Data Sharing Across Agencies: A guide to getting on the same page Bruce Schmidt Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Presentation to Oregon Chapter,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sharon Gross U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service The U.S. Invasive Species Management Plan.
Advertisements

ClimDev-Africa Program & African Climate Policy Center (ACPC)
ASIAES Project Overview Satellite Image Network for Natural Hazard Management in ASEAN+3 region Pakorn Apaphant Geo-Informatics and Space Technology Development.
Monitoring Watershed Restoration Effectiveness Nez Perce Tribe DFRM-Watershed Division Rebecca A. Lloyd, Project Leader.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
Implement Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish- Wit Watershed Assessment and Restoration Plan Now A Regional Support Program Sponsored by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal watershed and salmon monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring.
Data Management Projects Data Management Framework Subcommittee Update June 19, 2007.
Data Management in Support of the Fish & Wildlife Program Summary.
1.A standardized format that identifies the types of information required or allowed in a particular document or exchange. 2.Data exchange templates contain.
1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) and StreamNet NW Power & Conservation Council, Sept. 20, 2006.
Northwest Habitat Institute Interactive Habitat and Biodiversity Information System (IBIS) for the Columbia River Basin.
DS-01 Disaster Risk Reduction and Early Warning Definition
Illinois Justice Network Portal Implementation Board Meeting February 11, 2004.
Feed-back on Belgium Experiments
© 2008 Lockheed Martin Corporation. All Rights Reserved. Multi-Channel Data Capture Session 8– Data Capture: Internet/PDA, Manual Data Entry UNSD Regional.
Overview What is the National ITS Architecture? User Services
WMO WIGOS in support of DRR 2013 Coordination Meeting of DRR FP October 2013, Geneva Dr S. Barrell, Chair, ICG-WIGOS Dr I. Zahumensky, WIGOS-PO.
A Comprehensive Provincial Air Emissions Inventory to Support AEMERA, ESRD and the AER Richard Melick Emissions Inventory Scientist Air Policy.
WMO WIGOS in support of DRR 2013 Coordination Meeting of DRR FP October 2013, Geneva Dr S. Barrell, Chair, ICG-WIGOS Dr I. Zahumensky, WIGOS-PO.
© UKCIP 2011 Learning and Informing Practice: The role of knowledge exchange Roger B Street Technical Director Friday, 25 th November 2011 Crew Project.
AOC Services EPA Analytical Operations/Data Quality Center August 14 th, 2001 US Navy/NAVSEA Training Session.
Metadata Tool Proposals PNAMP Meeting Wednesday, December 15 th 2010.
Centro Internacional para Estudios del Medio Ambiente y el Desarrollo Sostenible CIEMADeS Centro Internacional para Estudios del Medioambiente y el Desarrollo.
1 State ESF 6 presentation Michael Whitehead State Mass Care Coordinator.
Oncor’s EIM Program.
Introduction to the State-Level Mitigation 20/20 TM Software for Management of State-Level Hazard Mitigation Planning and Programming A software program.
LEVERAGING THE ENTERPRISE INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT Louise Edmonds Senior Manager Information Management ACT Health.
NGAC Interagency Data Sharing and Collaboration Spotlight Session: Best Practices and Lessons Learned Robert F. Austin, PhD, GISP Washington, DC March.
2012 MIS Conference: The Return on Investment From Implementing Common Data Standards Kathy Gosa Shawn Bay Adam Miller Photos are stock, release for web.
8/29/2006 DRAFT Implementing an Adaptive Management Framework for the Fish and Wildlife Program DRAFT.
California’s Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Data Management Systems Cassandra Lamerdin SWAMP Data Management Team Marine Pollution Studies Laboratory.
Considerations for Regional Data Collection, Sharing and Exchange Bruce Schmidt StreamNet Program Manager Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Presentation.
StreamNet Project Overview for Data Management Category Review Bruce Schmidt Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Presented to: NPCC Independent.
Documenting the Participation of Fishing Vessel Crew Members in Alaska’s Commercial Fisheries Documenting the Participation of Fishing Vessel Crew Members.
EMI INFSO-RI SA2 - Quality Assurance Alberto Aimar (CERN) SA2 Leader EMI First EC Review 22 June 2011, Brussels.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
Dr. David Mowat June 22, 2005 Federal, Provincial & Local Roles Surveillance of Risk Factors and Determinants of Chronic Diseases.
REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.
FEA DRM Management Strategy Presented by : Mary McCaffery, US EPA.
1 Developing a Framework for an Early Intervention System of Care NECTAC/ ITCA Finance Seminar May 22, 2006.
Draft GEO Framework, Chapter 6 “Architecture” Architecture Subgroup / Group on Earth Observations Presented by Ivan DeLoatch (US) Subgroup Co-Chair Earth.
EPA Geospatial Segment United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information Enterprise Architecture Program Segment Architecture.
Why Does NOAA Need a Climate & Ecosystem Demonstration Project in the California Current System? Capabilities and Drivers La Jolla, CA 6 June, 2005.
Water Quality Exchange (WQX) Pilot and its Potential Role in NWIS/STORET Coordination October 18, 2005.
The HMO Research Network (HMORN) is a well established alliance of 18 research departments in the United States and Israel. Since 1994, the HMORN has conducted.
National Monitoring Network Report Methods and Data Comparability Chapter 5 Outline National Monitoring Council Meeting April 12-14, 2005.
Pilot Census in Poland Some Quality Aspects Geneva, 7-9 July 2010 Janusz Dygaszewicz Central Statistical Office POLAND.
Columbia River Basin Monitoring, Evaluation, Research, and Reporting (MERR) Plan DRAFT Nancy Leonard Fish, Wildlife, Ecosystem Monitoring and Evaluation.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Fourth IABIN Council Meeting Support to Building the Inter-American Biodiversity Information Network.
Network Reliability and Interoperability Council VII NRIC Council Meeting Focus Group 1B Network Architectures for Emergency Communications in 2010 September.
Managing Web Components of the National Marine Mammal Health and Stranding Response Program (MMHSRP) System Presented by: Angela D. Collins-Payne Information.
Fire Emissions Network Sept. 4, 2002 A white paper for the development of a NSF Digital Government Program proposal Stefan Falke Washington University.
What do we have in common? Do more with less! PNAMP Integrated Status & Trend Monitoring Workgroup.
1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) CBFWA – Ken MacDonald ESSA Technologies Ltd. - Marc Porter State Agencies IDFG.
SUSTAINING ENVIRONMENTAL CAPITAL (SEC) INITIATIVE Providing resources for applying ecosystem services in public land & water management.
Coordinated Assessments Project Overview & Next steps January 17, 2012 Presented to: Independent Science Review Panel Tom Iverson, CBFWA.
Justice Information Network Strategic Plan Development Justice Information Network Board March 18, 2008 Mo West, JIN Program Manager.
Data Stewardship and Data Standards Practices Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership (PNAMP) Prepared for: USBR Tech Transfer Meeting Jennifer.
Considerations for Regional Data Collection, Sharing and Exchange Bruce Schmidt StreamNet Program Manager Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Presentation.
The Components of Information Systems
BPA Expectations for Regionally Coordinated RM&E Programs Jim Geiselman – BPA BPA Expectations on the Development of Standard.
Standards for success in city IT and construction projects
The Components of Information Systems
2017 Health care Preparedness and Response Draft Capabilities
MSDI training courses feedback MSDIWG10 March 2019 Busan
Information System Building Blocks
Cynthia Curry, Director National AEM Center
  1-A) How would Arctic science benefit from an improved GIS?
Presentation transcript:

Data Sharing Across Agencies: A guide to getting on the same page Bruce Schmidt Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Presentation to Oregon Chapter, AFS February,

Cross Jurisdictions Legal: Remand, US v. OR, PST, etc. ESA Recovery Planning Coordinated Monitoring Population Assessments (VSP) Inter-jurisdictional Management Co- management High Level Indicators, SOTR Increasing Wide-scale Programs BiOp Compliance Need Shared Data

Benefits of Sharing Data Fosters collaboration Expand scope of analyses (ESU, DPS) Contributes to multi-agency processes (e.g., ESA analyses, recovery planning and list/delist decisions; co-management; etc.) Could distribute cost of data collection

2002 Council Contract with SAIC Talk of a Comprehensive Regional Data Delivery System… 2000 BiOp RPA 198 CBCIS / NED 2008 BiOp RPA Col. Basin Data Center Fish and Wildlife Program So why isn’t there one? NOAA Guidance

Impediments to Sharing Data Sampling is focused Do things differently Data often not consolidated internally Data not on Web Hard for others to understand, use the data Concerns over misuse, first use, etc. Cost

Current Data Sharing Status: Individual agencies (States, Tribes, Federal) Independent Different mandates Sample different environments Longstanding approaches No mandate to share data Little support, capability to share data

Current Data Sharing Status: Wide scale database projects Focused – specific data types Not comprehensive

Current Data Sharing Status: Proposed regional data delivery applications Comprehensive Never built, or not completed Mechanisms to supply data not in place

Ideal Distributed Network … Multiple types of data from multiple sources, standardized by data type FishHabitatWater db Output Tool Regional Data Access Standards Others

Use Regional Data Projects db … Multiple types of data from multiple sources, standardized by data type WaterHabitatFish db Output Tool Regional Data Access dd db Others Pacific Northwest Water Quality Data Exchange StreamNet But, Current Reality is more like this: db

Data sources: field offices, research projects, etc. Database Project Agency Database Consolidated v. Individual Offices Approach

Most Expedient db … Multiple types of data from multiple sources, standardized by data type WaterHabitatFish db Output Tool Regional Data Access dd db Others

The Essential Driver of a Comprehensive Data Delivery System db … Multiple types of data from multiple sources, standardized by data type WaterHabitatFish db Output Tool Regional Data Access dd db Data flow can be automated Others

Automation is the key! Efficiency, Speed Accuracy Automatic data updates Canned products Translation to regional format Essential for any data portal technology

The ultimate endpoint?? … Multiple types of data from multiple sources, standardized by data type WaterHabitatFish db Others

Considerations for Regional Data Collection, Sharing and Exchange ‘The Data Sharing Guide’ A White Paper to: Outline steps Avoid overlooking critical steps Describe roles entities play Break it down: it’s not really that difficult ftp://ftp.streamnet.org/pub/streamnet/projman_files/Data_Sharing_Guide_ pdf

How Does the Data Sharing Guide Help? Organize discussions Consider ALL components Provide a blueprint Identify needed support Assure that when a system is built, the data are there to deliver!

The Data Sharing Guide addresses data flow from field to highest reporting need Non prescriptive Any data type Any agency Non-technical Primary focus is on infrastructure and processes to assure data accessibility

What’s Needed? 1. Uninterrupted data flow, source to output

Data Flow Field data creation (local office/project) Regional data application Regional standards Post metadata on the Web Describe full data set (metadata) Agency data QA / QC Agency database system Local use of data Describe the data (metadata) Quality Assurance / Quality Control Input to electronic form GOAL Steps in Data Flow Post data on the Web Data interoperability

Data Flow Field data creation (local office/project) Regional data application Post data on the Web Post metadata on the Web Describe full data set (metadata) Agency data QA / QC Agency database system Local use of data Describe the data (metadata) Quality Assurance / Quality Control Input to electronic form GOAL Steps in Data Flow Regional standards Data interoperability

Data Flow Field data creation (local office/project) Regional data application Post data on the Web Post metadata on the Web Describe full data set (metadata) Agency data QA / QC Agency database system Local use of data Describe the data (metadata) Quality Assurance / Quality Control Input to electronic form GOAL Steps in Data Flow Regional standards Data interoperability Any missed step can prevent data flow! Significant effort to bridge the gaps!

What’s Needed? 1. Uninterrupted data flow, source to output 2. Data validated by agency

What’s Needed? 1. Uninterrupted data flow, source to output 2. Data validated by agency 3. Descriptive information (metadata) X. Y

What’s Needed? 1. Uninterrupted data flow, source to output 2. Data validated by agency 3. Descriptive information (metadata) 4. Data and metadata on the Internet

What’s Needed? 1. Uninterrupted data flow, source to output 2. Data validated by agency 3. Descriptive information (metadata) 4. Data and metadata on the Internet XML SQL Database Spreadsheet ASCII Word Processing PDF

What’s Needed? 1. Uninterrupted data flow, source to output 2. Data validated by agency 3. Descriptive information (metadata) 4. Data and metadata on the Internet 5. Data able to roll together Ideal: standard data collection, definition, codes Minimum: Data translate to a standard

All of this is needed for seamless data delivery to ANY regional tool

Sampling Crews Sampling Agencies Funding Entities Regional Data Users Database Projects Policy Makers Roles Create the data Data Entry QA Describe the data Maintain the data Establish procedures Set standards, codes Agency data systems Post data / metadata Biological & data mgt. responsibilities Negotiate key issues Metrics Methods Data disposition Contract language Support data automation Set priorities Policies to remove obstacles to data sharing Agency support Technical assistance System development Data tasks for agencies Post data & metadata Feed regional data tools

The Data Sharing Guide Will Help To: Inform development of agency data systems Inform development of a regional data system Avoid skipping essential components Get us started

Questions? Funded by:Through: Fish and Wildlife Program Administered by: Photographs courtesy of CalFish