Food for Thought If we didn’t have a current education system and you were asked to design one, what would it look like? How would you get there?

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Rhode Island Model for Educator Evaluation Systems August 2010.

Advertisements

2007 CAH HF Program Group 2 Roadmap Next Steps for Phase II January – March 2007 JANFEBMARAPRMAYJUNJULAUGSEPOCTNOVDEC Engage Internal Stakeholders Plan/Educate.

Technology to Improve Instruction A Vision for Technology …and affording it North Carolinas Instructional Improvement System.

Directorate-General for Climate Action, European Commission

Training for Teachers and Specialists

Mentoring New Educators

A Continuous Improvement Update. Category 1 Leadership Requires leaders to set and communicate direction consistent with stakeholder requirements –H–How.

The Baldrige Model of Performance Excellence A framework for continuous improvement.

NWCCU Year Three Self Evaluation Workshop : Standards 2E & 2G Donna Reed, Ph.D. Portland Community College Library Director March 13, 2012.

Library Review. Agenda for today Outline of Library Review Campus review process Development of Library Review framework Library Self Study stage Steps.

Cambrian Union School District GATE Update January 2011.

Race to the Top Years 2 to 4 Finish line webinars July

Tech Plan - Timeline 3 Year Cycle Required by OSPI and Title IID Federal funding year July 2010 Plan due to OSPI before April 5 th Board Approval at March.

Karrie Y. Cox EdTech 501 Boise State University. Education is an enterprise that asks, whats worth knowing and being able to do? ( U.S. Department of.

PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track

Santa Rosa County District Schools Evaluation Systems.

LENNOX PD PLAN SCHOOL YEAR LENNOX SCHOOL DISTRICT 950 students Student surveys indicate that not enough project based assessments are given.

PRESENTED BY: LINDSAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT THOMAS L. ROONEY, SUPERINTENDENT LANA BROWN, DIRECTOR OF CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION High School Transition.

Personalized Learning Update. Essential Questions  What is Personalized Learning and how is it aligned to our business plan?  Where are we now?

What it means for New Teachers

April 10, 2013 SPDG Implementation Science Webinar #3: Organization Drivers.

1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.

IT Learning Programme The Evaluations Tool Pilot Project 19 th July 2010.

Primary Science Quality Mark hub leader training part two NSLC York Jan 17 th 2012.

STaR Chart Analysis Roberto Martinez EDTC The University of Texas at Brownsville.

LCFF and LCAP Phase II Gathering Input. LCFF and LCAP This is the second in a series of three presentations. Presentation 1 Nov./Dec.

Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,

Connecting the Dots BISD’S LEARNING PLATFORM AND ESTABLISHING EXPECTATIONS FOR LEARNING RUBRIC.

Honors Level Course Implementation Webinar Honors Rubric and Portfolio Review Process October 7, 2013.

Thank You for Attending! The powerpoint for this webinar is now

Professional Development Plan Erin Schwartzberg, Courtney Mancuso, Vanessa Denham, and Gail Blouin.

1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.

Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.

Company LOGO MCPS District Technology Teaching Plan Department of Instructional Technology Presented by Jennifer Martin July 16, 2012

Sue Southwood Programme Manager for Professional Standards and Workforce Development.

Certification Learning Network February 2,

Orientation and Summer Institutes Implementer’s Forum October 2005 Susan Barrett PBIS Maryland.

 Growing concern over college enrollment and remedial courses in the United States  Dramatic improvement in education in countries such as Finland and.

Webster Public Schools October 8, Goal for AYP in every subject, at every grade level, and for every subgroup. We can do this.

SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.

SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.

SCIENCE CONTACT MEETING June 6, AGENDA Updates / Feedback Secondary Renewal – Courses / timeline – Working groups – piloting Assessment – Large-scale.

Evaluating the 21 st Century Educator with Fidelity School Executive Training Beaufort County Schools April 19, 2012.

Integrating Technology in the Classroom. Why Technology Integrating technology provides – An opportunity to differentiate instruction – Help for teachers.

1 School Board and Superintendent Continuous Improvement and Evaluation Quality New Mexico June 9, 2011.

Teacher Tube Teach the World. Goals of TeacherTube: Provide an online community for sharing educational videos Fulfill a need for a more educationally.

Future Directions Update Project Timeline Report to the Steering Committee - 6/04 Briefing to Coordination Group - 6/1/04 Comments due - 5/14/04 Briefing.

Selkirk College 50 th Anniversary Theme Celebrations School Specific Engagement: Deans & Chairs Committee Oct 6, 2015.

Presented by Diana Mitchell Beaumont ISD Central Medical Magnet High School.

What it means for New Teachers

University Strategic Planning Phase I – Vision for the Second Century II (“V2C2”) Opportunities for Faculty Input Faculty Senate meeting 1/25/17.

Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event

Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback

District of Innovation Update: International School Development

ISKME and GSC, IMLS Project Year 3 March 1, 2017

Clinical Practice Guidelines and Document Submission

Alabama Teacher Mentoring Program

Talent Development System mytalent.ku.edu

Today Galaxy S II Galaxy S III Neo Galaxy S7 Active

Evaluating Principals Making a Fuzzy Process More Clear

Overview Edward G. Rendell Governor Tom Gluck Secretary of Education.

Gateway to Competency Portability

Themes Collaboration – vertical and horizontal Autonomy at all levels

Henry County Schools’ Vision for Personalized Learning

PBIS Update November 2005.

PBIS Update December 2005.

School Redesign: Cohort 19

PSELI Measurement Tools – Phase1 & 2 Sites

Maryland WIOA Alignment and Integration

PBIS Update January 2006.

Presentation transcript:

Food for Thought If we didn’t have a current education system and you were asked to design one, what would it look like? How would you get there?

Where we’ve been March D11 Personalized Learning Vision April Phase I School visits, training, strategic planning June District prioritization and strategic planning July District Business Plan integration Sept Phase II School visits Oct Phase III School visits Jan All school visits, training and strategic planning completed April Basic teacher technology tool kits advanced May SharePoint site development June Personalized Learning Lead Educators launched June Online professional development secured June DODEA grant secured for seven schools

Where we’re going in D11 PL vision update - PL Model development integrating Common Core and Achieve rubric - PL Lead Educator development and support - Current State vs. Desired State document - Look For document - D11 Guide to Personalized Learning - School Plan updates - Teacher self-review and baseline teacher skill level - Teacher and learner technology skill ladders - Classroom proof points - Demonstration classrooms - D11 plans for 1:1 computing

Today’s Agenda  Update  Personalized Learning Model  Teacher Self Review  Individual Goal Setting  Feedback/Questions/Comments