Purpose “…to evaluate existing pedestrian crosswalks and determine if additional countermeasures are needed to facilitate a safe and convenient pedestrian.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QUESTIONS (AND ANSWERS) FROM THE ALABAMA DRIVER’S MANUAL
Advertisements

Tysons Tysons Corner Circulator Study Board Transportation Committee June 12, 2012.
Signing Plan Design - At Grade Intersections TEM Chapter Application Guidelines - Regulatory Signs.
Signing Plan Design - At Grade Intersections TEM Chapter Application Guidelines - Warning Signs.
Signing Plan Design - At Grade Intersections TEM Chapter Application Guidelines - Guide Signing.
Addition Facts
1 ODOTs Complete Streets Initiative. 2 Tipping Point for Complete Streets.
Enhanced Pedestrian Crossing Treatments in Santa Monica ITE 2012 Western District Annual Meeting Session 8C Wednesday June 27, 2012 Sam Morrissey, P.E.
Speed Feedback Signs Traffic Engineering Division Board of County Commissioners February 11, 2014.
New Pedestrian Crossing Devices for California Wayne Henley Caltrans Division of Traffic Operations Beth Thomas District 4 Pedestrian Coordinator.
Fine Tuning Boulders transportation system Presented by: Marni Ratzel GO Boulder/ city of boulder making infrastructure work for biking and Walking.
Road Diets and Roundabouts
Who we are these people? Gabriela Vega – Transportation Planner, DDOT/PPSA George Branyan – Pedestrian Program Coordinator, DDOT/PPSA Trey Dickerson –
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
Safe Driving Rules and Regulations
Safe Driving Rules and Regulations
Speed Limits 25 Speed Limits 35 Speed Limits 50 Speed Limits 55 Speed Limits 65.
Hosted by Mrs. Dickard RatiosProportionsUnit Rates Indirect Measurement
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
North Lamar Boulevard Project Neighborhood Meeting February 12, 2013 Alan C. Hughes, P.E. Austin Transportation Department.
Equal or Not. Equal or Not
December 10, 2013 Street by Street Committee. 3 Projects NE Holman, 52 nd to 55 th SE 57 th, Rural to Nehalem SE Woodward, 75 th to 77 th.
Biking in Traffic Share the Road: Driver's Education.
Signs, Signals, and Pavement Markings
Drivers Education Journal # Please pick up all the handouts Get out a sheet of loose leaf paper and something to write with Write the.
LOR-U.S. 20 / S.R. 113 Center Ridge Rd. Widening Center Ridge Rd. at Avon Belden Rd. (S.R. 83)
Tower Road Enhancement Project Prepared for Alachua County By Causseaux & Ellington, Inc. Alachua County Roadway Network Improvements.
By: Vanessa Victor Scott Yoshida Travis Hills Lucas Sprague.
Pedestrian Safety Master Plan. This Presentation Similarities and Differences with Other Areas No Magic Bullet Site, Corridor Specific Multiple, Complementary.
Ed Cox City of Sacramento, Department of Public Works Bicycle Solutions in Sacramento.
38 th Street to Kessler Boulevard Traffic Engineering Review Summary For Historic Midtown Initiative (HARMONI) By HNTB Corporation June, 2010.
US Highway 17 (Center Street) Sidewalk Feasibility Study Town of Pierson, Florida.
Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C & G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT.
Florida Department of Transportation, November 2009
Redwood Road & 35th Avenue Traffic Study. Problems Observed: High collision rate along the corridor was found at McArthur Boulevard intersection, with.
Share the Road Lesson Plan. “Share The Road” Lesson Plan: Why??  Usually little or no training for cyclists, motorists, and pedestrians on safe interactions.
1 Channelization and Turn Bays. 2 Island Channelization flush, paved, and delineated with markings – or unpaved and delineated with pavement edge and.
HAWK Evaluation NE/SE 41 st Ave & E Burnside St Sirisha Kothuri William Farley Kimber Miller Aaron Rieck Civil & Environmental Engineering.
August 7, 2013 Luke Lortie, EIT Jerry Auge, PE
Pinehurst School Traffic Safety Pinehurst School Traffic Safety Meeting January 27-28, 2015.
Hawthorne & 16th Brian Marcum Chloe Ritter Collin Roughton.
Third & Fourth Streets Traffic Calming Study Presentation to Transportation Commission May 14, 2015.
Sustainable Transportation Design Project: Proposed Changes to Belmont/Morrison Couplet By: Bryan Blanc, Marisa DeMull, Andy Kading.
Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C.
Engineering Study Griffin View Drive & Harbor Hills Blvd. Prepared for Lake County Public Works Engineering 437 Ardice Avenue Eustis, Florida Purchase.
Traffic Safety. WHY ARE WE HERE To keep children safe around our schools What we will be discussing –Driving safely in and around Schools –Bicycle safety.
At-Grade Intersection Design
Intersection Control Chapter 8 Dr. TALEB AL-ROUSAN.
District VI, Florida Department of Transportation SE 2 nd Avenue and SE 4 th Street/Biscayne Boulevard Way March 25 th, 2014 Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory.
University Drive Road Diet September 8, Goals and Objectives A. Reduce vehicular speed in the corridor. B. Provide an attractive bicycle accommodation.
Bicycle Safety Countermeasures Module 4.
Saving the King Street Bicycle Boulevard
Nixon Road Corridor Study: Findings & Options
S.R. 44 Corridor Management Plan S.R. 44 Corridor Management Plan
JUAN DE FUCA PEDESTRIAN CROSSING Transportation and Public Infrastructure Committee Colwood, BC 1 October 2012.
Pedestrian Safety & Mobility Study
Project Management Team Meeting #3
APTA Sustainability Conference July 2016
BELLE TERRE BLVD/PKWY CORRIDOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Pedestrian & Bicyclist Crash Analysis
River to Sea TPO Meeting US 92/International Speedway Boulevard
Beachside Traffic/Crosswalk Update
Meeting of the Hillsborough MPO Board December 5, 2017
Safety Effects of Marked vs
APTA Sustainability Conference July 2016
HSM Applications to Multilane Urban Suburban Multilane Intersections
ODOT Region 1 Lents Neighborhood
Alex Henry FDOT District Seven Safety Office
Project Location: 35th Ave HSIP8
Presentation transcript:

Purpose “…to evaluate existing pedestrian crosswalks and determine if additional countermeasures are needed to facilitate a safe and convenient pedestrian crossing of S. Atlantic Avenue (CR A1A).”

Project Limits

Looking north at Sea Woods Blvd

Looking north from 17 th Av

Looking south from 12 th Av

AADT and LOS Comparison for S. Atlantic Av

Marked Crosswalk Inventory Location Crosswalk Type Traffic Control Crossing Number of Lanes Posted Speed Limit (mph) Ped Crossing SignsLighting Crosswalk Spacing (ft) Cumulative Crosswalk Spacing (ft) Begin ProjectN/A 345No -- S of Sea Woods Blvd Mid BlockNone345YesNo1,345 Oyster QuayIntersectionNone345Yes 1,1252,470 Mathews AvIntersectionPed Signal 345Yes 1,1053,575 S of Bahama DrMid BlockNone345YesNo5604, th AvIntersectionSignal545NoYes2,5506, th AvIntersectionNone545Yes 3607, th AvIntersectionNone545Yes 7057, th AvIntersectionNone545Yes 1,4009, th AvIntersectionNone545Yes 7009, th AvIntersectionNone545Yes 1,05010, th AvNone 545NoYes1,04011,940 8 th AvIntersectionNone545Yes 2,45014,390 7 th AvIntersectionNone540NoYes36014,750 Between 6 th Av & 7 th Av Mid BlockNone540Yes 14514,895 3 rd AvIntersectionSignal540NoYes1,23516,130 Total =3.055 miles

Looking south at mid-block crossing between 6 th Av and 7 th Av

Looking west at mid-block crossing between 6 th Av and 7 th Av

8-Hour Pedestrian/Bike Volumes Crossing S. Atlantic Av

Crash Summary Over 42 month period: 66 total crashes 1 fatality 19 crashes with injuries (23 injuries) 6 pedestrian/bicycle/motorcycle crashes 53 daytime crashes, 13 nighttime crashes 59 crashes with dry conditions, 7 crashes with wet conditions

42-Month Crash Analysis

Vehicle Gap Size Analysis Minimum gap required for safe pedestrian crossing at 20th Street (5 lanes/60 feet) – 27 seconds Total Gaps >= 15 SecondsTotal Gaps >= 27 Seconds Time PeriodNorthboundSouthboundCombined (2-way) 10:00 ‐ 11:00 AM :00 ‐ 12:00 AM :00 ‐ 1:00 PM :00 ‐ 2:00 PM :00 ‐ 3:00 PM :00 ‐ 4:00 PM :00 ‐ 5:00 PM :00 ‐ 6:00 PM23530 “…pedestrians would have enough gaps to cross one direction at a time, but not both the directions in one stretch.”

Qualitative Assessment With 14 marked crosswalks within the 3.05 mile project length, the spacing between them averages 1,240 ft Sidewalks are not continuous throughout the project limits Horizontal curve between 5 th Av and 6 th Av limits sight distance Ponding occurs on crosswalks after rains No paved shoulders from 27 th Av to 7 th Av; bicyclists and motorists must share lane or use sidewalk 85 th percentile speeds: 50 mph from city limit to 27 th Av and 48 mph from 27 th Av to 3 rd Av From observations in the field (and from gap study), it appears difficult for pedestrians to cross the 5-lane section None of the existing mid-block crosswalks showed sufficient pedestrian crossing volume to warrant a mid-block crosswalk

Beneficial Measures 1.Install continuous bicycle facilities along S. Atlantic Avenue a.4’ Paved Shoulders b.5’ Paved Shoulders 2.Install sidewalk along the east side of S. Atlantic Avenue between 27th Avenue and 7th Avenue 3.Install Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) 4.Supply Pedestrian Flags 5.Install Median Refuge Islands 6.Install Advance Yield Markings with Signs 7.Install Additional Marked Crosswalks at Intersections 8.Install On-Street Parking 9.Reduce Vehicular Travel Speed

Comparison of Beneficial Measures MEASURE INCREASES PED SAFETY INCREASES BIKE SAFETY DECREASES VEHICULAR SPEED APPROXIMATE COST 1Consider installing continuous bicycle facilities along S Atlantic Av a) 4’ Paved Shoulders b) 5' Paved ShouldersNY NPNP $136K $400K 2Consider installing sidewalk along east side of S Atlantic Av between 27th Av and 7th Av YNN$150K 3Consider installing RRFBs (Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons) at Oyster Quay, 24th Av, 7th Av, 18th Av & 12th Av YPP $10K/intersection $50K total 4Consider supplying pedestrian flags. Can be used at all non‐signalized crosswalks. Good candidates are 26th Av, 20th Av, 15th Av, 8th Av YNN$3.00/flag 5Consider installing median refuge islands at mid‐block crosswalks south of Sea Woods Boulevard and south of Bahama Drive 1 YYY$4,000/island 6Consider installing advance yield markings with signs. Can be used a tall crosswalks without existing or proposed active treatments. Good candidates are 26th Av, 20th Av, 15th Av, 8th Av and 6th Av/7th Av mid‐block crossing YYN$1,500/intersection 7Consider installing on‐street parking along S Atlantic Av PPY$400K Y=Yes, N=No, P=Possilbly 1 Consideration should be given to having an Access Management Study completed to determine the necessity of providing full access along the corridor and left turns into and out of the side streets.

Summary of Crosswalk Measures Location Cross-Walk Type Traffic Control Crossing Number of Lanes Posted Speed Limit (mph) Ped Crossing Signs Cross- Walk Spacing (ft) Cumulative Cross-Walk Spacing (ft) Potential Measures Begin ProjectN/A 345No--- S of Sea Woods Blvd Mid BlockNone345Yes1,345 Ped Refuge Island Oyster QuayIntersectionNone345Yes1,1252,470RRFB Mathews AvIntersectionPed Signal345Yes1,1053,575None S of Bahama DrMid BlockNone345Yes5604,135Ped Refuge Island 27 th AvIntersectionSignal545No25506,685None 26 th AvIntersectionNone545Yes3607,045Flag/Yield Markings 24 th AvIntersectionNone545Yes7057,750RRFB 20 th AvIntersectionNone545Yes1,4009,150Flag/Yield Markings 18 th AvIntersectionNone545Yes7009,850RRFB 15 th AvIntersectionNone545Yes1,05010,900Flag/Yield Markings 12 th AvNone 545No1,04011,940RRFB 8 th AvIntersectionNone545Yes2,45014,390Flag/Yield Markings 7 th AvIntersectionNone540No36014,750RRFB Between 6 th Av & 7 th Av Mid BlockNone540Yes14514,895Yield Markings 3 rd AvIntersectionSignal540No1,23516,130None Total =3.055 miles