Doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/0665r1 Submission May 2012 Anh Tuan Hoang et al (I2R) Slide 1 Prioritized PS-Polls Date: 2012-5-16 Authors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0338r1 Submission March 2012 Hung-Yu Wei, National Taiwan UniversitySlide 1 DeepSleep: Power Saving Mode to Support a Large Number.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1043 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Giwon ParkLG Electronics LG R&D Complex 533, Hogye- 1dong, Dongan-Gu, Anyang, Kyungki,
Submission doc.: IEEE /0325r0 March 2012 Slide 1 TIM Enhancement With Group Bits Date: Authors: Zhong-Yi Jin, Nokia.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0xxx March 2014 Giwon Park, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Discussion on power save mode for real time traffic Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1097r1 Submission Sep 2012 Timo Koskela, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 Reserve Channel List in ah Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1355r2 11ah Submission Date: Authors: Nov 2012 James Wang, MediaTek Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0295r0 Submission PRAW Follow Up Date: Authors: March 2013.
GroupID Concept for Downlink MU-MIMO Transmission
Doc.: IEEE /1550r1 Submission Nov 2011 Zander, I2R SingaporeSlide 1 Extension of AID and TIM to Support 6000 STAs in ah Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0696r2 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Slot-based Power Save without PS-Poll Date: Authors: Date: July, 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0074r0 Submission NDP Type PS-Poll Frame Follow-Up Date: Authors: Slide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Huawei.
Doc.: IEEE /1106r0 Submission September 2012 Osama Aboul-Magd, Huawei TechnologiesSlide 1 A Short-Header Frame Format Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0070r1 Enabling AP Sleep Date: Authors: Jafarian, Qualcomm Slide 1 January 2013.
Doc.: IEEE /630r1a Submission S. Choi, Philips Research November 2001 Slide 1 HC Recovery and Backoff Rules Sunghyun Choi and Javier del Prado.
Doc.: IEEE /0342r0 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Power Efficient PS Poll Date: Authors: Date: March, 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0608r2 Submission May 2012 Shoukang Zheng et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 Low-Power PS-Poll Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0328r0 Nokia Internal Use Only March 2012 Slide 1 Date: Authors: PS-Poll Enhancements Chittabrata Ghosh, Nokia.
Doc.: IEEE /0881r0 Submission July 2012 Anna Pantelidou, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 PS Mode Enhancements with Timing Indication Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/1329r0 PS-Poll for Downlink Bufferable Units Date: Slide 1Eric Wong, Broadcom November 2012 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1325r0 Submission Nov PS-Poll TXOP Date: Authors: David Xun Yang, Huawei, et. al.Slide 1.
PS-Poll TXOP Using RTS/CTS Protection
Doc.: IEEE / 0052r0 Submission January 2011 Slide 1 Max Nss for SU BF Date: Authors: Sameer Vermani, Qualcomm.
Doc.: IEEE /1123r0 Submission September 2010 Zhu/Kim et al 1 Date: Authors: [TXOP Sharing for DL MU-MIMO Support]
Slide 1 doc.: IEEE /1092r0 Submission Simone Merlin, Qualcomm Incorporated September 2010 Slide 1 ACK Protocol and Backoff Procedure for MU-MIMO.
Doc.: IEEE /0606r1 Submission Uplink Channel Access Date: Authors: May 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1.
TIM Compression Date: Authors: January 2012 Month Year
Doc.: IEEE /388r2 Submission TGah Efficient TIM Encoding Date: Authors: May 2012 Minyoung Park, et. al. Intel Corp.Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1357r3 Nov Slide 1 Dynamic TIM and Page Segmentation Date: Authors: Weiping Sun, Seoul National University.
Doc.:IEEE /0860r0 July 2012 Qualcomm Inc. Collision reduction after TIM Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1413r1 Submission November 2013 Edward Reuss, UnaffiliatedSlide 1 Real-Time Multicast Streams During Power Save – Part 2 Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0329r1 March 2012 Chittabrata Ghosh, Nokia Slide 1 Date: Authors: Group Synchronized DCF.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1454r0 November 2014 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide ax Power Save Discussion Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0112r4 Submission Supporting Authentication/Association for Large Number of Stations September 2012 Slide 1 I2R Date:
Doc.: IEEE /650r0 Submission May 2012 Anna Pantelidou, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 Grouping Methodology Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0285r0 March 2013 Submission Resource Allocation Frame Format for RAW- based Medium Access Date: Authors: Chittabrata Ghosh,
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0288r0 TXOP Sharing Operation for Relay Date: Slide 1Eric Wong, Broadcom Authors: March 2013.
Doc.: IEEE /0089r0 Submission Listen interval update Jan 2013 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Jinsoo Choi, LG Electronics.
Doc.: IEEE /117r0 Submission January 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1 TGah TIM Operation Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0880r2 Submission Scheduled Trigger frames July 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: A. Asterjadhi, H. Choi, et. al.
Doc.: IEEE /0840r1 Submission AP Assisted Medium Synchronization Date: Authors: September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0071r0 January 2013 Submission Channel indication in RAW/TWT Date: Authors: Merlin, Qualcomm Slide 1.
Doc.:IEEE /0114r0 January 2012 Low Power Medium Access Date: Slide 1 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0619r3 Submission May 2012 Haiguang Wang et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 Overlapping IEEE ah Networks of Different Types Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1324r0 November 2012 Very Low Energy Paging Date: Authors: Slide 1 S. Merlin et al.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/0592r0 May 2015 Eric Wong (Apple)Slide 1 More Power Save Calibration Results Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0364r3 SubmissionJeongki Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 AID Reassignment Protocol Date: Authors: May 2012.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1204r1 ZTE CorporationSlide 1 Power saving mechanism consideration for ah framework Date: Authors: Sept 2011.
Doc.: IEEE /0409r6 Submission July 2012 Shoukang Zheng et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 Channel Access Supporting Low Power Operation Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0409r5 Submission May 2012 Shoukang Zheng et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 Supporting Low Power Operation Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1101r1 Submission Sept Active Polling Date: Authors: Slide 1Yong Liu, Marvell, et. al.
Doc.: IEEE /0370r0 Submission January 2012 Haiguang Wang et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 TIM Compression Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1309r0 November 2012 Non-TIM Mode Negotiation Date: Slide 1 Authors: Kaiying Lv, ZTE.
Doc.: IEEE /0618r0 Submission Listen interval for sensor devices May 2012 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Jinsoo Choi, LG Electronics.
Doc.: IEEE /1034r0 Submission September 2015 Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM Notification of Operating Mode Changes Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Supporting Low Power Operation
Supporting Authentication/Association for Large Number of Stations
WUR coexistence with existing power save mode
QoS Handling of Trigger Frame
Integration of WUR to Power Save Mode
Wake Up Frame to Indicate Group Addressed Frames Transmission
Power Efficient PS Poll
Overlapping IEEE ah Networks of Different Types
Peer Power Save Mode for TDLS
Power saving mechanism consideration for ah framework
PS-Poll TXOP Date: Authors: Month Year
Overlapping IEEE ah Networks of Different Types
Scheduled Peer Power Save Mode for TDLS
Dynamic TIM and Page Segmentation
Power Efficiency for Individually Addressed Frames Reception
Enhancement of Low Power Medium Access STAs
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0665r1 Submission May 2012 Anh Tuan Hoang et al (I2R) Slide 1 Prioritized PS-Polls Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE /0665r1 Submission May 2012 Anh Tuan Hoang et al (I2R) Abstract This contribution suggests allowing STAs to transmit PS-Polls at different priority levels. This is achieved by having a TIM encoding that conveys different STA groups and assigning channel-access priority to each group The objective is to reduce PS-Poll collisions when a large number of PS STAs are associated with an AP Slide 2

doc.: IEEE /0665r1 Submission May 2012 Anh Tuan Hoang et al (I2R) Background In 11ah, there can be a large number of STAs associated with each AP; many of them operate in PS mode Upon waking up from doze and seeing its bit in the TIM set, an STA will send a PS-Poll to AP PS-Poll collisions happen when several STAs transmit PS-Polls shortly after a TIM PS-Poll collisions increase latency and drop rate for buffered BUs at AP Slide 3

doc.: IEEE /0665r1 Submission May 2012 Anh Tuan Hoang et al (I2R) Observation 1 Not all STAs with set TIM bits are ready to transmit PS-Polls: –Different STAs have different Listen Intervals that determine how often they listen to the Beacon frames –For each STA, the longer the TIM bit has been set without PS-Poll being received at AP, the more likely that the STA will attempt to transmit a PS-Poll following the next TIM The likelihood of a non-TIM STA ([1],[2]) transmitting PS-Poll in a certain BI can also be deduced from its Listen Interval => AP may compare the likelihood of different STAs being awake to transmit PS-Polls and use that to coordinate the transmissions Slide 4

doc.: IEEE /0665r1 Submission May 2012 Anh Tuan Hoang et al (I2R) Observation 2 Not all buffered BUs at AP need to be delivered to STAs with the same latency/drop-rate requirements: –Different applications, e.g., real-time vs. best effort, have different QoS constraints –Within one application, there are certain messages with more stringent requirements than others => Based on QoS requirements of the buffered BUs, AP can coordinate PS-Poll transmissions from the corresponding STAs Slide 5

doc.: IEEE /0665r1 Submission May 2012 Anh Tuan Hoang et al (I2R) Main Idea – Prioritized PS-Polls Define a mechanism that allows AP to prioritize PS-Poll transmissions by: –Indicating different STA groups within each TIM –Associating with each STA group within the TIM a channel-access priority –An awake STA with buffered BUs transmits PS-Poll according to the given channel-access priority of its indicated group Slide 6

doc.: IEEE /0665r1 Submission May 2012 Anh Tuan Hoang et al (I2R) Indicating STA Groups within TIM Approach 1: using a fixed k-bit field after each set TIM bit: Slide 7 Approach 2: mixed use of explicit AID listing and TIM bitmap:

doc.: IEEE /0665r1 Submission May 2012 Anh Tuan Hoang et al (I2R) Assigning Priority to PS-Polls Each STA-group within a TIM can be given an access priority to transmit PS-Polls; the priority can be a combination of: –Interframe Space, e.g., AIFS –Contention Windows, e.g., CW, CWmin, CWmax –Time Allowance, e.g., different groups of STAs are allowed to transmit PS-Polls in different slots/periods –Retry Limit, e.g., set the maximum number of PS-Poll retries within a beacon interval for each STA group => Can be further studied Slide 8

doc.: IEEE /0665r1 Submission May 2012 Anh Tuan Hoang et al (I2R) Summary In 11ah, with a large number of STAs operating in PS mode, PS- Poll collisions increase latency and drop-rate for buffered BUs AP has knowledge of how likely/urgent each STA can/should transmit PS-Poll => We propose that AP indicates through TIM the different groups of STAs (that have buffered BUs) and gives different channel-access priorities to different groups The implementation details are TBD Slide 9

doc.: IEEE /0665r1 Submission May 2012 Anh Tuan Hoang et al (I2R) References [1] ah, Non-TIM Stations in 11ah [2] ah, Listen Interval for Sensor Devices Slide 10

doc.: IEEE /0665r1 Submission May 2012 Anh Tuan Hoang et al (I2R) Straw Poll 1 Do you agree that, to reduce collisions, PS-Polls from different STAs can be transmitted using different channel-access priorities? –Y: –N: –A: Slide 11

doc.: IEEE /0665r1 Submission May 2012 Anh Tuan Hoang et al (I2R) Straw Poll 2 Do you agree that PS-Poll priority can be indicated in the TIM through STA grouping, as explained in Slide 6? –Y: –N: –A: Slide 12