1 ARANSAS COUNTY ISD PBMAS Program Effectiveness Review PBM November 11, 2008 DEIC Meeting Prepared by: Susan Kovacs Director of Federal & Special Programs.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 Title I Training & Technical Assistance Plan New Jersey Department of Education Division of Student Services Office of Title I Program Planning and Accountability.

Advertisements

NCLB Consolidated Monitoring Integrated Approach to Title III Monitoring.

Federal Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress. TEA-USDE Flexibility Agreement

2006 Preliminary AYP Release. Overview 1. State Summary Results 2. Update of Preliminary AYP Data 3. Schedule for Appeals and Final Release 4. Overview.

Federal Accountability/ AYP Update Texas Assessment Conference December 1-3, 2010 Shannon Housson and Ester Regalado TEA, Performance Reporting Division.

Federal Accountability/ AYP Update Accountability TETN November 18, 2010 Shannon Housson and Ester Regalado TEA, Performance Reporting Division.

(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and

PBM The Staging Process. Check the dates August In late August, districts receive their PBMAS summary report.

Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Report Presented to ACISD Board of Trustees 12/17/2009 ARANSAS COUNTY ISD – A TEA RECOGNIZED SCHOOL.

Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Report Presented to ACISD Board of Trustees 12/18/2008 ARANSAS COUNTY ISD – A TEA RECOGNIZED SCHOOL.

System Safeguards and Campus Improvement

Division of Instructional Support Office of School Improvement, Accountability & Compliance.

Initial Compliance Reviews (ICRs) Didi Garcia Texas Education Agency Division of Federal and State Education Policy.

Aldine ISD Career and Technical Education Department

Performance-Based Monitoring and Interventions April 3, 2008.

PRESENTER: W. C. Wiseley, Ed.D Acknowledgements: Lucia Robles and Sharon Wong as co-creators Perkins Title I-C Online Final Report Tutorial.

RF Monitoring: RF Monitoring  RF Monitoring will still have its own guidance document for 

I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=

I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=

1 University of the State of New York State Education Department Differentiated Accountability School Quality Review (SQR)

Rider 70 Changes to Staging for Special Education.

Adapted from Texas Education Agency PBM ProductDate of 2014 release Projected date of 2015 release PBMAS (Unmasked reports) LEA reports posted.

PEIMS and Accountability. Clear System of Data Quality Documentation (Enrollment, Special Program, etc.) PEIMS Data Entry Pearson Data File Answer Documents.

Public Hearing & Presentation of MISD Annual Accountability Report 2011 MILLSAP ISD Prepared in compliance with Texas Education Code January 2012.

1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.

ESL Education Program Report Hudson ISD ESL/Content-Based An English program that serves students identified as students of limited English proficiency.

Who Are We? Marianna GoheenDeifi Stolz Health ScienceMethods of AdministrationProgram Supervisor.

Susan Fanelli, Deputy Director Emergency Preparedness Office, CDPH Local Health Department Submission, Certification, Proposal & Assessment Checklist September.

Title IA Annual Parent Meeting  Date: September 14, 2015  Gainesville ISD  School: Edison Elementary  Time: 6:00 p.m.  I. Discussion of.

1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.

Texas Accountability Intervention System (TAIS) ESC3 – NET3 Session: Data Analysis/Problem Statements.

Go for the Touchdown with ESC-2

Student Answer Documents: Accuracy & Accountability.

PREPARING FOR A COMPLIANCE REVIEW PERKINS COMPLIANCE Monieca West ADHE Federal Program Manager October 19, 2012.

Title IA Online Coordinator Training NCLB Transferability

Performance-Based Monitoring Analysis System (PBMAS) January 2005 Update.

1 Bilingual/ESL Required Services for Students with Disabilities.

CAREER TECHNICAL EDUCATION FACILITIES PROGRAM Cycle 2 Conversions.

1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.

Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.

An Overview 2015 PBMAS and Intervention Activities

ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.

Addressing Federal Program Stages in PBM OCTOBER 27, 2015.

FREQUENCY and DURATION SPED Monitoring TETN December 16, 2010 Event # 8222.

South Hunterdon Regional School District Consolidated Monitoring Report (CMR) Presentation to the SHRSD Board of Education on October 26, 2015 Audit from.

Subrecipient Monitoring FY14 Oklahoma State Department of Education Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III, VI and X.

Staging Training Region 4 ESC January 16, Data Validation Acronyms  DVM – Data Validation Monitoring  DA – Data Analysis (Intervention document)

Effective Programs for Successful Students The Network Summer Summit Presenters: Rachel Harrington (Performance-Based Monitoring Division) Judy Struve.

TAKS Release Plan  In 2007 SB 1031 changed the release of tests to every three years  In 2009 HB 3 changed the release of tests to exclude retests 2.

Collecting and reporting compliance across SEA departments Center on Innovations in Learning Academic Development Institute Stephanie Benedict.

Harlingen CISD Performance Based Monitoring Analysis System (PBMAS)

Edgewood ISD   School District Effectiveness  Statutory Requirements  Valid Indicators of Performance  Maximum Inclusion  Individual.

HB 2804: A-F Accountability

Perkins Monitoring Update

Public School Monitoring Roadmap

Federal Accountability/ AYP Update

ESEA Consolidated Pre-Monitoring Meeting

Annual Report Georgetown ISD 2016 Accountability Rating:

Perkins Grant Fund applications

Career Technology Education Performance-Based Monitoring Summer Overview Ed Garcia, CTE Specialist Region One Education Service Center (956)

Accreditation Pathway

ESEA Consolidated Monitoring

The Answer Sheet—Where Assessment & Accountability Meet

Consolidated Application Compliance Report training Title III

DATA REVIEW A Comprehensive Needs Assessment For School Improvement Planning Susan Wright, Program Evaluator Northside ISD 1/18/2019.

Annual Report Public Hearing

SC3001—Needs Assessment, Priorities, and Program Outcomes— Reporting for ESSA and the alignment with Perkins federally-funded programs Heather Justice,

A Quick Carl D. Perkins Act Update

Annual Report Public Hearing

Welcome! Title III, Part A Meeting

Presentation transcript:

1 ARANSAS COUNTY ISD PBMAS Program Effectiveness Review PBM November 11, 2008 DEIC Meeting Prepared by: Susan Kovacs Director of Federal & Special Programs

2 PBMAS Data driven analysis Federal/State accountability system which has a focus on student performance and program effectiveness in the following areas: Bilingual Education/ESL: Title III Career and Technical Education (CTE) Carl Perkins Special Education IDEA NCLB Title Programs: Title I, II, IV, PBMAS relies on district reported data.

3 PBMAS Performance Level Criterion: Performance level = not assigned Performance Level = (met standard) Performance Level =1 Performance Level =2 Performance Level =3 PL not equal to 0 and special analysis process results in the assignment of a PL Not Assigned State standards based on ranking District at or above the standard for the subject. PL = 0 This is ideal District TAKS passing rate is 0.1 to 5.0 % points below the standard for the subject Minimum interventions required District TAKS passing rate is 5.1 to 10.0 % points below the standard for the subject Interventions requirements increased District TAKS passing rate is 10.1 % or more points below the standard for the subject Maximum interventions required

4 ACISD 2008 REPORT BE/ESLStage 1A CATE: Met standards Special Education: Stage 1A NCLB:Met standards Stage 1A indicates individual indicator equal to 3 or 2 (Stage 1 A-C, 2 A-C, 3 A-C, Stage 4)

5 Minimum Size Requirement and Special Analysis Typically the district must have 30 students in the denominator to meet minimum size requirement Special analysis may pull 2 years of data.

6 PBMAS – NCLB (Hidden Indicators) NCLB Program Effectiveness Review: (PER) related to certain overarching program requirements. Performance on a set of initial compliance Review (ICR) indicators conducted by Division of NCLB Program Coordination at TEA. Initial Compliance Review (ICR) 30 Compliance Items 43 Indicators

7 STEPS for Review Assemble team (DEIC) Conduct NCLB Program Effectiveness Review utilizing PER template Integrate the information from the PER template into DAP and CAPs Submit required material to TEA Due date: January 11, 2008

8 Submittal Documents There are documents to submit regardless of intervention stage Submit to TEA: Coversheet Compliance Summary Program Effectiveness Review Template Complete but retain at District level Submit only on request Continuous Improvement Plan

9 Areas of Concern 4 years of PBMAS data collection Some indicators show reason for concern: LEP students Special Education students