1 Dr. Abhay Karandikar A Jishnu, M Vinod Kumar Protection Switching for Point to Multipoint TESI.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

MEF 30.1 Service OAM Fault Management Implementation Agreement

Advertisements

TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST

Slide 1 Insert your own content. Slide 2 Insert your own content.

By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.

ag Discussion May 18, 2004 Ali Sajassi Paul Bottorf

Towards PAR for Segment Protection Switching

Slide 1 Load sharing in PBB-TE Zehavit Alon IEEE Interim Meeting May 2008.

Requirements of PBB-TE Segment Protection for Consideration Ao Wei Wu

Combining Like Terms. Only combine terms that are exactly the same!! Whats the same mean? –If numbers have a variable, then you can combine only ones.

Chapters 1 & 2 Theorem & Postulate Review Answers

© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 MPLS –TP Fault OAM draft-ietf-mpls-tp-fault-01 George Swallow

1 Introducing the Specifications of the Metro Ethernet Forum MEF 17 Service OAM Framework and Requirements February 2008.

MEF 30 Service OAM Fault Management Implementation Agreement

Network Protection and Restoration Session 5 - Optical/IP Network OAM & Protection and Restoration Presented by: Malcolm Betts Date:

Geneva, 28 May 2010 PBB-TE Infrastructure Protection Switching Operation Bob Sultan, Huawei Technologies Joint ITU-T/IEEE Workshop on The Future of Ethernet.

Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13

Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13

DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.

MULTIPLYING MONOMIALS TIMES POLYNOMIALS (DISTRIBUTIVE PROPERTY)

ADDING INTEGERS 1. POS. + POS. = POS. 2. NEG. + NEG. = NEG. 3. POS. + NEG. OR NEG. + POS. SUBTRACT TAKE SIGN OF BIGGER ABSOLUTE VALUE.

MULTIPLICATION EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 3. WHAT EVER YOU DO TO ONE SIDE YOU HAVE TO DO TO THE OTHER 2. DIVIDE BY THE NUMBER IN FRONT OF THE VARIABLE.

SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION

MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.

Teacher Name Class / Subject Date A:B: Write an answer here #1 Write your question Here C:D: Write an answer here.

CS4026 Formal Models of Computation Running Haskell Programs – power.

Slide 111 May 2008 Point-to-Multipoint in 802.1Qay Nurit Sprecher, Nokia Siemens Networks Hayim Porat, Ethos Networks.

1 Transport Services Layer Protection Switching Types Interacting with DRNI Maarten Vissers

S Licentiate course on Telecommunications Technology (4+1+3 cr.) Course Topic Spring 2000: Routing Algorithms in the DiffServ MPLS Networks Introduction.

O X Click on Number next to person for a question.

© S Haughton more than 3?

© Charles van Marrewijk, An Introduction to Geographical Economics Brakman, Garretsen, and Van Marrewijk.

5.9 + = 10 a)3.6 b)4.1 c)5.3 Question 1: Good Answer!! Well Done!! = 10 Question 1:

1 DRNI Examples and DAS position Maarten Vissers

1 DRNI Examples and DAS position Maarten Vissers Version 01.

1 Directed Depth First Search Adjacency Lists A: F G B: A H C: A D D: C F E: C D G F: E: G: : H: B: I: H: F A B C G D E H I.

Take from Ten First Subtraction Strategy -9 Click on a number below to go directly to that type of subtraction problems

Linking Verb? Action Verb or. Question 1 Define the term: action verb.

Energy & Green Urbanism Markku Lappalainen Aalto University.

Past Tense Probe. Past Tense Probe Past Tense Probe – Practice 1.

Limits (Algebraic) Calculus Fall, What can we do with limits?

Properties of Exponents

M Vinod Kumar Dr. Abhay Karandikar. Multiplex Entity CBP PIP Towards Core Towards Core All fault indications are available on one port All fault indications.

© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialBCMSN BCMSN Module 1 Lesson 1 Network Requirements.

Addition 1’s to 20.

25 seconds left…...

Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts

11 = This is the fact family. You say: 8+3=11 and 3+8=11

We will resume in: 25 Minutes.

1 Ke – Kitchen Elements Newport Ave. – Lot 13 Bethesda, MD.

Bottoms Up Factoring. Start with the X-box 3-9 Product Sum

FIND THE AREA ( ROUND TO THE NEAREST TENTHS) 2.7 in 15 in in.

O X Click on Number next to person for a question.

Chapter 14 Switching Circuit Switching Packet Switching Message Switching WCB/McGraw-Hill  The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998.

Optical networks: Basics of WDM

1 Distributed Network Protection (DNP) architecture study Maarten Vissers v4 v2: includes a few slides at the end illustrating segment protection.

IEEE Interim, Seoul, Sept 08 Case for Segment Protection or Local Repair M Vinod Kumar Tejas Networks.

1 DRNI and Distributed Protection Examples Maarten Vissers v01 Based on slides presented in IW meeting in Nanjing on Thursday Sept 22.

M Vinod Kumar Tejas Networks Ltd.  Example  Requirements  Possible solutions.

1 Distributed Network Protection (DNP) architecture study Maarten Vissers v3 v2: includes a few slides at the end illustrating segment protection.

Segment Protection Scaling Bob Sultan Deng Zhusheng.

1 Terminology: Segment Protection M Vinod Kumar Abhay Karandikar.

1 Terminology: Segment Protection M Vinod Kumar Abhay Karandikar.

1 Forwarding Ambiguity M Vinod Kumar Dr. Abhay Karandikar.

Tejas Networks Ltd 2010 Shortcuts 1.AgendaAgenda 2.Indian ScenarioIndian Scenario 3.P2P PBB-TEP2P PBB-TE 4.P2MP PBB-TEP2MP PBB-TE 5.Critical LinkCritical.

MPLS-TP Survivability Framework

RNI Requirements Imposed by PBB-TE

Co-ordination Between Segment Protection and Global Protection

Presentation transcript:

1 Dr. Abhay Karandikar A Jishnu, M Vinod Kumar Protection Switching for Point to Multipoint TESI

2 Introduction Qay has P2P 1:1 protection mechanism –P2MP protection mechanism is pending This presentation describes protection switching requirements for P2MP

3 PBB-TE Network Topology BEB1BEB2 BEB3 BCB1 BCB2 BCB3 Link

4 P2MP work TESI BEB1BEB2 BEB3 BCB1 BCB2 BCB3 Work Link

5 Concept PBB-TE MA enhanced with MD levels Switchover is performed first in the lowest MD level –If switchover fails within an MD level then switchover is performed in the next higher MD level –Switchover is locked-out in higher MD level using LockOutProtection (LoP)

6 P2MP Protection: Segment 1 BEB1BEB2 BEB3 BCB1 BCB2 BCB3 Work Protect Link

7 P2MP Protection: Segment 2 BEB1BEB2 BEB3 BCB1 BCB2 BCB3 Work Protect Link

8 P2MP Protection: Segment 3 BEB1BEB2 BEB3 BCB1 BCB2 BCB3 Work Protect Link

9 P2MP TESI Protection BEB1BEB2 BEB3 BCB1 BCB2 BCB3 Work Protect Link

10 HPD for Segment 1 BEB1BEB2 BEB3 BCB1 BCB2 BCB3 Link Protected Domain 1 => MD Level 1 Protected Domain 0 => MD Level 0

11 HPD for Segment 2 BEB1BEB2 BEB3 BCB1 BCB2 BCB3 Link Protected Domain 1 => MD Level 1 Protected Domain 0 => MD Level 0

12 HPD for Segment 3 BEB1BEB2 BEB3 BCB1 BCB2 BCB3 Link Protected Domain 1 => MD Level 1 Protected Domain 0 => MD Level 0

13 HPD implementation BEB1BEB2 BEB3 BCB1 BCB2 BCB3 Work Protect Link Protected Domain 1 => MD Level 1 Protected Domain 0 => MD Level 0 w w pp pp -MEP -MIP CCM

14 Fault in MDL = 0 BEB1BEB2 BEB3 BCB1 BCB2 BCB3 Work Protect Link Protected Domain 1 => MD Level 1 Protected Domain 0 => MD Level 0 w w pp pp -MEP -MIP CCM LoP=1

15 Switchover in MDL = 0 BEB1BEB2 BEB3 BCB1 BCB2 BCB3 Work Protect Link Protected Domain 1 => MD Level 1 Protected Domain 0 => MD Level 0 w w pp pp -MEP -MIP CCM

16 Benefits Simple to understand, to implement and to provision Other TESIs will be less affected by the switchover Has less stringent requirement on the network resources Some path segments need not be protected Node protection can be handled –Node failure is similar to atleast two link failure Leads to unified framework for link protection within a single PBB-TE domain Leads to unified framework for protection across multiple PBB-TE domains