 Corridor Plan and Meeting Objective  Project Background  Short Term Improvements  Long Term Improvements/Corridor Planning  Construction Funding.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Roadway Safety For Local Agencies Wrap-up Doug Bish.
Advertisements

City of Hubbard Transportation System Plan Update April 25, 2012.
Who we are these people? Gabriela Vega – Transportation Planner, DDOT/PPSA George Branyan – Pedestrian Program Coordinator, DDOT/PPSA Trey Dickerson –
Riding a Bike for Transport 2011 Survey Findings.
Biking in Traffic Share the Road: Driver's Education.
Urban Transportation Council Green Guide for Roads Task Force TAC 2009 Annual Conference and Exhibition Vancouver.
January 8, 2014 FMATS College Road Corridor Study FMATS Technical Committee Update.
Safety Conversation: NLTAPA Conference Michael S. Griffith Director Office of Safety Technologies Federal Highway Administration.
City of High Springs - Traffic Study City of High Springs Traffic Study Sept. 16th, 2003 Public Meeting #2.
City of Omak Central Avenue Bridge Replacement Project Prepared by Highlands Associates Photos by FlyBy Photos.
P IKES P EAK R EGIONAL N ONMOTORIZED T RANSPORTATION S YSTEM P LAN P UBLIC M EETING N OVEMBER
Safety at Signalized Intersections. Signalized Intersections FHWA Safety Focus Areas 2.
TRAILS AS TRANSPORTATION Design & Construction Michael J. Kubek, P.E. Ohio Department of Transportation, District 12 Production Administrator.
JANUARY 9, 2002 SCAJAQUADA CORRIDOR STUDY Grant Street to Parkside Avenue City of Buffalo Fisher Associates Joseph Passonneau & Partners In Association.
Florida Department of Transportation, November 2009
Share the Road Lesson Plan. “Share The Road” Lesson Plan: Why??  Usually little or no training for cyclists, motorists, and pedestrians on safe interactions.
Feasibility Study FOREST GLEN PASSAGEWAY April 10, Isiah Leggett Montgomery County Executive Arthur Holmes, Jr. Director Department of Transportation.
1 Austin Transportation Department Ali Mozdbar, P.E., PTOE Division Manager, Traffic Signals Traffic Signal Features for Pedestrians & Bicyclists.
HAWK Evaluation NE/SE 41 st Ave & E Burnside St Sirisha Kothuri William Farley Kimber Miller Aaron Rieck Civil & Environmental Engineering.
 Life in communities has changed over the years.  One of those changes is in transportation. Transportation is a way of moving people or things from.
City of Leawood Bicycle Friendly Community The Year in Review.
Intersection & Interchange Geometrics (IIG) Innovative Design Considerations for All Users Module 8 Intersection- Interchange Evaluation Process.
The Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure welcomes you to an Open House for: Trans Canada Highway No.1 Improvements in Salmon Arm Your comments.
Alameda Creek Bridge Replacement Scoping Meeting March 4, 2014.
Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE). Outline  Background  ICE Process  Impacts  Current Status.
Trail Funding Sources & General Information
1 Item 11: Review of Draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for the National Capital Region Michael Farrell TPB Staff Presentation to the Transportation Planning.
Vegetation Control For Safety Russ Johnson – Maintenance Supervisor - WSDOT Don Petersen – Safety/Design Engineer - FHWA.
Federal Highway Administration University Course on Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Greenways and Shared-Use Paths Lesson 19 Publication No. FHWA-HRT
Share & Be Aware Driver’s Education Class. Brought to You By:
Bicycling in Montgomery County Where we are and where we’re going Montgomery Bicycle Advocates (MoBike) – 5/14/11.
Highway Location I. * Principles of Highway Location 1. allowing convenient, continuous, free-flowing traffic operation, and 2. best meeting the major.
Chicago Department of Transportation Bobby L. Ware, Commissioner Richard M. Daley, Mayor Metropolitan Planning Council November 3,
1 Item 12: Report on Draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for the National Capital Region Michael Farrell TPB Staff Presentation to the Transportation Planning.
Transportation and Transit Committee 4 December 2002 Albion Road Corridor Study.
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION Saint John. ATSJ VISION A City that supports a high quality of life where calm and friendly streets encourage the connection between.
Spring 2011 Campaign Briefing Michael Farrell DTP 13/16/2011 Item #5.
Engineering Study Griffin View Drive & Harbor Hills Blvd. Prepared for Lake County Public Works Engineering 437 Ardice Avenue Eustis, Florida Purchase.
Peachtree Road Transformation Project: Operations and Safety Analysis P.I Fulton County August 25, 2015 Buckhead CID 1.
Seattle Center City Connector Transit Study Open House #1 February 6, 2013.
Urban Bicycle Networks Throughout Virginia I. Introduction This multimodal investment network is the incorporation of four urban bicycle studies and plans.
At-Grade Intersection Design
East-West Corridor Connectivity Study – Study Recommendations November 17, 2009.
SEPARATED BIKE LANE PLANNING AND DESIGN GUIDE. Separated Bike Lane Planning and Design Guide Context Conforms to federal and state standards and guidelines:
Proposed Additions to MUTCD. Chapter 8E. Busway Grade Crossings Proposed revision submitted to FHWA in June Intended for next edition of MUTCD.
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Gulf Islands National Seashore Perdido Key / Johnson Beach Environmental Assessment WELCOME TO GULF.
5/8/02FHWA Office of Safety1 Funding Resources for Highway Safety (FY2001 Fed-Aid) $1.4 $5.6 Min. Guarantee Bridge Surface Transp. Program National Hwy.
Share The Road Traffic Safety Program Sausalito Police Department’s.
Complete Streets Training Module 4b – Designing for All Users.
MD 30 (Hanover Pike) at Mt. Gilead Road
Hesperian Boulevard Corridor Improvement Project San Lorenzo
Complete Streets Award Program
Project Management Team Meeting #3
Pilot Project Evaluation
Pedestrian & Bicyclist Crash Analysis
Bill Good Chief Operations Officer
Introduction to Development of a city-wide traffic calming program
Finance Committee & City Council August 8, 2016
Neighbourhood Traffic Calming Open House
Transportation Alternatives (TA) Set-aside
Module 1 A Nationally Emerging Practice
City of Wilmington Bike Plan Update
Using CMFs in Planning for Virginia’s Project Funding Prioritization
Developing a Pedestrian -Bicycle Safety Action Plan
School of Civil Engineering
WELCOMES YOU TO THE COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSE OCTOBER 2018.
Jaime Jordan, PE Project Manager Eric Germundson, EI Roadway Designer
Alex Henry FDOT District Seven Safety Office
The Use Of Hard Shoulders As A Turning Lane: A Safety Evaluation
Project Location: 35th Ave HSIP8
Presentation transcript:

 Corridor Plan and Meeting Objective  Project Background  Short Term Improvements  Long Term Improvements/Corridor Planning  Construction Funding Opportunities  Milepost 4.0  Why Corridor Planning  Other intersections/observations  Questions/comments  Breakout Sessions and Dot Exercise

Short term improvements – began by looking at what would be installed immediately to improve safety

Short term Intersection Improvements at Row River Road MP 4

Short term intersection improvements at Row River Road MP 5.8

Short term Intersection Improvements at Row River Road MP 5.8 included grading and vegetation removal to increase sight distance for trail users.

Short term Intersection Improvements at Row River Road MP 11.0

 Construction grant cycles have started:  Transportation Enhancement (TE) – pre- application due past spring; application due 12/14  State Transportation Improvement Program – deadline was 11/27/2012 for application  Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) Pre- application due 12/13/2012; application due 1/25/13  Will continue to seek opportunities

 How do we address intersection safety?  Educate  Enforce  Engineer - engineering options based on yielding  Urban areas of trail – bicyclists/pedestrians have right-0f-way - motorists must yield to bicyclists/pedestrians.

 Engineering options based on yielding  Rural areas of trail - motorist has right-of- way. Bicyclists/pedestrians must yield to motorists

 Completely separates motor vehicles and pedestrians/bicyclists  Safest option for all users  Most expensive option

 Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (PHB) ▪ Changes the yielding relationship – pedestrian/bicycle users push the beacon to stop traffic

 What option do you favor best and least?  Overcrossing – Option 1  Undercrossing - Option 2 (aligned with trail)  Undercrossing – Option 3(angled from trail; shorter tunnel)  At grade crossing (with PHB) – Option 4  Do nothing – no further improvements

 Opportunity to evaluate entire trail

 Please provide your feedback about design alternative for MP 4.0  Indicate most and least favored with dots  Please provide your feedback about any other issues along the trail  Make notes on large maps and intersection maps  Fill out comment cards  Talk with staff