TUES PI Forum Workshop Yolanda George, Lance Perez, Russ Pimmel, Roger Seals, and Sheryl Sorby Jan 25, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Definitions Innovation Reform Improvement Change.
Advertisements

© 2006 Open Grid Forum OGF19-Diversity, Education & Outreach BoF Open Grid Forum A diverse group of opinions often produces a better result.
Leadership Development and Outreach for ATE Mentoring System, Phase I Opportunity for NSF ATE Grant Preparation Assistance (Updated September 2013)
Survey Responses Challenges and Opportunities Matt Richey St. Olaf College.
Audrey Desjarlais, Signetwork Coordinator Survey Findings SPDG Initiative Goals SPDG Initiative Outcomes.
Manchester Children and Young People’s CYP IAPT Learning Collaborative
Strand C – In Depth. Competencies 8 and 9: The teacher demonstrates a willingness to examine and implement change, as appropriate. The teacher works productively.
2011 PI Conference Overview Assessment/Evaluation 2. Collaboration 3. Dissemination 4. Faculty Development 5. Key Challenges 6. Materials Development.
Leading by Convening: The Power of Authentic Engagement
1 Performance Assessment An NSF Perspective MJ Suiter Budget, Finance and Awards NSF.
Session 5 Intellectual Merit and Broader Significance FISH 521.
International Research and Education in Engineering (IREE) − Ideas for the Next Phase − Win Aung Chair, NSF/ENG IREE Working Group Division of Engineering.
Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research RII Track-3: Building Diverse Communities May 21, 2013 Jeanne Small & Uma Venkateswaran 1.
Merit Review and Proposal Preparation Mark Courtney Division of Environmental Biology
NSF Merit Review and Proposal Preparation Mark Courtney, Ph.D Adjunct, Department of Biology New Mexico State University 24 September 2008.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals: Fellowship Track Washington, DC January 9, 2014.
Mining Life Cycle Small Scale and Artisan Mining Challenges in South America Results of a Multi-stakeholder Workshop Prepared by: Cristina Echavarria.
Russell Pimmel, Roger Seals and Stephanie Beard.  Spring 2010, NSF/DUE Engineering PDs initiate IWBW Series; Spring 2011-CS PDs join  Overall goals.
Addressing the Challenges of Graduate and Post-graduate Training in the Geosciences Margaret Leinen Assistant Director for Geosciences National Science.
Computer & Information Science and Engineering Directorate (CISE) National Science Foundation (NSF) CPATH CISE Pathways to Revitalized Undergraduate Computing.
1 CCLI Proposal Writing Strategies Tim Fossum Program Director Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation Vermont.
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
Proposal Strengths and Weakness as Identified by Reviewers Russ Pimmel & Sheryl Sorby FIE Conference Oct 13, 2007.
C ATALYZING I NSTITUTIONAL C HANGE IN STEM E DUCATION AT THE U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA Funded by National Science Foundation March 2009.
Sharon Walpole University of Delaware Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia Literacy Coaches in Action: Strategies for Crafting Building- Level Support.
BIRDS Jeannette M. Wing Assistant Director for Computer and Information Science and Engineering National Science Foundation June 22, 2010.
Webinar NSF’s Improving Undergraduate STEM Education (IUSE) Program Conducted by the Virtual Faculty Collaborative (a partnership among AAAS, Louisiana.
Webinar NSF’s Improving Undergraduate STEM Education (IUSE: EHR) Program November 3 and 5 Conducted by the Virtual Faculty Collaborative (a partnership.
Overview of NSF Education R & D Programs with an Emphasis on the TUES Program Louis Everett Susan Finger Sue Fitzgerald.
Training Session #2 Further Practice with the IWBW Approach Lance C. Pérez, Russ Pimmel, Roger Seals, and Sheryl Sorby January 31, 2013.
Writing More Effective Proposals Russ Pimmel Abe Nisanci U of Alabama NSF. Share The Future IV March 17, 2003.
INTOSAI Public Debt Working Group Updating of the Strategic Plan Richard Domingue Office of the Auditor General of Canada June 14, 2010.
A 40 Year Perspective Dr. Frank Scioli NSF-Retired.
Promoting Diversity at the Graduate Level in Mathematics: A National Forum MSRI October 16, 2008 Deborah Lockhart Executive Officer, Division of Mathematical.
Lessons Learned about Going to Scale with Effective Professional Development Iris R. Weiss Horizon Research, Inc. February 2011.
Susanne Hambrusch Department of Computer Science Department Head Increase diversity of faculty, students, and staff Division Director in CISE at NSF The.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Update on NSF Geoscience & STEM Education Programs in FY 2014 Jill Karsten, Ph.D. Directorate for Geosciences National Science Foundation AGU Heads & Chairs.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
Innovation through Institutional Integration (I 3 ) National Science Foundation Directorate for Education and Human Resources National Science Foundation.
1 Developing a Competitive Proposal ( An Interactive, Web-Based Workshop) Russell Pimmel Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation.
MARGINS Successor Education Planning Workshop Workshop Goals: Review and evaluate impact and effectiveness of existing MARGINS education programs Develop.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
Innovation through Institutional Integration (I 3 ) Jody Chase, Tribal Colleges and Universities Program Sylvia James, Innovative Technology Experiences.
EVAL Self Assessment (Adapted from LaConner School Improvement Presentation) Your Name Your District Your Date.
Policy, Standards, Guidelines. NSF draft Article for FATC supplement The awardee is responsible for all information technology (IT) systems security and.
NSF’s Broader Impacts Criteria Bev Watford, Sue Kemnitzer, Russ Pimmel Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation Session T4B, Thursday.
Overview.  Accreditation is both a status and a process  Status:  Status: Accreditation provides public notification that standards of quality are.
Workshop for Faculty from Minority Serving Intuitions ---- Overview ---- Russ Pimmel Workshop for Faculty from Minority Serving Intuitions Feb. 8 –10,
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Presentation subhead CM223 Unit 4 EVALUATING EVIDENCE & FINDING A FOCUS.
Hill College Strategic Plan Hill College Mission Statement Hill College will provide high quality comprehensive educational programs and services.
Information Literacy Prepared for “The Role of Academic Libraries In Fostering Civil Society” Nancy Bolt, September 2002 Nancy Bolt & Associates.
Images: Images are extremely important to publicize the results of NSF investments. In general, graphs, spectra, and reaction diagrams are not compelling.
Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship The NSF Reviewers’ Perspective NSF Training Grants Workshop.
CISE New Action for Broadening Participation (BP) of Underrepresented Groups (UGs) in Computing Janice Cuny Timothy Pinkston October 19, 2007 CISE AC Meeting.
NSF INCLUDES Inclusion Across the Nation of Learners of Underrepresented Discoverers in Engineering and Science AISL PI Meeting, March 1, 2016 Sylvia M.
CIRTL Network Administrative Meeting Wednesday, December 4, :00-1:00 ET/ 11:00-12:00 CT/ 10:00-9:00 MT / 9:00-8:00 PT.
The Cultural Transformation of USDA: Results and Implementation.
Minority Serving Institutions’ Faculty Evaluation Initiative 2009 AEA National Conference Orlando, Florida.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2016
NSF INCLUDES “NSF should implement a bold new initiative, focused on broadening participation of underrepresented groups in STEM, similar in concept.
EnFUSE PI Forum Apr. 27, 2016.
Finding Research Collaborators
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2018
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2017
Employee engagement Delivery guide
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2019
Presentation transcript:

TUES PI Forum Workshop Yolanda George, Lance Perez, Russ Pimmel, Roger Seals, and Sheryl Sorby Jan 25, 2013

Workshop Goals Participants will: – Learn how the NSF Project will support the PI Forums – Begin preparing an application

PI Forum Need – At PI Meeting, PIs recognize a common interest and want to build an on-going interaction ultimately leading to joint activities – After PI Meeting, they struggle to find the time and means to build the interaction, and it eventually is forgotten NSF grant to explore a community-building model for ongoing, virtual, collaborative efforts among TUES PIs – Facilitated, structured approach to encourage and help build these collaborations

Types of PI Forums Special interest in collaborations dealing with evaluation, dissemination, broadening participation, and transformation Other ideas welcome Examples: – PIs working with a common instructional approach or area Share and develop evaluation approaches and data Form a group dissemination effort Create a shared, interactive repository – PIs working with underrepresented students Explore impact on a broader scale

Project Leaders Responsibilities Project will – Host six to eight virtual meetings for each PI Forum State of the art internet conferencing software – Provide guidance and training on use of software – Provide list of meeting attendees and list of awardees in appropriate NSF Programs with addresses

PI Forum Leaders Responsibilities PI Forums leaders will – Schedule meetings – Plan meeting agendas – Lead meetings – Maintain a website and give the Project access – Participate in the project evaluation

PI Forum Application On-line application at forum/application/ forum/application/ Title of PI Form – Leaders – Focus area – Ultimate Goals – Expected outcomes of the PI Forum – Recruitment plans – Meeting plans Applications are due February 8, 2013

Selection Criteria The impact of achieving the ultimate goal on STEM education The reasonableness of expected outcomes and their impact in moving toward the group’s ultimate goal The appropriate of the plans for achieving the expected outcomes Anticipated number and diversity of participants

PI Forum Focus, Goal, and Expected Outcomes Write – A sentence or two describing the focus of your collaboration – A statement of the ultimate goal of the collaboration – List the expected outcomes of your PI Forum Share and critique these – CRITERION: (1) The potential impact of the ultimate goal on STEM education and (2) The reasonableness of expected outcomes and their impact in moving toward the group’s ultimate goal Report the nature of the suggested changes Questions

PI Forum Meeting Plans List the topics that would be treated in each meeting Share and critique the statements – CRITERION: The reasonableness of the plans in achieving the expected outcomes Report the nature of the suggested changes Questions

PI Forum Recruitment Write – A sentence or two describing your recruitment plans – A sentence or two describing how the Project can help with recruitment Share and critique the statements – CRITERION: Anticipated number and diversity of participants Report the nature of the suggested changes Questions

Issues with Virtual Meetings Indicate how running virtual and face-to-face meetings differ Report to the group Questions