codes; Phenomenological systematics of the (d,p) cross sections; Phenomenological systematics of the (d,p) cross sections; Structure effects for the enhancement coefficients; Conclusions. 3d CRP Meeting on FENDL-3, Vienna, 6-9 December 2011

48 Ca(d,p): experimental data and the corresponding DWBA description W.D.Metz, W.D.Calender, C.R.Bockelman. Phys. Rev., C12 (1975) 827

48 Ca(d,p): experimental data and the DWBA descriptions for 9 th and 10 th levels W.D.Metz, W.D.Calender, C.R.Bockelman. Phys. Rev., C12 (1975) 827

DWBA description of the integral (d,p) cross sections for 48 Ca and 50 Cr

Description of the (d,p) and (d,t) cross sections with the ALICE-D code The simple Kalbach formula was used: where C=3800, V a is the potential well depth, g N is the single-particle level density for neutrons and K is the adjusted parameters. This parameter should be energy dependent to describe the available experimental data !

Experimental data for the 197 Au(d,p) 198g Au cross section in comparison with various calculations

Description of the (d,p) cross sections with the ALICE-D code

Phenomenological systematics The analytical function for the description of experimental data was accepted in the following form: where the factor before the square brackets defines the low-energy increasing part of the (d,p) cross section and the terms in the square brackets characterize the decreasing part. The parameter b determines the effective threshold of the (d,p) reaction and it should be close to the height of the Coulomb barrier The mean value of the radius parameter estimated from the experimental data analysis is r eff =1.985±0.045 fm. b.

Experimental data for the 59 Co(d,p) reaction compared with various calculations

Experimental data for the 197 Au(d,p) reaction compared with various calculations

Parameter values estimated from the analysis of experimental data Parameter 59 Co(d,p) 197 Au(d,p) a1a1 751±87 mb904±121 mb b 5.13±0.22 MeV9.86±0.11 MeV c 0.75 MeV was fixed 0.716±.035 MeV a2a ± ±.015 d1d1 7.21±0.61 MeV 7.05±0.84 MeV d2d ±2.76 MeV35.0 MeV was fixed

Experimental data for the 141 Pr(d,p) reaction compared with various calculations

Experimental data for the 181 Ta(d,p) reaction compared with various calculations

Optimal parameter estimated from the analysis of the available experimental data. Other parameters: c=.75 MeV, a 2 =0.848, d 1 =7.1, d 2 =35 MeV

Conclusions: For the deuteron induced reactions the TENDL-2010 evaluations essentially underestimate the (d,p) reaction cross sections for the most of nuclei. There are also unphysical jumps of the cross sections at low energies. So, the corresponding sections of the TENDL-2010 files should certainly be corrected in the process of the FENDL-3D library formation. The phenomenological systematics of the (d,p) cross sections, proposed in the present report, can be recommended as an optimal evaluation of such data for all nuclei and the whole energy region.

Empirical estimation of the (d,t) dir cross sections for 169 Tm

Analysis of the 169 Tm(d,x) cross sections