Doc.:IEEE 802.11-12/0439r0 March 2012 Switching between DCF and PP-MAC Date: 2012-3-14 Slide 1 Authors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0960r1 Submission July 2012 Stephen McCann, RIMSlide 1 ISD SG Closing Report Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0104r1 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Fragmentation with A-MPDU Date: Authors: Date: Jan, 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0338r1 Submission March 2012 Hung-Yu Wei, National Taiwan UniversitySlide 1 DeepSleep: Power Saving Mode to Support a Large Number.
Doc.: IEEE /0527r0 Submission March 2010 Slide 1 A Periodic 5 MHz Measurement Pilot for Channel Scan Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0410r2 Submission March 2011 Slide 1 Data Transmission Protection on the IEEE ac MU-MIMO Downlink Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0325r0 March 2012 Slide 1 TIM Enhancement With Group Bits Date: Authors: Zhong-Yi Jin, Nokia.
Doc.:IEEE /1523r4 Submission November 2011 Access Delay Reduction for FILS: Network Discovery & Access congestion Improvements Slide 1 Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0553r0 May 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Response Criteria of Probe Request Date: Authors:
Protocol for SU and MU Sounding Feedback
Doc.: IEEE /1097r1 Submission Sep 2012 Timo Koskela, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 Reserve Channel List in ah Date: Authors:
Doc.:IEEE /0859r0 July 2012 Simone Merlin, Qualcomm Inc Short Block Ack Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0802r0 Consideration on UL MU transmission Date: Slide 1Jinyoung Chun et. al, LG Electronics July 2014 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1515r0 Submission November 2011 Timo Koskela, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide ah Wi-Fi Offloading Considerations Date:
Doc.:IEEE /223r1 Submission March 2002 J. del Prado and S. Choi, Philips Slide 1 CC/RR Performance Evaluation - Revisited Javier del Prado and.
Doc.: IEEE /1355r2 11ah Submission Date: Authors: Nov 2012 James Wang, MediaTek Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0295r0 Submission PRAW Follow Up Date: Authors: March 2013.
Doc.: IEEE /0613r0 Submission May 2012 Ron Porat, Broadcom US Channelization Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0443r0 March 2014 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 What Is P2P Traffic in HEW Simulation Scenarios? Date: Authors:
GroupID Concept for Downlink MU-MIMO Transmission
Doc.: IEEE /1550r1 Submission Nov 2011 Zander, I2R SingaporeSlide 1 Extension of AID and TIM to Support 6000 STAs in ah Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1205r1 Submission September 2011 ZTE CorporationSlide 1 Consideration on battery power alarm mechanism for IEEE ah framework.
Doc.: IEEE /0696r2 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Slot-based Power Save without PS-Poll Date: Authors: Date: July, 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0074r0 Submission NDP Type PS-Poll Frame Follow-Up Date: Authors: Slide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Huawei.
Doc.: IEEE / hew Submission March 2014 Raja Banerjea, CSRSlide 1 A Simplified Simultaneous Transmit and Receive Mechanism Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1106r0 Submission September 2012 Osama Aboul-Magd, Huawei TechnologiesSlide 1 A Short-Header Frame Format Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0273r0 February 2011 Stefan Aust, NEC Communication Systems Submission Slide 1 TGah Use Case: AP Power Saving in Smart Grid Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0645r5 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Beamforming in IBSS, Mesh BSS, AP as Beamformee Date: Authors: Date: May 2011.
Doc.: IEEE /0798r1 Submission July 2008 L. Chu Etc.Slide 1 HT Features in Mesh Network Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1345r0 Submission November 2013 Jiamin Chen, HuaweiSlide 1 Dynamic Channel Transfer(DCT) Procedure for IEEE aj ( 60GHz New Technique.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1409r0 November 2013 Adriana Flores, Rice UniversitySlide 1 Dual Wi-Fi: Dual Channel Wi-Fi for Congested WLANs with Asymmetric.
Doc.: IEEE /0342r0 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Power Efficient PS Poll Date: Authors: Date: March, 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0608r2 Submission May 2012 Shoukang Zheng et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 Low-Power PS-Poll Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0665r1 Submission May 2012 Anh Tuan Hoang et al (I2R) Slide 1 Prioritized PS-Polls Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0328r0 Nokia Internal Use Only March 2012 Slide 1 Date: Authors: PS-Poll Enhancements Chittabrata Ghosh, Nokia.
Doc.: IEEE /0881r0 Submission July 2012 Anna Pantelidou, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 PS Mode Enhancements with Timing Indication Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/1329r0 PS-Poll for Downlink Bufferable Units Date: Slide 1Eric Wong, Broadcom November 2012 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1325r0 Submission Nov PS-Poll TXOP Date: Authors: David Xun Yang, Huawei, et. al.Slide 1.
PS-Poll TXOP Using RTS/CTS Protection
Doc.: IEEE /0324r0 Submission Slide 1Michelle Gong, Intel March 2010 DL MU MIMO Error Handling and Simulation Results Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0567r0 Submission Slide 1Michelle Gong, Intel May 2010 DL MU MIMO Analysis and OBSS Simulation Results Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0517r0 May 2013 Submission Slide 1 Authors: Combining Process in Virtual CS Mechanism for ah Date: Lv kaiying, ZTE.
GroupID Concept for Downlink MU-MIMO Transmission
Slide 1 doc.: IEEE /1092r0 Submission Simone Merlin, Qualcomm Incorporated September 2010 Slide 1 ACK Protocol and Backoff Procedure for MU-MIMO.
Doc.: IEEE /0606r1 Submission Uplink Channel Access Date: Authors: May 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0440r1 Submission July 2013 Jiamin Chen, HuaweiSlide 1 Dynamic Channel Transfer(DCT) procedure for IEEE aj ( 60GHz ) Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0327r0 March 2015 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Microsleep for HE STA Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1190r2 September 2014 Submission Kaiying Lv (ZTE) Frame Exchange Control for Uplink Multi-user transmission Slide 1 Date:
TIM Compression Date: Authors: January 2012 Month Year
Doc.: IEEE /1002r0 July 2011 Hyangsun You, LG Electronics Inc. Submission IPv6 for ah Author: Date: July 19, 2011 NameCompanyAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1255r0 Submission Sep.,2011 Siyang Liu, CATRSlide 1 DCF Enhancements for Large Number of STAs Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1019r1 Submission July 2011 MediaTek, Inc Slide 1 Supporting Large Number of STAs in ah Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0672r0 Submission May 2011 ZTE CorporationSlide 1 IEEE ah network operation & management consideration for functional requirement.
Doc.: IEEE /0028r1 Submission January 2012 Anna Pantelidou, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 Power Saving Possibilities for Networks Supporting.
Doc.: IEEE /0112r4 Submission Supporting Authentication/Association for Large Number of Stations September 2012 Slide 1 I2R Date:
Submission Jan 2012 doc.: IEEE 11-12/69r2 ZTE CorporationSlide 1 Consideration on Max Idle Period Extension for ah Power Save Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0288r0 TXOP Sharing Operation for Relay Date: Slide 1Eric Wong, Broadcom Authors: March 2013.
Doc.: IEEE /0094r2 Submission Jan 2012 Slide 1 Authors: MAC Header Design for Small Data Packet for ah Date: Lv kaiying, ZTE.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1512r4 November 2011 Slide 1 MAC considerations for ah (Probe and Pull MAC) Date: Authors: Zhong-Yi Jin, Nokia.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1081r3 September, 2015 Jing Ma, NICTSlide 1 Further consideration on receive behavior based on the cascading structure.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1512r1 Company Confidential November 2011 Slide 1 MAC considerations for ah (Probe and Pull MAC) Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0409r6 Submission July 2012 Shoukang Zheng et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 Channel Access Supporting Low Power Operation Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0409r5 Submission May 2012 Shoukang Zheng et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 Supporting Low Power Operation Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0624r2 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Scheduled Medium Access For Large Low Power BSS Date: Authors: Date: May, 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0971r1 Submission July 2011 BUPTSlide 1 Warning Signal Transmitting Requirements in IEEE ah Date: Authors:
Supporting Low Power Operation
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 January 2012
Header Compression Date: Authors: May 2012 Month Year
Station Group Management for ah
Consideration on Max Idle Period Extension for ah Power Save
Supporting Authentication/Association for Large Number of Stations
Presentation transcript:

doc.:IEEE /0439r0 March 2012 Switching between DCF and PP-MAC Date: Slide 1 Authors:

doc.:IEEE /0439r0 March 2012 Abstract This contribution proposes a solution for ah MAC to operate efficiently under the various situations. Slide 2

doc.:IEEE /0439r0 March 2012 Motivation Various use cases are defined in ah [1]. –Smart grid, environmental/agricultural monitoring, industrial process automation, healthcare system, … In some use cases, the traffic characteristics may vary depending on the situation. –In normal operation, STAs transmit uplink data sparsely with different transmission starting time. –When an event is detected or an emergency occurs, the STAs attempt to transmit data simultaneously for a while. –For example, when disaster (forest fire, flood) is detected (use case 1c), system is out of work (use case 1d), a patient’s condition (blood pressure, heart rate) changed (use case 1f). MAC proper to the situation should be considered. Slide 3

doc.:IEEE /0439r0 March 2012 Problems In normal operation, DCF is enough to handle uplink transmissions. –If the STAs’ uplink transmissions are sparse, there may be little degradation from collisions. –For example, STAs transmit few 100 bytes every few ~ 10s minutes in use case 1f [1]. –If Probe and Pull MAC [2] is used, probe/pull messages may be wasteful. –The STAs wait for the probe message to respond it and pull message to transmit data, which causes STAs’ power consumption and delay. Slide 4 SIFS Probe AP STA1 P-ACK STA2 STA3 STA4 Pull SIFS Data SIFS ACK Probe Have nothing to send Have data to send wasteful Should wait for the next probe message In DCF, STA2 can attempt to transmit data immediately Now, STA2 can transmit data

doc.:IEEE /0439r0 March 2012 Problems When an event is detected or an emergency occurs, PP-MAC is better. –PP-MAC provides better throughput & fairness, and low latency for the simultaneous uplink transmissions [3]. Changing MAC according to the situation is required. Slide 5

doc.:IEEE /0439r0 March 2012 Solution Switching DCF to PP-MAC when an emergency occurs –PP-MAC handles simultaneous uplink transmission attempts. Switching PP-MAC to DCF in the normal operation Slide 6 An emergency occurs DCF PP-MAC AP

doc.:IEEE /0439r0 March 2012 Solution Criteria for switching MAC –Information from the application (cognition of emergency traffic in AP or STAs) –Collisions in MAC (in DCF) –The number of STAs that respond to the probe message (in PP-MAC) Methods –AP starts to send a probe message (with a reserved bit set to 1) to switch DCF to PP- MAC. –AP sends a PP-END message or a probe message (with a reserved bit set to 0) to switch PP-MAC to DCF. –STAs request to AP for switching to PP-MAC by using a reserved bit in the MAC header of uplink data or by sending a PP-REQ message Slide 7

doc.:IEEE /0439r0 March 2012 Conclusions Issue the problem under the various situations Propose criteria and methods for switching between DCF and PP-MAC Further quantify the performance of the proposed solution according to the environments Slide 8

doc.:IEEE /0439r0 March 2012 References [1] 11-11/0457r0, Potential Compromise for ah Use Case Document [2] 11-11/1512r4, MAC considerations for ah (Probe and Pull MAC) [3] 11-12/0326r1, Uplink Performance Comparison of PP- MAC and DCF Slide 9