What is the S-48 Corridor? Study Area What’s Happened So Far? Previous Tasks  Project InitiationJune 2005  Existing ConditionsOct. 2005  Planning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reston Metrorail Access Group (RMAG) Status Report Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee September 20, 2011.
Advertisements

Reston Metrorail Access Group (RMAG) Status Report Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee November 29, 2011.
The presentation will follow this format:
City of Hubbard Transportation System Plan Update April 25, 2012.
Projects in the Forest Grove area Presented by: David Kim, ODOT Metro West Area Manager August 13, 2012.
Project Description and Needs Lincoln Way Widening Addition of a center-turn lane and safety improvements to the grade and horizontal alignment. Needs.
Salt Lake City Downtown Transportation Master Plan Light Rail & Bus; Presentation Background and Introduction August 23, 2006.
PUBLIC MEETING May 12, 2011 P U B L I C I N V O L V E M E N T Project Status PHASE III Construction PHASE II Contract Plan Preparation & Land Acquisition.
Who we are these people? Gabriela Vega – Transportation Planner, DDOT/PPSA George Branyan – Pedestrian Program Coordinator, DDOT/PPSA Trey Dickerson –
Downtown Access Improvements Plan Town of Hillsborough 2014.
Gainesville-Hall MPO 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan Update Public Information Meeting June 29, 2006.
January 8, 2014 FMATS College Road Corridor Study FMATS Technical Committee Update.
ESTABLISH A NORTH-SOUTH PARKWAY The LNTC and the towns should plan for a parallel north-south parkway that will expand the commuter rail impact area to.
DDI Traffic Informational Session Town of Cornelius Lake Norman Chamber of Commerce June 11, 2014.
City of Omak Central Avenue Bridge Replacement Project Prepared by Highlands Associates Photos by FlyBy Photos.
Tower Road Enhancement Project Prepared for Alachua County By Causseaux & Ellington, Inc. Alachua County Roadway Network Improvements.
1 Support Graphics for Traffic and Circulation Princeton Junction Redevelopment Area Township of West Windsor September 8, 2008 Urbitran | DMJM Harris.
US 52 Corridor Study Public Meeting November 15, 2010.
Capilano Road Improvement Project WELCOME TO THE OPEN HOUSE.
Southern Corridor Study Recommendations March 16, 2011.
JANUARY 9, 2002 SCAJAQUADA CORRIDOR STUDY Grant Street to Parkside Avenue City of Buffalo Fisher Associates Joseph Passonneau & Partners In Association.
San Mateo Rail Corridor Transit Oriented Development Plan ABAG/MTC/ULI Workshop September 29, 2006.
City of Ashland Transportation System Plan Update September 6 th, 2012.
May 14, st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project.
US Highway 17 (Center Street) Sidewalk Feasibility Study Town of Pierson, Florida.
Public Open House February 6, Study Overview - Study Area South North.
Juneau Downtown Tourism Transportation Study May 27, 2003.
Contact: Beth Morris
Tysons 1 Operational Analysis of Dulles Toll Road Ramps to Tysons Board Transportation Committee Meeting September 17, 2013 Seyed Nabavi Fairfax County.
SUISUN CITY Suisun City Planned Development Area Connectivity for a Better Community.
Board of County Commissioners November 8, Recommendation Project Background and Location Traffic Analysis Comparison of Alternatives Public Meeting.
Public Location/Design Hearings November 17, 2010 Laughlin, Nevada November 18, 2010 Bullhead City, Arizona.
Feasibility Study FOREST GLEN PASSAGEWAY April 10, Isiah Leggett Montgomery County Executive Arthur Holmes, Jr. Director Department of Transportation.
Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2 June 25,
VTA Light Rail System and Safety Enhancements MTC Railroad Crossing Seminar May, 21, 2008.
Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency Kamm’s Corners Development Corporation.
Lexington Town Center Streetscape Project Page 1 Battle Green Improvements Project Intersection of Bedford Hancock Street / Harrington Road Board.
1 Item 11: Review of Draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for the National Capital Region Michael Farrell TPB Staff Presentation to the Transportation Planning.
Alachua County Future Traffic Circulation Corridors Map Project July 10 th, 2007.
Public Comment Mobility Vision Plan 2035 MVP Website 2035 MVP Brochure and Survey. Provides specific information on the Plan Update. Survey – your opinion.
May 1, 2014 East Gude Drive Pedestrian Road Safety Audit Stakeholder Pedestrian Safety Meeting.
Roosevelt Road: State to Columbus Public Meeting September 22, 2015.
WELCOME! July 31, 2012 ODOT District July 31, 2012 PURPOSE OF TONIGHT’S MEETING Introduce the project –Reconstruct I-75.
Town of Cobourg Division Street Improvements Public Information Centre October 1, 2015 Image Courtesy of Google 2015.
Transportation and Transit Committee 4 December 2002 Albion Road Corridor Study.
9 TH STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN Corvallis Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) Ali Bonakdar.
PUBLIC MEETING November 19, 2003 Lower Manhattan Redevelopment D015183, PIN NYCD NYSDOT, REGION 11 Route 9A Project.
23 rd Avenue Corridor Greenway Community Open House November 6, 2013.
What is a TSP? Provides City with guidance for operating and improving a multimodal transportation system Focuses on priority projects, policies, and programs.
What is a TSP? Provides City with guidance for operating and improving a multimodal transportation system Focuses on priority projects, policies, and programs.
COUNTY ROAD 517 Improvements from State Highway 172 to Howe Drive DECEMBER 16, 2015 At Tribal Multipurpose Facility.
Shaping our Future Transportation Transportation trends Influencing trends through land use decisions Alternative futures: Base Case and Scenario Complementary.
Complete Streets Training
South/West Corridor Transit Improvements ZARZAMORA AND MILITARY PRIMO BRT PROJECTS ENVIRONMENTAL AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN PHASE September 9, 2014 VIA Community.
District VI, Florida Department of Transportation SE 2 nd Avenue and SE 4 th Street/Biscayne Boulevard Way March 25 th, 2014 Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory.
U.S. 1 AT CANAL STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS U.S. 1 AT CANAL STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS U.S. 1 AT CANAL STREET From South of Smith Street To.
Complete Streets Training Module 4a – Understanding Context.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
University Drive Road Diet September 8, Goals and Objectives A. Reduce vehicular speed in the corridor. B. Provide an attractive bicycle accommodation.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
Project Development and Environmental Study (PD&E) S.R. 30 (U.S.) 98 Gregory Street and Bayfront Parkway at 17 th Avenue Intersection Project Development.
Complete Streets Training Module 4b – Designing for All Users.
Rock Creek East II Livability Study
Fordham at Columbia as a Grade-Separated Intersection
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
I-85 Widening Project MM Cherokee County Public Hearing March 14, 2017.
Developing a Pedestrian -Bicycle Safety Action Plan
I-85 Widening Project MM Cherokee County Public Hearing March 14, 2017.
WELCOMES YOU TO THE COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSE OCTOBER 2018.
Fordham at Columbia as a Grade-Separated Intersection
Presentation transcript:

What is the S-48 Corridor? Study Area

What’s Happened So Far? Previous Tasks  Project InitiationJune 2005  Existing ConditionsOct  Planning CharretteNov  Issues IdentificationDec  Preliminary AlternativesFeb  Project InitiationJune 2005  Existing ConditionsOct  Planning CharretteNov  Issues IdentificationDec  Preliminary AlternativesFeb. 2006

What Did We Discover? Issues Identified  Vehicular Travel Issues Significant congestion during peak commuter hours  S-48 serves as the primary connection between Chapin and I-26 Lack of parallel routes and minimal connectivity “Bottleneck” at Chapin High School Future failure of all intersections Ninety-degree turn at western end of Columbia Avenue  Vehicular Travel Issues Significant congestion during peak commuter hours  S-48 serves as the primary connection between Chapin and I-26 Lack of parallel routes and minimal connectivity “Bottleneck” at Chapin High School Future failure of all intersections Ninety-degree turn at western end of Columbia Avenue

 Vehicular Travel Issues Through traffic at Chapin town center Offset intersection of Peak and Clark Streets Significant queuing where left turns are frequent Difficult truck ingress/egress to Ellett Brothers  Vehicular Travel Issues Through traffic at Chapin town center Offset intersection of Peak and Clark Streets Significant queuing where left turns are frequent Difficult truck ingress/egress to Ellett Brothers What Did We Discover? Issues Identified

 Pedestrian & Bicycle Issues Excessive travel speeds Lack of sidewalks and connections between land uses Minimal controlled pedestrian crossings Vehicular disregard for pedestrian/bicycle right-of-way and safety Lack of elements to designate a bicycle- friendly environment  Pedestrian & Bicycle Issues Excessive travel speeds Lack of sidewalks and connections between land uses Minimal controlled pedestrian crossings Vehicular disregard for pedestrian/bicycle right-of-way and safety Lack of elements to designate a bicycle- friendly environment What Did We Discover? Issues Identified

 Transit Issues SmartRide park-and-ride lot is limited by size and perceived safety Lack of ped/bike connections between SmartRide park-and- ride lot and Town of Chapin Absence of transit to majority of corridor  Transit Issues SmartRide park-and-ride lot is limited by size and perceived safety Lack of ped/bike connections between SmartRide park-and- ride lot and Town of Chapin Absence of transit to majority of corridor What Did We Discover? Issues Identified

 Railroad Corridor Issues Perpendicular intersection of S-48 and railroad Queuing of westbound traffic waiting for trains creates difficult left-turn movement and traffic backups across rail line Numerous at-grade rail crossings Railroad corridor acts as barrier  Railroad Corridor Issues Perpendicular intersection of S-48 and railroad Queuing of westbound traffic waiting for trains creates difficult left-turn movement and traffic backups across rail line Numerous at-grade rail crossings Railroad corridor acts as barrier What Did We Discover? Issues Identified

 Land Use Issues Large amount of vacant land with the potential to build out in a low density pattern Grouped incompatible uses Lack of design standards Eroding community character Existing development located in close proximity to roadway  Land Use Issues Large amount of vacant land with the potential to build out in a low density pattern Grouped incompatible uses Lack of design standards Eroding community character Existing development located in close proximity to roadway What Did We Discover? Issues Identified

Preliminary Alternatives – Vehicular Travel What’s Being Considered?  Dedicated turn lanes, traffic signals, and correction of geometric deficiencies at intersecting streets  New, localized east/west linkages  New circulation and connections within Chapin High School property  Dedicated turn lanes, traffic signals, and correction of geometric deficiencies at intersecting streets  New, localized east/west linkages  New circulation and connections within Chapin High School property

Preliminary Alternatives – Vehicular Travel What’s Being Considered? Potential for Redesigned Circulation and Access at Chapin High School

Preliminary Alternatives – Vehicular Travel  Widen S-48 to three lanes beginning at Chapin Road and transition to five lanes  Construct northern and/or southern connector  New interchange(s) with I-26 with appropriate roadway improvements  Widen S-48 to three lanes beginning at Chapin Road and transition to five lanes  Construct northern and/or southern connector  New interchange(s) with I-26 with appropriate roadway improvements What’s Being Considered?

Preliminary Alternatives – Vehicular Travel What’s Being Considered? Potential for Connectors and Interchanges

Preliminary Alternatives – Pedestrian & Bicycle Travel  Spot improvement or replacement of sidewalks and addition of ADA ramps  High visibility crosswalks with limited ITS elements  Pedestrian connections between land uses  Sidewalks throughout corridor  Bicycle lanes throughout corridor  Streetscape improvements  Spot improvement or replacement of sidewalks and addition of ADA ramps  High visibility crosswalks with limited ITS elements  Pedestrian connections between land uses  Sidewalks throughout corridor  Bicycle lanes throughout corridor  Streetscape improvements What’s Being Considered?

Preliminary Alternatives – Transit  Pedestrian and bicycle connections between park-and-ride, corridor, and town center What’s Being Considered?

Preliminary Alternatives – Railroad Corridor  Extend Columbia Avenue to St. Peter’s Church Road and grade separate crossing of railroad What’s Being Considered?

Preliminary Alternatives – Vehicular Travel What’s Being Considered? Potential for Railroad Grade Separation

Preliminary Alternatives – Land Use  Increase coordination between approval agencies  Refine regs to encourage denser development with a mix of uses  Street and sidewalk system plan and right-of-way dedication requirement  Performance standards targeting improved multimodal access and interconnectivity of parcels  Impact fees  Increase coordination between approval agencies  Refine regs to encourage denser development with a mix of uses  Street and sidewalk system plan and right-of-way dedication requirement  Performance standards targeting improved multimodal access and interconnectivity of parcels  Impact fees What’s Being Considered?

 Further Refine and Develop Alternatives  Develop Recommendations and Implementation Plan  Public Information Meeting #3 (April 2006)  Issue S-48 Columbia Avenue Corridor Study Report (May 2006)  Further Refine and Develop Alternatives  Develop Recommendations and Implementation Plan  Public Information Meeting #3 (April 2006)  Issue S-48 Columbia Avenue Corridor Study Report (May 2006) Schedule What’s Next?

 Give Feedback and Ask Questions Tonight What do think about the Preliminary Alternatives?  Fill Out a Comment Sheet Tonight  Mail/ /Fax Your Comments Phone: Fax: Blog: Mail: 236 Stoneridge Drive, Columbia, SC  Give Feedback and Ask Questions Tonight What do think about the Preliminary Alternatives?  Fill Out a Comment Sheet Tonight  Mail/ /Fax Your Comments Phone: Fax: Blog: Mail: 236 Stoneridge Drive, Columbia, SC Your Continued Participation What are We Asking Tonight? Thank You for Your Participation in this Important and Exciting Project! Thank You for Your Participation in this Important and Exciting Project!