The NDPC-SD Intervention Framework National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities Clemson University © 2007 NDPC-SD – All rights reserved.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Continuous Improvement in the Classroom -Professional Learning Communities.
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
GATE Graduation: A Team Effort School Counselor Summer Institute Red Lion, Olympia, June 27, 2013.
PORTFOLIO.
Individualized Learning Plans A Study to Identify and Promote Promising Practices.
Setting the Pace to Graduate Date1 Parent Mentor Partnership September 2013.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Response to Intervention: Multi- Tiered Systems for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati October, 2011.
Multidisciplinary Teams
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
National Center on Response to Intervention Developed by the National Center on Response to Intervention and RMC Research RTI Integrity Framework: A Tool.
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
Dropout Prevention for Students with Disabilities: Lessons Learned National High School Center Summer Institute Advancing High School Student Success:
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Dropout Prevention for Students with Disabilities: Evidence-based Programs that Work National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Team Planning Loujeania W. Bost National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities Clemson University © 2008 Clemson University – All rights.
TODAY Observations Hypotheses Connection to Student Performance CSIP ASPIRING Goal(s) Objectives & Actions.
Proficiency Delivery Plan Strategies Curriculum, Assessment & Alignment Continuous Instructional Improvement System ( CIITS) New Accountability Model KY.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.
V 2.1 Tier II Critical Features Building the Infrastructure to Support Tier 2.
SIMS User Training SIMS State-Wide Training
Building A Tier Two System In An Elementary School: Lessons Learned Tina Windett & Julie Arment Columbia Public Schools, Missouri Tim Lewis & Linda Bradley.
By Jo Ann Vertetis and Karin Moe. Self-Assessment Can you define RTI? What is its purpose? Rate your understanding of RTI and how to implement it on a.
Organizational Conditions for Effective School Mental Health
Introduction to Coaching School-Wide PBS:RtIB. 2 Agenda PBS:RtIB Brief Overview Coaching Tier 1 Coaching Skills and Activities Resources and Barriers.
Presentation to the Board December 17,  Spring 2011 – Economically Disadvantaged subgroup – Reading  Warning List – Begin to Develop Plan  Spring.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Miami Dade County Public Schools District Support Staff In Action! In Action! Barbara Cicilia, Ed.S Curriculum Support Specialist M-DCPS Dropout Prevention.
ASSESSMENT Parkway Academic Assessment: Federal and State Influences on the Parkway School District Curriculum Council Parkway School District January.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
Georgia’s Graduation/ Dropout Prevention Project Building Systems to Help Students with Disabilities Graduate.
Vermont Early Childhood MTSS
The CSEFEL and State Implementation Partnerships An Overview.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Brief Overview of Response to Intervention within Glenbrook South Andy Piper & Lindsay Schrand NSSED Problem-Solving Coaches.
10+ Ways to Analyze Data Presenter: Lupe Lloyd Lupe Lloyd & Associates, Inc.
IN-SIG: FOUNDATIONS & RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION November 1, 2007.
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Broward County Public Schools BP #3 Optimal Relationships
Instructional Consultation and Teaming: A Parent’s Perspective Closing the Gap Conference November 11, 2009 Tina Greene.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Integrating the MTSS Framework at the Secondary Level Dr. Jayna Jenkins, Learning and Development Facilitator, MTSS Shelly Dickinson, MTSS Trainer Charles.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental IV: Multi-Tiered System of Supports.
LEA Self-Assessment LEASA: Presentations:
Interboro School District Keystones to Opportunity Grant Four Year Overview School Years.
Multi-Tiered Systems of Support Kent ISD MTSS Implementation Team.
Evidence-Based and Promising Practices to Increase Graduation and Improve Outcomes Dr. Loujeania Bost Dr. Catherine Fowler Dr. Matthew Klare.
The PDA Center is funded by the US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Stories from the Field and from our Consumers Building.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
Response to Intervention Instruction. Agenda Ultimate Purpose Components of RtI Expectations Break Problem Solving Teams Homework.
NYSED Policy Update Pat Geary Statewide RSE-TASC Meeting May 2013.
New Jersey Tiered System of Supports (NJTSS)
District Leadership Team Sustainability Susan Barrett Director, Mid-Atlantic PBIS Network Sheppard Pratt Health.
What’s the connection to Ohio’s other initiatives?
Maryland State Coaches’ Meeting AM Session
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
Year 1 Results May 2012 NDPC SD and WVDE
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Presentation transcript:

The NDPC-SD Intervention Framework National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities Clemson University © 2007 NDPC-SD – All rights reserved

Implementing the School Intervention Framework Step 1: Data collection & analysis Step 2: Identification of target areas & interventions Step 3: Intervention framework & plan development Step 4: Intervention implementation, monitoring & evaluation 1.Training 2.Coaching 3.Consultation/performance feedback 4.Evaluation

© 2007 National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities at Clemson University – All rights reserved

Phase 1: Analyze Data District and school demographics Student performance (graduation, dropout, course completion, AYP) District/school infrastructure Assessment, curriculum, and instructional systems Current initiatives and partnerships Professional development Parent/family engagement

Data Analysis  Essential Questions:  Is your examination of relevant data complete?  If yes, are you able to identify which factors are influencing dropout in your district?  If not, what additional data will you need to make this determination  Is the data available to you – or will you need to collect the data?

Data Analysis  Essential Questions:  Did your data analysis include interviews with a cohort of youth who dropped out of school or post-hoc examination of educational records?  If yes, what additional information did learn?  Does the information support your conclusions from the data?

Data Analysis  Essential Questions:  What strategies/tools were used to examine the following:  School climate  Parental involvement  Community factors

Phase 2: Identify Target Areas for Intervention Academic content and instruction (reading, math, science, writing) Behavior (classroom management, behavior support) Attendance and truancy prevention School climate Self management (self determination, problem solving) Mentoring (employment, service learning) Family engagement

Identifying Targets for Intervention  Essential Questions:  After your team completed examination of relevant data, what are the top four major factors associated with dropout/ school completion in your school?  How did your team prioritize these factors?  What initiatives and partnerships are in place within the district or region to address priorities?

Phase 3: Develop Improvement Plan Select evidence-based practices (e.g., Check & Connect, Positive Behavior Support, Cognitive Behavior Interventions, Content Enhancements) Determine level of intensity (Universal, Selected, Targeted) Contextualize to setting Establish timelines Deliver initial staff training (Training Modules 1 – 6)

Phase 3: Develop Improvement Plan Select evidence-based practices List one evidence-based strategy for each factor you prioritized. Determine level of intensity (Universal, Selected, Targeted) for each strategy. Who are the recipients ? What criteria was used for selection

Phase 3: Develop Improvement Plan Contextualize to setting  Essential Questions:  What will I need to do to make these practices work in my school?  What are my strategies for but in of other staff?  How do I communicate this information?

Professional development  Essential Questions:  What training is needed?  Who needs to be trained?  What is your strategy for training?  What additional information and/or support will you need to move forward?

Are you Ready to Make A Plan?  Homework  Group Examples  Team Practice

Phase 4: Implement, Monitor, and Evaluate Conduct baseline measures Implement strategies: on-site coaching, consultation & feedback, progress monitoring, fidelity checks Measure results Evaluate outcomes Celebrate success! Disseminate